Comments on: Friday Night RPG

By: tsarbomba

tsarbomba — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:27:24 +0000

An informative look into what muslims are “allowed vs not allowed” to do, within the context of various forms of jihad, I mean “inner struggle”.

http://www.marisaurgo.com/MSJ/Scholarship_files/Treatise.pdf

It appears “not allowed” is subject to interpretation. And we all (infidels) know what that means.

By: Mullah Lodabullah

Mullah Lodabullah — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:59:36 +0000

* Britain’s enormous problem
(Britain’s Conservative Muslim Forum)

Just to show that the problem is across the full political spectrum, Muslim “youth” are holding monthly “dialogue meetings” (cheese & whine sessions?) with assorted politicians – Labour, Conservative & Liberal Democrat …

* Muslims launch dialogue meetings with UK political leaders
http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0710206543143713.htm

By: Trosp

Trosp — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:09:53 +0000

What I mean is it will be an open season.

By: Trosp

Trosp — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:06:55 +0000

The way I see it, if the bombing in Glorietta will be claimed by extreme Muslim in the Philippines, they’re going to regret it. A lot of innocent Muslim would be victims of the reprisal by vigilantes.

By: R_not

R_not — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:26:50 +0000

“The Conservative Muslim Forum also wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give “full recognition to the massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation”.”

This will certainly be a small book because they won’t mention their murderers at all – because they are jihadists in their minds and doing the will of allah per mohammed’s instructions, of course.

All that other stuff – the raping, stealing, torture – that is ok since it isn’t ‘shirk’.

This is a new thing that I learned in Mr. Spencer’s Blogging the Qur’an series. They might even feel bad for the victim – but it is ok – just as long as they don’t do ‘shirk’

There is a little bit of an explanation of it in this website:

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/07/blogging-the-qur%e2%80%99an-sura-6-%e2%80%9ccattle%e2%80%9d-verses-84-165/

But, this website goes into it much more:

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/09/30/blogging-the-qur%e2%80%99an-sura-6-%e2%80%9ccattle%e2%80%9d-verses-1-83/

This ‘religion’ never ceases to amaze me how low a human can be if they follow it. I blog with Mr. Spencer, and these two segments of his blogging really perked my interest. I have read the koran before and didn’t get this the first time around – I might have snoozed, or gotten a headache, at that time. It is a very, gawd-awful book to read – you can only do it in short segments – it is sooooo gawd-awful and kludgy.

By: antialla - the REAL †ru†h

antialla - the REAL †ru†h — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:26:59 +0000

The mask has long come off the death cult pigslam, its ugly visage exposed for all to see.

When we see Christians taking the violent passages in the Bible literally then we can talk about tu quoque.

In the meantime: “islamo-fascists shut the f•uck up!”

By: ISLAMSFORLOSERS

ISLAMSFORLOSERS — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:46:58 +0000

Tu quoque-always the main defense and top excuse employed by the Destroyers and their fellow travelers to defend and excuse things that cannot be defended and should not be excused.

By: Savitch

Savitch — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:42:41 +0000

Do you think these jerks quote old testament violence as a way of distracting from the horrible reality that is the non-stop killing machine of islam?

By: ISLAMSFORLOSERS

ISLAMSFORLOSERS — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:40:14 +0000

So Pakistan is ready to fight the Destroyers huh? Maybe had they cracked down on them years ago this fight (which I’ll believe when I see it) would not be necessary now. But I suppose better late than never (assuming this will really happen).

By: the Callipygian

the Callipygian — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:57:54 +0000

20:7. What man is there, that hath espoused a wife, and not taken her? let him go…, and another man take her.”

As for me, I like this one best.