"Britain Needs New Laws to Get Rid of the BNP"

“Prosecutors press for action against BNP leaflets”  from the Bunglawussi blog:

Not to worry: Peter Herbert, the chairman of the Society of Black Lawyers is onto it, with feverish support from the Bunglawussi, who  really really wishes that Islam was a race:

“… the main obstacle to a successful prosecution of the BNP over its incitement of Islamophobic hatred is that Muslims are legally defined as a multi-ethnic faith group. They are therefore covered not by the racial hatred laws but by the 2006 Act dealing with incitement to religious hatred. The latter requires not only that the offending material should be explicitly “threatening” but that the prosecution should prove subjective intent, which in practice means that the religious hatred law is completely useless as a means of combating the BNP.”

Guardian, 29 June 2009:

Senior prosecutors are calling for the laws on race hate crimes to be strengthened to counter the threat posed by the British National party.

The threshold for securing a conviction is so high that far-right activists are able to evade prosecution for material that many people would consider to be threatening and racist, according to sources at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Several BNP leaflets have been referred to the CPS over the last five years – some by senior police officers and one by a judge – but no further action has been taken.

peterhubert21                             Not disbarred yet: Peter Herbert

Peter Herbert, the chairman of the Society of Black Lawyers and a part-time judge, submitted a complaint last year over a leaflet called The Changing Face of London that had two pictures, one depicting an all-white street party from the 1950s, the other showing three Muslim women wearing a niqab, one of whom is making a V-sign towards the camera.

Under the law, it has been extremely difficult to mount a prosecution against extremism and hate speech,” said Herbert. “But with the rise of the BNP, and the subsequent rise in racist attacks and the fear the party’s leaflets can provoke, it is essential we are given the tools to deal effectively with this threat.”

*  Corrupt  Peter Herbert seems to be on the Al Sharpton, Jesse jackson race huckster gravy train, as we can see here…

8 thoughts on “"Britain Needs New Laws to Get Rid of the BNP"”

  1. The only way to fight this is to talk to your local politician – while you may not support the BNP you may also not like the islamisation of the UK – SAY SOMETHING. A well known muslim thug basically assaulted an 11 year old kid and I have heard little response from the people in the UK about this. People in the UK – get of your backsides or you WILL loose your country. The PC morons are in front ONLY because they know how to scream – learn to to yell louder!!!!

  2. Well said Kaw! People in this country have no interest in politics whatsoever, and most Brits live in a happy haze of drink and drugs where their biggest problem is if they don’t manage to pull some bird in a club or if their footie team is relegated. It is this apathy that is allowing the creeping islamites to gain their hold over every aspect of British life. What most Brits don’t realise is that if the islamisation goes far enough they will not have those luxuries they cling to anymore. It is time to stand up and be counted for the things we believe in!

  3. “Senior prosecutors are calling for the laws on race hate crimes to be strengthened to counter the threat posed by the British National party.”

    As long as they craft the laws to specifically target the BNP, and ensure that protected organisations like Hizb-ut-Tahrir UK aren’t inadvertently caught up and banned also.


    The Obligation of Khilafah


  4. Well Kaw and Davey Crockett who have said it all, the people of this country will awaken one morning and find it all gone.The MPs are all liers and treacherouse leaches who are afraid to speak the truth.They are all afraid to say anything about the 11 year old boy who was introduced to Muslim religion,not a word said by our so called leaders,or the so called Church of England this is a Christian country.

  5. Grim Reaper..
    Here’s proof of what liars our MPs really are, you will have heard them call the BNP liars for saying this, but here’s home office proof that they told the truth all along.
    From http://www.tpuc.org The BNP passed it onto them.

