Demoting Islam's Religion Status

The purpose of this article is to introduce the proposition that Islam’s religion status is undeserving, that it should never have been granted in the first place, and that its religion status should be immediately rescinded.

Why? Because Islam — whether you call it moderate, militant, main stream, traditional or radical — is a relentless foe inherently programmed to conqueror its host nation. Fail to understand this point and Islam will continue “trashing” civil liberties, shedding bloody pandemonium, wreaking havoc, litigating as warfare, demanding special privileges, and instigating anarchy until its host country suffers irreparable harm if not outright defeat. Such is the virulent modus operandi being used by Islam in England, Spain, India, France, Thailand, Holland, Bali, Lebanon, Denmark, Sweden, Philippines, Russia, America and elsewhere.

Perhaps, this is why Dr. Paul Williams, author of Dunces of Doomsday so truthfully and valiantly states in Chapter 1, Refusing to Identify the Enemy:

“The enemy is Islam. Not a fringe group within the body of believers … Not radical Islam as if a faction can be separated from the “mainstream” Islam. But Islam itself, as expressed by the life and teachings of Muhammad …”

Read the whole thing from Citizen Warrior

And then this:

99.9% of all Muslims have a deeply-held secret agenda (wish) that Islam will conquer their host country and turn it into an Islamic nation. Such is their indelible religious conditioning. This obvious fact has been completely neglected, ignored, avoided and shunned by the leadership of western democracies to their great detriment, including America.

30 thoughts on “Demoting Islam's Religion Status”

  1. Not quite sure about the 99.9% – I would actually disagree and say that amongst educated muslims the number is far far less (the uneducated sub-group are closer to this number but they should not be here – ask gordon why he is bringing them over ) – but I agree with the principal of the article.

  2. off topic I know but this cracked me up..

    “The only difference between a cult and a religion is the amount of real estate they own ”
    — Frank Zappa

  3. * “The enemy is Islam. Not a fringe group within the body of believers

    An “attack” on one of the “brothers” by the “infidel” police is taken
    as an attack on all …

    Facebook used to organise Auburn racial riot – police
    A RIOT by Muslim youths in the western Sydney suburb of Auburn last week was organised via Facebook, police believe.

    The troublemakers used the social networking site to flash up inflammatory references to police and rally their friends for a confrontation.

    One update identified police as “non-believers” who were raiding a “brother’s home”.

    More than 150 people gathered in Cumberland Road, Auburn, on Tuesday night, forcing police to call in 100 officers, the riot squad and a helicopter.

    The tense stand-off came after Middle Eastern organised crime squad police raided four homes.

    Opposition Police spokesman Mike Gallacher’s office revealed one of the Facebook updates read: “Kefeirs raiding brother’s house, everyone get down hier (sic)!!”

    (,28348,26067235-5014239,00 )

    Decision time for the Western world – choose wisely!

  4. So, will the Aussie Police change tactics and smarten up? How about using cell phone jammers and cutting power to entire grids right before conducting police raids and operations? American and European police, are you too stupid to realize what you are dealing with? Too stupid to learn from the mistakes of others? I believe so.

    This is why the entire world of good and free people need a second amendment type gun law, just like in the United States. And access to body armor….like “Dragon Skin”.

  5. I find this hilarious, about as stupid and obvious propaganda as the poll question and the previous one.

    “99.9% of all Muslims have a deeply-held secret agenda (wish) that Islam will conquer their host country and turn it into an Islamic nation. Such is their indelible religious conditioning. This obvious fact has been completely neglected, ignored, avoided and shunned by the leadership of western democracies to their great detriment, including America.”

    Yeah sure, get real and back to planet earth! Radicalism is a serious problem and the most aggressive estimates from educative, professional and government sources puts the figure at 15 per cent. Even if that figure is reached (which is very high and very worrying) it still puts 85 per cent of all Muslims as simply wanting to get on with life, make a living, feed and watch thier families grow and live in a peaceful life in whatever location they have chosen to be in.

    The reality for this article has already been explored and confirmed by both the blog-owner and myself on a number of threads, with this basically now putting it as a presentation.

    The blog-owner believes that the Palestinian Territories (of what he and Jews often call Samaria, Jordan and Hebron) as being a part of Israel and the Jewish State and he of course has hinted on numerous occassions that the Palestinians must be relocated and we can presume – or face the consequences.

    I cannot think of any other definition than this being a claim of ethnic cleansing and is under all laws, including those of the Jewish State, as being a war crime.

