Imam BLiar and the battle about Islam

by sheikyermami on March 25, 2009

tony_blair_narrowweb__300x4100
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam”
So says former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. And he makes it all very simple and Manichaean: there are “two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.” We just have to work with the one that wants to work with the West.

Of course! Why didn’t anyone think of that before?

Anything in his talk about why the “extremists” are so popular, or is that assumed to be a simple matter of policy and reaction to Western foreign policy? Did Blair even get close to mentioning the fact that there is a traditional, deeply rooted idea in Islamic texts and teachings, that Muslims must wage war against and subjugate unbelievers — regardless of what those unbelievers have done or not done? I am sure that he didn’t, despite its relevance to his point.

But until analysts grapple with that fact, nothing is more certain than that the global jihad will continue, no matter which smiling moderate is feted in Western capitals today.

“Battle on Islam heart of Mideast crisis—Blair,” by John Nery for the Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 23 (thanks to Wilkie):

MANILA, Philippines – Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in Manila for a series of leadership conferences, used an open forum at the Ateneo de Manila University to make what he called “a larger point” about the turmoil in the Middle East.
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam.”…

He told a sympathetic audience that the “larger point” was the right framework with which to understand the pivotal, conflict-ridden region.

Blair said there were two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.

The right approach to peace and development in the Middle East, then, would be to “partner with the modernizing and moderate element,” he said.

He made his remarks in answer to a question about how he made major decisions, such as joining the US-led Coalition of the Willing in invading Iraq.

He answered the Iraq question first, and then broadened his view to include the titanic struggle for the future of Islam.

Referring to the moderates doing battle with extremists, he said: “We gotta make sure those guys win.”
Comment:
Blair is definitely confused. Sure, lots of Muslims would like to “work with” the West. The issue is what they want, and it is clear from polls that most Muslims want the economic and technological advantages that may come from dealing with the West, but most of them don’t want to be influenced by Western values, and most of them want strict sharia.

Note, from the figures cited below, that across those four major Muslim countries, an overall simple average of only 9% of people “disagree strongly” with the goal to require a strict application of sharia law. Some of this 9% is probably composed of non-Muslims (especially in the Indonesian sample; see D4). If we take a moderate Muslim to be someone who disagrees strongly with sharia law, then, overall, less than about 9% of Muslims fit that category. The figures below regarding attitudes toward Western values also put into perspective Blair’s statements about “two elements” in Islam. Obviously, the “element” or subset of Muslims that is positive in its attitudes toward Western values is very small (see section “f” below).

Excerpts from World Public Opinion Poll 2007

Q27-F28: What do you personally feel about these goals? For each goal, please say whether you agree with it strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly.

a. To require a strict application of Shari’a law in every Islamic country.
………………………………………… Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….. 50%, 17%, 35%, 52%
Agree somewhat……………………24, 36, 41, 21
Disagree somewhat………………..11, 25, 10, 6
Disagree strongly………………….. 11, 15, 9, 1
Refused/Don’t Know…………….. 4, 7, 6, 19

f. To keep Western values out of Islamic countries.
………………………………………..Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….80%, 40%, 33%, 42%
Agree somewhat………………….11, 38, 31, 23
Disagree somewhat……………… 3, 9, 13, 7
Disagree strongly………………… 1, 4, 8, 2
Refused/Don’t Know……………. 5, 10, 16, 25

D4. What religion do you follow?
………………………………………….Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Muslim………………………………….93%, 87%, 100%, 98%
Christian…………………………………7, 7, *, *
Jewish…………………………………..na, 0, *, 0
Other…………………………………….na, 5, na, 2
Refused/Don’t Know………………na, 1, na, *

Source:

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/apr07/…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click hereThis is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening.We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way...But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted.Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it!One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display.But you won't be back, trust me on that.Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 2 trackbacks }

Blair Watch Project « Newsstand
March 31, 2009 at 3:25 am
Blair, Philippines - the ‘battle about Islam’ uppermost for peace « Tony Blair
March 31, 2009 at 10:03 pm

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

theresaj March 26, 2009 at 4:09 am

Sharia and technological advances don’t go together..they have to make up their minds..the stone age or the modern world..they must be very confused people.

Cassandra March 26, 2009 at 11:22 pm

“The right approach to peace and development in the Middle East, then, would be to “partner with the modernizing and moderate element,” he said.”

It’s all so simple. Why didn’t we all think of this before.
Now where do we find that modernizing and moderate element in the Middle East?

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: