Muslims are the biggest Heroin dealers in the world, but saying so makes you "racist…"

Muslim terrorism? It’s all our own fault because we’re racists

Counter Jihad Catches Clueless Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull with this pants down

Full article below…

Ex-BNP candidate faces “religious hatred” charge because the truth is no defense. But Muslims are still the biggest Heroin dealers:

A former British National Party election candidate was charged yesterday in connection with the distribution of leaflets which alleged Muslims were responsible for the heroin trade. Anthony Bamber, 53, of Greenbank Street, Preston, Lancashire, is accused of incitement to commit religious hatred, police said.

The leaflet was distributed in Burnley and reportedly circulated in other parts of Lancashire, Cumbria and Yorkshire. It urged people to “heap condemnation” on Muslims and said it was time to “apologise” over its claims they were responsible for 95 per cent of the world’s heroin trade.

Yorkshire Post, 10 August 2009

Atlas Shrugs

‘Racism’ Cries a Tired Obama Double-Standard

The left should be warned: The libelous smear of racism has lost its sting. If everything is racism, then nothing is. The charge has lost its power. The more that leftists pull this evil trick, the more folks will shrug.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY


Bush dissent vso racism

This is “patriotic dissent”                                             This is ugly “racism”
get it?

Weasel Links:

Atlas Links:

Here we go again. The NY Times whores itself for da jihad. This is so intellectually dishonest. This generation grew up on Hamas TV, suckling at the breast of the worst Jewish blood libels.

But the Times can’t bother itself with reality. Instead they put lipstick on a pig and euphemistically call them “new leaders [who] are considered more pragmatic than their predecessors”.

Fatah Party Election Brings in a New Generation NY Times (hat tip Dan)

Muslim terrorism? It’s all our own fault because we’re racists

VICTORIAN Police Commissioner Simon Overland in Saturday’s The Age blames terrorism on negative stereotyping

ISLAM is not the problem. Social isolation and disengagement stemming, from among other things, racism and negative stereotyping, is the real problem.

Berhan Ahmed in The Age on August 5 blamed the recession:

IN the present economic climate, some young people become marginalised and disaffected. It is people such as these that recruiters – religious extremists – look for and despite efforts by African communities, especially the Somali community, to engage young people in sport, education and social excellence a few people remain marginalised. This is not helped by what they hear of their homeland. The world now knows that this situation has to be fixed. And it also has to fix the problem of disaffected Somali youth feeling that their needs and those of their ancestral country have been ignored.

Tim Blair in Saturday’s edition of Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph:

TIME was when you’d have to wait at least a few days following some Islamic terror outrage before the first opinion pieces dodging responsibility or blaming everything on the West would appear. Now they’ve got it down to less than 24 hours. Impressively, though, Berhan Ahmed – the Eritrean-born academic, former Greens Senate candidate and current Victorian of the Year who wrote The Age’s instant post-raid comment piece – found an exciting new reason why some local Muslims might find themselves planning terror attacks:It’s all the recession’s fault! Sadly, that excuse wasn’t available for Abdul Nacer Benbrika (and company). These young men allegedly discovered ways to become disaffected even when the Australian economy was rockin’. Maybe they were angry about global warming.

More from Ahmed: “Terrorism thrives when it is able to provoke authorities and communities to over-react and behave unjustly.” Excuse me, but “over-reacting and behaving unjustly” seems more the domain of terrorists than of the people seeking to constrain them. Ahmed next makes what to him might seem a crucial point: “These young people are living with us and we have to ask the question as to why they are not satisfied with our systems.” No, we do not. The adjustment has got to come from Muslims arriving in new countries.

Tony Jones on ABC1’s Q&A spots a terrorist. Malcolm Turnbull doesn’t:

SHARIQ Nabi: I go to school where we have many refugee students, most of whom have seen or been subjected to pretty horrific things. I think these people need more support to function in our society or we risk alienating them, like many of the young Sudanese in Melbourne. What is being done to help them integrate into our Australian lifestyle?

Jones: Ok. Well, our questioner makes a point about the young Sudanese in Melbourne and it raises the issue of whether alienation could possibly lead to alleged terrorism.

