no heilig! capiert? s.heena@

I beg you to address the non-Muslims who attempt to defend Muslim terrorist attacks (9-11, Mumbai, London 7-7, Madrid) claiming they only attack because “we’re in Muslim countries.” I see that fallacious argument all too often.

Islamic Crusades 5: Why did they hate us in 1783?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUuH2G7dPFk

Have you seen his blog? He’s an activist for open borders, believes the whole ummah has the right to settle here, behind enemy lines, he is an ardent believer in ‘Global Worming’- (which is proven by gazillion ‘scientists’ beyond any doubt and our greedy corporations are destroying the 3rd world) he thinks Muslims will be nice to us if only we are nice to them, and its cool to let them take over. He believes our banking system is based on ‘usury’ while Islamic finance is better, he thinks America ‘had it coming’ (9/11), because for this kook the most benevolent nation on earth is causing all the poverty in the world, and he wants to educate Muslims on how peaceful Islam is.

Like “I just want to get to the bottom of it”- as in imam George Bush’s “Islam is a religion of peace” idiocy.

Of course Islam forbids suicide, which means to take your own life without any reason. But killing yourself in the cause of Allah becomes a martyrdom operation, and is therefore justified and glorified by all Islamic scholars.

Suicide operations are a constant throughout 14 years of Islamic history, and didn’t just start in 1982. If an Islamist walks into a police station and starts stabbing (or shooting) the police (as happened recently in the Netherlands) and gets shot in the process, then he is engaged in a murder suicide mission, which for him is a martyrdom operation. “Martyrdom” for a christian has a very different meaning, and if he is indeed a Christian he would understand that, but he doesn’t. All Islamic scriptures justify terror-suicide missions. ‘Striking terror in the hearts of the enemy’ is basic jihad, that’s what “good Muslims” do. The clerics may lie and deny it, (kitman & taqiyya) but that’s for infidel consumption only. “War is Deceit”, said Muhammad, and “I have been commanded to wage war on mankind until all religion is for Allah”- that means every Mohammedan is obliged to lie, to deceive, to propagandize, to do da’awa or to engage in terror against the infidel. Its perpetual warfare, and this is too hard to swallow for Western apologists, PC-infected kumbaya monkeys, who have elevated multiculturalism and global worming to ersatz-religions.

The 9/11 perps are glorified throughout the Islamic world, and the London bombers got hero’s funerals in Pakistan.

A while ago I started a glossary for Islam speak, to show that words have a completely different meaning for Msulims than for us. When Muslims say “Innocent” for example, it means Muslims only.Unbelievers are never ‘innocent’. Because “unbelief is worse than slaughter”, unbelievers are guilty of the most heinous crime because they rejected the prophet of Islam. What could be worse than that? We have a fatwa (ruling) from a popular South African mufti Ibrahim Desai to prove it.That’s why none, not one of their apologies is ever genuine. and that doesn’t include the obligatory ‘but’ that comes after every terrorist attack. Muslims believe in a G-d given right to rule over us, so they are justified in opposing “oppression”, but oppression for them means having to live under infidel rule, under “man-made” laws, and for Muslims only the sharia, which subjugates the kuffar to dhimmi (slave) status, is acceptable. Therefore they are religiously obliged to remove all obstacles to the spread of Islam, which is again jihad in many forms. The ends justify the means.

Another important point to make is that there is no place in the world where Islamic peoples have integrated or assimilated peacefully with the natives, everywhere there is strife, Muslims are responsible for nearly all the wars in the world today, so there is really no argument there.

But as always, Muslims see it differently, because of their global mission, and even more so, they are free of blame:

Bassam Tibi (1996): “Islamic wars are acts of “opening” the world to Islam and expressing Islamic jihad. Relations between dar al-Islam, the home of peace, and dar al-harb, the world of unbelievers, nevertheless take place in a state of war, according to the Qur’an and to the authoritative commentaries of Islamic jurists. Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it. In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars and are responsible for them. Only when Muslim power is weak is “temporary truce” (hudna) allowed.”

Enough for now. More later…

There are nearly 6000 blog posts on Winds of Jihad, and several hundred comments turds deposited from Muslims telling us that the earth is flat and Islam is peaceful. When challenged, they disappear, usually with death-threats. There are not enough hours in the day to bother with this. My time is too expensive. They should try to educate their co-religionists about their peaceful religion instead of trying to pull the Islamic wool over our eyes and ears.