I have just sent the following email to Gavin King. I wish you all the best and may God protect you from Islamic scum and leftist moonbats.

Tim Burton

Dear Mr King,

I have read with increasing disbelief the story of how you exposed someone who dares to tell the truth about the growing menace of Islam to the danger of assassination. I cannot believe that someone in your position who presumably professes journalistic integrity would stoop so low.

I don’t expect a response from you but I do think you should re-evaluate your chosen career. You are clearly not cut out to be a responsible journalist.

For your information the menace that Islam poses is real and it is growing daily. It is a malevolent cancer on society and on the world, and if it is not suppressed it will consume us all. And that includes you and your family and any descendants you may have. Someone has to take a stand and speak out against it.

So maybe the crocodile will eat you last. I hope that gives you some small measure of satisfaction.

Tim Burton

PS here is an idea for a T-shirt.

sheikyermami.com
Because the Devil
hates to be mocked

Tim Burton

Wie auch immer man sie letztendlich am liebsten bezeichnen möchte, im Grunde steckt das Wichtigste schon in der sie treffenden Bezeichnung “nützliche Idioten” drin. Vollkommene Idioten eben. So einer ist z. B. der “König” de…

Thank you for your kind response and assurance the sentence was not meant to hurt my feelings. I never thought so in the first place, so I wasn’t really hurt.

I think you are mistaken about Christianity as an ideology.
An ideology is not just a set of ideas. If it were so then every religion, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Taoism…and indeed every collection of moral concepts and injunctions, including the Ten Commandments, would be an ideology. In fact, the term “ideology” would become almost meaningless.

What makes a set of (usually philosophical) ideas an ideology is when it actively seeks to transform the existing social, economical, political structure of a land and its institutions to become the tightly coordinated parts of an apparatus that implements these ideas in every aspect of the social life while removing ideas and ideals it deems incompatible with its vision.
To accomplish that an ideology needs to acquire a total control over institutions and the population of the land. In short it becomes totalitarian – with all its unpleasant implications. In fact it must become totalitarian for its survival.

It is very important to realize that it imposes its vision “from above”, which means it changes, often violently, the social structure, order and rules of the society and presents the bewildered population with the “fait accompli”. The average member of society had never anything to do with the change and in most cases, but not always, did not welcome it. He will have to adapt. Period.

But Christianity’s growth was “from below”, so to speak. Its injunctions, including the “turn the other cheek” were, like each one of the “Big Ten”, always personal. It never presented a blueprint of a social structure with institutions enforcing and inspecting “cheek turning” or “enemy loving” duties. Whatever Moses, or Jesus insisted on was always; Thou shall, or Thou shall not. It was personal not only because it was addressed to a person, but because it was only concerned with inter-personal relation. Of course, it was only natural that when enough people take such commandments to their hearts, live and die for them, pass them on, sometimes betray them, sometime rediscover them, they will eventually and over the ages build that unique civilization called the West.

Another thing that makes Christianity so starkly contrasting with “ideologies” and Islam is its acknowledging the division between the religious and secular life. Give God what is God’s and Caesar…etc. This may have been many times ignored and violated, but it always stubbornly surfaced again and again, often at the expense of the power of the church. That “duality” created the unique for the Christianity “creative tension” that, to my mind, made the West develop and grow in arts, science, technology, economy to the degree no other civilization, or ideology could possibly attain.

Islam, like Nazism or Communism, doesn’t differentiate between secular and religious. In Islam secular must submit to god’s laws while under the Communism and Nazism it is the other way round. The goal of all three is to convert “from above” and by ANY means the rest of the globe to comply with their respective truths. While that “dreadful trio” aims at changing the heart of man by altering his world, Christianity changed the world of man by altering his heart and mind.

And it is true that Gandhi was a highly controversial person. In some ways a visionary and in some ways a perfect idiot. Whatever.
He may have proposed a certain doctrine, or rather strategy (of civil disobedience) to deal with a particular situation, but he never presented a comprehensive ideology.
Again, he was a leader of a mass movement to achieve a definite political objectives. That was not what Jesus was busy with. Although both insisted on “no violence” that similarity was only incidental.

I think I got carried away too much. Excuse me. I hope you had the patience to read that to the end.

