America's Muslim POTUS crows about 'Islamic Values' of Progress and Tolerance in Ramadan message…

Islam in Action:

Update from Pamela:

“They really think he is one of them. They think he is a Muslim. I was shocked.”

President Obama has continued with his effort to whitewash Islam, as he has made a video “on behalf of the American people” to send best wishes to the Muslim world for the Islamic holiday of Ramadan.

In the message posted on the White House Web site, Obama says the rituals of Ramadan are a reminder of the principles Muslims and Christians have in common. He says those principles include advancing justice, progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

Obama Joker three

This MoFo is more embarrassment and more bad news every day.

Obama did you miss this verse from the Koran?

Koran Verse 009.029

YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.

SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

Did you not notice that non-Muslims are persecuted across the Islamic world? Obama please stop with the obvious lies, you are only making a fool of yourself.

10 thoughts on “America's Muslim POTUS crows about 'Islamic Values' of Progress and Tolerance in Ramadan message…”

  1. This is what the Obamanation really is. I have asked countless Obamabot on many Blogs to answer 1) WHY is he HIDING all this information and how they could be so stupid to vote for someone about whom thay know so little. Needless to say I get only sarcastic stupid replies one moron even stated ‘Obama is the most open President we have ever had and we know more about him than any other President’ It is easy to see how he got elected if that moron is representative of so many STUPID Americans who voted emotionally and gullibly for the Obamanation.
    Just think of the Obamanations life as if his CLOSE PERSONAL associations with criminals , terrorists and communists and American hating Pastors were not enough. There is no public evidence, no actual documentation, of an Obama birth — none — nada — zero — zilch! It’s the Immaculate Deception.
    There is evidence a birth was reported — from data that could have been created any time after the birth — but that evidence has been discredited as counterfeit by at least three qualified examiners.
    There’s no evidence of a marriage between Stanley Anne Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. — no “marriage announcement” — no blood tests — no marriage license — no photographs — no minister, judge or guru — no witnesses or guests — no cake — no limo — no one caught the garter or the bouquet — there wasn’t a bridal shower.
    The first and only known reference to a marriage appears in Anna’s 1964 divorce filing, a sworn court document that contains demonstrably false statements. There’s no evidence that Obama Sr. was ever served with a copy — Senior was in Africa. Whatever facts Ann Dunham provided to her attorney were her version of the facts of the relationship. Funny thing, one the best documented parts of Anna’s life are her divorces.
    There’s no evidence that Anna and Obama Sr. ever lived together except a questionable “birth announcement” and there’s no evidence that Barack Obama Sr. is the father of Obama.
    I find the 1972 visit interesting. A lot of things were coming together in 1972. Anna brought “Barry” to Hawaii from Jakarta — somebody got Barry lined up to attend the prestigious Punahou School — Senior was sliding out of favor with his superiors in the Kenyan government — and out of the blue — another coincidence — Senior shows up in Hawaii — “on family business” — the only time the two Obamas laid eyes on each other. What brought Senior to Hawaii — in and out — “on family business.” Was a deal made?
    No state, county, city or town has declared itself the birthplace of Obama.
    No hospital claims Obama was born in its facility or on its grounds — no doctor claims to be the person who brought the Obamamessiah into the world — no midwife, nurse or nurse’s aid has ever claimed they were present at the blessed event — there’s no delivery room imprint of baby Barack’s footprint.
    There’s no original “Certificate of Birth” — none — nada — zero — zilch — and nobody has ever said they saw one — no one has ever said, “I have seen Barack Obama’s original birth certificate.” — no one, except Obama, himself.
    On page 26 of “Dreams…,” Obama writes, “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school….”
    Now there’s no birth certificate or old vaccination forms — there’s no scrapbook either — there’s nothing. Remember Obama’s raid on grandmother Madelyn’s typical white apartment, the evening of her death — Obama made sure his life was clean — whatever mementoes and records were in the 86 year-old’s apartment accompanied Madelyn to the other side — their ashes are also in the Pacific — the only real things in his life are in the Pacific — and Michelle was video’d jumping onto Obama in an expression of delight — odd behavior at a burial — why’d she do that?
    Do you know what we do have? We got Obama’s word that he’s on the level.
    There are no physical paper documents related to Obama during the first five years of his life in the public domain — and, there isn’t a single piece of paper that documents the relationship of Stanley Ann and Senior in the year proceeding his life. There is nothing.
    What Obama offers up is an alleged “autobiography” that is so full of lies, misrepresentations and mischaracterizations that it is correctly described as mythology.