Turnbull: But that’s not what … what the question he asked was: “What are the programs for refugee students in Melbourne from the Sudan.” Correct? He didn’t say anything about terrorism. He wants to know what programs are available.

Jones: Ok.

Turnbull: Look, he’s nodding his head.

Jones: All right.

Turnbull: Well, there you go.

33 thoughts on “Muslims are the biggest Heroin dealers in the world, but saying so makes you "racist…"”

  1. “racist…”
    Again, Islam is not a race of people. No it is the Islamists who are involved in a RACE to hell or should I say oblivion. But you never see the leaders, Imams or so-called Sheikhs leading by example. Just let the kids and the ignorant and easily led fools kill themselves in the name of Allah.

  2. The subject matter is not the point with almost all the above, it is how it is presented, what is implied and what is demanded that makes for bigoted, racist and hate-creating accusations.

    Yep, the bulk of poppy farming and thus heroine production is in Afghanistan, so it surely is Muslims whom are processing it and moving it on. That is a fact. But of course it is not that simple an issue and thus making such a statement as fact that “Muslims are the worlds largest heroine dealers” is sort-of-correct. The world’s largest producers are but the dealers and profiters are not. The one’s who sell it to your kids on the street are a mixed bag of ultra-low lifes.

    Yep, there are Muslims in this world who want to have the entire world under an ultra-extreme Sharia system (of their own unique style and interpretation) and are willing to kill, bomb and terrorise to get it. Yep, there are Muslims out there in the West whom are making ultra-conservative demands within the environment that they chose to immigrate to and it is rediculous and they certainly are resisting integration – but they are not the majority and their policies are so ludicrous that those same demands are not even accepted if not laughed at (or are considered criminal) in the actual Muslim World.

    The list goes on and on, and the whole point is that – in fact the blogger and most commentors know this – that the painting with a broad brush, the stating of facts but ignoring the context and the adding of innuendos, rumours and others BS is why those of you are targetted as bigots, racists and hate-mongerers, and frankly speaking until those of you change your ways.

  3. Hahahaha!

    Yes but… and ‘out of context’ Islam.

    Looks like solkar needs a new camel to ride. Or another website to troll on….

  4. Mmmm Solkhar so what WOULD these low lifes and dealers be selling if the MOHAMMEDANS weren’t planting and gathering the Poppies to make the BULK of the worlds illegal heroin??? Or maybe you are brainwashed to think the way you do. So you always spout the taqiyya BS ‘ us poor Mohammedans are ALWAYS the victims and never ever to be held responsible for our actions no matter how vile and uncivilized they are. ‘

  5. Blog-owner – I think Shari’a Law is outdated and not necessary. As you are aware (or should be) that MOST Muslim countries do not use Shari’a Law systems but Secular Legal Systems. Some have dual-systems for family law and even the Jewish State of Israel has Shari’a Family Courts for Muslims. The point is a good secular system will automatically reflect the morals and standards of that society so for a Muslim majority country will automatically reflect thier values – be it very conservative or moderate.

    As for your ten questions, I missed it amongst all the propganda, if you wish to state them here I will answer them – no problem from my part, but I have a suspicion that no matter what I say you will come back to your “self-preservation and a sacred duty ” to use the right-wing taqqiya escape clause, not that I care.

  6. for the blogger un “Realist” who said the following and frankly amazing statement:

    “Mmmm Solkhar so what WOULD these low lifes and dealers be selling if the MOHAMMEDANS weren’t planting and gathering the Poppies to make the BULK of the worlds illegal heroin??? Or maybe you are brainwashed to think the way you do. So you always spout the taqiyya BS ‘ us poor Mohammedans are ALWAYS the victims and never ever to be held responsible for our actions no matter how vile and uncivilized they are. ‘

    The brainwashing is on your part, probably from stairing at the computer screen waaaay to much that allows you to soke only the crap and not the facts. Go read a book and study a bit more before you produce such dribble.

    Having been to the poppy fields of Afghanistan, whilst being posted in Islamabad for two years and knowing both European and US Drug Enforcement Agency personnel – also on the subject of North African drug trackign – I know the following facts are public domain.

