‘We cannot live among people who support Islamic law’ – Nicolas Sarkozy

FORMER head of state, Nicolas Sarkozy has said France will never accept Sharia and that any radical muslims should be “kicked out”.

What? Sarko, the guy who is in bed with the Qataris and has his son manage some of their investment funds?  Is this the same Sarkozy who threatened the French they would be forced to intermarry with Mohammedan savages? And didn’t the same Sarkozy assure the Arabs that he doesn’t think that our civilisation is superior to the retarded Arab shari’a? The video is below the fold.

Sarkozy and a koranGETTY

The former president of France said Muslims are not integrating with French society

An opinion poll carried out by the Montaigne Institute, a liberal think tank, revealed that 29 per cent of Muslims living in France were hardline – known as “ultras” in France – who believe the country should respect Islamic law.

Sharia is widely considered as unsecular and flying in the face of the country’s liberal values.

Responding to this “troubling” poll during a radio interview with Europe 1 today Mr Sarkozy, said that the “zealous” Muslim community – the 29 per cent – should be deported from France, or be forced to assimilate – not just integrate – into French society.

He said: “The Montaigne Institute’s poll is extremely troubling. It proves that a quarter of young Muslims are being seduced by radical ideology.”

Integrating radical youngsters into France’s Republican society has not worked —Nicolas Sarkozy

According to the right-wing presidential candidate, it would be “irresponsible” for the government to allow these pro-Sharia youngsters to follow their Islamic law dream and said: “I’m not being over dramatic.

“The truth is this, simply integrating radical youngsters into France’s Republican society has not worked, it will never work. They must assimilate into French society and culture.”

Continue reading ‘We cannot live among people who support Islamic law’ – Nicolas Sarkozy

More than Half of Germans Fear Islamisation of Their Country

With 57 the Germans are eight points ahead of us Australians, where 49 per cent would like a ban on Mohammedan immigration, if the polls are to be believed. All in all there is hope that the tide is turning, but not for the far-left political class of traitors and the pressititutes of the lame stream media, who keep painting a picture of “right-wing extremists” that is not based on reality; whereas leftist thuggery is largely ignored.

More than half the German people fear the rise of Islam in their country, including two thirds of over-45s, a study has found.

The study, conducted by polling firm INSA Consulere for the Evangelical News Agency, found 57 per cent of Germans hold a negative few of Islam in their country, including 61 per cent of women. Less than a third of respondents did not share this fear.

The fear of Islam is also particularly strong among Catholics at 61.5 percent, mainline Protestants at 59.6 per cent and other Christians at 55.5 per cent. Non-churchgoers are also wary of rising Islam, with 57 per cent saying they fear it.

The survey comes as German Chancellor Angel Merkel faces increasing criticism over her decision to open Germany’s borders to over a million migrants last year, leading to a backlash among the German people and the rise of the anti-mass immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

The poll also found that fear of rising crime as a result of the migrant influx is also high, particularly among the country’s Jewish population, with 92 per cent of Jews saying they fear attacks.

Christians of all denominations also believe Germany will be less safe as a result of the migrant surge, with more than three in five saying they believe crime will rise.

Continue reading More than Half of Germans Fear Islamisation of Their Country

Cop Accused of Racism Slams ‘Oppressive Political Correctness’ in Londonistan Police

Its no longer your country, copper:

A London cop has accused the capital’s police force of “oppressive political correctness” after it investigated him for racism for telling an abusive pro-Kurdish demonstrator: “You don’t tell me what to do in my country”.

Marcus Tyson was supervising a demonstration last month when he was abused by screaming demonstrators shouting “fuck the police” and “get out of here”. He then confronted a female activist and made the statement for which he is being investigated.

The officer has now been placed on “restricted duty” by the force’s directorate of professional standards (DPS) while it investigates whether his actions constitute “gross misconduct”. He faces losing his job if he is found guilty.

Speaking to the Sunday Times, Mr Tyson said the actions of London’s Metropolitan Police were akin to “Stalinist thought police”, and demanded: “I would like to know upon what basis they regard my statement as being racist — it is purely a statement of fact that this is my country.”