    People have been know to puff up a resume or two, but few have ever made up a complete life history — and that’s exactly what “Dreams…” is — it’s a myth — Obama’s idealized version of his life — but it’s all made up — like Obama, it isn’t real — but it was first — now, it’s what most people know about him. It’s Obama’s version of the facts — demonstrably so — but he wants us to know that he’s on the level.
    Obots say they have documentation — they have Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth (COLB),” which they always describe as a “birth certificate,” and the magic birth announcements — both “discovered” in the summer of 2008. Somebody in the campaign obviously decided that Obama could be nominated and they better come up some documentation — somebody might ask if the guy was eligible.
    Obama’s “birth certificate” (COLB) appeared on June 12, 2008 on the DailyKos website without any reference as to who released it. There is no provenance explaining where the “birth certificate” (COLB), with the certificate number blacked out, came from. In Hawaii, birth certificates aren’t publicly available and reporters’ requests for one have been ignored for months. There is no explanation as to which official vouches for its origins or its authenticity.
    Hawaii’s Hawaii State Registrar, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, was asked if Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii Department of Health, had confirmed that his office produced a 2007 COLB, date-stamped June 6, 2007, with Obama’s birth information on it. His response was, “Absolutely not. No one in our office confirmed it.”
    At least one judge has used the Internet COLB to dismiss a challenge to Obama’s eligibility.
    And the birth announcements that appear out of the ether on July 22, 2008, raise more questions than they answer. The “birth announcement” is on microfilm/fiche from the Honolulu public library. The microfilm shows a notice placed in the Sunday Advertiser, and dated August 13, 1961. The announcement in the “Births, Marriages, Death” section reads: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4.”
    The problem is, Orland Scott Lefforge owned and occupied the house at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway. The “Obamas” didn’t live there. Mrs. Lefforge just happened to die 10 days prior to the appearance of the birth announcement that listed her address, so we can’t ask her. But we do know that the next door neighbor told investigators that, “his mama, and his papa never lived there.”
    Beatrice Arakaki affirmed she was a neighbor of the address listed. She has lived at her current residence of 6075 Kalanianaole Highway from before 1961 to the present. Mrs. Arakaki told investigators that “his ‘mama,’ and his ‘papa’ never lived there.” Arakaki told investigators that she had no recollection of Obama being born or of the family living next door having a black child born to a white mother.
    Not a shred of evidence links the Dunhams or Obamas to Kalanianaole Highway. Kalanianaole only surfaced in connection with the Obamas in July 2008. I don’t think you’ll be seeing a commemorative plaque on the old homestead anytime soon.
    There is no evidence of Anna’s whereabouts in July 1961. If we knew where she actually was in July 1961, we would have half the puzzle solved. But we don’t.
    We know that Anna lived apart from Senior — he in Hawaii — she in Seattle. Senior never spent one day under the same roof as his namesake. Anna returned to Hawaii after Senior returned to Africa to complete her degree, and begin Obama’s education. She enrolled Obama in the Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten.
    Now, get this — Obama’s kindergarten records went missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education. Millions of kids go through Hawaii’s kindergartens. Damned bad luck! Obama’s kindergarten records have been “lost.” Just another strange coincidence in a series of coincidences.
    This loss is important, because Kindergarten records for original school entry would have contained Obama’s REAL Certificate of Birth and an application with the following:
    • His Legal name
• Parents or Legal Guardians’ names
• Date of Birth
• Place of Birth
• Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB)
    And although Obama has had a first-class education, that spanned 25 years, there is only a single document that has ever been released — an application for admission to the Fransiscus Assisi Primary School in Jakarta, Indonesia — the document was discovered by independent investigators.
    The Obots attacked that authentic document, because it identifies Obama as a Muslim and a citizen of Indonesia. It’s really something! They love all his phony documentation, but attack the one actual piece of paper that has been released to the public — and, there’ll be nothing else coming from Indonesia.
    Our guy in Jakarta reports that on the 3rd of July 2007, U.S. Congressman Eni Faleomavaega touched down in Jakarta, Indonesia on one of those wonderful, taxpayer-paid junkets. According to his Indonesian sources, the “officials” who accompanied Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America’s “national archives” and they were offering cash, lots of it. In a show of faith, Barack Obama’s childhood school would be one of the very first beneficiaries of this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and for the purchase of computer equipment, thanks in part to the benevolence of this visiting junket.
    There followed a lifetime of “missing” documentation — but it must a coincidence — it has to be a coincidence — just keep telling yourself, “it’s a coincidence.”
    Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
    
