As the bollards are installed, Muslim migrants pour into the West, form ghettos and indulge their creed’s supremacist conceits. As we saw after Pauline Hanson’s stunt, even commentators of conservative bent can’t resist virtue signalling – excoriating those who dare to identify a threat as a threat
Did anyone in the public square approve unstintingly of Pauline Hanson’s parody of black-sack wearers? I didn’t spot anybody. Here is Ayaan Hirsi Ali in The Aussie(19/20 August): “Pauline Hanson can and should be reprimanded for her unparliamentary behaviour.” Miranda Devine (Sunday Telegraph, 20 August) described “the stunt” as “repellent”. I chose Hirsi Ali and Devine because they are on the sensible side of the Islamic issue. Yet both took umbrage at Ms Hanson’s parody.
You will notice that I have left aside the unctuous remarks of George Brandis. After all, currying favour of Islamists is where the Labor Party has already gone and, where leftists have gone, modern-day Liberals are not far behind.
Take a step back. Our very values are under threat by a growing alien force in our midst and Hirsi Ali cares about unparliamentary behaviour and Devine uses a word to describe Ms Hanson’s dress-up which she might care to reserve for describing various Islamic barbarities, like throwing homosexuals from tall buildings.
This is my view. The burqa is an affront to civilised values and has no place in Australia. It should be mercilessly parodied. This is not to say that a free society should outlaw any particular mode of over dressing in purely public places. However, holding it up to continual ridicule is entirely appropriate. So, without qualification, good on you, Ms Hanson. But, at the same time, let’s face facts.
Cartoons cause jihad. “Islamophobia” is worse than the blood in the streets. Exposing the jihad ideology and the religious texts motivating the jihadists cause the next attack. That’s the idiocy our political clown gallery and the journalise bought into, and only submission will keep us safe.
Charlie Hebdo draws ire with Barcelona attack cartoon
Reactions pour in over cover showing a van running over people with the caption: ‘Islam: religion of peace…eternal’.
Critics have taken to the internet to condemn the French satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo, over a front-page cartoon linking Islam to a recent deadly attack in Spain, saying it risked fanning Islamophobia.
Who are these “critics?”
The latest edition of the magazine, which was attacked by gunmen in 2015, shows two people lying in a pool of blood having been run over by a van next to the words: “Islam: religion of peace…eternal”.
A dozen fighters of Moroccan origin are believed to have plotted last week’s attacks in Barcelona and Cambrils.
In Barcelona, at least 14 people were killed and more than 100 injured after a van drove into crowds.
Critics of Charlie Hebdo saw its cover as tarring an entire religion, practised by around 1.5 billion people worldwide, by implying it was inherently violent.
The “entire religion” is bad. Islam has no redeeming features. Islam is inherently violent. This is a fact that is undeniable.
But who defends Charlie Hebdo today?
As the cartoon became one of the top trending topics on Twitter in France, prominent Socialist MP and former minister Stephane Le Foll called it “extremely dangerous”.
“When you’re a journalist you need to exercise restraint because making these associations can be used by other people,” he said.
Charlie Hebdo editor Laurent “Riss” Sourisseau explained the choice in an editorial, saying that experts and policymakers were avoiding hard questions out of concern for moderate, law-abiding Muslims.
“The debates and questions about the role of religion, and in particular the role of Islam, in these attacks have completely disappeared,” he wrote.
We cannot coexist. Islam doesn’t tolerate the other.
Translation: We were expecting it. Another Charlie Hebdo cover to incite anti-Muslim hatred #nausea
Supporters of four men accused of plotting a terrorist attack have refused to stand in court, prompting a sharp rebuke from a magistrate.
A “sharp rebuke” is about as effective as a wet handkerchief when your car’s on fire. Rest assured that the very same magistrate would have taken quite effective measures if it was you or me in court behaving like Muslims do.
Ibrahim Abbas, 23, his 22-year old brother Hamza, Abdullah Chaarani, 27, and Ahmed Mohamed, 24, are charged with conspiring to plan a terrorist attack in Melbourne’s CBD last Christmas.
Their committal hearing at the Melbourne Magistrates Court this week has been attended by several burka-clad women and a man who today refused to stand when magistrate Peter Mealy entered the court.
Australia: Jihad plot to blow up plane with bomb hidden in Barbie doll
Lebanon’s interior minister has claimed a terror cell attempted to blow up a flight from Australia with bombs hidden in a Barbie doll and a meat grinder….Amer Khayyat planned to detonate an improvised explosive device 20 minutes into an Abu-Dhabi bound flight with 400 passengers onboard.
The Islamic State is said to have been involved in the plot, and surveillance was being run on the two brothers for a full year since one of them travelled to Syria, yet still this near catastrophe continued to unfold.
The randomness of improvised explosive devices (IED’s) makes their impact particularly dangerous. During the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, statistics as of 2013 indicted that over half to two-thirds of Americans killed and wounded were victim of IED’s.
Western nations continue to be sitting ducks, as jihadists continue to hide among the general populace, having the same freedoms as law-abiding citizens. Jihadis are traveling in and out of Western countries, joining foreign jihad wars and returning back “home” with renewed vigor, hatred and drive to wage jihad.
“Components for the IED were sent through international cargo” from members of the Islamic State to Australia.
