An illuminating new piece from the European essayistÂ Wolfgang Bruno:
As I’ve stated in previous essays, Jihad is, simply put, anything undertaken to advance the spread of Islam, peaceful or not. Which means that Jihad is always present, even if there should be a temporary absence of violence because Muslims are too weak to use force. On the other hand, “aggression” is anything undertaken by non-Muslims to obstruct the advance of Islam, non-violent or not.
Based on this information, maybe we could make a sketch of a dictionary to explain what many Muslims actually think when they use various terms Westerners and infidels understand very differently:
Peace: “Peace” in Islam equals submission to the will of Allah through his divine and eternal law, sharia, and the extension of the Dar al-Islam â€“ or ‘House of Islam’ â€“ to cover the entire world. The absence of sharia is the absence of peace. Since it is the will of Allah that Islam will rule the entire planet, entering non-Muslim lands to subjugate the population and wipe out their corrupt, infidel culture is not seen by Muslims as “waging war,” but as spreading peace.
Freedom: Hurriyya, freedom, means freeing all people from being slaves of the laws of men and making them live in perfect slavery, in submission to the will of Allah and his laws.
Religious freedom: Subjugation of non-Muslims to religious apartheid and second class citizenship in their own country under Islamic rule. This option is only available to Christians and Jews, not Hindus, Buddhists or others, who have only the choice between embracing Islam or death. Muslims should practice sharia. Since these laws require the subjugation of non-Muslims, “freedom of religion” for Muslims essentially means the freedom to make others unfree.
Jihad: Peaceful, inner struggle that has killed up to 80 million people in the Indian subcontinent alone, and enslaved or killed tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of people on three continents for 1350 years. It can also be violent, but only for defensive purposes, such as the Muslims who defended their way from the Arabian Peninsula to the borders of China, wiping out the indigenous cultures along the way.
Aggression: When non-Muslims do anything to preserve their culture and resist the Islamization of their country. Even when this “aggression” is non-violent, such as publishing a cartoon critical of Islam, this intolerable insult to Islamic supremacy on earth can be answered with violence by Muslims. Since a refusal to submit to sharia is a rebellion against Allah, the very existence of non-Muslim communities can be viewed as an act of aggression.
“It can also be violent, but only for defensive purposes…”
Two more important word definitions which are missing from this dictionary:
Self-defense: Fighting against any non-Muslims who resist the domination of Islam.
Offense: When non-Muslims resist the domination of Islam.
Morality. In Islam, any personal or governmental act that advances the spread of Islam is “moral,” including war, drug distribution, assassination, murder, rape, torture, kidnapping, lying, deception, extortion, and just about anything else you can name. Any act that impedes the spread of Islam is immoral.
Another word missing from the dictionary is Justice. In Islam, “justice” occurs when the Muslims dominate all others around them. “Injustice” is when any Muslim has to defer, in the slightest way, in any situation, to the will of any non-Muslim person or group.
Which brings us to another missing vocabulary word: Humiliation. “Humiliation” is when a Muslim person is obliged to witness other persons living freely (especially if the others are economically better off) without conforming to Muslim strictures. Humiliation would include situations in which the Muslim is forced to view openly-displayed symbols and artifacts of other religions and cultures.
I am sure there are others could do a better job than I on these definitions. But, I think these particluar terms, that we hear so much in the news reports, should be not be left out of any dictionary of Muslim terms.
When Muslims sayÂ ‘liberation of India’ (or any other country) it means by converting it into an Islamic land.
“Free Palestine” means nothing other than making Israel Judenrein.
“Persecution” means Muslims cannot rob, rape and terrorize infidels with impunity, and therefore must suffer the indignity of having to obey the kuffars law, “man-made law”…
When we hear of “Neglected and impoverished” Muslims it means the infidel majority of a country (lets say Thailand or India, or France) is not paying enough jiziya with willing submission.
“Innocent”- only Muslims are innocent, the kuffar is guilty of rejecting Allah, which is the most heinous crime and therefore worse than killing. In fact killing the kuffar is doing Allah a great service, since it purifies the earth and strikes terror in the hearts of the infidels, which makes it easier for those who survive jihad to accept Islam.
“Humans, humanity”- Muslims believe only Muslims are human, kuffars are the vilest of creatures (TheÂ Qur’anÂ repeatedly callsÂ unbelievers “theÂ vilest of creatures” (Â Qur’anÂ 8:65), )Â The Qur’an clearly teaches that Muslims are the “best of peoples” (3:110) while theÂ unbelievers are the “vilest of creatures” (98:6).Â …
“Hypocrisy” is any kind ofÂ criticismÂ of Islam, any rejection of Islam by the kuffar is due to “ignorance” and if sufficiently terrorized, the kuffar will “accept Islam” and become a slave of Allah, like all other dhimmies and kuffars before him, otherwise the despised unbeliever will lose his head.
“Free to choose religion” is similar to offering “you can have anyÂ colorÂ as long as its black. Indeed: you are free to choose, but if you chose a religion other than Islam yours “is a painful doom…”
“Oppression” is when unbelievers rule over Muslims. This is an insult to the will of Allah and automatically causes injustice. Â Since the kuffars rule is illegitimate and must be removed.
The Moroccan understanding of ‘religious freedom’
The fight against Christian proselytizing in accordance with law cannot be considered among human rights abuses,” the Moroccan government spokesman said, “for it is an action aimed at preventing attempts to undermine the country’s immutable religious values. The freedom of belief does not mean conversion to another religion.” Source
When is Islam Oppressed?
“I am telling you that my religion doesn’t tolerate other religion. It doesn’t tolerate. The only one law which needs to be spread, it can be here or anywhere else has to be Islam.”
[ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) interview with Abdul Nacer Benbrika (Abu Bekr), the spiritual leader of the Victorian terror cell suspect). The daily Telegraph, Sydney, November 10, 2005, p.31]
- WHAT IS THE ISLAMIC definition of oppression? Ask any Islamist this question and he will certainly provide answers such as: Kashmir, Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya, Bosnia-.and so on. Think carefully, how true these statements are. In fact, if one takes the trouble to read the blood-soaked history of Islam, one could not help wondering why this label of oppression not be imposed on Islam itself? The unprovoked, savage invasions by the Bedouin Arabs, to subjugate, at the point of swords, the people of Iraq, Persia, Syria, Egypt, Asia Minor, Armenia, Cyprus, Sicily, Crete, Spain, Afriqiya (north Tunisia), India to their fascistic/Arab imperialism (peddled as Islam) demonstrate a naked truth-that it was Islam who had started this oppression.
Therefore, the charge that the Islamic mayhem in the current world is due to what is happening (read oppression) in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and Chechnya are just sham pretensions by the Islamists, the ideological gurus of the Islamist terrorists and the suicide bombers. India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Jordan, Turkey, France, Denmark-have none of their soldiers fighting in Iraq, yet these countries are not immune from the Islamist terrorists’ attack. Did you ever wonder why?-why, not being satisfied with the campaign of unremitting terror in the infidel territories, the Islamist terrorists even have to terrorize the innocent people of these Islamic Paradises. To find the answer to such a perplexing issue please read on.
One fact stands out very clear from the hypocrisy of the Islamists. This fact is: Islam is grossly offended/oppressed by any un-Islamic moves of the infidels/not-so-good Muslims (like the Islamic Paradises I listed above). This is simply because these Islamists audaciously believe that Islam is the only religion in which each and every person on this planet must be subjected to by hook or by crook-using terror, force and slaughter, if need be. They have the Qur’an solidly backing them up. This is the major theme of the Qur’an which is so eloquently supported by the cleric, quoted above.
Here are a few verses from the Holy Qur’an which are in 100% support of the above imam of a mosque in Victoria, Australia: [Readers, pleaseÂ CLICK the following link for the full texts of these verses]:Â http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/reference/reference.html]
The only religion is the religion of Allah, Islam-16:52
Muslims (Islam) are the best of righteous people…3:110
Allah has perfected Islam and it is the only religion for mankind (last verse revealed, and so, the final word of Allah disclosed to Muhammad)…5:3
Islam is the perfect religion; it will dominate all other religions…9:33
Can’t worship anything other than Allah; Islam is the only right religion (the purpose of an Islamic state)…12:40
There is only one God and all should bow to Islam…21:108
Allah proclaims Islam (the religion of truth) over all other religion..48:28
Allah has sent Muhammad to proclaim the ‘Religion of Truth’ (Islam) over all religions…61:9
- What happens to those people who, despite the call to convert to Islam, do not follow suit? In the language of the Qur’an, they are worse than animals, believe it or not. Here is how the Holy Qur’an grades theÂ Kafirs (infidels).
The worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and dumb (unbelievers) who do not understand Islam…8:22
How about using (read sword) on those who refuse to convert to Islam or deviate from Islam?Â After all, the Islamists are foaming: ‘Islam means peace’, ‘there is no compulsion in religion’ ‘killing one person is killing the entire mankind’, and so on. Because of such misleading propaganda by the Islamists and their bogies of western apologists of Islam, one might find it impossible to believe that there could be anything in the Qur’an but ‘peace’, ‘love’ and ‘mercy’ for the infidels. Sadly, to the disappointment of these gullible unbelievers, the Qur’an, in many verses, categorically exhorts the true believers to use force preemptively to convert the unbelievers to Islam. Here is a sample verse:
Allah sent down iron as a material for war and for other benefits; whoever deviates from Islam is to be brought back with iron (i.e. with force, meaning use iron (sword) to force people to Allah’s religion)…57:25
And when all efforts to pursue theÂ Kafirs to convert to Islam have failed, or when the unbelievers resort to rejecting Islam openly, Islam stipulates that they be crucified or maimed. Read this terrible verse from Allah:
Punishment for waging war against Allah (i.e. the unbelievers who reject Islam) and His messenger is execution (beheading) or crucifixion or cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides or exile from the land…5:33
One might still insist that the above verse is applicable only in war situations, when Islam and its founder, Muhammad (or Muslims) are/were attacked in a physical fight. Perish this thought, if you want to learn about ‘real Islam’. The words, ‘waging war’, in the above verse has very little to do with real combat (like Iraq, Afghanistan). Any action, activity, remark, gesture, word/s, sound, utterance, look, manner, habit, conduct, style and so on, which are not in conformity with Islamic percepts are considered as blasphemous or ‘waging war’. Thus, even the slightest criticism of Islam, Muhammad, Qur’an orÂ Sharia, verbally or in writing, might be treated as gross violations of Islamic tenets. These acts are absolutely blasphemous, and are punishable by death (by beheading, the Islamic method of slaughter). The conclusive proof of this dreadful provision is the blasphemy laws enacted by most of the Islamic Paradises. This is the meaning of freedom of thought in Islam-the freedom to mete out capital punishment to those who dare to criticize Islam, in any manner whatsoever. If anyone still has any suspicion of what I just wrote, let him consult the blasphemy law of any Islamic state, which complies one-hundred-percent with the Qur’anic verse I quoted above.
Below, I have listed a few innocuous activities, manners, social customs, traditions and the daily way of life, which theÂ Kafirs blithely take for granted but which are extremely un-Islamic. According to Islamic morals, customs and laws, these offensive activities/practices might be construed as oppressive to Islam and, therefore, they are legitimate targets for eradication, or they must be replaced by Islamic practices or Islamic purification. The very small number of Islamists currently occupying (the Islamists think that Allah has sent them to infidel lands to conquer it) the infidel lands (camouflaged as economic migrants or political asylum seekers or refugees) will fight tooth-and-nail, legally or politically, covertly or overtly to remove such un-Islamic practices from the infidel lands which they have occupied (migrated for Islamic occupation). They would, when possible, lobby the simple and fair-mindedÂ Kafir politicians to enact Islamic laws as a replacement for those infidel customs, traditions and values. In their language, this process of Islamisation by stealth is called ‘elimination of vices and promotion of virtues’-a secret method of imposing Islamic imperialism.
Here is how Islam is oppressed by the unbelievers:
The infidels do not submit to Allah despite repeated warnings to them. This is the highest form rebellion by theÂ Kafirs and an extreme type of oppression to Islam.
The infidel women go to swim in the beaches wearing bikini. Allah is greatly offended by such outrageous conduct of infidel women.
TheÂ Kafir nations condemn Islamic stoning in Islamic Paradises. Islamic penal code is written by Allah, how could the infidels condemn such a divine, merciful penal system? Allah is surely angry with the infidels.
TheÂ Kafirs ‘law court incarcerates Islamic rapists, but, who, according to Islam, has the inalienable right to have unlimited sex with infidel women, no question asked. As per Islam, these infidel women (Islamically, all western women, who do not dress Islamically are harlots, sluts and prostitutes and all infidels are incestuous, believe it or not) are Islamic captives.
To protect its innocent citizens from the Islamist terrorists, theÂ Kafirs pass anti-terror laws, but the Islamists believe it is their basic Islamic right to terrorize the infidels. The anti-terror law is oppression to Islam, as this law violates the Qur’anic injunction of casting terror in the hearts of the unbelievers.
An infidel woman gives birth out-of-wedlock and she is treated fairly by the social security system of theÂ harami (repugnant)Â Kafir. This oppresses Islam, as this woman must be stoned to death, as per Islam. The infidels are not respecting the sanctity of Islam.
An infidel woman goes out of her house withoutÂ hijab. This is oppression to Islam, as this violates the Qur’nic injunction that women must stay at home at all times and serves their husbands. In case she has to be out, she must be ‘covered.’
Violating the Qur’an andÂ Hadis, aÂ Kafir men and women patronize pubs and drink wine and liqueur. Islamic punishment of forty lashes is not meted out for such naked un-Islamic indulgence. To further anger the Muslims, during Ramadan, theÂ Kafirs eatÂ and drink publicly, in open view of the Muslims. This, of course is an unpardonable Islamic offence, as the infidels show no sensitivity/respect for the best religion on earth.
An unmarriedÂ Kafir woman engages in de-facto relationship with a man. This offends the migrant Muslims, but despite much harangue from the Islamist moralists, theÂ Kafirsrefuse to change their law of personal freedom. This (the unbridled mixing of opposite sexes), is certainly a gross oppression to Islamic faith.
The infidel’s local council prohibits the use of loud speakers to broadcast the melodious tune ofÂ Azan (the Islamic prayer call). This is the violation of Islamic right of noise pollution, and, therefore is a tyranny upon Islam.
Harami Kafirs enact law banning hijab in public schools. This angers the Islamists, as this amount to violating the Qur’an, and hence is oppressive to Islam.
The Kafirs refuse to pay jizyah (special privileges to the Arab Bedouins/Muslims). In modern times, this jizya is in the form of special privileges to the Muslims (for example, Bumiputra/Malay/Muslim policy in Malaysia, reservation of places for the Muslims in Kafirs’ Universities, special concession on employment policies, affirmative policies exclusively designed for the incompetent Muslims-and so on). Non-payment of jizya tax is a gross violation of the holy Qur’an and is oppression to Islam.
When, for security reasons, America, the Great Satan, requires, all visitors to the United States to be photographed, fingerprinted and biometrically registered to apprehend the suspected terrorists of peaceful Islam, it offends real Islam.
When the infidels and in-name-only Muslims patronize a theatre to enjoy a stage drama, Islam is offended, as this violates the basic tenets of the Qur’an-no idol worshipping. Ditto for patronizing cinema houses. Acting in a drama/and or watching this performance is grossly un-Islamic. In Bangladesh, bombs are thrown in such premises, as visiting stage drama and enjoying a movie is oppressive to Islam.
When you quote those murderous verses from the Holy Qur’an. Embarrassing Allah /Islamists is a great offence.
When you quote those anti-feminist and misogynistÂ hadis fromÂ Sahih al-Bukhari,Â Sahih Muslim andÂ Sunaan Abu Dawud Allah gets offended.
When you expose that Islam allows unlimited sex with maid-servants (sex-slaves) and infidel women. These provisions are Qur’anic, so they are above any discussion.
When the police embarks on a clean-up operation in an Islamic enclave in aÂ Kafirland. This action violates the incontrovertible rights of the Islamist terrorists to frighten the infidels, an absolute Islamic right enshrined by Allah in the Qur’an.
When theÂ Kafir government disallowsÂ Sharia law to be enforced for the Muslims living in aKafirland. Allah’s law supercedes all man-made laws, how could the infidels annoy Allah?
When, through earthquake and Tsunami, Allah tests His believers in Islamic Paradises and the Kafir’s aid is delayed due to the poor/non-existence of logistical supports in those Islamic Paradises. Infidels must attend immediately to the Muslims’ plight-this is also a form of jizya on the unbelievers.
When you disclose that the prophet of Islam, Muhammad (pbuh), had between nine to twenty official wives and at least one sex-slave. Allah is angry when you discuss Muhammad’s private life-a violation of Islamic privacy.
