Peanut Khadr Accuses Jewish Group of ‘Slander’ After Questioning Book

Jimmah: Ongoing pain and suffering with mental flatulence

Wednesday, February 07, 2007
By Melissa Drosjack


Jan. 23: Former President Jimmy Carter addresses an audience while taking questions from students at Brandeis University in Waltham, Mass.

*When he refused to debate Dershowitz?

WASHINGTON — Jimmy Carter has accused an international Jewish human rights group of “falsehood and slander” for launching a petition that resulted in thousands of signatures being sent to the former president in protest of his controversial book about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“I don’t believe Simon Wiesenthal would have resorted to falsehood and slander to raise funds,” Carter wrote last month in a handwritten letter to the head of the human rights center that bears the name of the late Holocaust survivor and Nazi hunter. The petition does not require payment to be sent, though Carter’s letter suggests it is being used as a fund raising tool.

*Look up ‘projection’ in the dictionary- Jimmah is on the money-grubbing trail and accuses the Jooozzzz….

“I believe that Simon Wiesenthal would have been as outraged by your book, ‘Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,’ as I was,” Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, wrote in a Feb. 2 response to Carter.

Carter’s fiery exchange with Hier is the latest in the controversy over the book, which last year prompted resignations of a longtime Carter aide and 14 members of a Carter Center board.

Critics allege the book contains inaccuracies and distorts history to shape the reader’s opinion to one side of the issue. Carter has defended the book, saying he didn’t mean to offend anyone.

*No, he just hates Israel and loves Arab money…

Read it all….


Charles from LGF has more:

Peanut Khadr, America’s worst president ever, exposes himself as a corrupt fool who was always on the take and in the pockets of the Arabs.

While he bags millions from the Arabs he accuses the Jooozzz of ‘money grubbing’- Just how low can this ex-president sink?

8 thoughts on “Peanut Khadr Accuses Jewish Group of ‘Slander’ After Questioning Book”

  1. *No, he just hates Israel and loves Arab money… *
    In a (pea)nut shell – YES!

    Some additional info just in:
    (sorry,no url).

    What is going on in the world

    By Alan Dershowitz

    I have known Jimmy Carter for more than thirty years. I
    first met him in the spring of 1976 when, as a relatively
    unknown candidate for president, he sent me a handwritten
    letter asking for my help in his campaign on issues of crime
    and justice. I had just published an article in The New York
    Times Magazine on sentencing reform, and he expressed
    interest in my ideas and asked me to come up with additional
    ones for his campaign. Shortly thereafter, my former student
    Stuart Eisenstadt, brought Carter to Harvard to meet with
    some faculty members, me among them. I immediately liked
    Jimmy Carter and saw him as a man of integrity and
    principle. I signed on to his campaign and worked very hard
    for his election. When Newsweek magazine asked his campaign
    for the names of people on whom Carter relied for advice, my
    name was among those given out. I continued to work for
    Carter over the years, most recently I met him in Jerusalem
    a year ago, and we briefly discussed the Mid-East. Though I
    disagreed with some of his points, I continued to believe
    that he was making them out of a deep commitment to
    principle and to human rights.

    Recent disclosures of Carter’s extensive financial
    connections to Arab oil money, particularly from Saudi
    Arabia, had deeply shaken my belief in his integrity. When I
    was first told that he received a monetary reward in the
    name of Shiekh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahayan, and kept the
    money, even after Harvard returned money from the same
    source because of its anti-Semitic history, I simply did not
    believe it. How could a man of such apparent integrity
    enrich himself with dirty money from so dirty a source? And
    let there be no mistake about how dirty the Zayed Foundation
    is. I know because I was involved, in a small way, in
    helping to persuade Harvard University to return more than
    $2 million that the financially strapped Divinity School
    received from this source. Initially I was reluctant to put
    pressure on Harvard to turn back money for the Divinity
    School, but then a student at the Divinity School-Rachael
    Lea Fish-showed me the facts>. They
    were staggering. I was amazed that in the twenty-first
    century there were still foundations that espoused these
    views. The Zayed Centre for Coordination and Follow-up-a
    think-tank funded by the Shiekh and run by his son- hosted
    speakers who
    called Jews “the enemies of all nations,” attributed the
    assassination of John Kennedy to Israel and the Mossad and
    the 9/11 attacks to the United States’ own military, and
    stated that the Holocaust was a “fable.” (They also hosted a
    speech by Jimmy Carter.) To its credit, Harvard turned the
    money back. To his discredit, Carter did not.

    Jimmy Carter was, of course, aware of Harvard’s decision,
    since it was highly publicized. Yet he kept the money.
    Indeed, this is what he said in accepting the funds: “This
    award has special significance for me because it is named
    for my personal friend, Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan.”
    Carter’s personal friend, it turns out, was an unredeemable
    anti-Semite and all-around bigot.

