"Prove that you're not racist-, you racist!"

 Now guilty until proven innocent

*  from Andrew Bolt:

*  The race industry says you are racist unless you can prove you aren’t:


A gift to witchhunters everywhere. Claims Chief Witchhunter Calma:

“You don’t get vexatious complaints for the sake of complaints.”

You know Calma’s real problem? He can’t actually prove there’s much of that racial discrimination around to justify keeping him his astonishingly well-paid job:

The friendly uncle Tom Calma said “Australia’s laws made it difficult to prove there had been discrimination.”

Spoken like someone who indeed isn’t much fussed with evidence – like the evidence of the operation of the Victorian Government’s obscene religious and racial vilification laws: 

Race Discrimination Commissioner Tom Calma wants the burden of proof in cases of racial discrimination to fall on the alleged offender, instead of the person making the complaint.

*  In other words, once an accusation of racial discrimination has been made, it won’t be the responsibility of the accuser to bring evidence to support their allegation, but the accused must then prove that he or she is not really a racist.

* That’s really what Australia needs: a racist Gestapo, witch-hunts  and Kafkaesque trials that go after perceived ‘Islamophobes’ and ‘racists’. Keep in mind that this kind of racism only applies to whites, because blacks can do no wrong.

Good night, Australia!

*  Source: Andrew Bolt

*  The Age

*  Thanx to Mullah

And then this: 

Race Discrimination Commissioner, Tom Calma, said yesterday that the 19 new projects under its Community Policing Partnerships Programme (CPPP) is a national initiative by HREOC, and aims at building relationships and improving trust between Muslim communities and the police.

“The race and religious hatred that continues to be directed towards Muslim communities in Australia, said Calma, is a breach of human rights and is absolutely unacceptable.”

* Source

* Calma whining: Australia’s human rights record slammed

Calma has been trying to screw upright Australians for a long time now. Its enough! Be gone….

The Apparatchiks who govern us: Jawohl Herr Kommissar!

* Here is how far off the rails this whole human rights circus is:


Sucking up to those above and kicking those below:

 The absolute classic case of this approach was the China Central TV interview with John von Doussa, a warmonista president of Australia’s Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, in Beijing a fortnight ago… (H)e implied that those demonstrating against the manner in which China rules Tibet were somehow infringing international human rights law, that the ruling Communist Party is a net contributor to human rights, that poor people in China and elsewhere should not expect access to the rule of law, that Westerners have yet again got China wrong.

I’ve been just as astonished by von Doussa’s extraordinary answers. Adds Callick:

In these emotional days here in China, it is especially important for visitors to consider carefully how to engage on such issues in a polite manner while remaining true to themselves and their values.

* With thanks to Andrew Bolt


Special treat:  ‘Islam is incompatible with democracy’- watch the debate with Dr Daniel Pipes

A message from Pat Condell to all the Calma’s in this world:

A Calma update:

Truth can hurt, but I’d rather hear it

Andrew Bolt – Sunday, February 08, 09

Telling viewers about the kinds of gangs shooting up Sydney is bad:

SENIOR racial vilification authorities fear a new television series on Australian crime gangs will fuel ethnic hatred, encourage discrimination and deepen anti-police sentiment on the streets.

Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner labelled Channel Seven’s Gangs of Oz “damaging” — a claim echoed by legal experts, a former detective and a leading community diversity group, which called on the network to re-edit the documentary before allowing it to be broadcast.

In the first episode, entitled Middle Eastern Gangs, which is due to premiere on Wednesday, Detective Superintendent Ken McKay, head of the NSW Organised Crime Directorate, states that “Middle Eastern groups are involved in everything. If they didn’t invent it, they perfected it in terms of crime.”

He then adds: “The criminal, in the Middle Eastern sense, is more cowardice (sic) than your general criminal. They’d rather use a gun than stand in a fist fight.”

Naturally, the damnation centred not on the truth or falsehood of that statement, but on the “helpfulness’’ of saying it in public: 

After watching the preview episode, provided by The Sunday Age, federal Race Discrimination Commissioner Tom Calma, whose role as head of ethnic discrimination at the Australian Human Rights Commission makes him the country’s most senior voice on race issues, said that Mr McKay’s casual use of terms such as “Middle Eastern” caused communities to feel stigmatised.