    Amazing details of exactly what asylum seekers MUST BY LAW be given for free.
    Were you aware? No you were not… And you are not allowed to become aware either.
    Date: Thu, 17 May 2007
    We know they’re going to move asylum seekers in there. All the flats have been done up, central heating, the works. And they’ve put up brand new net curtains. That’s a sure sign.
    This is the kind of message that we have been hearing from angry locals all over Britain for the last couple of years. Many of the details change, but the total renovations and the highly visible net curtains crop up time and time again.
    So too do the denials by local councils that the premises concerned are going to house asylum seekers. And almost as regular is the spectacle of those same councils being forced to eat their words within weeks as local residents wake up to find that new neighbours from Albania and Somalia have been moved in overnight.
    The repetition of this pattern over the entire country has been something of a mystery up until now. Strangest of all has been the sight of so many councils telling lies to local residents and newspapers alike, even though the bureaucrats and local councillors telling the lies must know that they will be exposed and discredited within weeks. Just such a sequence of events, for example, played a major role in the by-election victory of our Robin Evans in Blackburn last autumn.
    Secret Tenancy Agreement
    The answers to this puzzle lies in a secret 26-page document the Revised Tenancy Agreement April 2001 – produced by the Secretary of State for the Home Office, acting through the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. Its very existence is supposed to be secret, Section 3 (p), on page 8 has this warning for people or companies thinking of making money out of housing asylum seekers:
    The Landlord’s attention is drawn to the Official Secrets Acts 1911-1989. The landlord shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that all individuals engaged on any work in connection with this Agreement have notice that these statutory provisions apply to them and shall continue to apply after the expiry or termination of the Term.
    I don’t know whether there is anything to make a reader who is not planning to be a signatory to the document subject to the provisions of the Official Secrets Act. I don’t know, and I don’t care. This document is so shocking that the truth about it has to be told. All I will say is that this article is published here solely on my authority, so if some Home Office legal bigwigs wants to prosecute over this shockingly democratic breach of their veil of secrecy, they know where to find me.
    The anti-free speech restrictions continue on page 9, although by this time the section numbers seem to have become somewhat confused and very unclear. The actual meaning of Section (a) (iii), however, is all too clear:
    The Landlord shall ensure that no press release or other public document containing Confidential Information is issued and shall not make any public statement concerning Confidential Information without the prior written approval of the Directorate and the Tenant Company as to its content and the manner and extent of its publication.
    This is the answer to one key asylum mystery. This is why local councils and private companies alike, which are providing accommodation for ‘refugees’, continually refuse to comment or lie about their role in housing asylum seekers. Once they’ve signed up to this Agreement, they simply don’t have a choice.
    Detailed list of items for asylum seekers
    So what doesn’t the Home Office want you to know? Take a look at Schedule 1 on page 14, and you can see for yourself:
    This list of requirements for any property being used to house asylum seekers begins, reasonably enough, by insisting that it shall be fit for human habitation, and have adequate light. Let us ignore the fact that many hundreds of thousands of our own people are either homeless or live in houses which are unfit for human habitation because, according to central government and local councils, there isn’t enough money to deal with all the problems.
    By the time we get to Section 1.3, the secret Agreement begins to lay out requirements which are beyond the reach not just of a relatively small number of the homeless or desperately poor:
    all meters shall be of the quarterly type, the use of card or key meters shall not be allowed.
    Isn’t that nice? If you and your family fall into arrears on your utility bills, particularly electricity, you have to agree to the installation of a card meter set at such a rate that it gobbles up money. British families with children can’t be officially cut off but if they run out of meter credit, their lights and heating go off anyway and they have to go to bed at dusk in the winter to try to keep warm. Such hardships are unacceptable, however, when it comes to asylum seekers.
    Section 1.7 insists that The Property shall have a full and safe central heating system installed. Paraffin or bottled gas fed heating systems shall not be used. Perish the thought! Such devices are fine for British pensioners and young families shivering on the poverty line, but far too smelly, inconvenient and dangerous for Mr Blunkett’s favourites.
    New electrical goods
    After laying down requirements on issues such as fire safety, the Schedule reaches Point 10: All electrical appliances in the Property shall be either new or, if second hand, shall be supplied complete with a twelve month guarantee. Well, I don’t know about you, but when my wife and I got married and set up home, we had to get our first electric cooker and heaters from an auction, completely without any guarantee at all. And, of course, ordinary British youngsters moving into places of their own still face the same choice between paying through the nose for new equipment or going without guarantees.