When the harami freethinkers disclose that the 52-year-old prophet (pbuh) of mercy married a six-year-old girl and had sex with her when she turned nine. See above for the reason.
When the ‘Islam bashers’ reveal that Hazrat Omar (Allah’s mercy be upon him) married a four-year-old baby-girl when he was around 54-55 years old. See above for reason.
When the Islamphobes divulge that Hazrat Ali (Allah’s mercy be upon him) used to have sex with captive women, routinely, even when he was married to Fatima, Muhammad’s dearest daughter. Those who embarrass theÂ Khulafa Rashedin (the rightly guided caliphs) embarrass Allah. Allah will not forgive them
When the infidels learn from the writing of the Muslim apostates that Muslims must not be friendly with the Jews and the Christians and the unbelievers. When the Qur’an has decreed certain matters, it is a great offence to discuss about them.
TheÂ Kafirs inÂ Kafirland, instead of adopting the Islamic values of the myopic Muslim community in their midst, urge the Islamists to respect multiculturalism. This is an affront to Islam. According to Islam, theseÂ Kafirs (read animals) must adopt pristine Islamic values, and not the other way round.
TheÂ Kafirs do not learn Arabic, the language of Allah/Islam, but instead, urge the Islamist immigrants to learn the language of their adopted country and try to integrate. Allah is offended when theÂ Kafirs do not learn the language (Arabic) of His Scripture.
The western/infidel civilization refuses to adopt Bedouin/Arab culture, instead, follows their own decadent, petrified, immoral, corrupt, lascivious way of life. Islam is oppressed when the Muslims, the best creation of Allah have to witness, with their open eyes, such blatant depravity and corruption. After all, Islam came to purify the world but the infidels refuse to comply. This is an oppression to Islam
Peaceful Islam is not allowed to preach hateful sermons by the clerics living in infidel territories. This is a gross of violation Islamic human rights, of freedom to preach hatred for the infidels, since this right has been enshrined in the Qur’an.
Kafirs deport/cancel visa of firebrand clerics who exhort in Friday congregations jihad and murder of the infidels. Read above why Islam is oppressed for such an action of theÂ Kafir.
Billboards near Allah’s house (mosques) inÂ Kafirlands display women’s underwear, bras and lingerie in provocative manner, arousing the sexual passions in the devotees of Allah. This is oppressive to Islam, as Allah does not like to have a look at women’s undergarments and their half-clad body. Allah only looks atÂ hijabi/Burka-clad Muslimahs.
Islamists living inÂ Haram land pass by a fitness centre and observe infidel women (and men) performing physical exercise wearing sportswear. Offended, the Islamists complain to the local council and advise the authority that during physical fitness chore the women must wearÂ Burka andÂ jilbab, their shiny and sexy thighs and polished legs must be covered inside baggy Islamic trousers, otherwise, the doors and windows of the gym must be covered with black ‘hijab.’ The local council turns down the Muslim request. This is oppressive to Islam.
The Islamists inÂ Kfirlands go to the local swimming pool and observe men and women practicing swimming together. This is grossly un-Islamic and is oppressive to the Muslims. They ask the local council to open separate swimming pools exclusively for Muslim women having no access to male visitors. The council turns down their request, which offends the Islamists.
In Olympic events, women are allowed to compete, in the presence of mixed spectators, in gymnastics, track and field, swimming, beach volleyball, high jump (despicable, because of the possibility of viewing the women’s pudenda), long jump, pole vault-etc., Allah is offended with such display of female flesh in such provocative/erotic manner. The Islamists write lengthy articles and lobby their politicians to ban women from participating in such events. In Islamic Paradises they successfully force the government to ban the telecasting of such ‘pornographic’ events of the International Olympic.
The infidels enact laws to prevent polygamy; Muslims could no longer acquire four wives at any time. This is surely, a gross violation of Islamic rights of Muslim men.
Imams preaching the goodness in beating wives to discipline them are deported from infidel lands. This is a great torment to Islam, as it grossly violates the Qur’anic verse which calls to beat women to control them.
During Christmas gala, party, theÂ Kafir invites his Muslim neighbor and unwittingly servesharam food and wine. The display ofÂ haram food and alcoholic drinks to the Muslims is, of course, very offensive. The infidels must not eat and drinkÂ haram stuff in the presence of Muslims-it is very odious, Allah becomes angry.
- If you have time to spend, I am certain you could find many other actions and traditions of the infidels which are grossly offensive to the Muslims, and, therefore, oppressive to Islam. Many of those examples cited above were from my own experience-from real world. So be prepared to witness many such examples in your land as well.
The above list is just a sample example of the extent to which the Islamists are prepared to go to launch their agenda of globalization of Islamic imperialism, which is basically Arab/Bedouin imperialism. Why should we consider Islam as Arab/Bedouin imperialism? Here is the answer.
You see, the ultimate goal of the Islamists is the creation of a Pan Islamic world, which must be ruled by a caliph (the Islamists call it theÂ Khilafat movement) who will be responsible to enforce Islamic laws (Sharia) globally. So, what are the requirements to be a caliph?-you might ask. According to Islamic law, (ref: Reliance of the Traveler, published by Amana Publications, Bettsville, Maryland, 1999, pp.640-642, law number o25.3) the mandatory qualifications of an Islamic caliph are:Â 1. must be a Muslim 2. must be a male 3. must be from the Quraysh tribe of the Arabs 4. must be a freeman (i.e., not a slave) 5. must be of sound mind. This provision of Islamic law means that the world (the Pan Islamic world) must be ruled by an Arab (from the Quraysh stock, probably from Saudi Arabia or Jordan) and no one else. This also means that George Bush, Tony Blair, Jacque Chirac, Vladimir Putin, the Chinese Prime Minister, the Japanese Prime Minister-.the most powerful infidel leaders in the world and the not so powerful infidel leaders must convert to Islam, declare their allegiance to the new Arab/Quraysh caliph and become this Arab caliph’s governors. If they do not comply with such Islamic demand then they must be removed by terror, intimidation and force. Please stop laughing! I hope by this time you clearly comprehend the reason of the Islamists terrorists of what they are doing around the globe. The Islamists are absolutely serious in their goal-the Islamic caliphate, and to assist them there is no shortage of Arab charity money to finance their strategy and operations. This is the reason why the Islamists, the Islamist terrorists, the Jihadists and the Islamist apologists have no shortage of fund-the Arab/oil money is aplenty to finance the establishment of a super Arab (Islamic) kingdom. This is what I mean by Arab Imperialism when I say that ‘Islam is Arab/Bedouin imperialism’.
Terrified, threatened and in panic, the unbelievers might want to know when this Islamic madness might end. I am afraid there is bad news for them. The war against the infidel world is a perpetual war. Islam divides the entire world/humanity into two-the world of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the world of warfare (Dar al-Harb). These two worlds are in permanent confrontation, until Islam replaces the current civilization with its own version, the Islamic Caliphate. This is what Samuel Huntington had ominously postulated in his classic work,Â The Clash of Civilizations. This inevitable clash is now on us, make no mistake on this.
Here are two verses from the Qur’an which clearly divide the civilization into two categories: Islamic and un-Islamic, and the declaration of a perpetual war against the infidels.
Believers fight for Allah, unbelievers fight for evil, so fight against the friends of Satan (this verse literally divides the into two camps-the world of Islam and the world of unbelief or Kufr; i.e., Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb) -4:76
- Those who resist Allah and Muhammad will be humiliated (i.e. Islam, for ever, is at war with the infidels)…58:20
As exemplified from the most authentic source of Islam (Qur’an), Islam, truly is intolerant to any idea/faith which does not endorse it as the only religion for mankind. Once we understand this fascistic and imperialistic nature of Islam, the fight against the Islamist terrorism becomes quite simple and straightforward. It (the Islamic terrorism) is not at all a political one-it is an ideological war-truly, the collision of culture and civilization. But, in contrast to the battle among various civilizations, as hypothesized by Samuel Huntington, this clash is between two worlds-the word of Islam and the world ofÂ Kufr or unbelief. Let the PC politicians pay heed to what the cleric above had said. He is 100% Muslim and 0% politician/hypocrite.
The current world is about to be divided into two camps-the camp of Islam and the camp of infidels, without any third-world between them. Thus, having almost been polarized, a final showdown is gradually shaping up between these two camps. It is just a matter of time when this showdown will result in a massive loss of human lives-both Muslims and non-Muslims, unless correct steps are taken to diffuse this cataclysmic time-bomb. Read the Qur’an and theHadis, to learn who will win this showdown, if the showdown does really take place. You might be greatly surprised, if you were to believe these Islamic scriptures.
