Tolerance
By sheik yer’mami
English Version:
Click below to listen:
German Verson:
Click below to listen:
Tolerance is a mildly perverted Tango depicting the insomnia of the west towards a war that has been deliberatly ignored: Militant Islam, radical Islam, extremist Islam, Islamo-faschism etc. The question must be asked: Is there any other kind?
Nutroots and moonbats believe that it is US that is at fault, that it is only a matter of poverty and that we can just ‘talk it out…’
If it only was that easy! How do you tolerate the intolerable, how do you tolerate those who have sworn to forcibly convert or kill you!
Political correctness is killing us, help us identify the enemy, help us to raise awareness!
The Words In English
Tolerance,
All we need is tolerance
we do dot want integration
we do not want assimilation
we only need tolerance
Tolerance,
we only need tolerance
For Bali and for Beslan,
For 9/11 and Madrid, for London and for Moskow
For terror, murder and Islam
We need only Tolerance
We still need more tolerance, yes
We demand: More tolerance
Tolerance when we outbreed you
Tolerance to drive Islam into you
We only need to call you ‘racist’
Or scream ‘discrimination’ to drive you right out of your wits
And all the lefty-loony twits
Will jump up and down to turn your nation
Right on track for the Islamization
Do you want total tolerance?
For multi-culti mummenschanz
You never cared for your history
You never cared to learn a thing
You better learn about Islam
and that you must be tolerant,
tolerant, for the intolerance
The Words In German
Als Tango
Tolleranz,
Sie wollen nur Tolleranz
Sie wollen sich nicht integrieren,
sie wollen nicht assimilieren,
Sie wollen nur Tolleranz
Tolleranz
Sie wollen nur Tolleranz,
Tolleranz fuer Bali und fuer Beslan,
Fuer Terror Mord und Islam:
Tolleranz
Wir brauchen noch mehr Tolleranz,
Wir brauchen nur Tolleranz,
Wir werden uns sehr schnell vermehren
Und Euch den Islam bescheren
Tolleranz
Jetzt schreien wir noch schnell ‘Rassismus’
Und dann noch ‘discrimination’
Und schon sind alle linken Helden
Die sich ‘Menschenrechtler’ schelten
Dabei und schreien Tolleranz
Willst Du totale Tolleranz
Fuer Multi Kulti Mummenschanz?
1000 Jahre Geschichte sind vergessen
under Islamist verlangt vermessen
Tolleranz, fuer die Intolleranz..z
*
“Tolerance meaning we tolerate all that is good and dont tolerate idiots who wish to superimpose good with bad.”
Stumble it!
Digg It 
Technorati 
Print This Post
Email this articlePlease note: Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Winds of Jihad. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Winds of Jihad.
December 20th, 2006 at 5:32 am
i can give you a thousand reasons why the hate us ..
the illegal invasion of Iraq comes to mind as one .
December 20th, 2006 at 10:38 am
Would you please provide some proof as to what was ‘illegal’ about it?
Did the US need a mandate from the UN to go into Iraq and is that your criteria to make the difference between right and wrong?
December 20th, 2006 at 9:17 pm
Seems to me they hated us long before Iraq. 911, Khobar Towers, USS Cole, Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, first WTC, American embassy in Teheran all preceeded the invasion of Iraq. What does the hatred of the US have to do with bombings in Bali, Thailand, London, Madrid, Moscow, the massacre at Beslan? Maybe they don’t like us because we are kufr, infidels, non believers. This is not a left against right, liberal against conservative, atheist against deist fight. We need to come together to present a strong front against Islam. If the islamists win there will be no more atheists, Hindus, Buddhists or Zoroastrians because they are not “people of the book”.
December 22nd, 2006 at 5:06 am
Carataus has 100% common sense. These bastards will kill the liEberals before the even get to us.
Liberalism is indeed a menatl disorder!!!
December 22nd, 2006 at 5:16 am
atheist Says:
December 20th, 2006 at 5:32 am
i can give you a thousand reasons why the hate us ..
the illegal invasion of Iraq comes to mind as one .
