What we see here again is that Austrian judges apply Mohammedan dhimmi laws. As in the case of Elisabeth Sabbaditsch-Wolf, who was convicted for saying Muhammad was a pedophile, (the judge ruled he wasn’t because he ‘remained with Aiisha till his death) this Islamic rapist is let off despite clear evidence of a violent rape of a minor.
Muslim Migrant Who Anally Raped 10 Year-Old Boy Has Conviction Overturned: ‘He Didn’t Know The Boy Didn’t Want to be Raped’
The Geller Report
A Muslim migrant who was convicted of raping a child at an Austrian pool has had his sentence overturned‘He didn’t know the boy didn’t want to be raped.” Do you mean in Muslim countries little boys want to be raped?
What kind of vicious islamophiliac pedophiles serve on Austria’s Supreme Court, to free a rapist who violently assaulted and anally raped a 10-year-old boy?
The Supreme Court overturned this monster’s conviction, saying the court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist realized the child was saying no. What? The child suffered severe anal injuries which had to be treated at a local children’s hospital, and is still plagued by serious post-traumatic stress disorder.
These judges need their own children anally and brutally raped.
“‘He didn’t know the boy didn’t want to be raped’
Court throws out migrant child sex charge,” By Indra Warnes, The Express, October 22, 2016: