Little ditty about a Bosnian
Another terrorist livin’ off the Man
Sulejman’s gonna be a martyr star
Suicide bomb debutante in his car

Suckin’ on a halal dog outside the Tastee Freeze
guns n ammo sittin’ on Sulejman’s lap
He’s got his hand on the squeeze
Iman say “Hey Sulejman lets fire off
a few rounds”
Kock off those Bobby Brooks
Let me do what Allah please.
And Iman Say

Oh yeah jihad goes on
Long after the thrill of livin is gone
Oh yeah say jihad goes on
Long after the thrill of livin is gone, now kill on.

Sulejman sits back reflects his thoughts for the moment
Scratches his head and does his best Jihad Deen.
Well you know Allah, we oughta nuke the city
Imam says “Baby, you aint missin’ no-thing”
Jihad say a

Gonna let it rock
Let it roll
Let the Jihad Bomb Belt come down
And Save My soul
Hold on to my M-16 as long as I can
Resistance come around real soon
Make us martyrs and mean

Chorus

Little ditty about a Bosnian
Just a terrorist doing what he can

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/02/muslim-rape-epidemic-in-sweden-and.html

Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm, who has investigated violent crimes in Svea high court, found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or by foreign parents.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/Fjordman51213.htm

The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hand. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men — his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us — our future booty. No wonder there is a deep and increasing suspicion against Muslims in the Swedish and European public.

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/08/rape-nothing-to-do-with-islam.html
rape nothing to do with the islam cult ? think again!

Western Muslims’ Racist Rape Spree
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/009563.php

I refer you to my previous comment on that factoid. I hate to repeat myself but here it is once again. Read my lips:

“I leave aside what exactly is a “religious right”, what is its legal and political structure, and when is the last time it succeeded in deporting a scientist, or anybody else for his/her unbelief in God.
By the way, I am quite sure you can find a few people who would like our Atheist deported to Pakistan, or North Korea, or wear a hat with a blinking “I am Intellectually Superior” sign , but I doubt they could influence the government to enforce it.”

Please address that first and then other comments I patiently responded with to your gibberish.

Really, look, I have been very patient with you and dealt with every “argument” your abysmal ignorance and congenital obtuseness made you discharge.
I admit, in the begining, it was rather amusing and very easy to slap you around – in fact much too easy. Eventually it became a bit of a tedious routine. I don’t mind to be challenged by bright, well informed people. I learn a lot in the process – especially when they prevail over me. But you are a monumental bore, ignoramus and poseur and your monotonous, robot-like reiteration of the same, many times demolished, incongruities tires me. So, unless you are able to come up with a rational and sensible rejoinder to my responses to your pathetic “arguments” I shall ignore you in the future.

PS. I scare you, you say? Try Prozac

“the list is endless”

It doesn’t mater how endlessly you stretch the list. Everyone is free to compile lists of names in whatever way he wants – telephone book is a good example. But only a simpleton believes that the size of the list proves, or disproves a god – even if you should add yourself to the list.

But you are obviously desperate to convince yourself that if you parrot a “cool” opinion of smart people the smartness will somehow rub on you. Is it because of the shock you suffered years ago when presented with the miserable results of your IQ test?

And again, try to make an effort understanding the implication of each of the quotations you are presenting. If instead of gobbling on “quotes” you made a serious study of the complex personality of B. Franklin you would find a letter he wrote at the age of eighty-four, just previous to his death, in reply to inquiries concerning his religious belief from Ezra Stiles, the President of Yale College, he wrote as follows:

“Here is my creed: I believe in one God, the Creator of the universe. That he governs it by his providence. That he ought to be worshiped. That the most acceptable service we render him is doing good to his other children. That the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this.”

Some atheist, heh?

And although Lincoln “could never give assent to the long, complicated statements of Christian dogma.” it may disqualify him as a theologian, but only a simpleton like yourself would jump on the conclusion that the fellow was an atheist.

And the same goes for Mark Twain whose quoted by you remark expresses only his criticism of Christians of his time, but never dismissal of the notion of God. How does your keen intellect deduce that?

As for Thomas Edison, he was an avowed and honest atheist. Well, good for him. But do you think it somehow testifies to your own “intellectual superiority”?

Well, you probably do.