“If one amongst the pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah; and then escort him to where he can be secure that is because they are men without knowledge.”Â [Al-Qur’an 9:6]
“Virtue”- Islam demands “virtue” and that “virtuous” behavior will be imposed by a theocracy.
Muslims often claim that Â (the Ottoman Turks) Â have offered refuge to Â Jews during the time of the inquisition, for example. However, the wording of the Koran is self-explanatory: asylum is to be granted to “invite the unbelievers to accept Islam”, that’s all. If they don’t accept Islam, then they are fair game. That’s the reason why there are no more Jews in Turkey or elsewhere where the soldiers of Allah rule. No non-muslim in his right mind would ask Muslims for asylum for obvious reasons…
Winds of Jihad readers, please feel free to add more to this work in progress….
ISLAM is not about ‘good works’ – but about creatingÂ Â political FEAR – example, this link shows howÂ ISLAM treatsÂ the surviving victims of the Dec, 2004 Tsunami
Taqiyya – the ‘sanctified’ deceit, practiced against non-believers – to promote the ‘Cause of Allah’ […the spread of ISLAM]
Pushing_the_boundaries -Â the ISLAMISATION technique, of slow and steady ‘pressure’, a wearing down attrition
Kuffar ‘magic’ TRUTH pill – read my explanation, of who theÂ Kuffar REALLY are.
Jihad – the ‘struggle’, until the whole world submits to ISLAM
Muslim logic explained – explaining to how Jihad against the infidel, is ‘defensive’,Â Â ….when Kuffarresist the muslim prerogative [to bring ISLAMIC rule toKuffar lands].
Un-ISLAMIC ‘muslims’ are not safe from the Jihadists.
‘Why do they hate us?’ …..because ourÂ existence is an ‘insult’ to ISLAM.
Dhimmitude -Â “…Allah has made the infidels spineless.”
‘One Cannot Be a Muslim, and Secular,’ – an ISLAMIST inÂ Turkey declared, in a speech 10 yrs ago! […and he should know, this ISLAMIST is the currentÂ Turkish PM!]
Muslim sedition in the UK – goes unchallenged, unpunished, by UK authorities. Why?
“…..Make no mistake. The British government, the queen, the MPs in this country, they are enemies to you, enemies to Allah and enemies to the Muslims.”
ISLAMIC_’victimhood’ – a tactic, only used where ISLAM’s influence is still weak [otherwise the ‘host’ country gets street protests, riots, and acts ofÂ organisedviolence]
There is very little [factual] reporting by mainstream media [MSM], which is prepared toÂ actually identify the ‘immigrant youths’ responsible for the violence and sedition as muslims.
“I know how these terrorists are inspired” – The account of a UK,Â ex-Jihadi. He talks of the ‘problem’ of ISLAM in the West.Â Â ….Yes, we HAVE got a problem!.
ISLAM is a failed culture – When in power, ISLAM’S violence and lustful hate, sows its own eventual self destruction – like a CANCER destroying a host?
ISLAM, is cultural apartheid at best, it is ABSOLUTE cultural oppression at worst – Majority, political ISLAM, where it is found, is not a culture of co-existence – with ‘others’.
More from troublewithIslam
As for Islam being all about “equality” – what in god’s name can she be talking about? Equality of men and women, when a man can marry four women but a woman only one man? When a man can triple-talaq his way out of any marriage, even apparently being able to fax home his triple-talaq message for it to be valid? When male heirs inherit more than female ones? Where the blood-money payable for a murder is twice as large for a male victim than for a female? When the Qur’an itself gives instructions on how, and how hard, to beat a wife? When the testimony of a woman is worth half that of a man? When, where there is accusation of rape, a woman must have four male witnesses? Where, when a woman is raped, or perhaps even just looked at, her family – in order to protect the honor of the menfolk — it is she who is in danger of being killed by her own father, or brothers, or uncles, or all of them put together? Â More>>
The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into believer and kafir (unbeliever). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not.
Kafir is what the Koran and Islam call the unbelievers. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.
The Koran defines the kafir and says that the kafir is:
Hated- 40:35 They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart. and despised by Allah.
Mocked- 83:34 On that day the faithful will mock the kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the kafirs be paid back for what they did?
Punished- 25:77 Say to the kafirs: My Lord does not care for you or your prayers. You have rejected the truth, so sooner or later, a punishment will come.
Beheaded- 47:4 When you encounter the kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thor-oughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.
Confused- 6:25 Some among them listen to you [Mohammed], but We have cast veils over their [kafirs] hearts and a heaviness to their ears so that they cannot understand our signs [the Koran].
Plotted against- 86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the kafirs and leave them alone for a while.
Terrorized- 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fin-gers!”
Annihilated- 6:45 So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.
Killed- 4:91 If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them.
Crucified- 5:33 The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to com-mit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.
Made war on- 9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.
A Muslim is not the friend of a kafir- 3:28 Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.
A kafir is ignorant- 6:111 Even if We had sent down the angels to them [kafirs], the dead had spoken to them, and We had gathered all things before their eyes, they would not believe unless Allah had willed it, but most of them are ignorant.
Evil- 23:97 And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with You from the suggestions of the evil ones [kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.
Disgraced- 37:18 Tell them, “Yes! And you [kafirs] will be disgraced.” a partner of Satan 25:55 And still they worship others besides Allah who can neither help nor hurt them. The kafir is Satan’s ally against Allah. Unclean- 9:28 Oh, believers, only the kafirs are unclean.
Cursed- 33:60 They [kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and mur-dered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.
Stolen from- Bukhari 5,59,537 On the day of Khaybar, Allah’s Apostle divided the spoils of war of Khaybar with the ratio of two shares for the horse and one share for the foot soldier.
Raped- Ishaq 759 [Mohammed’s official biography] On the occasion of Khaybar, Mohammed put forth new orders about forcing sex with captive women. If the woman was pregnant she was not to be used for sex until after the birth of the child. Nor were any women to be used for sex who were unclean with regard to Muslim laws about menstruation.
Christians and Jews are infidels, but infidels are kafirs, too. Polytheists are Hindus, but they are also kafirs. The terms infidel and polytheist are religious words. Only the word “kafir” shows the common political treatment of Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, animist, atheist and humanist.
The word kafir should be used instead of “unbeliever”, the standard word. Unbeliever is a neutral term. The Koran defines the kafir and kafir is not a neutral word. A kafir is not merely someone who does not agree with Islam, but a kafir is evil, disgusting, the lowest form of life. Kafirs can be tortured, killed, lied to and cheated. So the usual word “unbeliever” does not reflect the political reality of Islam.
“Hi i am not sure that 23:97 refers to Kafirs but to demons or jinns ,i read many translations at two quran browsers and a couple of tafsirs at www.altafsir.com.
Evil- 23:97 And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with You from the suggestions of the evil ones [kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.
Islamic Dictionary: What is Islamization?
Islamization[Islamisation]: The erasure of the customs, norms and laws of any country or region in order to purely reflect Islamic sentiment. This can be done through political pressure â€“ as in the West â€“ where full out Jihad is not possible, such as in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan, where the ultimate goal of Islamization has been achieved by violent Jihad and finally through political pressure for peace â€“ which in Islam can only come under Shari’a rule.
WHAT DOES THE KORAN SAY ABOUT JIHAD?
In Islam’s 3 Holy Books: 97% references to jihad relate to holy war; while only 3% relate to inner struggle
If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.
Lets tackle the ideology first:
In “If You Don’t Get Islamic Ideology, You Don’t Get the Problem in Afghanistan” atÂ The Corner today, Andy McCarthy discusses several things we have pointed out here many times: the policy errors that result from an inadequate, politically correct understanding of Islam and jihad, and the fact that many Muslim condemnations of terrorism condemn attacks by Muslims against Muslims, but say nothing about attacks on non-Muslims:
Adopting the conventional Western wisdom about Islam (which is probably best exemplified by Larry Wright’s otherwise worthy history of al-Qaeda,Â The Looming Tower), General McChrystal and Fred miniaturize what we’re up against. By their lights, our enemy is a fringe element of Muslims who hold the controversial view that Muslims resistant to their severe interpretation of Islam are apostates and can properly be killed under Islamic law. The Islamic term for this view, by the way, istakfir. Fred describes it as an Islamic “heresy” although, as Bernard Lewis has explained, heterodoxy is a Western concept that doesn’t have a precise Islamic analogue. Because the takfiris are engaged in “anti-Islamic” violence, the McChrystal/Kagan thinking goes, we can exploit their “heresy” and win the majority of Afghan Muslims to our side.