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released

    Soetoro adoption records — Not released

    Punahou School records — Not released

    Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)

    Selective Service Registration — Released — Probable counterfeit

    Occidental College records — Not released and vigorously defended

    Passport records — Not released and official government passport files scrubbed clean by John O. Brennan — now Obama’s terrorism and intelligence czar

    Just a coincidence?

    Columbia College records — Not released

    Columbia thesis — “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament” — Not released
    
Harvard College records — Not released
    
Harvard Law Review articles — None

    Illinois Bar Records — Not released
    
Baptism certificate — None

    Medical records — Not released (unless you count a one-pager from his personal physician saying Obama’s healthy)

    Just a coincidence?

    Law practice client list — Not released
    
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

    Annenberg Challenge Board Minutes — None

    Illinois State Senate records — None
    
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost

    Almost 50 years old and there’s no paper trail — coincidence, Would you hire someone with this curriculum vitae? The man is completely undocumented. You don’t know anything about Obama — operative word, KNOW. None of us really do because he and his life are undocumented — an impossible coincidence — and Obama fiercely defends the release of what documentation is available.
    Some of us believe that something isn’t on the level and that we are entitled as United States citizens to ask any damned politician who he is, what his politics are, what his agenda is, where he came from and who sent him.
    You do know Obama could end all of this with a single phone call — why doesn’t he press the button?

    //www.theobamafile.com

  2. The items says:

    “Obama did you miss this verse from the Koran?”
    Koran Verse 009.029″

    Obviously he did not, nobody does, but then they understand wht it is saying and in what context.

    It only takes agenda based glib artists with their hands more commonly in their shorts to continuously play the game of above.

    1. Debating Muhammedan Taqiyya Doctors

      Infuriating, is it not, to attempt to have a rational debate and to find yourself instead with an opponent who slithers about like an eel, and with whom you can never quite engage, because you can never quite grasp and hold him long enough, because he is forever slipping and sliding and meanwhile keeping of a non-stop patter of distraction and attack and omission and exaggeration. The very idea of a debate is or should be related to the idea that each party attempts, in good faith, to examine a topic together, and to ask, or answer, questions of or from the other.

      In this case the topic was Islam, what it inculcates, and what such inculcation may reasonably be said to do to the minds of Believers, and how the observable behavior of Muslims in their attacks on Infidels, and attempts to undo the legal and political institutions of Infidel lands so as to ensure that “Islam dominates and is not to be dominated” everywhere, can be attributed to what Muslims learn in Qur’an, Hadith, Sira.

      But Solkhar and those like him are never going to discuss such matters. Personal invective (counting on the ignorance of listeners) is the first weapon. Tu-Quoque attacks a second. Taqiyya, outright lying about the nature of Islam, and the beliefs of Muslims, is a third. And in such circumstances the good-faith debater seeking an intelligent debate discovers, not for the first time, that in such cases it is an ignis fatuus, with emphasis on the fatuity, that is to say, a will-o’-the-wisp that no matter how close one thinks one may be getting to it, in the end simply disapears, or flickers further off in the miasma of the Muslim apologist’s non-stop rhetoric.

      Unless the moderator-hosts for such things set up strict rules, and demand that questions be answered and not remain un-answered or answered with irrelevancies, the farce will continue. And all that will have been learned is something about the eerily eel-like quality of the other side, with all that slipping and slithering –perhaps not quite as effectively as Tariq Ramadan — as far away from the real and serious matter at hand, as is possible.