I guess it would, but surely we need to know if McKay’s claim is true, because we’d then be better informed about what to do about these gangs, right? But this article does not once offer an answer to that central question. All we get is more sliming of McKay:


But Dr Kennedy said: “Ken McKay has a record for shooting his mouth off and he has a limited intellect.”

I know neither man, but I already know from this article which one I’m less likely to trust to tell me an unvarnished truth.

4 thoughts on “"Prove that you're not racist-, you racist!"”

  1. OK! Im a racist. I admit it. I like my Caucasian race better than other races. I like my so-called “white” culture better than other cultures. Caucasians have invented more things, produced more and better science, produced more and better music, produced more and better art, given more people an opportunity to live better lives, and on-and-on. Yes, there is the other side of the coin, too. Some members of the Caucasian race have also done horriffic things. Hitler, Stalin, Islam — all have cast a dark shadow of butchery over the earth; but on the whole, far more good has been done than bad.

    The Caucasian race also “invented” Judeo-Christianity, a model for living that is near perfect in theory but subject to occasional failure of the flesh and will in practice. Even so, this moral frame of reference tells me to respect ALL people, regardless of their race, capabilities and achievements, IF they behave in a manner deserving of respect.

    And here’s the kicker — ALL PEOPLE ARE RACISTS, it’s the nature of the beast. It’s a BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVE folks. It’s NATURAL! Just like the fact that we are all thieves and liars, under the right circumstances (unless you’re one of those people who are, sad for you, just neurotically good) . The key is to live a MORAL LIFE as best we can and try to curb our NATURAL but IMMORAL tendencies when they rear their ugly heads.

  2. Western legislatures and courts have reinforced the “spirit of appeasement.” In 2005, Norway’s parliament, with virtually no public discussion or media coverage, criminalized religious insults (and placed the burden of proof on the defendant). Last year, that country’s most celebrated lawyer, Tor Erling Staff, argued that the punishment for honor killing should be less than for other murders, because it’s arrogant for us to expect Muslim men to conform to our society’s norms. Also in 2007, in one of several instances in which magistrates sworn to uphold German law have followed sharia instead, a Frankfurt judge rejected a Muslim woman’s request for a quick divorce from her brutally abusive husband; after all, under the Koran he had the right to beat her.
    from Bruce Bawer’s City Journal

    It is far more ‘arrogant’ to use violent coercions against women, gays, and apostates, especially murder ‘honor’ killings, than to expect Muslim men to conform to civilized norms of our freedoms. Sharia is the most arrogant form of law there is, demanding that we surrender our freedoms to some barbaric 7th century codex of world domination for their so-called ‘religion’. They must adapt to our civlizaitional values of freedom, not the other way around. Drop the “religion” tag and the whole issue of ‘whose arrogance’ becomes totally transparent: Islam is a violent anti-freedom political coercive Cult!

  3. Sheik, as you know from comments elsewhere, what is emerging in regards to the AHREOC initiative to alter our basic rights as Australians is…. how few people know it is happening.
    I am certain all the submissions I have read on their website – which run at the Australian average of 85% “concerned” about islam whenever we are asked to give an opinion – will be totally ignored. A complete shame that is illegal and treasonous, by my estimation.
    The fact is, muslims have put in their submissions and those are what will be acted upon…. that was the intention all along.

    Jay – I am also a racist, if I am to accept the definitions our “betters” seem to be operating under.
    In fact, I actually prefer the Sth East Asian cultures, where I spent 11 years, all by choice. I also married an Asian woman, 21 years ago, and she continues to reinforce my “racism”…. I definitely prefer her over all others!
    My wife has a small islamic branch in the family tree, so none of us are in ignorance of the impact. Nor is my wifes once Christian neice, who married into islam. Now she has a dead son, who was cut down by Thai military (2003) in an action against terrorists in Naratiwat Province.
    We need to rirm up our resolve – not one inch; not now, not ever.

Comments are closed.