Amir Taheri says says Mumbai terrorists were imitating the Prophet Muhammad

Bunglawussi Watch

*  They all do. Good Muslims do their best to imitate the prophet who has given them a perfect model of conduct, for all mankind, for all time. That’s what Islamic terrorists do: they follow Muhammad. But tell the truth and the Bunglawussi goes apeshit. That’s why he calls on Britains Muslims to complain to the editor of the Telegraph and to smear Taheri. Because good Muslims are obliged to lie to infidels, something the Bungla would never do. Or would he?

* Cambridge Savings Bank Collects Funds for Arab Charity That Refuses Anti-Terror Pledge

Telling the truth about Islam and the motivations of the jihadists is dangerous business. Truthtellers like Ali Sina, Ayaan Ali Hirsi and in this case Amir Taheri, live dangerously. Apostates must be killed in Islam, especially if they know too much and are seen doing damage to the cause, which could wake infidel apes and swine up from their slumber. A while ago, Amir Taheri raised a bit of a stink when he claimed that the Iranian parliament passed a law that “envisages separate dress codes for religious minorities, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, who will have to adopt distinct colour schemes to make them identifiable in public.” This would have been in line with Islamic Dhimmi laws. The fact that it was vehemently denied and the scheme not followed through doesn’t make it untrue. 

Telegraph writer says Mumbai terrorists were ‘imitating’ the Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H.)      

Writing in the Daily Telegraph yesterday, Amir Taheri offered his own explanation for the terrible slaughter in Mumbai: 

“…it looks as if the perpetrators were trying to imitate the tactic of ghazwa, used by the Prophet against Meccan caravans in his decade-long campaign to seize control of the city. The tactic consists of surprise no-holds-barred attacks simultaneously launched against a caravan or settlement with the aim of demoralising the enemy and hastening his capitulation.”

If you do not agree with Taheri’s explanation and believe that it is intended to portray Islam itself as being inherently violent then do let the editor know by writing a short letter to .



5 thoughts on “Amir Taheri says says Mumbai terrorists were imitating the Prophet Muhammad”

  1. Checkout the comments at the bottom of that article, Muslims do indeed speak the language of their father. I wonder what their excuse is for the torture and killing of the Rabbi will be? Oh that’s right, they don’t need an excuse because that is precisely what Mohammed did –

    Kinana b. al-Rabf, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, ‘Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?’ he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-‘Awwam, ‘Torture him until you extract what he has’ so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmiid.
    Sirat Rasoul Allah, p 515.

  2. “…it looks as if the perpetrators were trying to imitate the tactic of ghazwa, used by the Prophet against Meccan caravans in his decade-long campaign to seize control of the city. The tactic consists of surprise no-holds-barred attacks simultaneously launched against a caravan or settlement with the aim of demoralising the enemy and hastening his capitulation.”

    What Amir Taheri refers to here as “ghazwa” has also been spelled “razzia”, though his description of the term is rather phlegmatic. From what I have gathered, the razzia or ghazwa was a style of para-military attack designed primarily to instill terror in the populace of the land (or crews of sailing vessels), in order to soften the victims up for future conquest. Secondary benefits were from plunder of booty, abduction of people to be enslaved, and rapes.

    As Bostom wrote in his “The Legacy of Jihad” compendium:

    “The great French historian C. E. Dufourcq’s description of the razzia –– the preliminary raids by Islamic warriors to acquire slaves and plunder and to test a region’s suitability for full-scale conquest –– should be read by anybody tired of hearing about Western depredations against the “religion of peace.” For centuries, town after town in southern France, Spain, and Italy was plundered, sacked, and looted for slaves; churches were particularly targeted for the precious articles of worship they contained. One purpose of such raids was to instill terror in the inhabitants so that they either would not resist and thus be softened up for later conquest, or would pay ransom to avoid this devastation. The 17th-century Muslim historian al-Maqqari is quite explicit about the intended effect of this terror: “Allah thus instilled such fear among the infidels that they did not dare to go and fight the conquerors; they only approached them as suppliants, to beg for peace.” ”

  3. Hello;

    The following item shows that Islamic Terrorists are following Mohammeds example and decrees. Tolerance comprise only 3% of Mohammeds statements. They were in his early period in Mecca. After his escape to Medina, 97% of the statements relating to unbelievers, were hate and violence decreed against all infidels. The first 3% are abrogated by later decrees. Anyone who is learned in the Muslim faith who states that Islam is a religion of Peace, is a 5th columnist doing his duty for Islam, to undermine and lull our Democracies.