Hey.. atheist.. would you please give me the other 999 reasons?
And while I am asking.. WHY should I care HEY they hate US?
Should they maybe ask themselves WHY do WE hate THEM?!
Do YOU ever ask why the smartest among us hate THEM?!
December 22nd, 2006 at 4:13 pm
Well, we still got the nukes.
And for good reason, too.
We could use them if they wouldn’t hide in the cracks and behind their women.
When have you seen a terrorist with a uniform, fighting like a man?
Stay in the middle east and deal with your problems there.
Don’t come here.
Don’t send your children to go to school here.
Live like you want, in the middle ages.
Don’t accept modern ways of life.
Don’t practice modern medicine.
Treat your women like crap, if you think it make you a man.
Pound you chest and rant and rave about how the west has done you wrong.
And keep your oil.
Let’s see you eat it!
We’re developing alternatives really fast, using modern science.
Count Brazil off your list, they have already bailed out. They grow their own now.
In 20 years you won’t have the west as a customer for you fossil poison and you’ll have to come up with a way to eat it or the sand you live in because oil won’t be worth the energy it takes to pump it out of the ground.
You’re on your way back to the 15th century.
Does this make you happy?
Ever seen a terrorist when he’s caught and separated from his buddies?
Have you?
I have.
He’s not so bold.
There isn’t any shouting God-is-great, he cowers like a dog that is about to be beat.
You aren’t men, you’re sissys that shout like an insolate brat. It’s time for a time out.
January 28th, 2007 at 12:52 am
Where were the muhujadin when Saddam and family were killing, raping and torturing MUSLIMS? Where was the ummah to fight against oppression of MUSLIMS then…no, they don’t care about Iraq, the insurgency is all about a Shia Sunni power struggle.
Actually Islam attacked America first, from 1776 onwards. Muslims (The Barbary Pirates) were attacking American ships (amongst others) and enslaving the crew, and forcing huge ransoms to be paid, even for those who died in the dungeons, their ransom still had to be paid. America (and other countries) were forced to pay huge sums of tribute money (Jyzia tax?) When George Washington died they (the muslims) demanded a tribute from the Americans of $10 000!
In 1786 Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Tripoli ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja to renegotiate a peace treaty.
They asked the ambassador WHY America had provoked such hostility from Tripoli…the answer was, as they reported to the Continental Congress, “that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Please note this was many years before American foreign policy, before oil, before Israel, before US troops in muslim countries…before all the excuses liberal loonies use today to justify muslim aggression.
February 10th, 2007 at 10:22 am
February 9, 2007
The Truth about Tolerance
How our therapeutic thinkers threaten Western values.
by Bruce Thornton
Private Papers
Acceptance of a double standard has always been a sign of inferiority. To let someone behave according to one set of principles or values while demanding that you be subjected to others is to validate a claim of superiority that justifies the inconsistent and unfair behavior. A double standard can also reflect incoherent thinking, a failure to apply consistently a principle that presumably has universal validity. In the West’s struggle with Islamic jihad, doubts about the superiority of Western values have coupled with a breakdown in ethical reasoning. The result is the appeasement of jihadist aggression and the confirmation of the jihadist estimation of the West’s corruption.
That’s why many Muslims demand from Westerners a hypersensitivity to Islam, all the while that Christians and Jews in Muslim countries are subjected to harassment, assault, and the looniest kinds of slander and insult. In the West, respect for Muslim ways such as the veil for women is supposed to be granted as a self-evident right beyond argument or debate. Yet Western ideals and values, such as the equality of the sexes, are derided, disrespected, and rejected as self-evident evils. The worst inconsistencies, however, involve the violation of core Western ideals, most importantly free speech. Many Muslims demand the right to deny the Holocaust, recycle Nazi-era anti-Semitic drivel, characterize Christianity as polytheistic idolatry, and excoriate a decadent, corrupt Western civilization. But no such criticism of Mohammed or Islam is tolerated, but it is, in fact, met with violence and threats.