    In reading Carter’s statements, I was reminded of the bad
    old Harvard of the nineteen thirties, which continued to
    honor Nazi academics after the anti-Semitic policies of
    Hitler’s government became clear. Harvard of the nineteen
    thirties was complicit in evil. I sadly concluded that Jimmy
    Carter of the twenty-first century has become complicit in

    The extent of Carter’s financial support from, and even
    dependence on, dirty money is still not fully known. What we
    do know is deeply troubling. Carter and his Center have
    accepted millions of dollars from suspect sources, beginning
    with the bail-out of the Carter family peanut business in
    the late 1970s by BCCI, a now-defunct and virulently
    anti-Israeli bank indirectly controlled by the Saudi Royal
    family, and among whose principal investors is Carter’s
    friend, Sheikh Zayed. Agha Hasan Abedi, the founder of the
    bank, gave Carter “$500,000 to help the former president
    establish his center…[and] more than $10 million to Mr.
    Carter’s different projects.” Carter gladly accepted the
    money, though Abedi had called his bank-ostensibly the
    source of his funding-“the best way to fight the evil
    influence of the Zionists.” BCCI isn’t the only source:
    Saudi King Fahd contributed millions to the Carter Center-
    “in 1993 alone…$7.6 million” as have other members of the
    Saudi Royal Family. Carter also received a million dollar
    pledge from the Saudi-based bin Laden family, as well as a
    personal $500,000 environmental award named for Sheikh
    Zayed, and paid for by the Prime Minister of the United Arab

    It’s worth noting that, despite the influx of Saudi money
    funding the Carter Center, and despite the Saudi Arabian
    government’s myriad human rights abuses, the Carter Center’s
    Human Rights program has no activity whatever in Saudi
    Arabia. The Saudis have apparently bought his silence for a
    steep price. The bought quality of the Center’s activities
    becomes even more clear, however, when reviewing the
    Center’s human rights activities in other countries:
    essentially no human rights activities in China or in North
    Korea, or in Iran, Iraq, the Sudan, or Syria, but activity
    regarding Israel and its alleged abuses, according to the
    Center’s website

    The Carter Center’s mission statement claims that “The
    Center is nonpartisan and acts as a neutral party in dispute
    resolution activities.” How can that be, given that its
    coffers are full of Arab money, and that its focus is away
    from significant Arab abuses and on Israel’s far less
    serious ones?

    No reasonable person can dispute therefore that Jimmy Carter
    has been and remains dependent on Arab oil money,
    particularly from Saudi Arabia. Does this mean that Carter
    has necessarily been influenced in his thinking about the
    Middle East by receipt of such enormous amounts of money?
    Ask Carter. The entire premise of his criticism of Jewish
    influence on American foreign policy is that money talks. It
    is Carter-not me-who has made the point that if politicians
    receive money from Jewish sources, then they are not free to
    decide issues regarding the Middle East for themselves. It
    is Carter, not me, who has argued that distinguished
    reporters cannot honestly report on the Middle East because
    they are being paid by Jewish money. So, by Carter’s own
    standards, it would be almost economically “suicidal” for
    Carter “to espouse a balanced position between Israel and

    By Carter’s own standards, therefore, his views on the
    Middle East must be discounted. It is certainly possible
    that he now believes them. Money, particularly large amounts
    of money, has a way of persuading people to a particular
    position. It would not surprise me if Carter, having
    received so much Arab money, is now honestly committed to
    their cause. But his failure to disclose the extent of his
    financial dependence on Arab money, and the absence of any
    self reflection on whether the receipt of this money has
    unduly influenced his views, is a form of deception
    bordering on corruption.

    I have met cigarette lobbyists, who are supported by the
    cigarette industry, and who have come to believe honestly
    that cigarettes are merely a safe form of adult recreation,
    that cigarettes are not addicting and that the cigarette
    industry is really trying to persuade children not to smoke.
    These people are fooling themselves (or fooling us into
    believing that they are fooling themselves) just as Jimmy
    Carter is fooling himself (or persuading us to believe that
    he is fooling himself).

    If money determines political and public views-as Carter
    insists “Jewish money” does-then Carter’s views on the
    Middle East must be deemed to have been influenced by the
    vast sums of Arab money he has received. If he who pays the
    piper calls the tune, then Carter’s off-key tunes have been
    called by his Saudi Arabian paymasters. It pains me to say
    this, but I now believe that there is no person in American
    public life today who has a lower ratio of real to apparent
    integrity than Jimmy Carter. The public perception of his
    integrity is extraordinarily high. His real integrity, it
    now turns out, is extraordinarily low. He is no better than
    so many former American politicians who, after leaving
    public life, sell themselves to the highest bidder and
    become lobbyists for despicable causes. That is now Jimmy
    Carter’s sad legacy.

    Alan Dershowitz is a professor of law at Harvard. His most
    recent book is Preemption: A Knife that Cuts Both Ways
    (Norton, 2006)

  2. As horrible a president as Carter was, he’s been far more insufferable since he’s been out of office. Do they grow peanuts in Gaza? If so, Peanut Brain needs to go there and retire. Maybe the palestinians will give him an outfit worn by Arafatpig as a token of gratitude-few Americans shill for them as much and as well as he does.

  3. He is a real creep for sure. Wasn’t it him and Clinton who made big cutbacks on the CIA and FBI which could have facilitated 9/11?

    Sheik, did any of my emails get through? Happy to help:)

    “Do they grow peanuts in Gaza?”

    No,,the only thing they use soil for is buliding tunnels for weapon smuggling. Then again, maybe they think by putting weapons underground they will grow? Pardon my mirth!

  4. Gramfan-

    We can only hope one of those tunnels is reserved for Peanut Brain for his final resting place. As for your comment on growing weapons it would not surprise me if many palestinians actually believe that. They seem to be the ummah’s dumbest members. No wonder nobody else in the ummah wanted to take them in after 1948-who’d want this bunch lowering their national IQ level?


    He’ll be buried in Arlington I suppose: doesn’t deserve it.
    Loved the rest of your post. I wouldn’t be surprised about that either,lol!

    Can one have a national IQ in the minuses? Yes, that would indeed have happened, given some of the s*** they all believe.

  6. Anything to dispel Satan Khomeini’s “there’s no humor in Islam” statement. Islam is humorous in the extreme (unintentionally, of course)-you just have to look for it.

Comments are closed.