    Muslims consider Mohammed the most honourable of all men. This allows them every act that he did or supported.

    For the security of Democracies, please read the following item.

    Ban Islam for past and present War Crimes

    Muhammed: The Con Man and False Prophet

    As we are against terrorism in the world for the ultimate survival of our society, I’m offering viewpoints to win the battle against Islam’s goal of world domination, which is stated in their writings.

    Muhammed and his sayings, found in the Koran, Hadiths, Sunnahs and Surahs, are the root of Muslim terrorism.

    With truth and reality, we must discredit the founder of Islam, his sayings and the belief system that spawns this terrorism.

    Let the world know that Muhammed, while in Medina, organized raids on camel trains hauling trade goods, and received twenty percent (20%) of the ill gotten loot. The spiritual mechanics of functioning as a Prophet does not mix with being a thief and killing for wealth.

    Let the world know that Muhammed betrothed a six year old (6) child , in her ninth year (9) consummated their marriage sexually. He was in his fifties (50’s) at the time. The inner development of a Prophet does not function with paedophilia. Muhammed was a Paedophile. He claimed that Aisha was his only wife that caused him to experience revelations while under the blanket with her. Muhammeds counsel to others and actions, legitimized paedophilia through Islams ideology. What was the source of Muhammeds revelations as a Paedophile? All this is stated in th Hadiths and Surahs.

    On returning to Medina after taking Mecca, he attacked one of the Jewish tribes, the Qurraysa. After 28 days of siege, the Jews capitulated. Muhammed immediately ignored the terms agreed upon as part of their surrender. He ordered and watched as all males from puberty on were beheaded in a trench. Their families were made to watch this slaughter of the male children and men. Some of the women became hysterical while watching the beheading of their husbands and sons and were also beheaded. During the slaughter, Muhammed spotted a beautiful Jewish girl and selected her for his sex slave. Her name was Rayhannah. She had to watch while her mother and sister were raped. Her sister was traded as a slave for arms which is stated in both the Hadiths and the Surahs. There were three tribal groups of Jewish origin and belief in Medina at that time. Those that weren’t killed or sold into slavery were forced out into the desert to die.

    These atrocities are the actions of a demonic fiend not a Prophet.

    Muhammed also encouraged and rewarded many assassinations in his lifetime. Murder is not an activity of a Prophet.

    The fantasy paradise that Muhammed developed to entice the itinerant, uneducated Arabs to Islam is a personal bordello. This paradise in the hereafter shows a sexual fixation and addiction in the spirit of Muhammed. This is not the development of a spiritual Prophet. This demonic personality is no doubt the most successful con man ever. Muhammed has been more successful than Hitler and the Nazi movement in longevity, size of his organization and hatred of the Jews.

    Compare Muhammed to all former Prophets and founders of great religious movements, East and West, and it easily shows us how debased he was. His organization was developed by tacking spiritual words to robbery, killing, conversions by the sword and terrorism with Fatwas which are all fiendish acts. This activity by his followers is presently seen on television clips with kidnapped, innocent people being beheaded in praise of Allah.

    Last but not least, Allah was one of over two hundred and fifty (250) idols in the Ka’aba. After taking Mecca, Muhammed destroyed all other tribal idols except for the Quraysh tribe’s idol and pronounced Allah the one and only God.

    I believe that, in warfare against terrorism, we must attack the heart and not just the tentacles of Islam with truth. We must not let this perversion of religion spawn numberless adherents to Muhammed’s words to expand their terrorism. We must confront terrorism head on.

    When combating Evil remember: Appeasement is like feeding a steak to a tiger in the hope that it will eventually become a vegetarian.

    International Ban Islam petition:

    Canada’s for debate in the House of Commons:

    Guardians of Democracy site:

    Unfortunately, Muslims in debate or negotiations are forced to LIE to preserve Islam’s integrity. This noble Islamic activity is called “TAKIYA”.


    Lorenzo Bouchard

  4. “read the Quran where is shows terror.”

    We’ve been there, done that, bought the vest and moved on.

    “Allah” speaking through its false prophet, and boasting about casting
    terror into the hearts of the infidels, and ordering its followers to behead and maim them.

    Your “god” and its false prophet in action: “Allah revealed his will
    to the angels, saying ‘I shall be with you. Give courage to the believers. I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike
    off their heads, maim them in every limb!'” (Sura 8:12)

    Do you, or any other muslim, actually read the words of allah and its
    false prophet before posting, or do you just make it up on the fly?

Comments are closed.