* BS-peddlers, conspiracy nutters, Jew-hating liars, wankers and crackpots of all colors are coming out in force to stir the foul smelling bitches brew that rhimes with ‘Jew:’ Some also blame the Hindus, because Islam, as we all know; Â is a Religion of Peace:
The mayhem in Mumbai had barely subsided when I received the first e-mail suggesting the terrorist attacks had been carried out by agents of Mossad — Israel’s military intelligence — masquerading as Islamic terrorists to give Muslims a bad name.
* Â Unfortunately, it looks like Jews have been killed by the demented killer zombies that follow the teachings of the prophet:
Victims of Jihad:Â An Indian newspaper has reported that Chabad-Lubavitch emissary Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife Rivka were murdered by Muslim terrorists who held them hostage.
“Terrorism” the big lie used to club the minds of free men into confusion. This isn’t terrorism. This is war, holy war.BTW, ever hear of Jews killing imams?Â (not that that matters, right)
One hour earlier, we still had hope:
Fears have grown that the Chabad rabbi and his wife in Mumbai has beenÂ killed.Â Indian helicopters dropped commandoes on the roof of the Chabad House in Mumbai early Friday morning, and Â after a longish battle 5 bodies have been found.
A writer from Toronto forwarded a news item claiming, “India’s Internal Security Police are now holding and questioning an identified Israeli Mossad agent, who had been in communication with some of the alleged terrorists in India two weeks before the BLACK OP attacks took place.”
As ridiculous as this may sound, chances are countless Muslims are deluding themselves into believing that it is not their co-religionists who are responsible for the savagery let loose on India, but some hidden hand that is part of a U.S.-Zionist conspiracy against Islam. If at all there was an intelligence agency whose finger prints can be spotted all over the crime scene, it appears to be Islamist rogue elements from the Pakistan ISI, hell-bent on disrupting a marked improvement in India’s relations with neighbouring Pakistan.
For two decades, the Pakistan Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) has been the de-facto government in Pakistan, toppling regimes, aiding the Taliban, giving cover to al-Qaeda fugitives, and running a business empire worth billions of dollars.
In July, the new democratically elected government in Islamabad led by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani attempted to bring the ISI under civilian control, but under threat of a military coup, had to perform a humiliating about-face within 24 hours.
Then last Sunday, Pakistan’s foreign minister announced the political wing of the ISI, responsible for rigging elections and blackmailing politicians, had been disbanded, saying, “The ISI is a precious national institution and wants to focus on counterterrorism activities.” It seems the foreign minister had spoken too soon. Within hours, BBC reported an unnamed senior security official had contradicted the foreign minister’s statement.
While the tussle between the ISI and ruling Pakistan Peoples Party for control of the country’s intelligence network was going on behind the scenes, the President of Pakistan, Asif Zardari, threw a bombshell that caught the Pakistan military establishment off guard. Speaking to an Indian TV audience via a TV satellite link this week, President Zardari announced a strategic shift in Pakistan’s nuclear policy. He startled a cheering Indian audience by saying that Pakistan had adopted a “no first strike” nuclear war policy.
This apparently did not go down well within Pakistan’s military establishment that has ruled the country for decades using the “Indian bogey” to starve the nation of much needed development investment to put the huge military machine on a permanent war footing with no war in sight.
Immediately military commentators denounced Mr. Zardari, with one saying that he believed the president was “not fully informed or completely aware of” Pakistan’s policy on the issue.
To further alarm Pakistan’s own military-industrial complex, Mr. Zardari borrowed a quote from his late wife, who once said that there’s a “little bit of India in every Pakistani and a little bit of Pakistan” in every Indian.
While most Pakistanis welcomed the new air of peace and friendship, the country’s religious right was upset.
The founder of one of Pakistan’s most feared armed Islamist groups had accused President Zardari of being too dovish toward India, and criticized him for referring to militants in Indian-held Kashmir as “terrorists.” Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a major militant group fighting in Indian Kashmir, described Mr. Zardari’s comments as “a clear violation and digression from the consistent policy of Pakistan.”
