Mark Steyn Debates 3 Muslim Law Students

 images29.jpeg

* Some people have problems playing this video, it works fine on Safari. Enjoy!

*

* More Muhammedan grievance theater where Mark Steyn comes from:

Canuckistan: Islamic group calls newspaper cartoon a hate crime

mac1573pvw.jpg

* Terrorists feel terrorized by…cartoons!

“Under the Criminal Code of Canada, a hate crime is committed to intimidate, harm or terrify an entire group of people to which the victim belongs. The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done.”

Then, the “hate crime” allegations certainly fall short for a cartoon that was making fun of the behavior of two individuals. Also note the absence of the word “offend” from that definition. “Newspaper cartoon a hate crime, Islamic group claims,” from CBC News, via DW

 * Please note that this ‘hate crime’ suit is instigated by  a jihadist female who, in her marriage contract with her husband made it clear that she would divorce him should he discontinue on the jihad warpath… Link

images27.jpeg

Qayyum Abdul Jamal 

images28.jpeg

Cheryfa MacAulay Jamal:  [I]f he ever refuses a clear opportunity to leave for jihad, then i want the choice of divorce.”

*  The cartoon by Bruce MacKinnon is a reference to Cheryfa MacAulay Jamal, a woman from Nova Scotia whose husband was arrested in 2006 in an anti-terrorism raid. Qayyum Abdul Jamal was released from jail after charges against him were stayed on April 15.
Zia Khan, director of the Centre for Islamic Development in Halifax, said the cartoon goes beyond what can be considered free speech.

*  “Under the Criminal Code of Canada, a hate crime is committed to intimidate, harm or terrify an entire group of people to which the victim belongs. The victims are targeted for who they are, not because of anything they have done.”

*  Then isn’t islam itself (or at the very least – the quran) a hate crime ?

* More from Canuckistan:

Jihad suspect tries to walk out of his own trial, saying he doesn’t recognize Canadian law

TORONTO — An Islamic convert facing terrorism charges was re-arrested after trying to walk out of his own trial Tuesday – saying simply that “I’m outta here” – after telling the court he wouldn’t recognize Canadian law.

*  Authorities are treating it, of course, as a sign that he may be unbalanced. No one gets the idea that maybe, just maybe, he is acting upon some principle of Islam that it might be good for Western authorities in general to know about. “Terrorism suspect tries to quit his own trial,” by Colin Freeze for the Globe and Mail, 

*

Calderoli Cold Feet Watch

calderoli_vignette.jpg

Libya seethes, Calderoli apologizes for “consequences” of wearing Muhammad t-shirt

Careful wording or abject dhimmitude? “Libya/Italy: Calderoli ‘sorry’: Berlusconi confident migrant coooperation will resume,” from ANSA

calderolicolore.jpg

“Conquering the multicultists..”

*

“Every Muslim should be a terrorist”

everymuslimterrorist.jpg

Indian cleric Ashraf Mohamedy in a public address which aired on Peace TV on April 22, 2008 advocates for Sharia law in America among many other things: 

 Highlights from the sermon:

Allah has instructed us to follow the hijab, so that women can be saved from rape and molestation. In Islam, there is capital punishment for the rapist. Whenever we say this to non-Muslim brothers, they react by saying that Islam is a cruel law, that it is a barbaric law. But believe me, Islamic law gets results. […]

If the Islamic Shari’a is applied in America, if every man, whenever he sees a woman, would lower his gaze, if every woman is asked to cover herself completely, except for the face and hands up to the wrist, and if there is capital punishment for the rapist – will the rate of crime go up, remain the same, or come down in America? Of course it will come down! Islam gives dignity and protection to the women in Islam, and that is just the reason why Islam has prescribed the hijab. […]

I would stress that every Muslim should be a terrorist. I repeat: Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who terrifies others, who terrorizes others. That is precisely the reason we have the police. As soon as the robber sees the policeman, he is terrified, he is terrorized. Similarly, the Muslims should terrorize the anti-social elements in society. He should terrorize the robber, the decoy, the rapist. I know that “terrorist” is taken as a concept of a person who terrorizes the common man. But we Muslims should be terrorists for the anti-social elements in society.

Anyone dare to take a guess on who he figures are the worlds anti-social elements?


Full video at MEMRI

*

2 thoughts on “Mark Steyn Debates 3 Muslim Law Students”

  1. I watched the video and it is still the same old “victim muslim” mentality. No issues were directly confronted, it was pretty much 3 (well educated) muslims saying that you are not allowed to say negative stuff about islam and muslims. That was all they said.
    I particularly liked the bit where they criticised Mark for quoting mullah kregar on the “muslims breeding like mosquitos” crack and backed away when asked to take action against the mullah.

Comments are closed.