This confuses a couple of very important things. First, the point of disagreement between the takfiris and other Muslims is primarily over the propriety of killingMuslims. The fact that there is discord between them over that point does not mean the majority of Muslims will side with us over the takfiris. We are non-Muslims, and whatever differences Muslims in general have with takfiri Muslims, their differences with us are more thorough-going and profound.
Second, the fact that most Muslims see takfiri violenceÂ against Muslims as violative of Islamic principles does not mean that they see takfiri violence (or, indeed, violence by any Muslims) against us as violative of Islamic principles. To the contrary, as I explain in my column, mainstream Islamic ideology (not just takfiri ideology, not by a longshot) holds that infidel military forces operating in Islamic countries must be fought until they are driven out, especially if they are sowing the seeds of Western culture and governance.
The speech doctors:
Complete Lexicon of Political Speech
Numerous AT readers suggested additions to a recently posted partial lexicon of political speech.
We’ll call it “complete” for now, but there are, no doubt, still some oft used terms missing. Contributing AT readers are noted [in brackets].
1. Affordable: A word that, when attached to a proposed piece of federal legislation, signals that anyone with an ounce of economic common sense recognizes the venture as unaffordable.
2. “All economists agree that…”: Introductory language to a false citation proposing the credibility of an economic assertion made by someone who is clueless reference economics. All economists don’t agree on anything.
3. Astroturf : “A dodge to mislead the serfs that actual grass is not real.” [rickhb]
4. Bailout: Most commonly refers to removing water from a sinking boat by use of a pail or similar receptacle, or to exiting an airborne craft via a parachute. Since late 2008, it refers to the federal government bailing money into sinking enterprises so as to redistribute their assets to political friends and supporters. Hence it really means “bail-in,” as in pouring in taxpayer money for political gains.
5. Big tent: A phrase used by liberal media commentators, bloggers and presenters to impose their belief and influence on an opposing ideological demographic/party. It’s intended to populate an opposing party with “moderates” that will (a) make this opposing party ideologically blurry, and therefore weak, (b) make this party pliable and susceptible to Democrat influence, or (c) effect ‘change’.” [Tel…]
6. Bipartisan: A situation when 1-3 “moderate” Republicans vote with Democrats. “It does not apply whenever a significant number of Democrats join with Republicans in a close but losing vote.” [A Citizen]
7. Bitter: “A word used by liberal elitists to describe rural Americans to other liberal elitists.” [Tel…]
8. Blue dog Democrats: “People who will lie down with dogs and accept the fleas if paid enough.” [Mike Brafford] Also, “A person who runs as a fiscal conservative and then votes the party line once elected.” [Zoltan]
9. Bold and swift action: “A phrase used when cumbersome, expensive, poorly formulated and questionable legislation is desired to be rushed, pushed, rammed and imposed on a country without the scrutiny, debate or examination.” [Tel…]
10. Budget neutral: “A never realized accounting gimmick used to hide cost projects in years that fall outside the budget time period and, coupled with immediate tax increases and faux savings, perpetuate a fraud on the taxpayer.” [rickhb]
11. Bush’s fault: A cause deployed to explain all “socio-economic-politico-enviro-religio-militaristic ills.” [SierraBear]
12. Climate Change Bill: Translation: Global Warming Bill. [Russell C]
13. Comprehensive: “The battle cry that signifies an assault on the constitution and liberty, as in comprehensive health care reform, comprehensive immigration reform, etc.” [B’ham]
14. Compromise: It means “arriving at an acceptable solution to a problem by capitulating totally to the liberals’ position and doing exactly what they want done.” [NaperBille]
15. Consensus: “Some agree with me, so therefore [some] represents the sum.” [Vaughan]
16. Conservative talk radio: A term that, when used by liberals, refers to “a small group of dull, uneducated, and misinformed Americans who have used shameful propaganda, false statements, and general sorcery to control the nation’s airways – in addition to the opposition party – and espouse outdated policies like individualism, capitalism, lower taxes and deregulation that have wreaked havoc on this country.” [rickhb]
17. “The debate is over concerning…”: Used by a politician, e.g. Al Gore, to indicate that the debate over some topic, say global warming, really isn’t over but the speaker would like to end. [Tel…]
18. Engage in dialogue: “Talk to our enemies and try to win them over to the exact opposite of their long held positions since we are so wonderful and enlightened and not the go-it-alone, cowboy, war-mongering Bush administration.” [steve_b]
19. Experts: Persons affiliated with liberal think tanks. [djaymick]
20. Fairness : “It means promoting the political preferences of the speaker/writer.” [Miguel Guanipa]
21. Fiscally responsible: “A bribe to buy votes for the short term for Democrats, but that will be paid for in the future by taxpayers using a shell game of cost shifting and hidden taxes/fees that are downplayed with the bill is first proposed.” [steve_b] It really means “fiscally irresponsible.”
22. Government run healthcare: This is referred to variously as “the government option,” “competitive option,” “healthcare reform,” “healthcare co-op,” “health insurance reform”…nearly any combination of words that include government healthcare, system, option, consumer, single payer, and public. [Tel…]
23. Green jobs: It refers to the recently unemployed who have, by virtue of their unemployment, reduced their carbon footprint. Satire from [Whodini].
24. Fairness: It means “fair to me, unfair to you.” [GFox]
25. Free: It means costly. [Rob]
26. Freedom of the Press: “Whatever the Obama administration deems fit for ‘journalists’ to print.” [twoiron]
27. Freedom of Speech: Whatever the Obama administration deems fit for ‘reporters’ to say.” [twoiron]
28. Fees: It refers to “new taxes as opposed to the actual increase that will occur in our present taxes.” [floridaconservative]
29. Folks – Used to refer to “you stupid serf suckers out in flyover country.” [Emily]
30. “…for the American people”: Usually coming at the end of the sentence, it’s a prepositional phrase that signals that the American people are about to get hosed, again.
31. “…for the children”: Used by liberals to justify anything particularly outrageous. Works so well that 99% of the population automatically believe it, even when it is either completely inapplicable or even contrary to the interest of children.” [NaperBille] [A.L.Byers]
32. “…for too long”: Obama’s “favorite three-word phrase to incite class warfare.” [Ilr]
33. Give back to society: It means “give me your money.” [GFox] Very similar to “for the common good.” [GFox]
34. Hope and Change: These are classic comfort words coupled together to enable the hearer to attach their personal fond wishes for the future onto a superior being’s ability to deliver whatever the hearer defines as “hope and change.” The actualization of hope and change lays somewhere over the rainbow, next to the pot of gold, inside the Lost Dutchman’s mine, next to the Holy Grail.
35. Inexplicable: As it was used in President Obama’s comments on Ft. Hood, it means “the truth is simply too frightening for me to handle, acknowledging the truth would, in fact, turn my worldview on its head.” [california patriot]
36. Investment: When applied to government spending, it refers to government expenditures that will multiply the spending party’s power and influence with minimal return-on-investment to the taxpayers.
37. “I found this national debt, doubled, wrapped in a big bow waiting for me as I stepped into the Oval Office.”: When said by President Obama, it meant I have “carte blanche to spend as much money as I want and still blame it on GWB.” [Leman Russ]
38. “I support the troops…”: “Usually followed by an anti-war rant or public smear of the commanders or mission in order to make political gains.” [rickhb]
39. “I won.”: When used by President Obama, it meant “Shut up and do as I say.” [Leman Russ]
40. “I’m busy and Nancy’s busy with our mop cleaning up somebody else’s mess. That’s a socialist mop.”: Translation: “People are starting to figure out I am a socialist so I will attempt to deflect criticism with humor.” [Leman Russ]
41. Islamophobic: “Tending to believe that some parts of the Qur’an actually mean what they say.” [Call me Lennie]
42. Jobless Recovery: This is an oxymoron used to explain why the unemployment rate continues to climb when a “recovery” is allegedly underway. Like touch less sex (e.g., Bill Clinton’s phone sex with Monica), it is existential foolishness that, for credibility, relies on the reasonable notion that unemployment is a lagging indicator of a recovery. But as most often used by politicians today, it’s like saying, “I’m not sick anymore, but I’m still vomiting an awful lot.”
43. Learning moment: “Is when you have screwed things up so badly that even an apology wouldn’t work. But once you call it a ‘learning moment’ the MSM will give you a pass on it and it will never be mentioned it again.” [wbhickok] See Obama’s “stupid police” comment for an example.
