But that may lead to the worst thing imaginable - an Islamic Inquisition.

The only thing “inciting hatred of Islam” in today’s world is the behavior of those PROMOTING ISLAM.

“Why are you making me kill you?” they ask plaintively, “when all you have to do is submit to the peace of Islam.”

“But I don’t LIKE Islam”, you reply.

“There you go again, making me kill you… Stop calling Islam violent, this is all YOUR OWN FAULT!”

They decapitate their Bourbon monarchy, replace it with thugs likes Robespierre, then get Napoleon who becomes an emperor (even worse than the king), and wants to unite Europe, (isn’t that what the EU is all about?), and then they exile him. Full circle?

During WW2 they have the Vichy government and are the first country in Europe to send their Jewish children to the gas chambers.

Easy to see why they are giving Iran money, really.

I have run out of sympathy for them.

(And they make lousy, tasteless wines and overrated champagne!).

Islamic ‘Peace’
Best, most damning, breakdown I’ve read on Islam’s version of peace.

By Bassam Tibi, Muslim scholar of jihad:

‘At its core, Islam is a religious mission to all humanity. Muslims are religiously obliged to disseminate the Islamic faith throughout the world. “We have sent you forth to all mankind” (Q. 34:28). If non-Muslims submit to conversion or subjugation, this call (da’wa) can be pursued peacefully. If they do not, Muslims are obliged to wage war against them. In Islam, peace requires that non-Muslims submit to the call of Islam, either by converting or by accepting the status of a religious minority (dhimmi) and paying the imposed poll tax, jizya. World peace, the final stage of the da’wa, is reached only with the conversion or submission of all mankind to Islam…Muslims believe that expansion through war is not aggression but a fulfillment of the Qur’anic command to spread Islam as a way of peace. The resort to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurab (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of “opening” the world to Islam and expressing Islamic jihad. Relations between dar al-Islam, the home of peace, and dar al-harb, the world of unbelievers, nevertheless take place in a state of war, according to the Qur’an and to the authoritative commentaries of Islamic jurists. Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it.

In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars and are responsible for them.’

http://fawstin.blogspot.com/2007/11/islamic-peace.html

MAJID JAFARZADEH?

SHOULD I SOUND THE WEASEL IN THE HENHOUSE ALERT NOW?

Rejecting Islam equates to declaring war on Islam? Where’d he get such an idea?