FromÂ a great editorial in the Jerusalem PostÂ which eviscerates Moron of Parliament Gerald Kaufman, who proves that there are such things as Jewish anti-Semites in the world:
Still, for some knee-jerk enemies of Israel like the 78-year-old British MP Gerald Kaufman, even the killing of “militants” is inexcusable. He’s implied that Israel’s shooting of a Hamas gunman is akin to the Nazis’ murder of his grandmother during the Holocaust.Â We can have no common language with someone whose moral compass is so warped.Kaufman, like the mullahs in Iran, has convinced himself that Israel is exploiting the “continuing guilt from Gentiles” over the Holocaust “as justification for their murder of Palestinians.”
Read the rest.
My grandmother was ill in bed when the Nazis came to her home town .. a German soldier shot her dead in her bed.
My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza.
* Read it if you can bear it. Our enemies are laughing their sorry asses off over these………………(fill in your favorite expletive)
The present Israeli government ruthlessly and cynically exploit the continuing guilt from gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the Holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians.
Sir Gerald likened the Israeli claim that large numbers of Gaza victims are militants to the claims of the Nazis : “I suppose the Jews fighting for their lives in the Warsaw ghetto could have been dismissed as militants.”
He is calling for an arms embargo on Israel : “It is time for our Government to make clear to the Israeli government that its conduct and policies are unacceptable and to impose a total arms ban on Israel.”
Sir Gerald hasn’t always been a critic of Israel. In his youth he was infatuated with Zionism. In a BBC documentary titledÂ The End of the Affair, he describes how his early idealism gave way to eventual disillusionment. He has called Israel a “pariah” and its senior politicians “war criminals”.
In April 2002, in response to Israel’s military operation codenamedÂ Defensive Shield, Sir Gerald had this to say:
It is time to remind Sharon that the star of David belongs to all Jews, not to his repulsive Government. His actions are staining the star of David with blood. The Jewish people, whose gifts to civilised discourse include Einstein and Epstein, Mendelssohn and Mahler, Sergei Eisenstein and Billy Wilder, are now symbolised throughout the world by the blustering bully Ariel Sharon, a war criminal implicated in the murder of Palestinians at the Sabra and Shatila camps and now involved in killing Palestinians once again.
Of the present Israeli leadership and their actions in Gaza, he said: “They are not simply war criminals, they are fools.”
Moonbats’ Jewish Infallibility Tactic
The “liberal infallibility” tactic that Ann Coulter courageously addressed inÂ GodlessÂ has reared its head in another form: Jewish infallibility. AsÂ Ben ShapiroÂ observes, self-hating Jewish moonbats have been using it lately to attack Israel in its hour of need.
As readers might recall, Coulter caused an uproar when she pointed out that the insidious Jersey Girls, a bevy of 9/11 widows who happen to be moonbats, have used their victim status as a shield from criticism while launching leftist attacks on the Bush Administration. Coulter’s refusal to regard the widows as beyond reproach threw the Left into a frenzy. Senators Clinton and LautenbergÂ denouncedÂ her; other Democrats called for her books to beÂ banned.
Jewish liberals are now using a similar tactic by prefacing their attacks on Israel with claims of moral superiority by virtue of their Jewish parentage. Fox News’ token moonbat Alan Colmes, British MP Gerald Kaufman and Puffington Host blowhard Jeff Dorchen have all employed the device. As Shapiro writes:
For Jews who oppose Israel’s right to defend herself, their Judaism is a convenient tactic utilized to silence critics. “Surely,” they imply, “if I am a Jew, I must have a deeper and more abiding love for Israel than anyone else. If you challenge my arguments, you will first have to admit that I have the moral high ground. I have a personal stake in this matter.”
Shapiro points out that though identity politics tends to dominate discussion, it is almost always illegitimate, because “even if you have a personal stake in an issue, your ideas may be terrible.” But in this case, the identity politics angle is worse â€” it’s a lie:
Link here for Sir Gerald’sÂ comments on YouTube.