  3. It is in fact the blog-owner who is the slitherer-general and I have never avoided any topic. The greatest example is how I have never attacked nor do I use the common western-agenda word “infidel”.

    The use of the escape clause by agenda-based blog-owners ‘taqqiya’ is the greatest one. Show us then blog-owner were I have lied about “the nature of Islam, and the beliefs of Muslims”, it is infact yourself who has made all the accussations when either shown or questioned you have simply – changed the subject or threatened to ban me.

    In fact the lack of good-faith in debating is all yours, I have been ready to debate any issue, and of course point out untruths, errors and your very bad history.

    Serious debate is in fact impossible on this blog, as the owner is there to sell his agenda, not actually provide facts, information nor debate.

    If the blog-owner had in fact kept logical and stuck to honest comments, I would have been the first one to support and join in and condemn the acts of radicals, extremists, corruption and the thousands of fools that happen to be Muslim. I would be the first to shake the hand of my former Erasmus University establishment for dropping Tariq Ramadan along with my home-town, as this particular person is an egocentric and self-gratifying snob whom thinks he is better than others. I apposed his appointment in the first place by letter to the Rotterdam Town Hall.

    No the slippery one is yourself, quick to make a comment and then as quick as possible hiding and avoiding any logical debate, mostly by hiding under anothe barrage of indefensible allegations. The greatest tool of course is to flood the pages with individual examples of things done wrong by Muslims as if this is an example of the greater whole, of which most are quotes from others.

    Continue squirming blog-owner, you have an important acknowledgement to make when you answer the question that your repuation stands on – so in what recognised institution and the Five Schools of Islam have supported, proscribed and/or declared a Jihad?

    We all know the answer is none, except you of course.

    1. Solkhar, for you there is only one thing left to do, which is to answer the questions. If you don’t answer, then there is no point in you leaving your droppings here. It appears that you strongly believe your Koran, which means you are in complete agreement with the suras that call the kuffar ‘blind, deaf, ignorant, vile’ etc.

      “It is in fact the blog-owner who is the slitherer-general and I have never avoided any topic. The greatest example is how I have never attacked nor do I use the common western-agenda word “infidel”.”

      All irrelevant drivel. People who post here know who and what you are, Solkhar.

      Unimpressed. If you don’t use “infidel” then what do you use? Kuffar, mushrikeen, harbi or what? Google “things najis” Solkhar, and you’ll find the Mohammedan love for the kafir among feces, urine, cadavers and worse.

      To our readers:

      Most Muslim apologists assume that (their ideal of) Islam is perfect and the Koran is perfect, therefore any alleged problems with the Koran or (ideal) Islam must be purely in the mind of the critic. Thus, the critic is to blame. This appears to be how Muhammad understood the non-Muslims’ rejection of his message and system: They were either (1) ignorant, deaf, dumb, blind, etc.; (2) malicious/evil, liars, etc.; or (3) ill, perverse, etc.

      1. “ignorant”

      –foolish (6:35); deaf, dumb, and blind, and have no sense (2:171); deaf and dumb and in darkness, Allah sends them astray (6:39); have no sense (5:103, 10:100); a folk who do not understand (9:127); their fathers were unintelligent and had no knowledge or guidance (2:170, 5:104); are “a folk without intelligence”/ “most ignorant” (8:65, 6:111); losers who are deceived by Allah (2:6), and deceived by Satan (4:60).

      2. “bad/evil, liars, etc.”

      –“evil” is upon them (16:27), evil (2:91, 2:99); “wicked” (80:42, 9:125); the “wrong-doers” (42:45, 2:254, 5:45); evil-doers (42:44); evil-livers (5:59); they have no good in them (8:23); are “guilty” for disbelieving (45:31, 83:29); on the side of Satan and are fighting for him (4:76-77); of the party of Satan (58:19); Allah assigns them devils for protecting friends (7:27); they choose devils for protecting friends (7:30); are partisan against Allah (25:55); “enemy” (63:4); ungrateful traitors (31:32).