Then Wednesday, the so-called Deccan Mujahideen struck against India with the clear aim of triggering a Hindu backlash against the country’s minority Muslims, with the obvious danger to Pakistan-India relations. Most security commentators agree the Deccan Mujahideen is merely a tag of convenience and behind this well-planned terror attack lies the secret hand of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).
Only time will tell whether these Islamists succeed or whether the good people of India — Hindus and Muslims — can see through this provocation and embrace the hand of friendship extended by President Zardari.
In the meantime, Muslims around the world will also have to decide whether to enter the 21st century and distance themselves from the doctrine of armed Jihad, or go back to the 12th century and embrace these haters of joy and peace.
Tarek FatahÂ is the author of Chasing a Mirage:
The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State.
Comment by Jdamn:
Whatever you do, people, don’t deal in reality. Deal in some invented sicko/pervert some parallel universe wherein Muslims aren’t terrorists, Pakistan doesn’t churn them out like sausage machines, and those terrorists didn’t arrive in rubber dinghys from Karachi. Just feed one of the two Muslim delusions, which exist side-by-side, namely the one that they put up for liberals and journalists whereby terrorists are never Muslim and when they are they are a tiny minorty of extremists who are impoverished and disenfranchised, never the one that exists when they speak among themselves and they high-five each other and ululate over stuff like this.
Posted by: jdamnÂ Â atÂ November 28, 2008 9:47 AM
More on Mubai: Andrew Bostom: “Ethos” of the Mumbai Jihad on Chabad? “Whenever a Jew is Killed it is For the Benefit of Islam.”…….
Hat tips to  Pamela Geller and  Bob Spencer regarding this  story about an apparently targeted attack on a Chabad House in Mumbai by the jihad terrorists wreaking carnage in that great Indian city.
This tragedy within a much larger tragedy reminded me of the Indian Sufi “inspiration” for The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism, Ahmad Sirhindi. Nearing completion of my first book compendium, The Legacy of Jihad, in early 2005, specifically the section about jihad on the Indian subcontinent, I came across a remarkable comment by the Indian Sufi theologian Sirhindi (d. 1624). Typical of the mainstream Muslim clerics of his era, Sirhindi was viscerally opposed to the reforms which characterized the latter ecumenical phase of Akbar’s 16th century reign (when Akbar became almost a Muslim-Hindu syncretist), particularly the abolition of the humiliating jizya (Koranic poll tax, as per Koran 9:29) upon the subjugated infidel Hindus. In the midst of an anti-Hindu tract Sirhindi wrote, motivated by Akbar’s pro-Hindu reforms, Sirhindi observes, “Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam.”
The biographical information I could glean about Sirhindi provided, among other things, no evidence he was ever in direct contact with Jews, so his very hateful remark suggested to me that the attitudes it reflected must have a theological basis in Islamâ€”contra the prevailing, widely accepted “wisdom” that Islam, unlike Christianity was devoid of such theological Antisemitism. Having originally intended to introduce, edit, and compile a broader compendium on dhimmitude in follow-up to The Legacy of Jihad, this stunning observation inspired me instead to change course and focus on the interplay between Islamic Antisemitism, and the intimately related phenomenon of jihad imposed dhimmitude for Jews, specifically.
Of course Jew-hatred was merely a sidelight to Sirhindi’s hatemongering Islamic “ethos.” He was an intensely anti-Hindu bigot, as revealed by these words:
Cow-sacrifice in India is the noblest of Islamic practices. The kafirs [Hindus] may probably agree to pay jizya but they shall never concede to cow-sacrifice…The real purpose in levying jizya on them [Hindus] is to humiliate then to such an extent that, on account of fear of jizya , they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It in intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honor and might of Islam…
Islamic-supmemacists slay 6 innocent Jews to prove ‘Holy War’ essence of terror crusade, despite MSM denials
With thanks to Democast TV
Why?Â Jihad Watch answers:
BecauseÂ they seetheir jihad in IndiaÂ as just one part of the larger jihad against America, Britain, and the West, and against Israel. And becauseÂ the Qur’an saysÂ that “strongest among menÂ in enmity to the believersÂ you will findÂ the Jews…” (5:82).