“The action the DPS have taken against me is so wildly over the top, it discredits the investigators and brings their judgment into question,” he added.

Mr Tyson said in his notes taken at the end of the protest that some protesters were expressing support for the PKK – a proscribed Kurdish terror group – and were deliberately blocking traffic.

Continue reading Cop Accused of Racism Slams ‘Oppressive Political Correctness’ in Londonistan Police

Cold Sweat

You can smell the fear of Pauline in their sweat

By Lucas Rosas/ XYZ

Recently, the establishment narrative has taken a few hits, and the slimy weasels that rely on the docility of the average Aussie punter for their daily bread have started to show signs of panic.

10710479204_441a3e4006_Redback-spider

A visual illustration of the fear induced in lefties by Pauline Hanson.

The shock poll finding released this week, showing that most Australians are sceptical at best regarding continued Muslim immigration, was a direct rebuke to the almost frantic denunciation and mockery of the press regarding the One Nation maiden speeches in the Senate.

Peter Lewis, who organised the poll, was clearly expecting a different result, one that could have been used to further ridicule Hanson and her fellow patriotic Senators.

He did not get quite the outcome that the left desired:

“The result floored me.

“This not a “basket of deplorables” who sit outside the confines of polite society, that is 49% of the men and women who make up our nation.

“Yes, they are more likely to vote Coalition or “other” but 40% of Labor voters and one third of Greens agree too. Look around you right now, there are people in your workplace, in your street, on your train, who agree with Hanson.

“So here’s the challenge to everyone concerned or affronted by these findings. How do you tell half the population that they are wrong?”

Mariam-Veiszadeh-618x349

Muslim immigrant, anti-free-speech activist and shameless self promoter Mariam Veiszadeh predictably used the results to call for greater restrictions on the ability of Australians to criticise her co-religionists:

Continue reading Cold Sweat

Andrew Bolt: Grand Mufti needs interpreter to tell us Muslims can integrate

 

c08681c9c033abdaeb4acfdc74cf9ee9

OUR Grand Mufti last week gave the funniest press conference I’ve seen. Funny, although not for many Muslims.

For some reason, Ibrahim Abu Mohammed thought he was just the man to tell Australians they were wrong to think Muslims don’t integrate and should be banned from immigrating.

What nonsense, sighed the Mufti, our most senior Muslim cleric.

The answer was simple: “What we need is collaboration and proper communication.”

 

And here is the joke: the Mufti, who moved here from Egypt in 1997, said it in Arabic. Through an interpreter.

Yes, after living here for 19 years, the Mufti still hasn’t integrated enough to speak English in public. The many integrated Muslims here will despair.

That kind of thing explains why 49 per cent of Australians in last week’s Essential poll said Muslim immigration must be banned, fretting that Muslims don’t integrate and some even want to blow us up.

But the issue here is not just that the Mufti refuses to speak English.

Continue reading Andrew Bolt: Grand Mufti needs interpreter to tell us Muslims can integrate

Words from a “High” Representative of the EU

“Immigration is a phenomenon that will go on….

I know it’s something some of you don’t want to hear but it’s a reality. There are seven billion people on the earth and more and more inequalities……”– Federica Mogherini

 Mogherini may be a brainless twat, but she is nevertheless dangerous. A cog in the EU machinery. As a devout Marxist apparatchik for the NWO, she is a programmed traitor. It is an absurd myth which is being peddled that migration is a natural condition. To suggest that we are somehow responsible for “inequalities” in the third world and that we should accommodate billions of illiterate savages to replace us is monstrous. But she knows what side she’s on and so should you.

Words from a “High” Representative of the EU
This (from François Desouche ) will cheer you up: Federica Mogherini, High Representative on Foreign Affairs of the European Union, anno…  GALLIAWATCH.BLOGSPOT.COM

Smell the BS!

Smells like BS:
Government whispers: most Syrian refugees we take are Christian

Sources tell The Australian the special provision of 12,000 extra people to be taken from Syria will comprise a majority of Christians.