      –liars/they lie (2:10, 4:50, 6:28, 9:42, 16:39, 16:105, 59:11); foolish and liars (7:66), liars and losers (58:18-19),

      3. “sick, perverted, etc.”

      —“perverted” (63:4); disgraced lives (22:9); are ill (84:20); have a “diseased heart” (2:10, 9:125); in false pride and schism (38:2), in schism (2:137, 2:167).

      There couldn’t possibly be anything wrong with (ideal) Islam or the Koran, oh no. Beats me how Solkhar understands his Koran without the hadith. Nothing makes sense.

      The most important thing in Mohammedanism is this:

      “The chief weapon in the quiver of all Islamist expansionist movements, is the absolute necessity to keep victims largely unaware of the actual theology plotting their demise. To complete this deception, a large body of ‘moderates’ continue to spew such ridiculous claims as “Islam means Peace” thereby keeping non-Muslims from actually reading the Qur’an, the Sira, the Hadith, or actually looking into the past 1400 years of history. Islamists also deny or dismiss the concept of ‘abrogation’, which is the universal intra-Islamic method of replacing slightly more tolerable aspects of the religion in favor of more violent demands for Muslims to slay and subdue infidels”

      That’s what matters to the solkhars of this world, because WAR IS DECEIT!

  4. Solkar
    Why attack the blog owner? Of course any blog owner has an agenda…why make having an agenda sound like a crime?
    You do sometimes make some reasoned statements. Why don’t you just stick to doing this rather than getting personal with the blog owner? Getting personal always detracts from what a person is trying to say. The message becomes lost and almost completely overridden by the personal comments.

  5. No-one’s reputation stands on whether five schools of islam … declared
    a jihad (or not).

    Horse, dead, flog.

  6. Solkhar,
    For the last time – your mode of dealing with questions is typical of the procedures followed in the circles where you once worked – these standards (or lack thereof) do not apply in this forum. Provide proof to support your assertions and direct your vitriol to the muslims who are causing the problems. You also have a problem in understanding what is passing in your community. Let us use your quotation as an example:

    “No the slippery one is yourself, quick to make a comment and then as quick as possible hiding and avoiding any logical debate, mostly by hiding under anothe barrage of indefensible allegations. The greatest tool of course is to flood the pages with individual examples of things done wrong by Muslims as if this is an example of the greater whole, of which most are quotes from others.”

    Now, firstly the spelling indicates that this was written quickly and was not checked – not a good frame of mind within which one can argue. Most of the allegations here are taken from the media, and it is reasonably safe to assume that most of the allegations are verifiable. In fact I do go to the problem of cross-referencing AAP sources and as of yet I have not found evidence of a false allegation against muslims, although many allegation by muslims against non-muslims are deeply questionable. Then we come to differences in personnel option – these should remain precisely that – but given that there is no central authority in Islam then this issue does become relevant. Here there is no option but logical debate and respect for other points of view. The central questions related to discussions of this nature are usually open, implying the existence of more than one plausible solution which necessitates a search for an optimal solution. Now, there are so many atrocities being committed by muslims on the basis of their religion that to state this is not an indication of a disease in the whole, a problem in islam,
    is to argue in the face of what seems to be a clear truth. It seems that there is a problem, and until people like you are willing to talk openly about it the situation will not improve but will deteriorate – and the moderate muslim majority who are not chained to a primitive arab male’s interpretation of religion will suffer. Unlike many here I do sense the existence of a muslim majority that are not islamists and who are capable of interpreting the quran as a guide and not as an absolutely totality of rules. However when teenage thugs are allowed to rob, assault, and threaten in the name of islam, and to claim a city (that has been graceful enough to give their families refuge) for islam, and nothing is said by this moderate majority against these thugs then I will declare the moderate majority as an enemy by their silence. In pakistan there are now horrendous crimes being committed by non-muslims and you cannot state that this is not part of a larger problem. Until muslims like you are courageous enough to openly discuss the problems that besets your religion there will be no improvement in the situation. Use your time profitably – attack the source of the problem and not those that comment on muslim behaviour.

Comments are closed.