    Interesting, the blog-owner avoided also comments on the item posted about these territories and I placed interesting items from the media about how recently the religious orthodox-far-right have increased their numbers into the IDF and have convinced elements in the government to support the increased numbers of Rabbis with troops. That this started in the Gaza War and that they were active (as they are officers and trained with weapons) often leading the forces. We all know as fact that the Gaza War was contraversial for being extra brutal, used weapons that are considered inhumane and illegal and many more civilians died than expected.

    The blog-owner did not comment at all, and it is a safe assumption that he simply is happy and supported these events.

    This brings completely to question (well I questioned it from the first time I posted) that this blog is here simply to try and make excuses to try and justify a political-religous land-grab and thus I put that agenda along with the blog-owner in the same category as Hamas, Hezbollah and radical Islamists (that he is trying to condemn). His support may be on the internet and not pulling triggers, but he is supporting the violence as much as the radical clerics that he points fingers at.

    Radicalism is evil, be it the one’s with guns and abusing the Qur’an and those radical Zionists on the internet. The only bright-spark in this entire process is that the blog and its owner are unwanted and disliked frindgedwellers.

  6. From

    re⋅li⋅gion  /rɪˈlɪdʒən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-lij-uhn]
    –noun 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
    2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
    3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
    4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
    5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
    6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
    7. religions, Archaic. religious rites.
    8. Archaic. strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one’s vow


    Pronunciation: ri-ˈli-jən
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Middle English religioun, from Anglo-French religiun, Latin religion-, religio supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perhaps from religare to restrain, tie back — more at rely
    Date: 13th century
    1 a : the state of a religious b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
    2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
    3 archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness
    4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith

    — re·li·gion·less adjective

    As we can see, the article is pure and utter BS and all establishments of credibility, governments, all major religious institutions and academic institutions all agree and recoginise Islam.

    In addition, all the above consider that the God of Islam is also the same God of Judaism and Christianity and they recognise and understand that the term “Allah” is simply the arabic language form of “God”.

    But of course the blog-owner, Spencer and Fitzgeral know better…..LMAO, ROFL.

  7. We are not fighting “radicalism”, sokker. We are fighting Islam and Jihad. Or more precisely: the soldiers of allah are waging jihad against us since the 7th century.

    All we’re trying to do is to wake up the sleeping dolts around us and raise awareness to the fact that Mohammedans are in the final stages of conquering us without firing a shot:

    “Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam does not look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam does not care about the land or or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, islam will fight and destroy. In order to fulfill that goal , Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is jihad.”

    Sayyed Abdul A’la Maududi in “Jihad in Islam.”

    “The chief weapon in the quiver of all Islamist expansionist movements, is the absolute necessity to keep victims largely unaware of the actual theology plotting their demise. To complete this deception, a large body of ‘moderates’ continue to spew such ridiculous claims as “Islam means Peace” thereby keeping non-Muslims from actually reading the Qur’an, the Sira, the Hadith, or actually looking into the past 1400 years of history. Islamists also deny or dismiss the concept of ‘abrogation’, which is the universal intra-Islamic method of replacing slightly more tolerable aspects of the religion in favor of more violent demands for Muslims to slay and subdue infidels”….

  8. * In addition, all the above consider that the God of Islam is also the same God of Judaism and Christianity and they recognise and understand that the term “Allah” is simply the arabic language form of “God”.

    Jesus Christ, God’s only begotten son, had a different view – it matters little what “all the above” consider – their blasphemy will be dealt with, should they die in unbelief concerning Jesus’ atoning death on the cross, and subsequent resurrection.

    “allah” has no son; the Biblical God consists of Father, Son and Holy
    Spirit (the Comforter / Paraclete)

    This is a war, Solkhar – a war which will see islam and its “god” eliminated by the very God it mocks and blasphemes against.

  9. Should also point out that in his totally off-topic post he quoted Sayyed Abdul A’la Maududi whom is an example of a radical, a prosthelitizer (Jamat al Islami) and a believe in the caliphate concept.

    If you want to quote radicals all the time, then you will get radical quotes. If you quote actual “authorities” you will get authoritive quotes and if you post moderates you will get modrating quotes.

    Thus, if you pick and chose, you are not showing reality.

  10. * Should also point out that in his totally off-topic post

    Whose blog is it, Solkhar, yours, or Sheik Yer’mamis?

    Here is a radical quote for you, Solkhar:

    “I am the good shepherd, and I know My own and My own know Me,
    even as the Father knows Me and I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep.”

    You equate your foul demonic god with God the Father and Son, Solkhar? Do you really believe that Jews and Christians tampered
    with the Word of God?