Much of the non-Christian ­remainder will be from other persecuted, non-Muslim ­minorities, including Yazidis, Druze and ­Zoroastrians. The Sunni Muslims who are included will comprise in part of Kurds, fierce opponents of Islamist extremism.– Herald Sun

And here, the truth about the N*99a  riots in Charlotte:

Jordan: Muslim Holy Man Assassinates Christian Cartoonist/Journalist

Part 2 of Killer Cartoons

Nahid Hattar was murdered outside the court where he was facing charges for insulting Islam. In response, if they make any response at all, Western leaders will no doubt say that Nahid Hattar should have been more respectful of Islamic religious beliefs. That is always their response: if Muslims will kill you for doing something, we are told that we shouldn’t do it, and that it is wrong and insulting and offensive to do it. No one ever tells the Muslim killers to stop being irrational, violent bullies.– Robert Spencer

Christian cartoonist/Journalist murdered by a Mohammedan holy man?

The gunman was arrested at the scene has been identified as Riyad Ismail Abdullah, a 49-year-old imam who recently returned from making the Hajj pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia.”

How did an imam, someone who has dedicated his life to understanding Islam properly, get the idea that he should murder people who are perceived as insulting Islam? Could what our leaders tell us about how Islam is entirely peaceful be false? Could such an injunction really be part of the religion?

Jordan: Murderer of Christian charged with insulting Islam was Muslim cleric

More on this story. “Imam kills Christian writer charged over anti-Islam cartoon,” by Ajomole Helen, Naij.com, September 25, 2016:

Jordanian writer, Nahed Hattar was shot dead by a suspected Islamist gunman today Sunday, September 25th, outside the courtroom where he was due to stand trial for insulting Islam by sharing a cartoon on Facebook. 

Hattar was arrested in August for sharing a cartoon on Facebook showing a bearded man in heaven smoking, lying in bed with women and calling on God to bring him wine and cashew. He captioned the cartoon which he deleted shortly after posting it: 

“It mocks terrorists and their concept of God and heaven. It does not infringe God’s divinity in anyway” 

cr7lpqnxeaa1ezx

Continue reading Jordan: Muslim Holy Man Assassinates Christian Cartoonist/Journalist

Obama’s DOJ Applies Shari’a

In Initially Airbrushing Orlando Jihadist’s Calls, DOJ Followed Obama-Clinton U.N. Resolution against Negative Speech about Islam

 

by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

Before reversing itself this afternoon amid rebukes from commentators and Republican leaders, the Obama Justice Department undertook to bleach the Islam out of Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen’s statements about his Islamist mass-murder attack — specifically, his pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State terror network and its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the effect of which was to claim an Islamic doctrinal justification for the killing of 49 people, and the wounding of 53 others.

lynch-600-li

Even the White House appeared to be distancing itself from Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s original decision to release an edited version of one of Mateen’s 911 calls to the public. Obama, after all, had earlier conceded Mateen’s pledge of allegiance. Still, the Justice Department’s action was predictable. The purging of the transcript was a straightforward application of the Obama administration’s counter-constitutional U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18, which purports to mandate the suppression of speech that could cast Islam in a bad light — regardless of whether the speech is accurate or the negative impression it creates is justified. Lynch had said the Justice Department would edit out Mateen’s effort to fit his atrocity in the Islamic State framework. This purge was rationalized by the attorney general as a refusal to abet the spread of Mateen’s propaganda. In fact, it was a promotion of the administration’s own propaganda — much like the whitewashing of references to Islam in instructional materials used to train American law-enforcement, military, intelligence agents. From his first days in office, President Obama has forged a collaborative relationship with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The OIC is the largest United Nations bloc. It includes 56 nations with significant Muslim populations plus the Palestinian Authority (which these Muslim nations regard as a fellow sovereign). Throughout her four years as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was Obama’s point-person in the administration’s collusion with the OIC. Among the most significant “achievements” of this partnership — and, from a constitutional perspective, the most appalling one — has been the adoption of Resolution 16/18. In blatant violation of the First Amendment, this provision calls on Western governments to outlaw any speech that “constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence” toward religion, on the rationale that such speech could provoke “religious hatred.” The resolution, if honored, is a drastic violation of First Amendment free-speech principles, which protect speech that constitutes political debate and promotes the introduction of accurate information in discussions of public policy. These are cornerstones of a self-governing, properly functioning republic. Let’s put aside the fact that Islamic supremacism, a mainstream interpretation of Islam, is not really a religion in the strict sense, but rather a radical, totalitarian political ideology with a religious veneer. Even if we were talking purely about religion, the First Amendment does not permit the government to prohibit speech or expression that could potentially incite mere hostility. There are many beliefs that deserve to be condemned; the Constitution safeguards our right both to be hostile to them and to engage in speech that promotes such hostility. (Indeed, that is just the most obvious principle. Besides inciting hostility, the resolution purports to prohibit speech that incites violence and discrimination. There is no need for an international resolution to prohibit the incitement of violence; it is already against American federal and state laws. As for speech that could incite discrimination against religion, the First Amendment would not permit a prohibition. We outlaw certain categories actual discriminatory action against religious believers, but not the mere statement or thought that a religion should be discriminated against.) The joint Obama-OIC Resolution 16/18 effectively imposes sharia blasphemy standards on American law. As I’ve previously outlined, sharia proscribes not only expression that is arguably insulting to Islam (e.g., burning the Koran, or cartoons that poke fun at Islam’s prophet Mohammed); it further forbids any speech or expression, by anyone, that constitutes an unflattering portrayal or belittling of Islam; and Muslims are forbidden to renounce Islam (which is deemed to include dissenting speech that denies any Islamic principle that is supported by scholarly consensus). Yet speech critical of religion is unexceptional in a free, pluralistic society — it is the kind of provocative or even infuriating expression that those provoked or infuriated are expected to tolerate for the greater good of promoting a marketplace of ideas.