The past few years have seen numerous examples, from the riots over the extremely mild political cartoons featuring Mohammed, to the uproar over the Pope’s quotation of a Byzantine emperor. The exercise of free speech in all these cases is met with rage, violence, and hysterical demands of “respect” for Islam, but there is no reciprocal respect for Western values. And for the most part, we in the West go along with this double standard, and thus accept the logic of the jihadist position: we are weak and unsure of our beliefs. Our craven behavior is a sign of our inferior status and our justified subjection to those who passionately believe in the rightness of their faith.
Let’s be clear on the roots of this cowardly response — the West has lost its faith. We have created John Lennon’s juvenile utopia in which there is “nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too.” Shorn of transcendent validation, now all our beliefs are contingent and negotiable, easily traded away for security or comfort. At the same time, the therapeutic mentality bestows on the non-Western “other” a finely calibrated sensitivity to his culture, no matter how dysfunctional, all the while the West refuses to extend such consideration to its own. Why would it? Haven’t generations of Western intellectuals and artists told the world how corrupt and evil the West is? Having culturally internalized this self-loathing, we are vulnerable to those who are filled with passionate intensity about the rightness of their beliefs and the payback due to us for our various historical sins such as colonialism or imperialism or globalization. And then we wonder why the jihadist considers us ripe for conquest, and destined to be subjected to the superior values of Islam.
Consider the following cautionary tale, from San Francisco State. Last October the College Republicans held an anti-terrorism rally during which posters painted to look like the flags of the terrorist gangs Hamas and Hezbollah were walked on. Since those flags have the name of Allah in Arabic, a complaint was filed in which the College Republicans were accused of “incitement,” “creation of a hostile environment,” and “incivility.” The complaint is now headed for trial before one of those campus star chambers created to monitor and police student behavior.
“chilling effect.” The Vice President of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Robert Shilbey, has pointed out the obvious: “At a public university, stepping on a flag — even burning an American flag — is without question a constitutionally protected act of political protest. The right to protest is at the very heart of the First Amendment, and means nothing if only inoffensive expression is permitted.”
Here’s where the double standards and incoherence of much politically correct behavior comes in. On any college campus in this country, every day, inside of class and out, you can encounter speech that is “insensitive,” “uncivil,” or “hostile.” But of course, this speech is directed towards Christians, or “conservatives,” or Israel, or Republicans, or “straight white males.” Nobody attempts to censor this speech or haul people before tribunals to answer vague charges such as “incivility,” which will be defined according to the subjective standards of the complainants. And if someone does complain, the faculty and administration will immediately go into high dudgeon mode and start preaching the glories of unfettered free speech no matter how offensive. In other words, free speech for me but not for thee.
But the ill effects of this hypocrisy are nothing compared to the damage done when the institution caters to the unreasonable demands of those Muslims who, convinced of their spiritual superiority and righteousness, are active enemies of the West and think they are justified in imposing their standards on everybody else, even if those standards violate a core political value such as free speech. And when the appeasement comes from the university, which supposedly exists in order to foster what Matthew Arnold called “the free play of the mind on all subjects,” the message is quite clear: we don’t really believe in all these goods we profess and benefit from, but we will abandon them at the first threat. And if we don’t believe in them, why should the jihadist?
©2007 Bruce Thornton
May 5th, 2007 at 10:25 am
[...] clueless far left nutroots from the Cairns Post are so obsessed with multiculti ‘tolerance & diversity’ and so befuddled with ignorance that they call a proposed mega-mosque in a quiet street a [...]
July 7th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
[...] Click here for Sheik Yer’mami’s song ‘Tolerance’ [...]
October 25th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
atheist never saw an intolerant person he didn’t like (because their views of the West and Christianity match his SO well!)- not, at least, until one of the most intolerant takes his head off.
January 2nd, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Wonderful song! I’ld like to play it on my podcast: raretodd.net