    1. The poppy fiels of Afghanistan have been grown because overlords force the locals grow it – the value is way to great. That has been tribal war-lords from the 19th century, the British, the Persians, tribal war-lords again, the Russians and then the Taliban and now corrupt Afghani officials being payied by more war-lords.
    2. The farmers themselves would rather grow mixed foods to feed their familes than cash crops because they find it immoral and with cash they are forced to climb down the mountains to markets when their own foods will surfice. Each time they try, the war-lords, taliban and corrupt officials will force them to plough-in their crops and go back to poppies.
    3. Tribal versions of Islamic principles somehow have forgotten or ignored that drugs and all intoxicants including alcohol are concided haram and a block to spirituality. Thus the hypocrisy goes as far as they will publically flog someone drinking a beer but then the same official will go and smoke opium later on in his hookar/waterpipe.

    I make no assumption that Muslims are always victims and that is your BS (in fact all of what you said was) and I give no support to the actions of Muslims at all, all are responsible for their actions.

    It would be a good suggestion that you go and do some study before waffling off this dribble and then you will discover that this particular part of the world has suffered for countless generations because the poppy is growing there and has thus been the target of every greedy bastard whith the chance of controlling it. If was taken out (a big if) and the area well and honestly controlled, the importance of these valleys will disapear (thankfully for the locals) and basic foods will come back. It happend in the other Golden Triangle with reasonable success, the difference here is geography and politics.

  7. “I think Shari’a Law is outdated and not necessary. ”

    Really? The majority of your co-religionists would disagree. Many would not hesitate to kill you if you made such a statement in public. Isn’t your sacred duty as a Mohammedan to make the sharia the dominant law of the land? You don’t agree with the Muslim Brotherhoods goal whose work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within?”

    You reject the goals of your Muslim brothers for whom rejection of the jihad ideology makes you a kuffar?

    [The Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.

    But I forgot: you are a “moderate”, Solkhar. You cook your own little Islam, with 18 secret herbs and spices. Good for you if you can get away with it, Solkhar. But how many followers do you have?

    “As you are aware (or should be) that MOST Muslim countries do not use Shari’a Law systems but Secular Legal Systems.”

    Frankly, I don’t give a f*kc . Most of them are so corrupt that whatever they call law is a sick joke. The law of Egypt is certainly no good for the Copts, and the Christians (or few remaining Jews) in Arab or Muslim occupied countries have exactly what kind of a chance to get a hearing? Even if there is a ‘secular law’ construct somewhere on the books, like in Malaysia, the unbelievers are second class citizens and have no chance in court against a Muslim.

  8. “The majority of your co-religionists would disagree. Many would not hesitate to kill you if you made such a statement in public. Isn’t your sacred duty as a Mohammedan to make the sharia the dominant law of the land? ”

    So if you were correct, then why is not Shari’a everywhere in the Muslms World – that is the rediculous notion you keep coming up – it is your version of Islam you are talking about. If many would kill me, then why is it that people in all these countries are not killed because they support their government’s decision not to have Shari’a? Get real!

    “You reject the goals of your Muslim brothers for whom rejection of the jihad ideology makes you a kuffar?”

    I reject radicals as does most Muslims and their Governements.

    “[The Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from …… ” Your cuting & pasting Spencer I think and frankly speaking it is ranting and off topic.

    “Frankly, I don’t give a f*kc . …….”

    That is the escape clause and Spencer tactic that resulted in his being considered a fake academic and with no respect. You started by telling a lie that Shari’a is a demand and objective of all Muslims and when you are told it is not the case you “don’t give a f*ck”.

    Where are the 10 questions so you can get your answer to either claim taqqiya or not giving a damn and so you can then “ban me” straight afterwards.

    1. Stop being a slimy little eel, Solkhar.

      The quotes are the stated goals of the Muslim Brotherhood. Do yourself a favor and keep Spencer out of it, because you are shooting yourself in the foot. Spencer didn’t make it up, he merely quotes Muslims, and so do I. Your smears just reveal what kind of creature you are, Solkhar.

      Give me the name of one Islamic country, civilized, under secular law that applies to all people equally, regardless whether they are Christians, Jews, Bahai, Zaroastrians, Hindus or Buddhists. Give me the name of one Muslim leader who openly denounced the sharia. I’m really curious!

  9. From above about using the Bigot Word – or should it be the Taqqiya Word

    “The left should be warned: The libelous smear of racism has lost its sting. If everything is racism, then nothing is. The charge has lost its power. The more that leftists pull this evil trick, the more folks will shrug.”