  11. You know, we could save ourselves a lot of taxpayers dollars if this could be put in the form of a protest.
    If Islam is not a religion then the government should not grant them any special tax privileges and rights that they enjoy now
    Someone put this into a well-worded(that counts me out) online protest and I will be the first to sign it.

  12. This Solkhar shows where he is coming from with his pro-“palestinian” references in an ad hominim attack on the blog owner.

    As the percentage of Moslems increases in non-Moslem lands, the “Muslims . . . simply wanting to get on with life, make a living, feed and watch their families grow and live in a peaceful life in whatever location they have chosen to be in” will not join with non-Moslems to vigorously resist the Moslems’ drive for Islamic rule in the host nation.

    How many “peaceful” Moslems will condemn
    the drive to force sharia on the rest of us?

    The excuse can be made for these “peaceful” Moslems that they are afraid of the “non-peaceful” Moslems. If they do not join with us to resist Islamization, however, then we must count them that are against us.

  13. Solkhar,
    The fact is that the conflict is not with muslims, but with islam. No mattter which direction the problem is twisted, the conclusion is the same.

  14. kaw, Muslims follow the Koran and the hadith. Muslims do what Muhammad commands them to do. The difference between the so-called ‘radicals’ and the ‘moderates’ is solely in strategy: the Chaudareys and the bin Ladens want the fast jihad and engage in terrorism while the latter engage in subversion and outbreeding the infidel.

    They compliment each other. The endgame is the same.

    Maududi has a lot more clout and authority than any government paid agit prop, namely Solker….

  15. “85 per cent of all Muslims as simply wanting to get on with life, make a living, feed and watch thier families grow and live in a peaceful life in whatever location they have chosen to be in.”

    With islamic schools, wudu washers and “prayer” rooms in airports,
    no service dogs in taxis, the “right” to set conditions of employment
    (wearing hijab in trendy hairdressers, veils in schools etc), recognition
    of islamic “holy” days – while the nations they have left continue to
    limit the rights of Christians, Jews and others…

    Three steps forward, two steps back, but islamic encroachment on
    the West continues, with little effective response from the target

  16. I have to agree with this article. I started saying it should be taken out of the category of religion a few years ago. But with this will come a lot of violence with the first country that starts doing this. I don’t know if other countries will follow – Europe and the UK are wetting their pants whenever an infidel speaks poorly of islam. Our own politicians and religious leaders – except for a few – also cannot stand up to islam. They call a war just one of their tactics – terror. And they cannot even define the enemy.

    Well, I could go on showing how political and religious leaders fail us, but I think you all get the drift.

    The news? Well, they are on the same page as our politicians. The mainstream media, including Fox, wouldn’t even suggest such a thing but they might report it if someone else did. The Saudis bought even more of Fox news. But, overall their reporting fails in their understanding of islam overall. We are going to get more and more young adults being influenced by the MSA (that noone is taking on either) that has direct ties to terrorists that are in our schools. What is happening in our kid’s schools concerning islam should wake us up and have us out in droves – but the ACLU are completely silent unless they can pounce on Christians and parents, news, etc barely bring it up. Here is an article about what they have successfully gotten into our kid’s history books and make our kids do – it is appalling:

    And to read such drivel from someone like solkhar who says it would be a genocide shows us what is first on his mind – violence. Why would it be violent? Well, I would say the violence would be coming from the muslims – not the reverse. Yes, I think the violence would increase to a level we might not be ready for and the oil rich muslim nations would probably take actions too – monetarily and with their jihadists that they have been training/funding. Keep in mind that muslims target children, and women, right in keeping with their profit, oh er I mean prophet.

    So, to do such a thing – we need to be mindful that a population would need to be ready. And right now we have the left wing liberals running things – and they see us as the problem, not the ones who would rather see them dead or subjugated.

  17. @Solkar
    If you are into definitions, how about Islam is an ideology instead?
    1. the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group.
    2. such a body of doctrine, myth, etc., with reference to some political and social plan, as that of fascism, along with the devices for putting it into operation.
    e the anti-islamists are racist, fascist etc.: If it quacks, swims, and has a yellow beak, calling it a dormouse won’t make it any less hairy.
    You lot are the ones practising apartheid, killing Kufirs, requiring special WCs in university etc,. therefore you are the fascists, not us.

  18. R_not
    Just read an article reminding us that the German Nationalist Socialist Party (Deutsche Nazional-Sozialistische Partei ) was socialist i.e. Left, i.e. all this rubbish about the right wing being nazi/fascist etc. is part and parcel of the NewSpeak currently being practised.

