Sometimes it is indeed necessary to use your brain what a pity you don’t heed your own advice.

I really do wish I knew why, although I doubt we’d be able to stop it! Our government seems to only get stronger with the mass disapproval of it’s citizens, marauding on like a juggernaut with little care for the feelings and well-being of those it supposedly represents, their only ‘absolute’ being the upholding of the multicult, with no regards for the consequences, however violent! If you’re of British heritage in Britain, forget it, you’re fair game to both our politicians and new arrivals alike. It’s hard to see where the future of the British people lies.

“A violent group calling itself “The Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice” has carried out attacks in Gaza since shortly after Hamas took over the area in mid-2007. Now a female Arab journalist reports that the “unaffiliated” group is clearly an official branch of Hamas, charged with enforcing the group’s strict interpretation of Islamic law.”

This effectively is then an islamic police force with same goals and aims as the religious police in Saudi Arabia.

Now to other matters
I think that Davy Crockett’s brief outline on the driving force of liberalism in the UK is correct. However, what needs to be understood is why this is so. Observation supports the point of view offered by Davy Crockett, but it is rather more difficult to determine why this has happened. I believe this is a highly relevant question.

In theory liberalism and equality are great ideas, and when implemented properly are a truly fantastic idea. Unfortunately, I believe we’ve never seen true equality, not once in this entire world. And liberalism in Britain is a strange beast indeed. At my reckoning it’s a peer based system, and is all about scoring “moral high-ground” points. Aided and abetted by a subversive media, the politicians of Britain have built up a peer-pressure culture, in which any and all opposition to the multicult idealism of the liberal state is met by outright demonisation, threats of violence and sometimes legal action. Thus the people have learned to keep their mouth shut and accept the “enrichment” that comes in the form of drugs, violence and violations of their basic freedoms and rights.

This is only a brief explanation, it goes much deeper than this. Unforunately for them there are always those free-thinkers who are going to rock the boat a little, and sadly they are used as examples to further silence the people of western countries. Those that immediately come to mind are Enoch Powell, who was virtually lynched for his “Rivers of Blood” speech and more recently Geert Wilders who was banned from Britain and Nick Griffin, who has repeatedly been set up to be tried on the grounds of “race-hatred”. These men have been victimised by both the establishment and the lying media for basically holding forthright and truthful views on the threats facing our countries and people, and yet they are seen as peddlers of hate when this could not be further from the truth. I believe fully that were acting in the interests of preserving our culture and people. On the flipside, one-hundred years ago how many of our current leaders would now be on trial for treason?