Blogtroll Solkhar

Cartoon thanks to Shem:

A Mohammedan pest with multiple personality disorder has been  annoying our regular posters here. Solkhar is almost through with the usual program of tu quoque, taqiyya, obfuscation and blather and has now arrived at the stage where he issues threats. (We are sheiking already!)

In spite of being disinvited on several occasions, Solkhar believes, like Mohammedans do, that he “is here to stay” and that he has “rights”, but that should be the least of our worries. Solkar believes, (at least that’s what he tells us)  that reporting on the global jihad and connecting the dots  is turning him into a Taliban, or worse: a radical!

Its all our fault, you see: Resisting jihad breeds jihad…

In that sense he is the prototype of a troll who displays all the usual traits of the cult.


Thanks to Mullah we have  been informed that Solkar, apart from being a curry connoiseur, also advertises his “left leaning genitals”on other blogs. Quite a piece of work, the Solka troll.

If this is our friend Solkhar as DHH (and it looks likely)
he claimed to be on the political left and a NSW country boy,
plus service in the Navy – Frankston, & has a chef’s cert.

(one of his role-play identities)

DHH said
June 8, 2008 at 3:54 am

Though I left for Morocco in 2002, I am still try my best to keep up with
the homeland. Suprisingly we have a lot in common. I am a left-leaner
(genitals also) who will spit out something more `rightish´ if it suits
and makes sense to me.

Geelong – Yes!!! Though a NSW Country boy, my navy days starting at
Frankston may have had something to do with that.

Though I am in the security business, I have a chef-s certificate and I
love south asian food and had the pleasure of travelling extensively in
that region…. only one crappy Indian resteruant in Marrakech though, damn,

Maylaysia, lived there and my second choice of country to live
in….(personal reasons but I love Australian – don´t forget that….

I wish I had a pool, hot as hell here, but I make it up by sitting every
morning in a cafe, sipping a mint-tea (real mint), reading my newspapers
and watching the snow covered Atlas Mountains and date palm and olive
trees below them (yes snow, even when it is 38 degrees in town).

Great blog site Wah, you have a friend here.

16 thoughts on “Blogtroll Solkhar”

  1. Dear Sheik,

    Thanks for exposing this troll.

    However, Lets stick with what we should do, and leave the bashing of Individuals to the lower minded people.

    We are different from Muslims, we talk with facts and with Evidence, Not based on words without any grounds.

    Bash Muslim Oppression: Yes
    Bash Ideologies: Yes
    Bash Religion: No, But we question it critically.
    Bash Solkhar in Particular: No (but maybe once if fine)

    I support that Solkhar, while being annoying has right to talk unless hes banned, but totally guilty of being entertaining.

    But since we stand for freedom, we should show a good example, even for a muslim when they never show to us, We stand as the better man. If he writes against us, we would counter based on facts and not ramblings from books from ‘heavenly’ authors.

    Muslims know that they based everything from muhammad & their books that were compiled after muhammad died. Every notation and rights is derived from there and it has completely no basis.

    Its our job to stop them from spreading fear, intimidation and oppression in the free world. Its our Job to protect the people, both Non Muslims and Muslims from being oppressed.

    We the non muslims must lead the was from the 7th century mindset that plagued half the worlds population. We must free them, from their masters of ideologies.

    Remember, we are better than muslims because we believe in freedom.

    My 2 cents.

    1. twjork, its not about bashing, its about the time and energy one wastes with pathological liars and detractors like Solkar or our latest daisy, “Jen Schmidt”.

      As for ‘bashing religion’ I beg to differ, since Islam, even in the words of the chairman of the Council of American Islamic Relations, CAIR, (a Hamas front) is an ideology, not a religion. More later>>

  2. Solkhar has purported, among other things, to be a former Dutch diplomat, an expert in terrorism financing, possibly ex-RAN, and
    a student of a school of islam (or similar).

    He implies that he should be taken seriously on the basis of credentials that he may well have fictioned up – he is the one doing the “bashing”, mainly against the “agenda driven” “right wing”
    “blog owner” (not to mention the “evangalical”) 🙂

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve? (apart from satan the
    shape-shifter in the role of “allah”).

