LGF-Lizard Charles Johnson: “We are morally superior, non-racist, kosher and halal…”

..and everyone who disagrees gets booted off his blog, to the cheers of the canniballistic ‘lizard army’ –



‘Europeans are racist, Nazi’s and white power supremacists….


The latest from King Charles himself:

Interview by Tom Paine or “How to find Nazi’s under your bed if you keep looking…”

or better “why I am right and everybody else is wrong…”

* Here’s what the Lizards stand for:

* No internment and deportations for Islamofascists

* No alliances with Eurotrash, they’re all Nazi’s and can’t be trusted, its better to smear and destroy the resistance in its infancy.

* Europe is not founded on culture and traditions that matter to a brave American cyber- warrior, multiculti-diversity is for everybody and white Europeans should just welcome the marching millions of Africans or pack it in.

* Better to destroy the fledgling counter jihad movement than to let one Nazi-white supremacist get away…

  1. * Yes, and because we’re so morally superior we can handle it all by ourselves: our lizard cyber-geeks will be reporting on the global jihad, stay tuned, don’t switch that dial…


From the excellent Shire Network News

This week we speak to Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs about the whole giant argument going on within the anti-Jihad movement over cooperation with certain political groups in Europe. Last week we spoke to Filip Dewinter (which you can find here) from the Belgian Political Party, Vlamms Belang. This week we speak to Charles about why he has been raising concerns about the anti-Jihad movment working with certain European groups.

* If you can’t get the podcast to work log on to LGF here


The view from Europe:

A Utopianism That Demands Self-Destruction
by Baron Bodissey


Let’s stop pretending all faiths are equal

Religions and cultures that deny women basic equality, or exploit and abuse them, are, as far as I am concerned, a bad thing. I don’t feel the slightest obligation to respect them or to allow them to bring their practices into this country. However, the problem for Cherie Blair, not least during the visit here of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, is that in the western liberal agenda we are supposed to offer equal respect and equal rights to all cultures and all religions, and to people’s universal right to live according to them and to practise their faiths as they understand them. But you simply can’t. You can either have universal human rights, or you can have the universal human right to ignore them for cultural or religious reasons – not both.

If a culture or a religion does not share Cherie Blair’s absolute belief in universal human rights, then how can she respect it? And, for that matter, why should she expect them to respect her opposing beliefs? She spoke on Radio 4 of honouring people’s religious beliefs, when freely adopted, but why? Incidentally, as for Islam being freely adopted, a large proportion of young British Muslims think that the penalty for abandoning the faith should be death. There is not a great deal of freedom in Islam which, after all, means submission.


* Kilgore is watching:


Ethnic cleansing and war crimes at Gates of Vienna….
Who Do You Want in Your Foxhole?

All I know is it’s a plan; I don’t really care how they get there, so long as it achieves the desired results… is there another European Party’s plan for the deportation of Muslim immigrants and their descendants that I can compare it to?

Sounds to me like some of our counter-jihad buddies don’t have the stomach for what it’s going to ultimately take to REVERSE the Islamisation of the West. They’re living in some kind of fantasy world where we’re going to be able to achieve our lofty objectives within the realm of the current political processes, and without having to endure a constant stream of racism accusations from both the left and the right.
To me it boils down to: who do you want in your foxhole? Some crazy bastard who is more afraid of dying than getting court-martialed for violating the rules of engagement, or someone who is reading the UCMJ while the bullets are flying?

Hell, let’s win first… then we’ll worry about who had the high moral ground later.

* Kilgore comments:

Drinkin’ the koolaid. If you’ve ever wondered how the Nazis came to power in Germany now you know.

* Yes Kilgore. But the Nazi’s are gone and it was WW2 when we destroyed them, remember?  Its 72 years later now and there is no Nazi-movement to speak of. The Nazi’s won’t be back.

That’s where you’re wrong,  Messrs  Lizards…


* But if you’re looking for confirmation, here it is from Charles himself:

That’s the bottom line, really — the real reason why those folks think they need to have groups like VB on their side is because they know their fantasies of mass deportation of all Muslims could never be achieved in reality without massive violence. The neo-Nazis and racists would be the bully boys.


* There you have it. We ‘can’t have any violence’. ” wouldn’t want anybody to get hurt-, don’t we all? Perhaps Charles is suggesting we throw bibles at them? Money? How about a little flower power?

* How do these turkey’s think the Muhammedan invasion is going to be reversed? By negotiating? Like Israel does with the ummah?

5 thoughts on “LGF-Lizard Charles Johnson: “We are morally superior, non-racist, kosher and halal…””

  1. They did me a favor banning me. This was back in Feb before all this hysteria. Even then, I did get a hint they were like this. Its very sad because LGF puts up good articles. I dont know if Charles is feeling pressure or if he was always like this.

  2. I think we’d all be better off ignoring Charles at this point. He neither has the intellectual seriousness nor the stomach for actually doing anything about the Islamization of Europe. Most of the commenters at LGF simply hate Europeans.

  3. Tom Tancredo calls it “genetic replacement”. If what was being done to the Europeans were happening today in any other part of the world it would be called genocide.

  4. Well said Sheik, I have stopped visiting LGF, I think the only thing left for us is the deportation of Muslims, if not it will get violent.

    I would start of with the extremists first and try to keep those that have actually left Islam, but anyway…

  5. Fjordman said…

    I have touched this subject before, in The Age of White Masochism

    Jews were once told to “get back to Palestine.” When they did, they were told to “get out of Palestine.” The people who said this didn’t object to where Jews lived, they objected to the fact that they existed at all. I sometimes wonder whether whites of European descent, a global minority, are the Jews of the 21st century. I also notice that while people of European descent are told to “get back to Europe” in North America or Australia, whites in Europe are demonized if they resist being turned into a minority in their own countries. The problem then, apparently, isn’t where whites live, it’s that we exist at all.

    Observer Ole Kulterstad notes that Europeans who are against free migration are labeled as “right-wing extremists.” But common sense indicates that giving away your country to alien cultures is more extreme than merely wanting to preserve it as it once was. I agree with him. I’m sick of hearing how Islamic organizations that want to destroy my civilization are called “moderates,” whereas Westerners are extremists if we resist, yet that is exactly what our media and our authorities do. We are not extremists; we are subject to policies that are extreme. Is gradually reducing a people to a minority in their own land, without proper debate about future consequences, not to be regarded as extreme?

    9/20/2008 1:57 AM

Comments are closed.