Ward Churchill wins case, $1 in damages
by sheikyermami on April 2, 2009
Fake Indian Rewarded for Treason
Words fail me…
The jury ruled in Churchill’s favor, deciding that when he was fired in 2007 it was because a majority of CU’s Regents were responding to political pressure stemming from outrage over an essay he wrote after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
9-News.com
A Christian attorney and former Marine says he shares the outrage of other veterans who are upset that Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha received the Navy’s Distinguished Public Service Award.
Brian Rooney is a spokesman for the Thomas More Law Center:
“It’s disgraceful. As a former Marine myself, I have a hard time stomaching it, and I can understand the outrage. ”
Join the discussion...
Too small?
Click hereThis is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening.We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way...But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted.Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, write in English, try to tell the truth,
(we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it!One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for
trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display.But you won't be back, trust me on that.Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
the $1 award is a sign of contempt, signifying that even if there was a technical
unfair dismissal, he deserves nothing.
In the old days, when dishonest/disreputable people managed to win defamation cases on a technicality, the jury would award them a minimal amount to show that their reputation was worthless and they deserved nothing.
I suspect this is the case here, and if so, it’s a good thing. So long as he’s not reinstated and able to poison more young minds.
Cassandra–
I think you’re right, but in that case the award is 99 cents too high.