Bunglawussy Worries


* Inayat Bunglawala,  spokesman for the MCB, is keeping a keen eye on the upcoming election in Londonistan. The Bungla knows what is at stake: its  unlikely that  the MCB will ever get a better friend than Red Ken Livingstone, who sold his soul to the mob ummah. The Islamic propaganda machine is spinning like an Iranian centrifuge.


* Richard Littlejohn at the Daily Mail shows that there are still some Englishmen left who stand up and call a spade a spade: he doesn’t mince words and tells it like it is: Importing a Muhammedan proletariat to replace the natives may have not been the greatest idea to establish a socialist utopia after all.


*  The egregious George Galloway sees nothing short of  “a counter-revolution against the progressive stances which Livingstone has adopted against racism and Islamophobia”


Red Ken: there’s method in his vileness

This column has long argued that mass, uncontrolled immigration was a deliberate policy to secure electoral advantage for Labour.

* Spiegel: The Bizarre Fight to Be Mayor of London

Back in 1987, after Mrs Thatcher’s third victory, Labour concluded it could no longer rely on the old white working class.

So it decided that it would import a new working class, which would then return the favour by loyally voting Labour.

This was part of a wider strategy that also included the creation of a vast client state and putting as many members of the middle classes as possible on the payroll. It’s now coming to fruition in the London mayoral elections.

There are 350,000 new voters on the electoral roll in the capital, most of them immigrants.

There’s also a huge Muslim vote. Ken Livingstone reckons that 200,000 of them will swing it for him.

So he’s sent his goons into mosques to rustle up support and lavished hundreds of thousands of pounds in grants on Muslim organisations.

One of his most dedicated cheerleaders in the Islamic community is a big fan of suicide bombings and a supporter of Hamas, which wants to wipe Israel off the map.

Now you know why Livingstone embraces Islamist headbangers, insults Jews and smears anyone who challenges him as a “racist” or “Islamophobe”.

It’s all done with a cynical eye on the ballot box.

Vile he may be, daft he ain’t.


Voluntary Dhimmitude in Bradford:


Cancelled on police advice: St George’s Day parade through the Bradford race-riot zone

“Unfortunately, there’s a fear that someone may have used it to cause violence”

* Hmm. ‘Race riots?’ Really. ‘Someone may use it to cause violence?’ Who would do a thing like that, any idea?


3 thoughts on “Bunglawussy Worries”

  1. I have done some thinking about the situation in Europe and the UK. I would bet that one day they will whine to us that the violence is too unbearable for them.

    If they are not willing to do something, to fight for their own freedoms, then why should we fight for them?! I know that we probably will do so, but we will only get this attitude once again from them. Losing Europe and the UK as an ally will be devastating. It will indeed hurt us. But, are they so helpful now? What exactly, or how exactly, is NATO helpful? They are more like the UN than not. We end out having to deal with the situation anyway since the UN and NATO both watch violence happen – they watch muslims rearming in Lebanon, they watch muslims killing in Bosnia/Kosovo, etc.

    I just don’t know about the Europeans. They remind me of arrogant jerks who would rather pass the time drinking coffee and worrying more about what we should do while they (EAD) make agreements with muslims for oil and money, agree to support the muslims while throwing Israel ‘under the tracks’ and then wail that they might lose something, as they did before Iraq. And when it is too late wail that they are being hurt because the muslims ran out of Jews to be violent against.

  2. R-not:

    While the EUro dhimmies may come across as cowardly and arrogant please don’t forget that they are closest to North Africa and the Middle East and they have been suffering from Islam-terror for more than 1000 years. This Islamic jihad terror, which is now reinvigorated with Arab money along with new and old grievances, is strangely perceived as a ‘new problem’, because we don’t teach history, at least not correctly.
    Americans and Australians, who are not quite on the front-lines, are quick to diss the EUros for their failings, but to be fair we should also see that no paper in the US or Australia has printed the Muhammad cartoons, and no TV channel has given ‘Fitna’ airtime. This, in the ‘land of the free’, where freedom of speech is guaranteed under the constitution, is equally despicable and cowardly.

Comments are closed.