  3. HaHaHaHaaaaa…..The Drawing is very Good Sheik,thats really Solkar..HaHaha. Anyway i told you before Sucky was a Fanatic and a Pathologic Liar Psychopath (a good muzz) …as i can see he is a social Parasite probably had never worked of all his life,he come from a Wealthy Family and spend most of his time ,mastubating himself in front of his Computer…it’s the only way he can have a ejaculation….Daugters…I don’t beleive’s another of his character invention,he live certainly in Holland beside of a Fucking Mosk…and now i think maybe he is a Turk not a morrocan,he hide his Ip…it’s easy to do with a program…
    Sheik you wrote ” a curry connoiseur” you make a mistake it’s ” a curry connaisseur”” just teasing you……
    Tjwork,i beleive you are a bit too much Angelic…Just a Feeling !

  4. Hang on guys.

    Yes, I agreed not to bash Religion, But I do not classify Islam as a Religion. Caught my drift? 🙂

    Pierre, I am good when Im supposed to be good, and I try not to win an argument without loosing my head. I said what I need to say & I would love to watch muslims use their heads for once.

    If they could use their head & think for themselves, they free their mind from a dangerous idealogy, & therefore I did my duty as a believer of the free world.

  5. The last thing I am going to do is put my real identity in front of a group of right-wing radicals whom spend their days spilling hate for the sake of their political or religious agendas. Especially when they have their own secrets to hide.

    The blog-owner for instance is not here to point out the dangers or evils of Islam, he has now confessed on three threads that his goal is to devalue Islam because he supports the turning of the occupied territories of the West Bank into a greater part of Israel.

    His use of condemned and failed academics shows the links he has and his very strong anti-Obama far-right views confirms what package he is – but of course he never admits to it – or anything that is pointed out as incorrect.

    There is also a radical evangalist regularly here who though using the fullest of insulting language and rhetoric that “good Christians” would never use, does so, attacks Islam as evil and disgusting and then in the same breadth says that the only salvation is through his version of Jesus (as if Jesus has a version). That sends a couple of simple messages, the first being that to “sell your religion” simply means a lack of confidence in it. That one must condemn one thing to install your own says that you do not only have lack of confidence in it but that you have an agenda in something that you really do not believe – to simply hide that it is wrong.

    A poster by the name of theresaj has serious problems. She has already confessed that here hatred for Islam is self-created because of her own singlular and individual experience with some bad Muslims (supposively). Something which in most books is simply a personal failure to look bigger than one’s own neighborhood and unjust to take it out on everyone. Most dangerous people in the world, historically, have been people with their own bad experience taking out their frustrations on others.

    She has shown how far and unfair her postings have been recently, particularly on the subject of Malaysia. Claiming (no actually saying lies) that Indians are suppressed, coordinated bias and suffering from Islamic-based persecution. Her biggest claim was that Christians are not allowed to have churches in Malaysia and they are called centres. I disproved that in a single second (knowing it is wrong because I have some very devout Catholic friends living there) by simply looking up on google the words Malaysia and Church.

    There are a number of other goofballs on the site, mostly there to simply post an abusive item with no logic or in some cases complete stupidity and then not appear for a day or so and they certainly will not hang around to justify their rediculous rants.

    I have nothing to hide except identity because I do not want my private email and life here in Marrakech and Rotterdam disrupted by the evil rantings of agenda based right-wingers. I have made it clear that I have an agenda, to identify and to understand the basis behind the agenda-based hate blogs against Islam. There is no doubt that by hanging around, proding and pushing the reasons for people to rant and post complete BS, twisted facts and bigoted statements that I have achieved to narrow down why. I have done this before and I certainly will do so again in other sites.

    The reality and conclussions are simple. Some of the posters basically fall into three categories. The ignorants (who believe what they come accross and never bother to look for themselves), the sheep whom just want or need to follow a group and fall always for the more radical because the words are exciting, and then there are the foxes, those that have an agenda and feed of the first two groups and have only to justify themselves to them, thus being able to make the most rediculous spins. Spencer is a fox, but ironically in his book, the blog-owner is probably a sheep wanting to be a fox and doing a pretty bad job at it.

    I am actually more interested in discovering the sheep and the foxes because the ignorants are always going to be there. The sheep get a kick out of the human habit that loves scandal and some go to far and start making their own scandal – even if they are making it up. Theresaj is a perfect example of a damaged sheep.