  19. It was difficult for the Allied soldiers in WW2 to determine who the ‘good’ (flower growing) and ‘bad’ (Hitler following) Nazis were.

    Eventually they found it easier to denounce all Moslems Nazis and everything about Nazism and kill or capture every one they saw.

    Worked real well too.

  20. The blog-owner’s tactics are clear now.

    If he is unable to justify or face debate he SNIPS the comment.

    The SNIP above is pointing out that this item/thread subject is an attempt to rediculously claim that Islam is not a religion. So I pointed out it is and his response was “as per normal” to change the subject.

    So SNIP, he does not want that pointed out and continues to press on another issue. Not very good blog-management there.

  21. gsw,

    Nazism is not on the left but on the far-right. Because it uses the word Socialist does not make it so. I can think of communist regimes that exist now that use the word Democratic but they are definitely communist.

    Nazism is the most extreme you can go on the far-right of polics and it also shows that extreme radicalism on both spheres in the end turn into almost carbon copies of themselves – which does not allow for freedoms, the desire to eliminate those that disagree and that they have to “tell you” what to do and how to do it – by force if necessary.

  22. “Nazism is not on the left but on the far-right”

    This absurd fallacy trumpeted by post modern liberals & Muslims is so easy to refute, I’ve always been mystified why every person with a ounce of common sense in their reasoning doesn’t destroy this lie. Let’s compare concepts of Nazism with Judeo/Christian conservative people these days. Are conservatives totalitarian in their principles of government? How on earth is the ideal of a Constitutional Republic that draws it’s vast majority of principles straight from the Bible in line with the Nazi ideology? Racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy is something conservatives detest and rally against with all passion. Pay close attention when people spew Nazi rhetoric…and you’ll see who is attracted to the garbage like flies. Modern liberals & Muslims find instant allies with the them. Liberals & Muslims LOVE to flame people with the stigma of racism to further their ideals…and absolutely adore state control of EVERYTHING from religion, politics to economics . This makes it extremely difficult to separate them when they operate in stealth mode in order to infiltrate western governments. Muslims in America hate right wing conservatives because the core values & principles have nothing in common what so ever and they plainly understand the ideologies are true enemies in every specific area concerning relations between government & the people. Its more than just coincidence that the rise of Socialism dominating Europe and the colonization of of the EU with millions upon millions of Muslims who show no interest in intergrating into the fabric of European society…yet are still being welcomed with open arms by the left wing Socialists. [left & right labels are flip flopped between the USA & Europe for reasons of demonizing conservatives here America]. Islamic interests in America find their true support among progressive ultra liberal democrats…perfect case in point – rep. Muhammad Keith Ellison, the first [public] Muslim to get elected in USA, found instant family with one of the most liberal districts politically in America…Minneapolis, MN.

    Liberals, Nazis, Muslims = band of brothers

    They have always allied and find aid in comfort within each other’s rule.

  23. LOL how funny the Muslim TROLL Solkhar trying the left wing ‘libtard’ smear that Hitler was a conservative. He does this of course despite all the historical evidence of the roots and the history of the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party. Still Mohammedans like him make the same false claims too about Islam being a “Peaceful religion” so what do you expect.

  24. “Nazism is often considered by scholars to be a form of fascism. While it incorporated elements from BOTH LEFT AND RIGHT WING, the Nazis formed most of their alliances on the RIGHT. The Nazis were one of several historical groups that used the term National Socialism to describe themselves, and in the 1920s they became the largest such group. The Nazi Party presented its program in the 25 point National Socialist Program in 1920. Among the key elements of Nazism were anti-parliamentarism, Pan-Germanism, racism, collectivism,[10][11] eugenics, antisemitism, anti-communism, totalitarianism and “opposition to economic liberalism and political liberalism”….”

    “According to most scholars of fascism, there are both left and RIGHT influences on the ideology; it has historically attacked communism, conservatism and parliamentary liberalism, attracting support primarily FROM THE FAR RIGHT.

    The term far right has been used by different scholars in at least two somewhat conflicting ways:[2]

    1. Reform-oriented right-wing movements or rightist factions of conservative political parties. These are sometimes called the dissident right, activist right, or right-wing populism. They are positioned between traditional conservatives and the extreme right. These participants are found outside mainstream electoral politics, but they generally produce a movement of reform rather than revolution.

    2. Neo-fascists and neo-Nazis are usually labeled extreme right or ultra right. Such groups are generally revolutionary in character rather than reformist. Neo-Nazi and Neo-fascist literally means “new Nazi” and “new fascist”, implying that they are from the period following World War II.

Comments are closed.