“Australian terror plan to hide plane bomb in Barbie revealed”, BBC News, August 21, 2017:
Lebanon’s interior minister has claimed a terror cell attempted to blow up a flight from Australia with bombs hidden in a Barbie doll and a meat grinder.
He said Amer Khayyat planned to detonate an improvised explosive device 20 minutes into an Abu-Dhabi bound flight with 400 passengers onboard.
Naz Shah claims she accidentally liked and shared message from parody Twitter account
A PROMINENT Labour MP and key ally of Jeremy Corbyn shared a social media message telling victims of sickening sex abuse to shut up for “the good of diversity.”
Naz Shah retweeted and liked a post on Twitter by an account parodying left-wing writer Owen Jones which said: “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.”
Her actions have reignited the furious row over Pakistani sex gangs which last week saw Labour MP Sarah Champion hounded out of Labour’s front benches for writing an article in The Sun addressing the issue.
Ms Shah, who later deleted the retweet and unliked the post, was a key figure in leading the furore against a column written by The Sun’s Trevor Kavanagh about the grooming sex scandal last week.
Equality and Human Rights Commission chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath immediately condemned the Labour MP last night.
Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
What else won’t the ABC report? In four nights of TV news reports on the Islamic terror attacks in Spain, the ABC does not once mention “Muslim” or “Islam”. It only once mentions the “Islamic State”. Watch.
See 3:03 for the ABC’s one and only reference to Islam in four nights of lengthy coverage – and even that was only a reference to Islamic State. One suspects, with good reason, that if it weren’t for IS, there would have been no mention of Islam at all in the ABC’s coverage.
Here’s where this is leading:
Arab Muslims rule once great Britain:
Social media hate crime to be treated same as offline offenses
… Alongside the release of these guidelines, the CPS has launched a social media campaign — #HateCrimeMatters — as part of an effort to encourage people to report hate crime incidents. A hate crime is defined as an offense motivated by hostility, or that shows hostility, toward the victim’s disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity.
More stifling free speech by rebadging it as ‘hate speech’ atArab News
The CPS’s decision to crack down on online mockery is a recipe for tyranny
By Brendan O’Neill
YESTERDAY, this country crossed over to the dark side.
We went from being a free-ish nation proud of its democratic traditions to one where officials talk openly about suppressing certain “views” and “opinions”. …
More on the state suppression of thought and speech atThe Sun
The dance of the clueless dhimmies:
Barcelona attack: Catalans gather to reject Islamophobia following latest Isis terror atrocity
Young and old, men and women, many of whom were veiled, the demonstrators chanted in unison: “I am Muslim! Not a terrorist!” Non-Muslims lined the sidewalks, clapping and crying. …
More on the terror-casting soldiers of Allah rejecting fear of its evil ideology instead of the terror intended to trigger the fear – and the hyphenated bystanders – atIndependent
‘Islam is Peace’: Barcelona Muslims march against terrorism following latest deadly attack
By Josh Robbins
“We are also victims because we are hurt by what happened, but secondly, we are also hurt because people are generalising, they are looking negatively at us, are insulting us in the streets,” Aziz Cetuani Farcho, a Moroccan woman living in Catalonia told Euro News. …
Lake County mosque opens doors to non-Muslims: ‘There are so many things in common between us’
Lee V. Gaines
Shaykh Azfar Uddin, the imam at the Islamic Foundation North Mosque, said when the prime minister of Spain called the recent deadly terror attack in Barcelona an example of “jihadi terrorism,” he did not know the true meaning of the word jihad. …Chicago Tribune
Seriously? We are trying to save Muslims from becoming radicalized? We are not at war with Islam & Muslims when they declare that they are at war with us every time they utter their prayers? This makes Breitbart Editor in Chief Raheem Kassam highly suspect.
Kassam Tells MSNBC: ‘We Are at War with Sharia’
Breitbart London’s Editor in Chief Raheem Kassam appeared on MSNBC and told host Ari Melber that the West was at war with Sharia.
Correcting Melber that Islam “is not a religion of a billion plus people”, Kassam asserted: “There are a billion plus Muslims, but you can’t say they all subscribe to Sharia. You can’t put them all in one box. There are Shias, Sunnis, Ismailis, Ahmadiyyahs – they all believe in different things.
(That’s utter tosh. All of them read the same Koran. All of them must hate the kafir, the mushrik, the infidels. That’s us, folks.)
“Let’s make it very clear: we’re not at war with all these people. We’re at war with Sharia.
“It’s a fascist ideology that says you should cut off a person’s hand and foot if they get in the way of spreading Islam,” said Kassam.
“We’re trying to save Muslims from getting radicalised,” he added.
Remember: this kind of thinking is what enabled the Muslim rape gangs in the first place. One Muslim rape gang victim said that when she went to authorities, “I was made to feel as though I was racist.” And 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in Rotherham, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
But the BBC stays the course, and is as determined as it ever was to demonize all opposition to jihad terror and Sharia criminality (which is what this rape gang activity is, as the Qur’an sanctions the seizure of Infidel women as sex slaves — see 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30) as “racist.” The BBC apparently wants to see the destruction of Britain as a free state. And it will.
Indeed. By associating Islam with race al BeBeeCeera has become complicit in the propaganda jihad against the West.