44. “Let’s not jump to conclusions.”: It means “I can’t handle the truth.” [Ilr] Similar to “We can’t jump to conclusions” which means “We didn’t connect the dots that we should have connected months ago before something terrible [Ft. Hood] happened, and we don’t want to look ignorant to most of the country.” [Jon W] It can also mean “failing to withhold judgment before the necessary facts are distorted.” [Call me Lennie]
45. Liberal: “Someone who uses the government to restrict liberties in every aspect of American life except abortion.” [JR]
46. Living Constitution: Refers to the murdered Constitution rearranged in effigy. [Sam]
47. Lower costs: When applied to federal government expenditures, it means higher costs.
48. “Now, let me be clear…”: It means “I’m lying.” The truth of what follows is the opposite of what’s said and intends to confuse and fool the listener. [Leman Russ], [Becky], and [JQAdams]
49. “Make no mistake…”: “When used by Obama means you should do the mistake he say you should avoid.” [JQAdams] In other words, believe the opposite to be true.
50. Man-caused disaster: “A phrase used to describe an actual terrorist act but with the desire to not insult the sensibilities of terrorists, or potential terrorists, or officials, and populations [where terrorists hide] in their safe havens.” [Tel…]
51. Middle Class Tax Cut: “A host of fees and regulations hidden in laws we don’t read and so they are not really taxes.” [rickhb] It should be a warning to middle class taxpayers that tax increases are on the way.
52. Misspoke: “Used when an intentional phrase or though is actually questioned and examined and found suspect.” [Tel…] It can also mean, “I got caught in a lie.”
53. Moderate: Politicians with no discernable or consistent political philosophy, although they tend to break Left when not drifting with the wind. Most often used to refer to Republican In Name Only (RINO’s). (See Senators Snowe, Collins, Graham, et al)
54. Moral imperative: “This phrase is used to ferment guilt among Christians and Jews who question government run healthcare system’s cost and effectiveness. It is invoked by professional campaigners when all constitutional means have been exhausted in trying to pass it.” [Tel…] The phrase “47 million Americans are uninsured” is used for the same purpose.
55. Open minded: “When used by liberals it means that the opposition should agree with their position, but the reverse is not true. What liberals refer to as ‘open minded,” conservatives refer to as ‘empty headed’.” [Syrin] Also, it mean as you think like me. [GFox]
56. Options, Choices: As it pertains to the proposed healthcare bills, these often interchangeable words signal a concerted effort to minimize, and eventually eliminate, options and choices.
57. Pay-go: A hyphenated word that purports to be a linguistic promise of a balanced federal budget when it actually means the taxpayers will continue to “pay” through the nose, and if they don’t like it they can “go” fish.
58. Political correctness (PC): “A seven-syllable two-word term which can be better expressed in a one-syllable one-word term: ‘lie.’ Example: All the ‘politically correct’ explanations of the Ft. Hood shooting are nothing but lies to avoid the truth about the Islamic death cult and Islamic jihadism.” [altalena]
59. “Reevaluating the conditions with regard to sending additional troops to Afghanistan…”: It means, “I’m clueless and don’t know what to do.” [Cincinnatius]
60. Republican Strategist/Democrat Strategist: Underemployed partisan 30-somethings who remain on standby to appear on cable TV news shows where they enthusiastically share their vast political wisdom with the ignorant public before returning to their pizza delivery jobs or entry level positions in marketing firms.
61. Save or create jobs: “A phrase used when someone wants to appear to have saved or created jobs that cannot be proven to have been saved or created.” [Tel…]
62. Saved jobs: “A term which makes it easier to claim one’s initiatives have mitigated further calamity when there is no other sign that any measurable progress has been achieved.” [Miguel Guanipa]
63. Share the wealth: It means to confiscate wealth from some in order to give it to others in the expectation that the others will express their gratitude to the party executing the transfer, or wealth sharing, during the next election. It’s somewhat similar to “redistribution of income,” and is a cousin of “fair.” Also, it means “keep the poor people poor and voting for” Democrats. [clarissa]
64. Teabaggers: A negative double intendre used to refer to those who oppose Obama socialism and show that opposition by attending one or more T.E.A. Parties. According to the Urban Dictionary, one meaning of teabagger is of “a man who squats on top of a woman’s face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex.” The term was recently used by former President Clinton when speaking to Senate Democrats. [LDC]
65. Transform: In the current political environment it means to socialize, or collectivize, by placing authority to manage the venture under federal government control. It’s often used interchangeably with “reform.”
66. Transparency: It’s what happens “behind locked doors at 2:00 am Sunday morning.” [Ralph Davis] Also, “whatever the Obama administration deems fit for ‘the people’ to know.” [twoiron] It is “a slight of hand, used in repetition, meant to convince the public that all is open and above board while in fact it is shrouded in secrecy.” [missbosslady]
67. Unemployment rate: This is a virtual number roughly equivalent to half the actual number of people who are unemployed.
68. Unsustainable debt: This refers to the debt level immediately before additional debt is incurred, which becomes post-unsustainable debt, and eventual bankruptcy. (See California and New York.).
69. “We all know…”: “Used most often by liberals to change the center of the field of debate. By using these expressions [including “Everyone agrees…”] they change the debate from ‘Is global warming a problem?’ to ‘What do we do about the problem of global warming?'” [UA]
70. “We must act now to…”: It means we must pass this legislation before “anyone has a chance to read what we about to impose upon them.” [Syrin]
From the Peoples Cube
- Condecession: set-asides or subsidies to groups one feels sorry for.
- Defaulty setting: Something incorrect that’s widely believed because it was the first explanation proposed rather than because there was any actual evidence or proof.
- Dimprovement: A bad, dimwitted improvement that isn’t better, often worse. (Can you say New Coke, Vista operating system or nationalized health care?)
- Feelosophy: positions and policies adopted because they make you feel good or virtuous rather than on any reasoned basis or because they could possibly work.
- Iconoklatch: group of nonconformists who uniformly conform to an “alternative” set of standards.
- Infopinion: The intermingling of news and opinion so that it’s hard to tell which is what. Often called analysis.
- Literateur: Someone who talks about and refers to books they’ve never actually read. Think Wealth of Nations or Das Kapital.
- Malapropitization: Needlessly adding prefixes and suffixes to words to make yourself sound erudite, more scholarlisticalful.
- Nincomproof: A line of thinking both logical yet so unreasonable only an idiot or an intellectual would buy it.
- Oprahtunity: The chance to cash in on fame in one area in another area you really have no qualification for. (Al Gore for instance.)
- Psychophant: A lunatic follower of a lunatic leader. (See Marxist-Leninist)
- Sophistreatment: A “fake but accurate” film treatment. Such as any “documentary” film by Michael Moore, or docudrama by Oliver Stone.
- Shamnesia: a condition where one cannot remember personal details or incidents on the advice of their attorney.
- Spoofemism: Play on words making fun of a euphemism. Like calling a bald guy “tonsorially challenged.”
- Straw-man Poll: a poll where the questions are composed to get only the answer you’re looking for.
- Wishteria: A craze people fall for because they want it to be true. (Also see Obamania.)
- Xenotopia: Something you find unbearable but, strangely, other people desire.
Obamatible: that which is hyped or promoted as wonderful, excellent, fantastic or profound but which is in reality a complete waste of time.
Preachable Momement: pompous blather masquerading as wisdom
Quackification: phony, over-hyped or bogus credentials
Propagandate: an official proclamation which is total baloney
Goracious: an insatiable appetite for manipulated information
Glue Dog: an animal that pretends to be strong and independent but is actually a wimpy lapdog stuck to his master
Compretention: simulated competition, as in two family members running for the same senate seat (also see “public option”)
Negatiate: a negotiation in which one party gives everything away in the very beginning (see “Polish-Czech missile defense”)
Factate: to feed false or irrelevant factoids to gullible supporters for wider dissemination
Changle: a con game where the mark is duped into believing some condition has changed when it hasn’t (see “hopeable”)
Hopeable: susceptible to false or unfounded hopes; idealistically gullible
Bidentify: to locate and recognize a gaffe-prone official idiot
Intaxicate: to become drunk with political power, especially with regard to fiscal authority
Anthropogentrification: the process by which one comes to believe baseless, fraudulent or convaluted theories due to frequent association with self-styled elitists and pseudo-intellectuals
Clodify: to make idiocy into law
CALLING ISLAM “ISLAM”
Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy’s ideology as:
“Islamic Fundamentalism”, “Islamic Extremism”, “Totalitarian Islam”, “Islamofascism”, “Political Islam”, “Militant Islam”, “Bin Ladenism”, “Islamonazism”, “Radical Islam”, “Islamism”, etc….
