Question 1 for Solkhar: Who Gets The 72 Virgins Now?

“My Allah is better than yours”

Photos of 72 Virgins

Andrew Bolt: Jihad against jihadists. Allah confused

My fundamentalist Islamist state is better than yours:

DIVISIONS within the Palestinian side of politics reached crisis point yesterday after 24 people were killed and more than 100 wounded in a seven-hour shoot-out in the Gaza Strip between Hamas and hardline Islamists linked to al-Qa’ida.

Security officers from Hamas, which runs Gaza, moved against Jund Ansar Allah – also known as Jihadi Soldiers of God, or Soldiers of the Partisans of God – after its leader Sheik Abdel-Latif Moussa, declared Gaza was “an Islamic emirate”.

Now, if Israel had attacked those jiahidsts… But when it’s Muslims yet again killing Muslims, it’s barely a story…

21 thoughts on “Question 1 for Solkhar: Who Gets The 72 Virgins Now?”

  1. Aparantly the blog-owner is not interested in asking Questions and as he has confessed in one thread that this blog is “humor based” we can only assume that its contents are thus not serious.

  2. Another wrong assumption, Solkhar. As noted in the Winds of Jihad Humor page, humour is a serious business, as in this example…
    ================================================
    What happens when a fly falls into a coffee cup?

    The Englishman throws away the cup of coffee and walks away.

    The American takes out the fly and drinks the coffee.

    The Chinese eats the fly and throws away the coffee.

    The Japanese drinks the coffee with the fly, since it was extra.

    The Israeli sells the coffee to the American, the fly to the Chinese, and buys himself a new cup of coffee.

    The Palestinian blames the Israeli for the violent act of putting the fly in his coffee, asks the UN for aid, takes a loan from the European Union to buy a new cup of coffee, uses the money to purchase explosives and then blows up the coffee house where the Englishman, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese are all trying to explain to the Israeli that he was too aggressive.
    ==============================================

    It may be humour, but it has a certain ring of truth to it.

  3. So based on the above (actually that one is a pretty good clever joke, though a copy from a very old joke against communists) , we can assume then that all the items on this blog are of such ilk and intention – that for what-ever-reason the blog does not like anything Muslim or Islam, that to express that we will bag, misdirect, lie etc for fun.

  4. Put all ten up – I am sure the first was not a question nor a test so that I can answer them, I have only today and then I am in off to a conference for the week, I have a presentation to do.

  5. Solkhar, do not fret!

    We will wait for you!

    Whenever you’re ready. We have all the time in the world!

    The jihad won’t go away and the Koran and his murderous followers will haunt us for quite some time to come.

    Not sure what ‘copy’ and ‘communist’ have to do with it, but if you say so…

    Stay tuned!

  6. Ahh the old ‘I am busy will get back to you ploy’ Mohammedans have no end of excuses as to why they cant give you an answer just now. They know all the answers of course but not just now. LOL,

  7. I certainly would not make such an assumption, Solkhar – it might be
    seen as “Yer’mamiphobia” if I did, but as I said, the joke has a certain
    ring of truth to it, given the Palestinian penchant for diverting resources from peaceful purposes to war, as in …

    [Defense Minister Ehud Barak was reconsidering the delivery of the cement after, according to IDF Southern Command intelligence, cement that was transferred for the renovation of a British War Cemetery in Gaza earlier this month was partially confiscated by Hamas.]

    Is the US Government paying you to attend the conference and give
    a presentation? If so, would they know you are a role-player?

  8. Realist, are you just stupid or in early high school perhaps ?

    I said go ahead and post them and i will answer even now and it is the blog-owner that has procrastinated over the last 48hrs over these so-called questions – of which the first one wasn’t one.

    I also said I am away for a bit and even then I have mobile internet on my blackberry so I can still check but frankly speaking, I have better things to do when I am there except maybe show a few of my colleages and fellow presenters how funny you guys are.

  9. Johh, I honestly do not know what or if that is a real question? Is the question about heaven, is it about the reference about Virgins in Heaven and my opinion about it?

    If it is, my view is about such references is as commonly believed my most of not all liberals and moderates, that it was the language style needed to those of the 7th century.

    What I find rather strange is that the Bible and Torah are full of parables and are not taken literally by anyone except radicals. The same is with the Qur’an but – guess who is blowing the taking things literally crap on blog-sites – yep, right-wing antiIslam wankers.

