Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace

* 50 roasted in Paki mosque blast

2009.03.27 (Jamrud, Pakistan) – Over fifty people are slaughtered by a horrific Taliban suicide attack on a rival mosque.  Associated Press

*    “Islamist threat to Turkey’s secular system” set to win fresh mandate

Turkish secularism on the ropes. Sharia is advancing in what is always held out to be that exemplary beacon of democracy in the Islamic world, Turkey. Bloomberg

*   Women told: ‘You have dishonoured your family, please kill yourself’

 As Turkey cracks down on ‘honour killings’, women are now told to commit suicide 

Whoops: Afghan suicide bomber accidently blows up fellow jihadists

No virgins for you, buddy. Just imagine how embarrassed he will be in front of Atta and the gang when he shows up expecting to be admitted into Paradise (Qur’an 9:111), welcomed by the virgins (Qur’an 44:54), and finds out that instead he faces an eternity of drinking molten lead in hellfire (Qur’an 18:29) because he killed fellow Muslims (Qur’an 4:92).

“Afghan bomber accidentally blows up militants,” from Reuters, via JW

Pakistan: “Schools” preparing boys for jihad, via “martial arts, archery and horse-riding skills”


Raising “questions about the Government’s pledge to crack down on terror groups accused of high-profile attacks in Pakistan and India, and ties to global terror plots.”

“The schools where pupils prepare for jihad,” by Chris Brummittin for the New Zealand Herald

UK: 200 jihadist schoolchildren identified!

Hey, kids! What time is it? It’s jihad time! “Police identify 200 children as potential terrorists,” by Mark Hughes for the Independent, via JW

Full article  below, scroll down

Two hundred schoolchildren in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are “vulnerable” to Islamic radicalisation.The number was revealed to The Independent by Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and Britain’s most senior officer in charge of terror prevention.

He said the “Channel project” had intervened in the cases of at least 200 children who were thought to be at risk of extremism, since it began 18 months ago. The number has leapt from 10 children identified by June 2008.

The programme, run by the Association of Chief Police Officers, asks teachers, parents and other community figures to be vigilant for signs that may indicate an attraction to extreme views or susceptibility to being “groomed” by radicalisers. Sir Norman, whose force covers the area in which all four 7 July 2005 bombers grew up, said: “What will often manifest itself is what might be regarded as racism and the adoption of bad attitudes towards ‘the West’.

“One of the four bombers of 7 July was, on the face of it, a model student. He had never been in trouble with the police, was the son of a well-established family and was employed and integrated into society.

“But when we went back to his teachers they remarked on the things he used to write. In his exercise books he had written comments praising al-Qa’ida. That was not seen at the time as being substantive. Now we would hope that teachers might intervene, speak to the child’s family or perhaps the local imam who could then speak to the young man.”…



Speak to them in what way? In a way that challenges Al-Qaeda’s claim to Islamic authenticity and purity? Doubtful.

The Channel project was originally piloted in Lancashire and the Metropolitan Police borough of Lambeth in 2007, but in February last year it was extended to West Yorkshire, the Midlands, Bedfordshire and South Wales. Due to its success there are now plans to roll it out to the rest of London, Thames Valley, South Yorkshire, Greater Manchester, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, and West Sussex.

The scheme, funded by the Home Office, involves officers working alongside Muslim communities to identify impressionable children who are at risk of radicalisation or who have shown an interest in extremist material – on the internet or in books.

Once identified the children are subject to a “programme of intervention tailored to the needs of the individual”. Sir Norman said this could involve discussions with family, outreach workers or the local imam, but he added that “a handful have had intervention directly by the police”.

He stressed that the system was not being used to target the Muslim community. “The whole ethos is to build a relationship, on the basis of trust and confidence, with those communities,” said Sir Norman.

“With the help of these communities we can identify the kids who are vulnerable to the message and influenced by the message. The challenge is to intervene and offer guidance, not necessarily to prosecute them, but to address their grievance, their growing sense of hate and potential to do something violent in the name of some misinterpretation of a faith.

“We are targeting criminals and would-be terrorists who happen to be cloaking themselves in Islamic rhetoric. That is not the same as targeting the Muslim community.”…

Of course not! But what if the misinterpreters of the faith challenge the claim that they’re misinterpreting it? What will Sir Norman do then?

But Inayat Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of Britain said the police ran the risk of infringing on children’s privacy. He warned: “There is a difference between the police being concerned or believing a person may be at risk of recruitment and a person actually engaging in unlawful, terrorist activity.“That said, clearly in recent years some people have been lured by terrorist propaganda emanating from al-Qa’ida-inspired groups. It would seem that a number of Muslim youngsters have been seduced by that narrative and all of us, including the Government, have a role to play in making sure that narrative is seen for what it is: a nihilistic one which offers no hope, only death and destruction.”


What if that’s what they want? As Maulana Inyadullah of al-Qaeda once put it: “The Americans love Pepsi-Cola, we love death.” How is one to respond to this kind of impulse? Not by saying, “Oh, that way offers only death and destruction!”

A Home Office spokesman said: “We are committed to stopping people becoming or supporting terrorists or violent extremists. The aim of the Channel project is to directly support vulnerable people by providing supportive interventions when families, communities and networks raise concerns about their behaviour.”

What the heck is a “supportive intervention”? Does it have anything to do with challenging the jihadist belief system? I highly doubt it.