The Debate We Have To Have

The trouble with Islam is bigger than  KRudds fantasies about “Global Warming”. Nobody can deny the 600 pound gorilla in the room, the question is now: WTF are we gonna do about it?

After Federal Labor MP Kelvin Thomson came out against unhindered Mohammedan immigration, a few more of our timid polit-props are “coming out:”

Here’s a young senator from South Australia: Cory Bernardi

A Debate We Cannot Ignore

The recent call for a review of Australia’s migration intake has, in my opinion, a great deal of merit.

In fact I am pleasantly surprised that the usual assortment of jibes attacking those who advocate for a more measured migration program hasn’t yet taken place.

Perhaps that’s because this time, the advocacy comes from a leftist Labor politician. I have no doubt that if a conservative made such a call the cries of ‘xenophobia’ and ‘dog whistle politics’ would have been deafening.

Continued below…

(Bill Muehlenberg) The Need for Clarity

An Australian writer suggests connecting the dots.


Who knows, perhaps those claims will be made after reading this comment.

But before you rush to judgment, let me make something very clear.

I have benefited from migration more than most Australians. My father came here from Italy in 1958 and my wife is an Irish migrant. I have an extended family comprising Australians who have originated from Malaysia, Denmark, Austria, Ireland, England and Italy.

They all add to the richness of my life and that of our nation, which is why I don’t want any of you to construe what I am writing today as me being anti-immigration. Nothing could be further from the truth.

But there is something clearly wrong with our current migration system and it is about time we had a decent conversation about it. Unfortunately it is a conversation that many conservatives shy away from due to the vile and outrageous pot-shots it often provokes.

I recall receiving a most abusive (and frankly inappropriate) email from an ABC journalist over a previous comment that dared to question the high level of benefits given to those entering our territory illegally and claiming asylum.

The facts apparently meant nothing to this supposedly unbiased reporter from our national broadcaster who told me what he thought in no uncertain terms.

The ‘coincidental’ inclusion of a grammatical error from that same comment on the ABCs Sunday morning show ‘Insiders’ suggests how upset he was when confronted with reality rather than the fantasy world he has created at taxpayers’ expense.

But the immigration problems we need to deal with are not limited to illegals. Our authorised migration processes are clearly not working effectively either.

The past few years has seen what can only be described as an explosion in race-oriented violence ranging from terrorist plots and riots in Cronulla to stabbings and gang rape.

The question is why?

Shooting from the hip, my view is that it comes down to assimilation – or lack of it.

Unfortunately too many new Australians put their faith, their clan or their historical hatreds ahead of the values of their adopted country.

They seek to use our freedoms, our systems and our tolerance as a means of undermining our values and indulging in behaviour that is anathema to most Australians.

The suggestion that our migrant intake should be reduced to ensure sufficient vetting of applicants and their background is a step in the right direction. But I believe there is a bigger problem.

Evidence suggests that the many so called ‘race’ problems are not caused by the original immigrants but by their radicalised children. Somehow the progeny of those who have been offered a better life in Australia are keener to continue ancient rivalries or religious hatreds than their forbears.

Such beliefs can only be cultured by the same extremist poison that is far too prevalent in the UK, Europe and parts of Africa and South East Asia.

The question many ask, but too many of us avoid answering, is where does most of this indoctrination of hate begin?

For some it is in the home but evidence suggests that for many it begins in the mosque. Yet to say so is to subject oneself to claims of intolerance and bigotry.

Frankly it is time for the excuses to stop.

For how long can we be expected to accept sermons of hate dismissed as ‘incorrect translations’? Surely it is right to ask how the self proclaimed ‘religion of peace’ can be so regularly used as an excuse for murder and destruction from some of the very people endorsed as scholars of its holy book?

This past week, the activities and arrest of an alleged Islamic terrorist were blamed on the Australian welfare system by one of his relations. Let me tell you, if this was a genuine reason for the dismantling of the welfare state then I’d probably join the campaign.

The problem though is that this claim, like many others, is a load of rubbish. It is simply seeking to blame Australian society for the alleged vile activities of a religious extremist.

The same type of excuses were used by radical islamists (and others) to endorse or justify the catastrophic events of September 11.

In Australia we are yet to see the public protests advocating death to infidels or open displays of bilious hatred that have occurred in other countries. The day we do, and are expected to accept it as freedom of speech, is the day our nation ceases to become the egalitarian one previous generations have fought so hard to defend.

You may ask, as I do, how we can prevent the expansion of racial and religious hatred from infecting Australian society? Unfortunately, I don’t have the answer.

However, it is clear to me that unless we are prepared to stop making excuses for those who support the doctrine of intolerance and hatred; until we are prepared to talk openly about the problems associated with immigration policy and assimilation, we will be ignoring a battle that must be won.

It is a battle for the very future of our country and winning it will require a great deal of courage from our politicians, transparency from members of the fourth estate and support by members of the public.

We must now be willing to engage in the same debate that too many nations have ignored to their own regret. Unless we are prepared to learn from the experience of others, the difficulties we are experiencing today may just be the genesis of a problem that could change our country forever.

Let me know what you think by posting your comments below.

3 thoughts on “The Debate We Have To Have”

  1. I agree 100% – however I would forcibly expel the muslim trash (and by this I mean the extremists – not the muslims who really are trying to integrate despite the Quran) – and if IT comes to violence I would reply 10 fold. These scum who pollute our shores MUST be expelled from them – we have the lessons of the UK, France and Holland to learn from. Appeasement (for what??????) is a waste of time and a sign of the criminally weak libtard. Then I would put the left wing fools who have put our children’s futures in such jeopardy on trail for treason and I WOULD call for the death penalty. You want to play social engineering then play it with your life only, not with the lives of the unborn generations who have no one to speak for them. The only word that come to mind when thinking of these idiotic left wing morons is “bloody selfish BASTARDS” – apologies for the swearing.

    On more practical terms perhaps we need to form a com-net to more effectively pass our concerns onto the idiots in Canberra who are supposed to work for us, and not against us.

  2. “not the muslims who really are trying to integrate despite the Quran”

    They would not be considered Muslims, rather they’d be apostates. Additionally it would not do anything to solved “sudden Jihad syndrome”.

  3. Point taken Darrin, however I suspect it is easier to work with the apostates rather then brand their entire community – at least the apostates have started asking questions and there is hope for them.

Comments are closed.