    Should be…

    “The far-right should be warned: The libelous escape clause of taqqiya has lost its sting. If every response is taqqiya, then nothing is. The excuse has no value and is diminishing. The more that agenda based var-rightists pull this evil trick, the more folks will laugh for what rubbish it is”.

    .

  10. You mean you did cut and paste from Spencer whom then in turn cut & pasted from a Brother Hood item. Seems to me to be the same thing.

    I noticed also again the quick twist and change of topic. You will find that the Islamic School of Al Qarayaoun in Fes, one of the five Schools of Islamic Thought supports the basis of Moroccan Secular Law which sepcifically refutes the necessity of a theological Shari’a Court because 1) the aspects of morality is within the secular laws as passed by Parliament and the King and 2) that a Shari’a Court would imply clerics taking the place of legally trained Judges and because of the first point is no longer necessary. You will find that the Parliament, Ummah Council and Judiciary of Tunisia has followed the same principle and follows the Sheik of Fez as apposed to the one in Cairo.

    As for legal systems, both countries do not have discriminatry laws against other religions though they will have laws against the “selling” of religions other than Muslims. Remember that Morocco (and Turkey) have the largest Jewish populations inside a Muslim country and are an integral part of the nation with Jews taking up even ministerial and royal advisory roles (I hear a “I do not give a f*ck statement coming up).

    Having said that, I have and always will continue to condemn those countries that treat other relgious groups badly and it even happens here. There is no arguing and still I wonder why you did the quick change of tactic? I would argue that this is a mix of politics, racism/bigotry and radical/extremism – but of course you wish to say it is more than that.

    Waiting for the ten questions.

    1. “You mean you did cut and paste from Spencer whom then in turn cut & pasted from a Brother Hood item. Seems to me to be the same thing.”

      For the last time: answer the question, Solkhar. Do you or do you not agree with the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood?
      Give me the name of one Islamic country, civilized, under secular law that applies to all people equally, regardless whether they are Christians, Jews, Bahai, Zaroastrians, Hindus or Buddhists.

      Give me the name of one Muslim leader who openly denounced the sharia!

  11. I will take you to task about second class and no chance for non-Muslim Malaysians in courts there.

    Malaysia has a three-tiered legal system, it has Secular-Law, Shari’a Law and Commercial Law with a Supreme Court and Appeals Court.

    The Secular-Law covers all things non-commercial and not covered by the Shari’a Law. Criminal matters for non-Muslims will go to this court as well unless it covers a capital crime were it goes to the Supreme.
    The Shari’a law applies only to Muslims, if a non-Muslim is involved it goes to the Supreme Court.
    The Commerical-Court is for anything to do with business – Muslim or not and is secular.
    The Supreme Court is for large cases and cases that the Shari’a cannot deal with such as disputes between Muslims and non-Muslims.
    The Appeals court is self apparent.

    Under Malaysian Law, judges and jurists have to be mixed and non-Discriminated except under Shari’a Courts and these Judges are not Clerics like in other Shari’a Courts in some countries. Radicals who say they do not recognise courts other than the Shari’a in Malaysia are given a secondary charge of “insulting Islam” under the present Shari’a Law and it is taken into consideration in dealing out the extra punishment in the other courts.

  12. Blog-owner,

    Two things here- firstly I reject the poltics, statements and ideals of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood and they are simply another dangerous quasi-political radical extremist group that should be banned and their leaders looked into by authorities world-wide for their links to terrorism. Is that clear enough for you?

    Second, I answered your second and third demands in a previous response, the Head of Al Quaraouin one of the Five Islamic Centres of Learning commends, supports and understands that the concept of Shari’a Courts is unecessary is if a secular court correctly reflects the morals and a majority Muslim society, then it is Sunnah by its very concept. Thus it supports the Secular court systems of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Republic of Tunisia that follow this Maleki-Islamic concept.

    Simply put – in reality and following that above principle, which I support – the concept of a Shari’a Law Court structure is mute and unecessary.

    As for which Islamic country is under secular law providing equally, at least the two above countries are – by law – but by practise, human bigotry, cultural ignorance and others are certainly making it difficult – never denied that.

