Comments on: UK: Dhimmies, where you gonna run to?

By: Hummer

Hummer — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:01:20 +0000

Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Democrats:19 Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Democrats:127 million Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: “In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare…”

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the “complacency and apathy” phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

By: dodge

dodge — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:32:47 +0000

Jihad if they want it mullahf**kers . . . . kick all religion into touch . . . those who wish to believe in the fairy tales of the uneducated and mentally sub normal who need these outmoded beliefs to cope with real life need sorting out. I would stand and fight for the rational . . . . fight to the death if needs be to rid the world of scumbag politicians and ALL religious followers just to protect our future generations. . . . . I want my country back!!!!!

By: £86 Million-Brownski pays Jizra tax! « Centurean2’s Weblog

£86 Million-Brownski pays Jizra tax! « Centurean2’s Weblog — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:26:07 +0000

[...] 26, 2008 · No Comments UK: Dhimmies, where you gonna run to? Australia: Mormon Missionaries Stabbed, Media Silent [...]

By: fifth colums

fifth colums — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:34:41 +0000

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/01/eleven-reasons-to-reject-sharia-in-any.html

I do hope that the Brits have done their home work and not just pandering to the fact that as a nation that needs to trade, it will dance with the devil to do business and suck up to the arab money men.

There is no such thing as moderate Islamists. They classify those who are apostates, and those who dont follow the Sunna as being extremists, and by this definition they see OBL as as a moderate. ie their use of the word moderate is quite different to the way others in the wider world use it.

Alos never ever forget that Taqiyya, or lieing of it benefits the religion, is an establsihed practice in ALL forms of Islam.

This acceptance of a limited form of sharia is a wedge which the Brits will come to rue.

By: Mullah Lodabullah

Mullah Lodabullah — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:49:46 +0000

They are changing laws. It won’t be long before they seek to change times, as “2008″ won’t
be inclusive for the multi-culti purists. From memory, Cambodia / Kampuchea started at
Year 1 or year 0, and the bloody killing fields resulted.

By: "Islamophobia"=BS

"Islamophobia"=BS — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:25:29 +0000

The Brits have opened a Pandora’s Box with this decision. Now any group can follow their own laws-hell, a person can now make up laws specific to himself and not acknowledge any other. Give it time-the most aggressive group (currently Koranists) will eventually impose its law upon all others. The Islamaniacs have obtained a major concession usually not granted except after a military defeat.

By: ciccio

ciccio — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:51:19 +0000

I would have no objection to sharia law if they would at the same time allow the old ecclesiastic law to return. This will be a fair and balanced solution. If the sharia law found a man not guilty of murder because the victim was an apostate, the ecclesiastic law could take him and burn him at the stake for being a heathen. I wrote this in jest, but on reflection, it is an extremely valid argument against sharia, in fact it is the most reasonable one I have yet heard, even if I did pen it myself. Please disseminate.