Wearing the burqa is neither Islamic nor socially acceptable

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: To deny face-to-face interaction is to deny our shared humanity


I am a Shia Muslim and I abhor the burqa. I am offended by the unchallenged presumption that women covering their heads and bodies and now faces are more pious and true than am I.

Another Westernized Muslimah who speaks against the burka? We just featured  Mona Eltahawy from New York, so that makes a whopping two. Very well, since the witness of two women (kind of) equals that of one man, lets hear it from Yasmin:

Islam in all its diverse forms entitles believers to a personal relationship with Allah – it cuts out middlemen, one reason its appeal extended to so many across the world. You can seek advice from learned scholars and imams, but they cannot come between your faith and the light of God. Today control freaks who claim they have a special line to the Almighty have turned our world dark. Neo-conservative Islamic codes spread like swine flu, an infection few seem able to resist.

The disease is progressive. It started 20 years ago with the hijab, donned then as a defiant symbol of identity, now a conscript’s uniform. Then came the jilbab, the cloak, fought over in courts when schoolgirls were manipulated into claiming it as an essential Islamic garment. If so, hell awaits the female leaders of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Soon, children as young as four were kitted up in cloaks and headscarves (“so they get used to it, and then later wear the full thing,” said a teacher to me who works at a Muslim girls’ school) and now for the graduation gown, a full burqa, preferably with dark glasses.

White liberals frame this sinister development in terms of free choice and tolerance. Some write letters to this paper: What is the problem? It is all part of the rich diversity of our nation. They can rise to this challenge, show they are superhuman when it comes to liberty and forbearance.

They might not be quite so sanguine if their own daughters decided to be fully veiled or their sons became fanatic Islamicists and imposed purdah in the family. Such converts are springing up in Muslim families all over the land. Veils predate Islam and were never an injunction (modesty of attire for men and women is). Cultural protectionism has long been extended to those who came from old colonies, in part to atone for imperial hauteur. Redress was necessary then, not now.

What about legitimate fears that to criticise vulnerable ethnic and racial groups validates the racism they face? Racism is an evil but should never be used as an alibi to acquit oppressions within black and Asian or religious communities. That cry was used to deter us from exposing forced marriages and dowry deaths and black-upon-black violence.

Right-wing think tanks and President Sarkozy of France scapegoat Muslims for political gain and British fascists have turned self-inflicted “ethnic” wounds into scarlet propaganda. They do what they always have done. Self-censorship will not stop them but it does stop us from dealing with home-grown problems or articulating objections to reactionary life choices like the burqa. Muslim women who show their hair are becoming an endangered species. We must fight back. Our covered-up sisters do not understand history, politics, struggles, their faith or equality. As Rahila Gupta, campaigner against domestic violence, writes: “This is a cloth that comes soaked in blood. We cannot debate the burqa or the hijab without reference to women in Iran, Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia where the wearing of it are heavily policed and any slippages are met with violence.” What happened to solidarity?

Violent enforcement is evident in Britain too. A fully veiled young chemistry graduate once came to my home, her body covered in cuts, tears, bites, bruises, all happily hidden from view. Security and social cohesion are all threatened by this trend – which is growing exponentially.

As for the pathetic excuse that covering up protects women from male lasciviousness – it hasn’t stopped rapists in the most conservative Muslim nations. And what a slur on decent Muslim men, portrayed as sexual predators who cannot look upon a woman without wanting her.

We communicate with each other with our faces. To deny that interaction is to deny our shared humanity. Unreasonable community or nationalistic expectations disconnect essential bonds. Governments should not accommodate such demands. Naturists can’t parade on the streets, go to school or take up jobs unless they cover their nakedness. Why should burqaed women get special consideration?

Their veils are walls, keeping them in and us out. We need an urgent, open conversation on this issue – which divides the Muslim intelligensia as much as the nation. Our social environment, fragile and precious, matters more than choice and custom should to British Muslims. If we don’t compromise for the greater good, the future looks only more bitter and bleak. Saying so doesn’t make me the enemy of my people.


More from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown

7 thoughts on “Wearing the burqa is neither Islamic nor socially acceptable”

  1. Yasmin Alibhai-Brown a while back wrote an article claiming that all white men were racist. I can’t find the article now, but at one point wrote something truely worrying. She said “I don’t like white men, I want them to become the lost species”. How can she have any sort of credibility as an anti-racist campaigner, when she openly expresses views that would support the genocide of 20-25 million British men, and many millions more of European and Americans?

    The left and muslims make great stable-mates, they both have this worrying knack of throwing around accusations as loudly and forcibly as they can, while actually engaging in those same activities they accuse others of!!

  2. This is a very confused article, in many ways.

    She opposes the Burqa etc but then castigates Sarkozy and others (BNP) who also oppose it. Just what are they supposed to do? Would she not support the President of France in his efforts to ban this covering? Is she too proud to say that in this tiny little area the BNP got it right? Does not sound like it. All these people and perhaps the others are labelled ‘right wing’ like some contagion. Then later she demands that the government do something about this issue.

    Also: ‘Saying so doesn’t make me the enemy of my people.’ This is a brave statement but unfortunately she does not decide which Muslim men consider her their enemy.

  3. I read the link about alibi -blown . Now I’m mad .
    What a monumental cheek .
    I could say a lot more but I have to go to work – and do something useful – better than shooting off about racism all the time anyway .

  4. She is. On the show “London Tonight”, effectively a news review by left wing journalists, she bemoaned the fact that muslims did not represresent the UK as ambassadors to Arab countries. Her argument had little to do with qualification

Comments are closed.