    So does that count for 3 of your 10 questions and were are the rest?

  13. * “so-called Muslim Brotherhood”

    Do you have a more accurate name for the group, Solkhar?

    If a Noahide Court structure is established among the nations, would
    a Sharia Court structure be redundant, given the view (of some) that
    Islam is a Noahide religion?
    (E.g. en.wikinoah.org/index.php/Islam_and_Noahide_Law#Islam_as_a_Noahide_Faith.3F)
    Would the various Sharia Courts be willing to submit to the authority
    of the Jerusalem Court for Bnei Noah, under the Sanhedrin?

    Do you see Islam as a Noahide religion, given your previous views?

    Do you see Islam, Judaism and Christianity as “three great Abrahamic faiths” (or something similar) worshipping the same god?

    Do you believe that peace will come about by man’s peace processes,
    or do you believe the prophecies of Jesus Christ returning for the dead and living saints, followed by sudden destruction of those who
    think peace has come to the Earth?

    What year is it, and what is the significance? (Part of Antichrist’s “job description” indicates that he will think to change laws – and times.
    Would you prefer a more “inclusive” global calendar?

  14. Obviously falling into the trap of an evangalist’s rantings, I will make this one statement on the probably vain hope that it silences his/her dribble.

    As a Muslim, I am of the Abrahamic school of thought which means that the God of the Jews, Christians and Muslims is the vary same one. Thus also the Prophets such as Adam, Noah (called Nu in Arabic), Abraham (written as Ibrahim) and Jesus (whom in Arabic is Issa). Islam teaches us that the Prophets Adam and Issa/Jesus are special in that they “came from the sand and returned to it” and scholars debate that is why there is the confusion of the status of Issa/Jesus being the “son of God” of which Islam says he is not, but he is special amongst Prophets. The mother of Issa/Jesus is also noted as being someone blessed as she alone was given the blessings by being visited by the Angel Gibriel (Gabriel) and told that she was now pregnant as God has placed within her the seed of a Prophet.

    The other thing to be aware is that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted by the hands of man, perhaps in good faith, but nevertheless much of the meaning and accuracy is gone. Some of those have been clarified in the Holy Qur’an. Thus references to prophecies of Issa/Jesus are not of value unless confirmed in the Qur’an.

    Issa/Jesus did not return from the dead, but his body turned to dust (and his spirit returned to God) and it was confused by those around them as more than that.

    The concept of the Day of Judgement is real and alive also in Islam and it says that all good Jews and Christians will stand shoulder to shoulder with good Muslims at the Gates of Heaven on that Day.

    These are the basic Islamic views, what is certain is that the words of an evangalist is rather a mute annoyance if a quoting game starts. I will not say more unless conversation gets civilized.

    1. Solkhar sez:

      As a Muslim, I am of the Abrahamic school of thought which means that the God of the Jews, Christians and Muslims is the vary same one.”

      Muhammad, the illiterate Arab goat-herder- camel-driver- marauding warlord, has nothing on Abraham. Nothing whatsoever.

      Muhammad makes the tall and absurd claim that he is the one that supersedes all and everything that came before him, but its nothing more than a claim, his claim. Its the same claim when Mohammedans claim ‘the Koran is the word of Allah because it says so in the Koran”- Muhammedans know that this is an absurdity, but Islam works like a drug on the slaves of Allah. The Jews who resided in Arabia during the time of Muhammad laughed at the absurd new religion that Muhammad invented, and he never forgave them for it: he wiped them out and gave his murderous followers a final, genocidal command before he bit the dust: that there be no 2 religions in Arabia and to kill the Jews everywhere his henchmen could get their hands on them.

      The Malaysians forbid the Christians the use of “Allah”. Since you know so much about ‘moderate’ Malaysia perhaps you could explain to us why they do this, Solkar.
      Christians under Mohammedan occupation use “Allah” to endear themselves to their Muselmanic masters.

      The few remaining Arab Christians in the ME tried that too, but where did it get them? Today, they are better off in Israel where they are free to do as they please.

      The Koran is the most corrupted piece of gibberish and absurdities ever concocted, and of course there are textual variations. you’ll find more value studiying Mickey Mouse, Solkhar. The Thorah is not corrupted and neither is the Christian Bible. The essential message is the same, so its also an irrelevant claim. Nonsense and smears by brainwashed Muslims without understanding.