Best regards

You said “the email bounced”. That is strange. I sent an email to myself in order to check and it worked OK.

If he feels this way about islam maybe his next target will be Pauline Hanson?
This “journo” hasn’t a clue. He is obviously not interested in the future of Australia or any western values.

Subject: Your comment

I just read again the main posting and discovered that ludicrous line:
“Islam, like Socialism, Catholicism, Capitalism or Nazism is an ideology.”

???…Who wrote that nonsense?

Christan West:

Your comment is appreciated. Your e-mail bounced back. Indeed an unfortunate construct to name Catholicism in one sentence with Islam or communism. You are quite right. It was not meant to hurt your feelings. However, the Christian religion is also an ideology. Or how would you describe ‘turn the other cheek?’ In more ways than one similar to Ghandhi-ism, inventor of the peaceful civil disobedience and non-violence movement.

Many Jews view of Ghandi are influenced by George Orwell caricature of him:

…Gandhi’s view was that the German Jews ought to commit collective suicide, which “would have aroused the world and the people of Germany to Hitler’s violence.” After the war he justified himself: the Jews had been killed anyway, and might as well have died significantly.”

Some Jews go beyond Orwell and call Ghandi an anti-Jewish Nazi sympathizer. Orwell just thought him stupidly naive.

???…Who wrote that nonsens?

Is capitalism an ideology? Since when? Capitalism was around long before the concept of ideology was even developed.

And whoever places Catholic “ideology” next to Socialism or Nazism doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Well, goodbye Winds of Jihad.

I think you are wrong thinking G. King that the motivation behind G. King abominable act is fear of “that bloodthirsty ideology”. You are giving a completely undeserved credit to that abominable person.

During the Nazi occupation of Europe the fear of Gestapo was shared by practically everybody. Yet it was only a very few who would actually actively try to destroy their fellow country men by turning them over to the enemy. They did it out of ideological conviction, opportunism, cynicism, material gain or the combination of all the above. Certainly not out of fear. The same was true in the Communist Eastern Europe.

If G. King is scared of Islam he could write on a million, other than Islam, subjects, run a pizza parlour, or try creative crocheting. There is no end of career opportunities for an able young man to pursue. But he enthusiastically, openly and out of free will informed Islamic Gestapo on whereabouts of a resistance man. He did not have to do that. He VOLUNTEERED in the service of the enemy just like those Danish men who joined “SS Viking” during the war. You certainly don’t think they did it out of fear.
Mr. King is an idealist – just like the multitude of Nazi and Bolshevik followers of the ideas proposed by Hitler and Lenin. He is a TOTALITARIAN adherent to the multicultural creed.
Being a totalitarian he would destroy anything and remove anybody opposing his messianic vision. That is why he hates the West and wants to silence those who fight for its survival. He recognizes that Islam has the same objectives and, quite correctly, sees in it the natural, albeit short term, ally. But he figures that short term ally is better than no ally at all.

He may, or may not realize that an Islamic Australia will be anything but multicultural. If he doesn’t then he is a moron. If he does, then he, like so many of the leftist maniacs before him, figured that massive Islamic immigration will destabilize the West to the point where it can offer no resistance not only to Islam, but to his own multiculti creed. He may also see that at that point his multiculti idealists may have to compete with Islam for power, but he is too stupid to see that in that competition the multiculti flock has no chance against the Sharia boys.

No Cassandra; when you are suggesting that G. King did what he did out of fear you are suggesting incorrect and completely inapplicable to G. King’s crime mitigating circumstances.

G. King has opted for treason not out of fear, but out of a total identification with an idea and fanatical hatred of those who oppose it.
A fascist is a fascist is a fascist.

I suspect Gavin King is scared, as anyone who has made even a cursory study of Islam would be, of this bloodsthirsty barbaric ideology, and reacts to his fear by siding with the barbarians. Initially it seems safer to do that than oppose them and risk violence. However, history has shown us that appeasement is never the right choice because it emboldens the barbarian. We really only have one choice: to confront manifestations of Islam whenver theyappear, until they realise they will get nowhere and no special privileges, but will be treated like everyone else in Australia.

If they don’t like it, there are lots of Islamic countries which openly discriminat e in favour of Muslims