    There is no doubt that the Muslim world is full of conservatives, iliterates and uneducated, whom are easy pray for radicals and they probably take things very literally, but they are iliterates and uneducated, what is the right-wing westerner’s excuse?

    1. More Tu Quoque, Solkar?

      This is not about Bible and Torah, Solkhar.

      This website is called Winds of Jihad.

      Its about Muhammad worship, the Koran, Islam terror and Islamic invasion, perversion of our culture and the destruction of our civilization by Islam. (i.e. jihad)

      “There is no doubt that the Muslim world is full of conservatives, iliterates and uneducated, whom are easy pray for radicals and they probably take things very literally, but they are iliterates and uneducated, what is the right-wing westerner’s excuse?”

      I would insist that the Islamic radicals are way better educated than you are, Solkhar.

  10. The quran is based on the Bible and the Torah..the dietary restrictions were borrowed from the Jews…there is nothing very original about islam.

  11. Hey Solkhar,

    I am what would be called a ‘Christian Fundamentalist’. I believe every word of the Bible. Why do people of your faith wish me dead? No Christian I have ever met wishes ill on muslims, they only want islam gone as they see it as the evil influence that it is. I have a question for you.

    Why is it that so many of your co-religionists find it easy to source violence from your ‘holy’ book, whereas true followers of Jesus display love and forgiveness even for their enemies?

    Have you even compared the mohammed of the koran and hadiths to the Jesus of the Gospel?

  12. * What I find rather strange is that the Bible and Torah are full of parables and are not taken literally by anyone except radicals.

    I find it rather strange that Solkhar rejects the Bible and Torah on the grounds that they have been tampered with, and yet will appeal to their contents, when it suits him. Where does the “parable” of the
    72 virgins come from, and why is “allah’s” recruiting branch still
    using it to recruit gullible muslims for jihad.

    The following doesn’t sound like “parables” to me, just more muslim
    lies:

    (MEMRI-TV – extracts)

    Al-Rahma TV, January 2, 2009, Sheikh Ayman Sayda: “Allah Turns the Sword Blows and the Bombs into Angel Kisses… There Are Black-Eyed Virgins Ready For You”

    “There are black-eyed virgins ready for you. The martyr gets at least two of the virgins of Paradise, and they embrace the martyr. Imagine a black-eyed virgin embracing the martyr. While people carry the body to be buried, a black-eyed virgin is embracing him. We’re talking black-eyed virgins, man! All you guys who are looking for the women and girls of this world… True, a righteous woman is a good thing, but the martyr gets something even more valuable – a black-eyed virgin.

    And so on, until God puts a stop to it. It looks like the West won’t
    stop fawning over it & trying to appease it, with a few exceptions,
    such as Wilders.

  13. If you want to quote radicals then do so, but why do you assume they represent the entire of Islam when they do not?

    Shall I judge all of Christianity on the mad rantings of ultra-conservative tele-evangalist Evangalists?

    Regarding the Bible and Torah, I do not reject them at all in fact I am obliged to support them as the Word of God, but I would argue that the Qur’an explains them correctly and the versions you read are corrupted.

  14. Solkhar, you will get your chance to argue that the versions I read are corrupted to the Author, when you stand before Him to be judged. I take it on trust, by grace through faith, that the versions I read are not corrupted as you claim.

    * Shall I judge all of Christianity on the mad rantings of ultra-conservative tele-evangalist Evangalists?

    Judge them any way you choose, but preferably by comparing their claims with the Bible. That would be a problem for you, however, as
    you argue that the Bible versions are corrupted. Your false prophet
    does not think too highly of me for believing that Jesus Christ is the
    Son of God, and I am not particularly endeared to your false prophet,
    who claims that the crucifixion of Jesus Christ did not happen, and
    that to claim it did is a “monstrous falsehood against Mary” (4:157)

    It is ending for you, Solkhar. As an ex-diplomat, you can do nothing,
    and let your fellow muslims pass into history, or you can warn them
    of the judgements to come…

    Stop the role-playing, Solkhar – unlike Legend of the Red Dragon,
    you can’t buy some more hit points.

  15. Solkhar, if the promise of 72 virgins can be explained as “it was the language style needed to those of the 7th century”, how would the
    more recent promise of access to “paradise” to dead holders of plastic
    trinkets killed in the Iran – Iraq war be explained?

    Same lies, same marketing technique, same outcome – those falling
    for it were dudded, regardless of the century and the language.

    When will “allah” & his followers stop this dangerous deception?

Comments are closed.