      Muhammads “Issa” has nothing in common with the Christian Jesus, as we can see here. In fact, Christians would be horrified to learn that ‘Isa’ Will Abolish Christianity:

      ‘Muslims believe Jesus will come back, break the cross and lead the war against the kaffirs’-
      or Jesus will come back, break the cross, kill the swine and abolish the jiziyah.

      The Christians are the swine, just in case you’re wondering.

      The concept of the Day of Judgement is real and alive also in Islam and it says that all good Jews and Christians will stand shoulder to shoulder with good Muslims at the Gates of Heaven on that Day.

      There is no Muhammad in the Thorah or in the Bible, and the Muhammedan ideology will not succeed in wiping us out or enslave us. What you have done here, Solkhar, is given it all you got: your best da’awa, so to speak.

      Da’awa, nothing but da’awa. Islam, nothing but Islam. Because nothing else matters.

      How pathetic. How fanatical. How insane, Solkar.

      PS: the only thing missing from your invitation to Islam is “that we’re all born Muslim”- its only our misguided parents and society who keep us from ‘the straight path’ to hell (Islam) Good one, that!

  15. You have said more than enough, Solkhar.

    There is time for you to rethink your position on Jesus Christ, the lamb
    of God who takes away the sins of the world, to change your mind about
    Him, and accept God’s gift of salvation and eternal life.

    Goodbye.

  16. In the US we can say the following:

    Fuck Islam
    Fuck Obama
    Fuck Christianity

    This is what freedom of speech allows and if you had any brains you would make sure to get rid of your stupid hate speech laws in England.

    Here is a test to see how much freedom a Muslim is willing to “accept.”

    Hey bloke, do you think I have the write to say that Mohammed was an illiterate pedophile? Because he was. Don’t you think that only a “bloomin” idiot would actually willing follow such an intellectually challenged hate monger that believes in polygamy, sexual slavery and lying to gain advantage.”

    The fact of the matter is we have a picture of Jesus in a vat of urine in a New York Art Museum. The Museum has yet to be burned down by angry Christians. But make a cartoon with Muhammed, with a bomb on his head, and 200 innocents get murdered and multiple Christian Churches get burned to the ground. So much for the religion of peace.

    There is a higher level of Bresinski’s “chess game” that we need to become aware of. Islam extremism and the heroin trade itself has been funded by the CIA and other black operations organizations within the global community. Great Britian has supported the Muslim Brotherhood since before the 2nd World War.

    Time for us all to wake up and destroy the Globalist plan for world domination before it is too late.

    By the way, I don’t dislike most Muslims: only those that think their religion is more equal than my own philosophies.

    So when I say “Fuck Muhammed” it is only a test. I’m into the mysteries and if it makes you feel better you can say “fuck Patanjali” or “fuck Yoga.”

    I will pr0bably just laugh or ignore you.

    And while I do believe we are all one philosophically I also believe we have a right and obligation to look after our legal citizenry before granting any special privilage to foreigners — most of which need to go back home.

    Yours in Peace and Freedom,

    Bruce W. Cain

  17. Bruce Cain, assuming you are directing the question to me, I can answer your points easy enough.

    You certainly have the rights to say what you want ….. as an individual. As an organised group – no. I have no problem condemning the inability of many Muslims and Muslim communities that cannot tolerate a personal view, but there are many historical, cultural and political reasons why that tolerance is not there.

    Now having said that, I should also now address your comments since you raised them.

    Hey dude, Mohammed was illiterate yet he was able to give the Qur’an. He was certainly not a peadophile, that is BS. It does not take actually an “bloody moron” to know that it is right-wing propoganda that Mohammed was a hate monger and that events of the 7th century compared to this day can be given all sorts of examples if such a “bloody moron” has not the brain-power to know the differences.

    It does not take much research capacity to know that the picture of Jesus in the vat of Urine is now in the NY Art Museum because the locations that it was supposed to be placed in Europe refused it due to the threats from Christian extremists to burn or bomb them.

    The only intelligent item that came from your rant is that indeed there was a higher level of Bresinski’s “chess game” that you needed to become aware of.