How many more such outrages, how many more wanton murders of innocent people,Â will the non-Muslim world endureÂ before itwakes up?Â How many more iterationsÂ of “it’s only a tiny minority of extremists,”Â and “what about the Crusades?”Â and “speaking about Jihad violence is Islamophobia and bigotry”Â must weÂ endureÂ before the mainstream media (liberal and conservative) begins to talk about this issue seriously?
Here are more links providing different perspectives on the Jihad Terrorism in Bombay (Mumbai) India:
Six bodies removed from Jewish centre in MumbaiÂ The Age (Australia)
Six people, including a rabbi and his wife, were killed at a Jewish centre in Mumbai, Israeli officials said – one of 10 sites besieged by suspected Muslim militants in a spectacular assault on India’s commercial capital.
The orthodox Jewish Chabad-Lubavitch organization reported earlier from its New York headquarters that the victims included its emissary to Mumbai, Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg, who ran the centre, and his wife, Rivkah. The couple’s toddler son, Moshe, 2, survived the assault and escaped the building with a centre employee on Thursday.
The organisation identified two other victims as Rabbi Leibish Teitlebaum ( son-in-law of the head of the Toldos Avraham Yitzhak Chassidic sect from Brooklyn) and Ben Tzion Chroman, his Israeli co-worker with dual US citizenship. An unidentified second Israeli woman was also killed, it said.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry later said the body of an unidentifiedthirdÂ woman was also found inside the five-story building.
The motivation behind Mumbai jihadi terror:
Dr. Andrew Bostom, author ofÂ The Legacy of Islamic AntisemitismÂ provides historical context onÂ The Legacy of Jihad in India, publishedÂ inÂ The American ThinkerÂ in 2005. Click link to read.
Today Dr. Bostom updates the news:Â The ethosÂ of the Mumbai Jihad on Chabad Jewish family:Â “Whenever a Jew is killed it is for the benefit of Islam.”
This tragedy within a much larger tragedy reminded me of the Indian Sufi “inspiration” for The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism, Ahmad Sirhindi. Nearing completion of my first book compendium, The Legacy of Jihad, in early 2005, specifically the section about jihad on the Indian subcontinent, I came across a remarkable comment by the Indian Sufi theologian Sirhindi (d. 1624). Typical of the mainstream Muslim clerics of his era, Sirhindi was viscerally opposed to the reforms which characterized the latter ecumenical phase of Akbar’s 16th century reign (when Akbar became almost a Muslim-Hindu syncretist), particularly the abolition of the humiliating jizya (Koranic poll tax, as per Koran 9:29) upon the subjugated infidel Hindus. In the midst of an anti-Hindu tract Sirhindi wrote, motivated by Akbar’s pro-Hindu reforms, he observes,Â “Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam.”
Dumbledores keeps an eye on the BS-peddlers in the media:
18 foreigners were among the dead, including two Australians, Israelis, two Americans, two French nationals, a German, a Japanese, a Canadian, a British Cypriot, an Italian and a Singaporean.”
Look carefully. AFP specifies the number of dead for each nationality – EXCEPT the ‘Israelis’.
I can do sums. Two Aussies plus two Americans plus two French plus one German plus one Japanese plus one Canadian plus one British citizen plus one Italian plus one Singaporean = twelve.
Eighteen take away twelve leaves SIX.
Let’s rewrite that nasty, sly little paragraph the way it should have been written:
“Around 18 foreigners were among the dead, including six Jewish Israelis, two Australians, two Americans, two French nationals, a German, a Japanese, a Canadian, a British Cypriot, an Italian and a Singaporean.”
That way, blind Freddie can see the obvious: that of all the foreign nations whose citizens were murdered by the jihadists during this violent ghazi/ razzia in Mumbai this week, it was ISRAEL – tiny, tiny Israel – that lost the most people.
One can see, also, the scale the jihadis were employing: non-Muslim Indians, of course, given that this was an Indian city, were butchered in large numbers; but after that, the jihadis made sure to kill quite a lot of Jews.
Posted by: dumbledoresarmyÂ Â atÂ November 29, 2008 1:46 AM