    Pages 15 and 16 go on to provide a long list of the things needed in the kitchen, living room, bedrooms and bathroom of each asylum property. As you’re probably expecting by now, this features everything from chip pans to teaspoons, from an easy chair for each bed space to a Boots first aid kit.
    The long ‘General’ list in Section 1.13 even proves that the popular observation about new net curtains showing that asylum seekers are moving in is true, since landlords are ordered to provide net & drawable curtains to all living rooms and bedrooms. They get everything, in fact, including the kitchen sink.
    Free colour TV and licence paid!
    One item does, however, stand out:
    For Each Living/Dining Room
    1 new twenty inch screen colour television complete with licence which shall be renewed at each annual anniversary of the Start Date throughout the Term.
    Native Brits, of course, have to wait until they are 75 to get a free TV licence, and non-payment of this iniquitous tax is the biggest single ‘crime’ that puts British women in prison.
    Many of those women can’t afford a TV licence because they are struggling to bring up young families on pitifully low incomes. As a result, they are also often unable to afford proper child safety equipment. No wonder, then, that the Home Office bureaucrats being so generous with our tax money wanted to keep Section 1.20 secret:
    Where there are to be children living in the Property, the Property shall include:
    Adequate cot and highchair facilities
    Appropriate sterilisation equipment;
    Child safety gates on all stairways;
    Childproof resistant devices or casement stays on all windows;
    Appropriate play areas both inside and outside the Property.
    Another thing that ordinary families on average incomes find a big problem is the occasional cost of major repairs. Asylum seekers have no such worries. Under this Agreement, the Landlord is bound to do all repairs within seven days, and to provide an emergency repair service (Section 1.23) where a threat to health and safety is apparent. The rest of us have to turn to Yellow Pages or pay for call out insurance, but it would be unfair to expect asylum seekers to do the same, wouldn’t it?
    Similarly favourable treatment is also specified in the Letting Provisions, Section (f) of which commits the Landlord to redecorate all parts of the Property in the third year of the Term. The rest of us may have to fork out down at “Do It All”, but not Mr Blunkett’s special guests.
    Perhaps most ludicrous of all, however, is the next section (g) of the Letting Provisions, whereby the Landlord agrees: To have the exterior of all windows of the Property cleaned once every twelve weeks. I kid you not, it’s there on page 7. What would George Formby have had to say about it?
    Who pays?
    So what do all these modcons and services cost the lucky occupants of such premises? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. When various bleeding heart liberals tell us how asylum seekers only get basic income support payments, they don’t tell us about the Letting Provisions on page 4 of the Home Office’s Revised Tenancy Agreement, do they? Yet these show that not only do asylum seekers get their TV licences paid for them, we also pick up the tab for their rent, water rates, gas, electricity and council tax bills.
    Surely, you must think, these people must want to spend night after night on the phone to all their friends and family back home, telling them all about the wonders of Soft Touch Britain? A lot of their pocket money must go on paying the phone bill? No, as you probably guessed, they don’t have to pay a penny. Section 1 ((b) of the Letting Provisions sets out the fact that the Tenant Company (funded by the taxpayer) agrees to pick up the phone bill for every single property provided by the Landlord in question to asylum seekers.
    Don’t forget that every single council or housing association in this land which is housing asylum seekers has signed this document. Thousands of councillors in the ruling party in Labour, Lib Dem and Tory councils alike have either read this document or studiously avoided seeing it so they didn’t have to.
    It only took one BNP member in one council to leak this insulting and undemocratic document. By contrast, we will never know how many Lib-Lab-Con merchants have seen this Agreement since it first started being used in 2001, but not a single one of them has had the guts to put the interests of democracy and their constituents before asylum seekers and the Home Office.

  6. .
    How dare the BNP expose immigrant crime!
    absurd thought –
    your Supreme God says

    it will only wake up
    way too many people

  7. I’m a proud offshore member of the BNP. Why? Because my family has sacrificed three of its sons in the defence of freedom. To cop out and surrender our democratic countries to a despicable horde of ninth century theocrats is tantamount to urinating on their graves.
    Why can’t we stand up and say that islam is NOT a great religion, and that all its followers must be expelled from countries dedicated to freedom and democracy?

  8. “Why can’t we stand up and say that islam is NOT a great religion …”

    Because that is “islamophobia”, and when the House of Saud takes over Buckingham Palace & destroys Westminster Cathedral, al-Britain can proceed to deport all non-muslims / Jews / Christians, and ban all Bibles, Stars of David and other non-muslim religious symbols, while maintaining the facade of “tolerance” and “diversity”.

Comments are closed.