    Islamist extremism and the heroin trade itself had been funded by the CIA and other black operations organizations within the global community at various points for various reasons. Great Britian certainly had supported the Muslim Brotherhood since before the 2nd World War to gain support in its operations. These are facts and their collective stupidity is now paying for it.

    Regardless of your test, I have no problem with anyone who has an opinion and a philosophy that does not attack my own. I have my own agenda which is clear, I defend the core tennants of my own faith and believe in the Qur’an, the haddiths are taken as for what they are – written by men. I do not defend the actions of Muslims, they have to stand on their own merit and frankly speaking, they are failing. I abhore radicalism in all its forms, be it Islamist or other.

  18. Oh, a last thing, the legalization of Mary-Jane is fine by me if it is controlled under laws like with alcohol. Smoke it while driving, giving it to minors etc, etc and it should thus be a crime. I have a 22yr old nephew who is totally f*cked up becaue of its ease of access in The Netherlands, his use since the age of 16.

  19. Now I get it, your an evangalist, and probably having a few beers to many tonight whilst on the net as well.

    You have your right to not believe, not BS on a forum though.

    Oh, for your info, dawah is means prayer, not as in the Salah but the personal type…. so I find it rather funny your throwing in words and phrases you have absolutely no understanding.

    I also laugh at the evangelical crap, most leaders of faiths, Pope, Archbishop of C, Rabbais, Patriachs etc, will dispute what you have said about Abraham/Ibrahim for instance and recognise the religion of Islam and it is only your small rabble of extremists that seem to deny and go on this internet BS rampage….. LOL, what a laugh.

    1. Solkhar my darling twit:

      “You have your right to not believe, not BS on a forum though.”

      Thank you for confirming the rights of a Dhimmi.Thank you for putting me in my place. How could I forget? LOL!

      Sure it wasn’t you who had a few too many when you wrote that?

      I don’t think the pope studied Islam. Offering the perpetually enraged Koranimals a sedative might be good politics, but it won’t pacify them. Unimpressed.

      Besides, I am not a Christian.

  20. At least one of you was polite with:

    Mullah Lodabullah August 15, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    You have said more than enough, Solkhar.

    There is time for you to rethink your position on Jesus Christ, the lamb
    of God who takes away the sins of the world, to change your mind about
    Him, and accept God’s gift of salvation and eternal life.

    Goodbye.

  21. * Now I get it, your an evangalist, and probably having a few beers to many tonight whilst on the net as well.

    Notice how quickly Solkhar connects dots that are not there, in pursuit of his “agenda-based” tirade against this blog and Sheik Yermami and others.

    * You have your right to not believe, not BS on a forum though.

    Solkhar has his right to reject God’s plan of salvation and eternal life,
    and apparently reserves for himself the right to post BS in support
    of the false prophet Mo on this site and many others.

    Many readers and commenters on this site, including the Sheik, are
    potential targets for death under muslim methods of tackling “blasphemy” against “allah” and his false prophet Mo.

    Here is a play sheet for how to respond to “blasphemy” against islam
    and the false prophet: (extracts)

    The Ruling for Blasphemy in Islam
    Saturday, 10 March 2007
    Dr. Zakir Naik

    With regards to how should Muslims respond to this sort of defamation against Islam, broadly, I can classify the Muslim response into six different categories.

    1. Replies via the Media

    2. Peaceful Protests and Demonstrations

    3. Filing a Legal Suit [successful “sheik down” of Nike by CAIR]

    A striking example in this respect can be cited of CAIR (Council on American – Islamic Relations), which is the largest Islamic civil liberties group in the U.S. In 1997, CAIR succeeded in shaking down Nike when they filed a defamation suit objecting to a pair of shoes manufactured by Nike, which had a design on the heel similar to the Arabic word for “God”, Allah. However, there was an out-of–court settlement and Nike not only publicly apologised but also agreed to give several million dollars to the Muslim community, which were spent to build three playgrounds at Islamic Centers in the United States.

    4. Economic Embargo

    5. Political Pressure

    6. Moderate Force

    Regarding the punishment for blasphemy in Islam, it is mentioned in the Glorious Qur’an:

    “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;” [Surah Al-Maidah 5:33]. In Islam, a person who has committed blasphemy can either be killed or crucified, or his opposite hands and feet can be cut off, or he can be exiled from that land.

