I have often said that European Christians, with the assistance of other non-Muslim groups, would do well to pick up on, and run with, the ancient English church custom of ‘beating the bounds’ of the parishes – look it up, it has all sorts of interesting possibilities and could easily function as a morale builder, community builder, and means of displaying and expressing resistance to the invading Mohammedan hordes. Being an adaptation of pre-Christian customs and with a strong civic element, it could easily accommodate the presence and involvement of non-Christian non-Muslims who wanted to make a stand. Sort of like ‘Reclaim the Night’ …only ‘Reclaim the Land’.

The overlapping feasts of Hanukkah and Christmas can also be celebrated to the hilt by all who wish to exhibit a spirit of defiance.

Let’s all hope that those European lawmakers who are going to Arieh Eldad’s ‘Facing Jihad’ conference, which will discuss ways to resist Islamification, will come home after it with renewed resolve and useful ideas.

NIMBY needs to start operating full-blast, with regard to Mosque and Islamic school construction proposals.

Having lived in Muslim countries, I learned that everything in Islam that is good is that which supports Islam and advances it throughout the world. From the viewpoint of Islam, a Muslim is correct when saying Islam is peaceful. Because there is no peace without Islam, therefore Islam is peaceful and everything else is warlike until Islam is present. That is why Muslims never agree to peace treaties unless Islam is completely victorious. Otherwise only a truce or ceasefire can be agreed upon, to be broken once Islamic forces again are ready to fight. What we call terrorism is not terrorism in Islam because actions of the ones we call terrorists are advancing the cause of Islam. We who are non-Muslims are the terrorists because we are opposing Islam. The OIC is correctly arguing, from its Islamic viewpoint, that Islam is not connected with terrorism and that Muslims are not terrorists. In the same way, CAIR is Islamically correct when saying JihadWatch.org is an internet hate site because it opposes Islam. Islam is peace, JihadWatch.org is war. We must be very careful to understand that Islam does not use the same definitions for words like peace as in all other societies. In Islam, “peace” means the “presence of Islam.” For most of the rest of us it means “absence of conflict” or something similar. Another example of the need to understand Islam’s definitions of words is when the Iranian president says the USA is a terrorist nation. He is speaking correctly as a follower of Islam, in a “peaceful” country (i.e., where Islam is present), about America opposing Islam (America is not Islamic and therefore is a warlike country). More scary is that when he says Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful, he is correct because its purpose is to advance Islam. And how might that “peaceful” nuclear program be used? To destroy Israel. Killing Jews is a tenet of Islam, so using nuclear weapons to eliminate them and wipe Israel off the map would be a “peaceful” solution because it supports peace, i.e., Islam. When the Jews exposed Mohamed as a fraud, he never forgave them, and they are still suffering his vengeance. In signing off, I must say that I can’t understand why the supposedly intelligent people of the news media, who have reported for many years about problems involving Muslims and their actions to advance Islam, still seem to have no clue about what Islam involves and the grave danger Islam poses to civilization, including the free press. I say to them: RTKS! (Read the Koran, stupid!). Islam is not just a religion; it is an ideology that has been waging war against the world since the seventh century.

Posted by: shallen at December 6, 2008 1:31 AM

When will European’s learn that the people of islam are a treacherous bunch, with the supposed moderates smiling in our faces while grabbing all they can with both hands, while the more honest fanatics stab us in the back and take whats left!