Ultimately, it is Satan that is behind both Islam & the EU, & his goal is to fake the Millennial reign of Christ with a false messiah.

OT, but relevant to islamisation: NSW Govt opposes Islamic college; 800 residents gathered to oppose it.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/state-government-to-oppose-islamic-college/2007/08/11/1186530675136.html
(NSW) State Government to oppose Islamic college (on planning grounds)

Heath Gilmore and Sarah Price
August 12, 2007

THE NSW Government will oppose the building of a highly contentious Muslim college next door to a state high school in Sydney’s west.

Education Minister John Della Bosca yesterday said the development proposal would be opposed on planning grounds when it came before Bankstown City Council for approval.

The NSW Government has been criticised for failing to block the sale of public school land to the proponents of the religious school, Al Amanah Islamic College. [...]

Actually, mass immigration, especially from the third world (Muslim or otherwise), does much more than dilute participatory democracy.

In a large radically multicultural society that kind of common mind can’t possibly exist among the people at large. As a result the society will not in fact be democratic. It will be ruled by some much smaller group, who are able to deliberate, decide and act collectively. The more fragmented the people are — the more multicultural they are, for example — the less influence they will have in public affairs.

Posted by: Jim Kalb on November 14, 2002 10:38 AM at VFR.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008533.html
———————————————————————–
What is clear from the above, is that there must be a common understanding and acceptance of what is good for a society, before any consensus can emerge as to what policies are best suited for the nation of a like minded people, and which political party will best ensure that objective.

In a multicultural society, there cannot be any general acceptance of what is best for society at large; each component of a multicultural society has a different idea and concept of what constitutes “good”. As there is no consensus, all that will happen is that all values have to be accepted. And from this arises as a matter of necessity, the value system of “tolerance” of everything. This has several rather important repercussions

1. The majority/native society loses all interest in its own country.

2. With no real agenda but “tolerance”, all parties of significance, gravitate to a few policies that are acceptable to all. In effect there is no real difference in the political parties.

3. From #1 and #2, it follows that there will be less then enthusiastic participation in the electoral process. All parties look the same, and no matter who gets elected, the result is the same. This is the reason why I believe, the number of people actually casting their vote is getting increasingly smaller.

4. With less participation, there is democratic deficit, and the whole democratic process fails.

Multiculturalism thus leads to the disenfranchisement of the people of a nation. Kalb makes the point, that this allows a small group of ‘elite’ to rule the populace without hindrance from the democratic process.

With no real difference in the perceived cultures of different nation states, it then becomes possible for a super-bureaucratic empire to come about. And this is what we are seeing – the emergence from a european common market to a full-fledged EU empire run by an elite that is answerable to nobody. All our ‘national’ politicians at all levels, whether central or local, are really quasi-EU bureaucrats; in the process of becoming full fledged ones. (EU Referendum shows that even local councils are making decisions on garbage collection and others such, on the basis of EU guidance).

I have said often enough – multiculturalism and the nation state are incompatible in the most fundamental way possible. To achieve its goal of hegemony, the EU has first to destroy a nation’s political and cultural identity, and multiculturalism becomes a very important tool in this objective. It is for this reason that Islam and Muslims are so vital to the EU project, and are well protected at all levels by the notionally ‘national’ governments and EU laws.

We protest about the Islamisation of Europe, but the real power behind it is the EU, with its own objective.