    The whole thing is at
    icsfp.com/EN/contents.aspx/quran/Contrad/en/gfx/contents.aspx?aid=4502

    Firefox should auto-complete the address

    I still have my hands and feet for now… but the blood-fest against the saints and martyrs of Jesus Christ is coming, in accordance with the Revelation of Jesus Christ that Solkhar rejects.

  22. Mullah Lodabullah,

    A Muslim would argue that he is the best supporter of Jesus as he follows the principles of Jesus/Issa as the continuation of the revalations of God and Jesus’s legacy via Mohammed and that the Qur’an explained what was lost in translations and corruptions of the Bible by man. Thus when you accuse me of “in accordance with the Revelation of Jesus Christ that Solkhar rejects. I would say it is you who have rejected them. If your getting my drift – what you are saying and arguing is mute and we will be in an endless cycle of what in the end is a subject of “faith”.

  23. I have said goodbye to you, Solkhar. You are a fraud who posts under a variety of “personas”, while condemning someone you accuse of doing much the same thing. You are currently making much of being a retired Western diplomat, now living in Morocco, and an “expert on terrorism-financing”, but how much, if any, is true, given your penchant for deception and role-play.

    * A Muslim would argue that he is the best supporter of Jesus

    A muslim will get the opportunity to put that case to God at the Great White Throne judgement of Revelation 20, shortly before being cast into the lake of fire.

    This is not a role-play game, Solkhar; this is for real, for eternity.

  24. Or the other way around, you may be the one dropping on your knees when you see Jesus standing next to Mohammed welcoming the righteous.

    As I said, it is a matter of faith, the claims and counterclaims can go on endlessly and though I do not like him, I will respect the blog-owner with not debating any one elses religous faith.

    On the subject of backgrounds, identity and roleplaying, if I wanted to continue the game I would not have started a blog but continued, that portion is over minus the name and the titles of my works to avoid mixing my work and private life and the internet. If you believe that or not is up to you, but if I was you I would consentrate on the agenda of this blog-site and its motives which are not what it claims.

    Have you noticed how the blog-owner has not delivered his 10 questions? Have you noticed his cut & pastes? His quickly changing emotive rants and then so-called facts only come when again they are cut & pastes from his beloved Spencer?

  25. Well, Solkhar, it is you who have gone to some trouble to use a variety of personas [conservative, someone from outside the west, European, Australian, American and so on], and thus undermine your current claims to be a “liberal-Sunni Muslim”, retired diplomat and so on.

    I cannot be certain that you are who or what you claim to be.

    As for the “agenda” of this blog site, it is articulated in the “About Winds Of Jihad” page. Do you, with your multiple personas, have
    a specific problem with this site being substantially different to
    what is openly disclosed on the “About” page? (I assume you will
    allow the Sheik the same latitude / flexibility that you reserve for
    your own blog).

    What is your agenda, Solkhar, apart from serving “allah” and his
    false prophet Mohammed?

  26. My agenda has been clear from the beginning and is in my blog and has not changed. I condemn radicalism and I defend the core principles of my faith Islam.

    I condemn radicalism in all its forms, be it the dangerous gun and bomb type Islamist or the poisen pen type western right-wing radical on the internet. All forms of radicalism is the cause of the backward steps mankind makes and this for those whom take the religous view is the work of Shaitan (the Devil) on mankind, forcing him to take the radical road instead of the enlighted one.

    As mentioned, the second goal is to defend the core principles of my faith Islam which is the Qur’an. I do not defend the actions of Muslims and I am not a believer in the unquestionability of the haddiths (not I put the word in lower case) as I see them touched by the hands of man, regardless of the good intentions or not. I value them for what they say on a personal level, remembering the cutlure and history that they were written in.

    Thus, my agenda is fine, condemn the acts of extremist Muslims and I will join you, attack the acts of radical leftists and I will join you. Do the same to radical right-wingers and I will join you but I think you will not, BUT attack the basic core values of Islam, the Qur’an and the Prophets (any of them) and I will defend them.

  27. it not racist but one most dumbest pieces of things i heard a person say

    ow boy we need salma yaqoob to be prime minister in uk sort our country out

Comments are closed.