    Foxes (or would be foxes like the blog-owner ) have a number of reasons to fill their agendas. In this case, he has shown his devotion to far-right Israeli politics and the total annexation of the West-Bank which is a perfect reason for an agenda. He knows, through the complete BS that he twists and lies about, that he cannot actually debate or follow his line with an honest face and frankly speaking he does not care – which he has already admitted to. He plays the language game because we all know and no-one is denying that there are radical and violent islamists that will kill and claim Islam is on their side. So he plays on that. There are also, but not in numbers, violent and dangerous others doing the same, some with a gun, some with laws, some by wearing a uniform, some by spouting hate. He will avoid that and claim first that it is not part of the subject matter, second he will try and say you are lying, then it is “he does not care” and lastly he will even SNIP your post. Fine, it is his fictional blog anyhow. He is though, very upset that his scam has been caught out and his fear is clear, that I point out to the ignorants and the sheep that his is in fact making most of it up for his agenda. He will deny I am important but he has devoted a lot of his posts now to trying to do everything and anything to discredit but not actually defend his postings with facts.

  6. * (as if Jesus has a version)

    God’s “version”, Solkhar:

    (John 3 – part)
    And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, [even] the Son of man which is in heaven.

    And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

    That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

    He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

    And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

    There are no other versions, Solkhar – definitely not “allah’s”.
    “Interpret” the Gospel through the koran at your own peril.

    Islam is doomed. Flee from it, Solkhar – run for your life!

  7. Solkhar ,
    You are deluded about Malaysia but I understand why you need to hang onto your delusions. You want to believe in the myth of “modern , moderate Malaysia” although almost noone in the region believes in it .

  8. sheikyermami, many other blogs filter comments; you don’t have to put up with the outrageous liar solkar. It’s hard enough to keep a reasonable discussion going without having to deal with obfuscation and outright deception.

  9. Arius, still sore because you were pointed out as supporting radical Serbian Nationalist propoganda BS? No, there was no Srebrenica massacre…LMAO, I was there two months after the event.

  10. theresaj,

    you like to state that there are no churches in Malaysia except those pre-indendance and you state as fact that those that try to build now are only called “centres” and that they all look like factories so they are not noticed.

    I put on the appropriate thread more than 100 churhes, listed and almost all post independance with almost all their own websites and all looking very much like churches.

    So I think we know who is deluded.

  11. 1) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
    2) Islam is seen as separate and ‘other’. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
    3) Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
    4) Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a ‘clash of civilisations’.
    5) Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.
    6) Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
    7) Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
    8) Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

    1. Yep, that just about sums it up.

      Now please tell us: do you agree with stoning, hand and limb-chopping, public beheading, killing of homosexuals, whacking women and children under burkas, rape of infidel women, child marriage, FGM, the killing of unbelievers and Jews etc or do you unequivocally denounce it?

  12. Sheik I can’t believe you waste so much time addressing this lying hell-bound Mohammadan infidel. There are millions of them out there.

  13. Solkar t’es vraiment un Malade ,T’es un Fou en Liberté….Ça dois pas être reposant vivre près de Toi.
    Sorry solkar no time for the Traduction…Go on Google Traduction…

  14. Solkhar wrote, among other things:

    2) Islam is seen as separate and ‘other’. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.

    Now why would that be, Solkhar? Could it be that islam maintains
    its “separateness” and “otherness”, by force if necessary?

    This is how Morocco seeks to bind people of Moroccan origin in Netherlands – financially, *culturally* and politically:

    NIS News Bulletin ( )
    AMSTERDAM, 19/09/08 – MPs and local council members of Moroccan origin are routinely approached by the Moroccan secret service to defend the interests of Morocco. So says Fouad el Haji, a Labour (PvdA) council member in Rotterdam. The Lower House is shocked and has demanded an explanation from the cabinet.

    El Haji said on n TV programme Pauw&Witteman that Moroccan-Dutch MPs, local politicians, entrepreneurs and police officers are enticed by the Moroccan secret service to serve the interests of Morocco. Rabat wants to bind them to it financially, culturally and politically, he stated.

    El Haji suggested that within the PvdA, Socialist Party (SP) and leftwing Greens (GroenLinks), there are polticians who have taken up the offer and thus work for the secret service. He suggested one or several MPs or ex-MPs are among them. But he declined to name any names.

    El Haji said he himself was also approached. “It is a pattern,” he explained. “You are invited to gala parties and treated with all attentions. Before you know it, you are on a plane to Morocco. When you visit Morocco, you are even more cosseted.”

    ‘Ordinary’ Moroccans are also targeted, El Haji continued. For example, they are urged to use their savings to buy a second house in Morocco. The integration process is thereby deliberately frustrated, according to El Haji.

Comments are closed.