The enemy calls it “Islam”.
Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as “Radical Nazism”, “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism”. Those who use terms other than “Islam” create the impression that it’s some variant of Islam that’s behind the enemy that we’re facing. A term such as “Militant Islam” is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. Bush told us, “Islam means peace” — after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And now we have Obama, who tells us, from Egypt: “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” Washington’s defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.
Read the whole thing, from the Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Definition of Slander according to Islam
Slander. Intuitively, for such an Islamic concept of war to succeed, one would
expect to see a largescale effort to keep the harbi unaware that such doctrinal-based
strategies exists. For authority on the limits of deception, “extremists” can look first to
the Qur’an and hadith:
Let not the Believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than Believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may guard yourselves from them. For Allah cautions you to remember Himself; for the final goal is to Allah. (Qur’an 3:28)
Anyone who, after accepting Faith in Allah, utters Unbelief â€“ except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith â€“ but such as open their breast to unbelief â€“ on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty. (Qur’an 16:106)
Muhammad said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari 4:267 and 269)
He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good
things, is not a liar. (Bukhari vol.3:857 p.533)
In tandem with the right to deceive harbi is the requirement to enforce nondisclosure
of those rules of Islam as an enforceable offense. Substantially different than
the American, the Islamic concept of slander fills this requirement:
r2.2 Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a person that he would
r2.3 As for talebearing (namima), it consists of quoting someone’s words to another in a way that worsens relations between them.417 (Emphasis added
r2.6 The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
(1) “The talebearer will not enter paradise.”
(2) “Do you know what slander is?” They answered, “Allah and His Messenger know best.” He said, “It is to mention of your brother that which he would dislike.” Someone asked, “What if he is as I say?” And he replied, “If he is as you say, you have slandered him, and if not, you have calumniated him.”
(3) “The Muslim is the brother of the Muslim. He does not betray him, lie to him, or
hang back from coming to his aid.418 (Emphasis added)
r3.1 … In fact, talebearing is not limited to that, but rather consists of revealing anything whose disclosure is resented, whether presented by the person who originally said it, the person to whom it is disclosed, or by a third person. … The reality of talebearing lies in divulging a secret, in revealing something confidential whose disclosure is resented. A person should not speak of anything he notices about people besides that which benefits a Muslim to relate or prevents disobedience.419 (Emphasis added)
From such definitions, it is easy to see how a legally sanctioned code of silence
could be imposed and enforced. This rule helps explains why “moderate” Muslims can
insist that acts of terrorism undertaken by “extremists” (who self-identify as jihadis
claiming Islam as their motivation to crowds of applauding Muslims broadcast as such on
Arab stations) had nothing to do with Islam. But should such explanations control our
understanding of those same events? When looking to the definition of talebearing in
Section r2.6, it is worth observing that the statement of law comes from breaking a hadith
into the elements of the law. The legal standard forbids the disclosure of any sensitive
information to non-Muslims, where sensitive means any information that disadvantages
Islam or a Muslim. Hence the rule of law seems to be that any information that a Muslim
discloses to a non-believer that would cause a non-believer to question either Islam or a
Muslim is forbidden; the penalty being eternal damnation. This means that reliance on
individuals who are held to such a standard involves acceptance of the wholesale
subordination of our collection requirements to the disclosure rules dictated by Islamic
418 al-Misri, Book R “Holding One’s Tongue,” r2.0 “Slander,” r2.6.
419 al-Misri, Book R “Holding One’s Tongue,” r3.0 “Talebearing (Namima),” r3.1.
law. This is submission. It also turns all professional notions of competent analysis on
Levels of Treason
The Gates of Vienna
It is now widely known that the during the paste decade the British Labour Party deliberately imported millions of new immigrants in order to change the social situation in the country and extend its hold on power. A Norwegian reader named Ola Olsen read the recent revelations and was prompted to send us the following essay:
Levels of treason
by Ola Olsen
After reading the Telegraph article about the deliberate plan to import millions of immigrants into Britain for political reasons, I realized that the expression “treason to your country” is too broad to cover all the different cases. After some thinking about it, I came up with a way to classify traitors against his/her country into three different levels:
Level 1: A person who is actively preventing others from saving their country. A typical example in this regard is a newspaper editor who will not print articles written by those trying to alert the people to what is going on.
Level 2: A person who is actively helping the enemy in damaging his/her country. This is the classical traitor who is a spy for the enemy.
Level 3: A person who is actively trying to destroy his/her country’s culture and identity by replacing the original people with another. This would typically be through uncontrolled mass immigration to the extent that the original population becomes a minority, or by the more direct approach of genocide.
Labour politicians responsible for the mass immigration into the UK are Level 3 traitors. It is true that they have not initiated genocide, but the long-term effect of uncontrolled mass immigration from a hostile culture will be the same.
These politicians have put their own people in a terrible situation which may only be “solved” by extreme upheavals and civil war over many years. Their actions would have been less severe had they decided to bring in people from a compatible culture. Instead they elected to import from the most hostile and dangerous culture on the planet: Islam.
The perversion of language.
If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.
Thus, the burqa becomes the freedom sack, freedom becomes oppression, freedom of speech becomes hate-speech, censorship becomes ‘fairness doctrine’ or politically correct, right is wrong, up is down, self-hatred is in, love for country and the constitution out. “New World Order” means UN government under the OIC and submission to Islam.
We are in deep shit.
Here’s more. Please feel free to add to it, its a work in progress:
ValuingÂ the foundingÂ American principle that every individual has a moral right to his or her own life, liberty, and the pursuit of their own personal happiness enables a politician to resist the temptation to use power to control other’s lives.
It is disregarding that founding principle that provides the path to evil – which we could define as the compulsion to controlÂ the lives of others, the willingness to sacrifice the lives and happiness of others in order to achieve your own goals.
And yes, Democrats have a word for this evil.Â Â They call it “compassion.”
They have other words for their moral cannibalism, such as “fairness” and “social justice.”
Pamela has more…..
Conservative in far left lingo doesn’t distinguish between the rabid mad mullah’s of Iran or other fanatical headbangers, in fact ‘conservatives’ are the epitome of evil, which equates American conservatives Â to radical Islamic terrorists:
“Yemen is aÂ conservative Islamic country better known forÂ the underwearÂ bomber,” the release notes. It also quotes Ms. Al-Masani: “I grew up wearing a niqab, watchingÂ Miss UniverseÂ on TV,” she says. “I love breaking stereotypes!” Â Â So Why Did the Devout Muslima Enter the Beauty Contest?
The Fake Fast (thanks to Vlad Tepes)
One of the projects I keep back-burner-ing over the past four years, is an Islamic to infidel dictionary. There are so many terms Muslims have, probably quite deliberately, adjusted the meaning of so that they mean one thing to Muslims and quite another thing to unsuspecting infidels. A malevolent example might be the term, ‘Justice’, which of course to the rest of humanity means a rational and balanced result from an action. One all would have to admit made sense and could be lived with by everybody concerned. The Islamic meaning of justice of course, means that an area is ruled by Muslims in accordance with the sharia.
For a truly unimpeachable demonstration of this, please see the spell binding movie,‘Farewell Israel’Â available on Amazon.com and elsewhere. This film also shows a number of other terms which have been rendered deceptive by traditional or orthodox Islam.
This isn’t to say that all Muslims, for example, use the word ‘marriage’ the way Mohamed did when he slaughtered the Jews of Yathrib and general area, then raped the wife of one man after slaughtering him and her son right in front of her, then, deciding he liked the way she looked, he raped her repeatedly but performed a ceremony first, so that was now ‘Marriage’ as far as Islam was concerned. Millions of Muslims meet a person and marry them with the normal (to us) procedure. I am saying that orthodox Islam claims that Islam’s founder, Mohamed, was a ‘perfect human being and to be emulated in all ways’ and therefore, for truly religious and devout Muslims like Osama Bin Laden, this would be his definition of marriage and also for millions of others. But not all, and certainly very few in Western countries.
