Stephen Sackur v/s Geert Wilders on Hardtalk

*   Goodness; this Sackur is dumb! Instead of letting Wilders talk, he keeps interrupting with his PC-BS: pathetic!

Part One:

Part two:

Part three:

In other news:

Netherlands extradites Pakistani plotter

The United Nations by definition sees us all as One Nation - but with hundreds of ethnic and philosophical differences - it obviously can’t work - and doesn’t.

Since we have made our society work - we get punished by making our national pride something to be ashamed about.

Yes, we do need change!

 

Stumble it! Digg It Technorati Print This Post Print This Post Email this article

Tagged:

Please note: Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Winds of Jihad. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Winds of Jihad.

One Response to “Stephen Sackur v/s Geert Wilders on Hardtalk”

  1. Sir Henry Morgan Says:

    Re Sac’s intro: did Britain and America abide by the principles they sought to defend during WW2? Carpet bombing, Firestorms, Nukes, Hamburg, Dresden, Berlin, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki …

    In a fight for survival, whether national or individual, there are NO principles. You do what is necessary to win. Go ask a ’stan vet.

    I’m criticising no one and nothing here other than Sac and the pussy ideology he represents.

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Winds of Jihad. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Winds of Jihad.