Continue reading Obama’s DOJ Applies Shari’a

Dear Anne Aly: How Many Jihadists Have You “Deradicalised?”

Australia: Muslim MP Anne Aly, Predictably, Gets All Het Up About Immigration Poll That Showed Many Aussies Want Ban on Muslim Immigration

 by Christina McIntosh

As reported by Fergus Hunter for the Islamophile “Sydney Morning Herald”.

“This Is Not The Australia I Know: First Muslim Woman MP Hits Back At Immigration Poll”.

Ann Aly

“The first Muslim woman elected to Federal Parliament, Anne Aly, has declared that a poll showing that half of respondents want to ban Muslim immigration doesn’t reflect the true feelings and reality of mainstream Australia.

‘However, Dr Aly, the Labor member for the WA seat of Cowan and a counter-radicalisation expert (that is, a Muslim who has made a career out of claiming to be able to get young Muslims to stop Going Jihad – CM), said a degree of xenophobia towards minorities does exist, fed by hateful rhetoric, and needs to be confronted by political leaders and regular people.

It isn’t ‘xenophobia towards minorities’. It is a perfectly rational fear, based upon observable facts, of being murdered in the street – or in shops, or in church, or on the train or in the bus or at the theatre or at work – by allahu-akbaring Mohammedan assassins.  And… hateful rhetoric?   Ms Aly is hoping that we Aussie infidels will never take a peek at a good clear translation of the Quran – with accompanying standard annotations – or of the Sira or life of Mohammed, or some of the Hadiths, all now right there online in Muslim-approved English versions made by Muslims.  But lots of us have done just that, and more are doing and will be doing it, and when they do, they are mostly taken aback by the hatred – toward us, us non-believers – that pours off the pages like heat from an opened oven.  Then there are those intrepid Aussies who have started poking around amongst the reams and reams of material on view at MEMRI, where one can watch bog-standard Islamic preachers and pundits and ‘scholars’ and political figures in action, whipping up the hate and the madhattery.  Their antics and their screechings make the most strident of non-Muslim demagogues look quiet and refined.

But in any case, by ‘xenophobia towards minorities… fed by hateful rhetoric’, what Ms Aly really means is “the dirty Kuffar are finding out what the Ummah intends to do to them, and they don’t like it, and are trying to warn other kuffar, and some of the other kuffar are listening to them, and becoming alarmed”. – CM

‘The poll, released this week, found 49 percent of people favoured a ban on Muslims moving to Australia, previously considered an idea espoused only by outsider politicians like One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

Continue reading Dear Anne Aly: How Many Jihadists Have You “Deradicalised?”