But what inspired me to write at least something on this very-important deformation of language is the notion of ‘fasting’. Now Muslims make aÂ great deal about the month of Ramadan and how they have to fast. In fact, actualÂ Western governments have issued instructions to the public and police to be extra polite to potentially cranky Muslims, and police have even been told not to eat to avoid aggravating the already hair-trigger sensitivities of the religious Muslims. But what aggravates me is the use of the word ‘fast’ to mean what any Western person would understand as, ‘skipping lunch’. Frankly, most busy executives fast more in a year than Muslims do without even thinking about it as a ‘fast’ They just don’t have time for lunch.Â Muslims in fact, gain weight during Ramadan. Try explaining that one to Gandhi.Â Continue readingÂ â†’
Guide for the Perplexed
Posted ByÂ Dr. Yasser DasmabebiÂ On October 26, 2011 @ 12:00 am InÂ Daily Mailer,FrontPageÂ |Â 15 Comments
I have come to realize just how difficult it may be to decipher news about the Middle East, Islam, Israel, the Arab World, and all these powerful and explosive issues of our times for those who rely on such media stalwarts asÂ The New YorkÂ Times,Â The Washington Post, theÂ Los AngelesÂ Times,Â the major television networks, cable news, etc. for their information. For example, how is a person to ascertain whether the slayer of a family is a terrorist or a militant or a gunman or an assailant or an activist or a freedom-fighter?
So, purely as a public service, I have organized the following glossary of the most pertinent terms and expressions, as typically used in the above-mentioned news sources. I hope,Â insha’allah, the reader will find it helpful to unravel the Gordian Knot of language that is today’s (and yesterday’s and tomorrow’s) Middle East!
Dr. Yasser Dasmabebi holds the Edward Said-Noam Chomsky Linguistics Chair at Abdul Abulbul Amir University in Cairo.
Aggression: Killing people who are trying to kill you.
Al Qaeda: the terrorist group that, according to American security sources, embodies the world-wide Islamist movement, and that is either “significantly degraded” or is still “extremely dangerous,” depending on which government official is doing the talking.
Apartheid:Â The political/social system of the one and only country in the Middle East that integrates Jews, Beduins, Arabs, whites, blacks, Muslems, Ethiopians, Russians, Christians, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Bahai, et al.
“Apes & Pigs”: See “Jew” below.
Arab Emir: Military dictator.
Arab King: Military dictator.
Arab President: Military dictator.
Arab Prime Minister: Military dictator.
Arab Spring: Replacement of one dictatorship with another, with the help of Western money and media cheerleading.
Arab Street: Enraged mobs chanting and screaming their hatred, determined to annihilate Israel and the Jews. They can often be seen burning American and Israeli flags, passing out candies and firing guns into the air in response to successful murders of Westerners (closely related to):
Arab Humiliation: The pervasive feeling on the Arab street generated by their failure to annihilate Israel and the Jews in several wars. Many opinion-makers, Middle East experts and op-ed writers argue that Arab humiliation is at the root of the Middle East conflict; i.e., “If only the Jews would let themselves be destroyed, the Arab street would feel better about themselves, and then there would be peace.”
Ayatola: Persian dictator. Spiritual leader of that faith that desires to ignite nuclear holocaust in order to bring about the arrival of the Mahdi. (See “Mahdi” below.)
Bias: An expression of support for the existence of Israel.
Caliphate: The unification of lands ruled in the name of Islam, ruled by a Caliph. (See “Arab King,” “Arab President,” etc. above.)
Compromise: To give something palpable, such as land, in return for a promise not to keep on trying to annihilate you.
Developing Country: A country that is not developing.
Disproportionate Response: Winning.
Diversity: The condition in which all cultures are viewed as equally and inherently virtuous, except for the culture of the West, which is viewed as evil by virtue of imperialism, colonialism and endemic racism (see “Racist” below).
Emergency Laws: The law.
Father of the Palestinian People: An Egyptian man, raised by his uncle, Hitler’s buddy, and one of the world’s most successful kleptocrats. (See “PLO” below.)
Fatwa: A pronouncement of a mullah that sanctions murder, but only of disagreeable people, like inadequately covered women, Salman Rushdie, etc.
Female Genital Mutilation: That ritual of which Western feminist organizations seem, by virtue of their silence, to approve.
Hamas: The democratically elected government of Gaza whose founding charter calls for genocide.
Hezbollah:Â The democratic group whose purpose is saving Lebanon from Israeli aggression, and whose founding charter calls for genocide.
History: Having nothing whatsoever to do with what has actually happened, but rather being what has come to be called “narrative,” i.e., “storytelling.” For one example, allusions to the “Ancient Nation of Palestine;” and for another, almost all the Muslem accomplishments President Obama enumerated in his momentous Cairo speech (also see “Rewriting History” below).
Holocaust: That genocide that did not happen, but that the Jews orchestrated in order to steal Arab land, and that of which the Jewish presence in Palestine is worse than.
Honor Killings: The cultural imperative to murder one’s daughter/sister/niece for humiliating male members…(see “Shariah” below).
Human Rights: The credo by which murder committed by a person from a country which used to be called “Third World” (now considered racist terminology) is good (see “Resistance” below); retaliatory killing by a person who is either from a developed country, a white person or most especially a Jew, is bad (see “Agression” above).
Human Shields: Integral part of Hamas & Hezbollah military strategy.
Islamic Republic: Military dictatorship.
Israel: Occupied territory (see “Zionist Entity” below).
Israeli Prime Minister: Hawkish, right-winger, hard-liner.
Jerusalem:Â City holy to Islam in which the Jews have no history.
Jew: The source of all decadence and evil in the world; descendent of apes and pigs.
Jihad: The inner spiritual struggle for self-purification or the bloody military struggle for world domination depending on to which journalist and in what language one is speaking.
Judeo-Christian Values: The credo of that civilization which has lost all its values, except for that racism is bad, and diversity is good.
Koran: The book that was revealed word-for-word to the Prophet Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him) by the Angel Gabriel…or not.
Leftist: Supporter of PLO (see “PLO” below) and Hamas (see “Hamas” above) and Muslem Brotherhood (see “Muslem Brotherhood” below).
Mahdi: The Shia Messiah who has been hiding for centuries at the bottom of a well.
Martyr: Someone who kills someone else while killing himself, said to be rewarded for his martyrdom by the acquisition of 72 virgins upon his arrival in Paradise, at least according to what the ProphetÂ Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him) said the Angel Gabriel told him (see “Koran” above).
Militant, Assailant, Gunman, Activist: terrorist.
Moderate Palestinian Leader: Former KGB operative, Holocaust denier, and financier of Munich Olympic massacre.
Mosque: A place for the storage of armaments.
Muslem Brotherhood: A mostly secular and non-violent political party in Egypt.
Occupation: Jewish presence in disputed territory. (See “Israel” above.)
Peace: War of attrition.
Peace Process: The dismantling of Israel.
Peace Talks: The avoidance of peace.
PLO: Organization created in 1964 to end the 1967 occupation.
Palestinian Authority: The world’s most successful kleptocracy.
Palestinian Hero: Murderer of children.
Palestinian Prime Minister: Moderate, bold (see “Arab Prime Minister” above).
Protocols of the Elders of Zion: The authentic Jewish playbook for world domination.
Racist: A person who disagrees with or does not like or does not support the reelection of President Obama.
Radical Islamic Movement: A group whose stated official goal is genocide (see “Hamas” and “Hezbollah” above).
Recognition: A truce until the next time.
Refugee: Someone who has refused to take refuge, or who has not been allowed to take refuge.
“Religion of Peace”: That civilization with which the Judeo-Christian civilization is locked in a war to the death.
Resistance: Randomly killing civilians, especially children.
Rewriting History: See “History” above.
Right: Demand to live in Israel by people who hate it and wish to destroy it.
of Return: By people very, very few of whom have ever actually been there.
Settlement: An illegal community made up of settlers. (See “Settler” below.)
Settler:Â Someone who builds his house in order to thwart any chance at making peace between Jews and Palestinians.
Shariah: The Islamic system of jurisprudence which codifies and dignifies rape, child marriage, specific classes of murder such as honor killings (see “Honor Killings” above), etc.
Shia: People who are certain that Sunnis are not real Muslems, and are in fact infidels, and should therefore be slaughtered.
Sunni: People who are certain that Shia are not real Muslems, and are in fact infidels, and should therefore be slaughtered.
War Crime: Retaliation and defense. Any action whose intent is victory.
War on Terror: Pretense that the enemy of the West is made up of small, shadowy groups motivated by childhood poverty (see “Al Qaeda” above). (“We’re depraved on account of we’re deprived” â€” apologies to S. Sondheim.)
Zionism: The ideology of the Jews who aspire to control, dominate and take over the world.
Zionist: Someone who is worse than a Nazi.
Zionist Entity: That place that does not exist, as on Arab maps, but that must be destroyed.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle. ClickÂ here.