"Jihad is an invention by right wing bigots & the Zionist media to give Islam a bad image"

Except when it isn’t: Whole lotta “inner struggle” going on!

JW Newslinks:

img051

Jordanian arrested in Dallas bomb plot had been under surveillance for some time after expressing “his desire to commit violent jihad”

Man arrested in alleged attempt to bomb Dallas skyscraper,” from WFAA, September 24:

FBI: Jordanian man planned to bomb Dallas building

More on this breaking news. “FBI: Man Planned to Bomb Dallas Building,” from MyFoxDFW, September 24:

Jordanian man arrested in Dallas in attempt to bomb downtown skyscraper

A very similar case to that which occurred earlier in the day in Illinois. Just in fromWFAA, and also reported on ABC’s World News Tonight. More information as it becomes available.

Muslim charged with plotting to blow up Illinois federal courthouse

Apparently another Misunderstander of Islam, and a freelance jihadist. Why did he think it would be a good thing to blow up the Federal Building, and where did he get this idea? “Man accused of plotting to bomb Springfield courthouse,” from Chicago Breaking News, September 24:

New York jihad suspect “purchased unusually large quantities of hydrogen peroxide and acetone from beauty supply stores in the Denver metropolitan area”

“Court documents say Zazi sent text messages to the others, “each communication more urgent in tone than the last – seeking to correct mixtures of ingredients to make explosives.”

But hang on. Surely we’ll all hear soon enough how this was “taken out of context.” “The Beauty Parlor Bomb Plan; Massive Terror Plot Alleged,” by Brian Ross and Richard Esposito for ABC News, September 24:

15 thoughts on “"Jihad is an invention by right wing bigots & the Zionist media to give Islam a bad image"”

  1. “Jihad is an invention by right wing bigots & the Zionist media to give Islam a bad image”

    No, jihad exists but is either inner struggle or the act of defending Islam. It has not been sanctioned since the end of the Crusades.

    The terms is abused by both radical militant “Islamists” whom think they have the right to claim it when they do obviously do not – by and those right wing radicals whom wish to benefit from it for their own agendas wich also includes basic bigotry.

    There, fixed it for you blog owner.

    1. Let me fix it for you, solker boy.

      Here, from my dear friend Robert Spencer, for whom you have such a boner:

      … peaceful Muslims have never formulated an Islamic response to the jihadists’ claim to represent pure and true Islam—and as long as they do not and apparently cannot do so, the jihadists will continue to hold the intellectual initiative within Islamic communities worldwide… no one, Muslim or non-Muslim, has ever yet refuted the contention that Islam teaches warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers. And so one thing is certain: that warfare will continue”.

      ”For while the Bible contains descriptions of violent acts committed in the name of God, nowhere does it teach believers to imitate that violence. Where people are commanded to commit acts of violence, these are commands directed to specific individuals or groups in particular situations; they are not universal commands.

      The Qur’an, on the other hand, quite clearly does teach believers to commit acts of violence against unbelievers—see 2:190-193, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4, etc. There are no equivalents to such open-ended and universal commands, addressed to all believers to fight unbelievers, in the Bible.”

      Need more fixing? Let me know if I can help!

  2. The “imposter” Solkhar knows more about islam and jihad than the
    “real” Solkhar, who is better at blaspheming and snitching than glossing
    over the waves of jihad & terror that “allah” is currently unleashing
    across the globe. Stick to being a Geelong supporter & food critic.

  3. Sulky,did you read my last comment voila 3 or 4 days ago, I just want to be sure you have not missed…..me too i want to Help.

  4. Robert Spencer knows only how to sell books…

    SNIP for a senseless stupid rant and ad hominem attack.

    If you cannot deal with the substance, don’t bother, Solker!

  5. Spencer studied Islam for over 20 years and knows everything, inside out, solker, better than your mufti.

    That’s just a fact. Smears don’t stick.

    Fitzgerald is a walking encyclopedia and a mental giant, and statements like ‘he doesn’t know what he’s talking about’ from a lowly snitch and an agenda driven Mohammedan blog troll don’t make it.

    You have behaved reasonably well tonight, solker, and that’s why I put up with you. But when you fail you resort to smears and senseless attacks on the man, and that’s not on.

  6. LOL, the other day some idiot drove through a give-way sign in Oujda (north east Morocco) and when I confronted him for almost denting my new Mercedez, he argued that he has been driving for 20 years. So, I told him it was a shame that in 20 years that he obviously learnt nothing.

    IF Spencer studies Islam for 20 years then it only confirms that he is lying through his teath because he has not shown any example of knowing the reality on the ground for the average Muslim in the street. Spencer depicts a world with Imams, Mullahs and radicals on every street corner, women huddled together in burqas running down the street being constantly sexually harassed and the only conversation in cafés is about hatred towards non-Muslims and how they are all going on to some jihad. That image, is of course, complete nonesense.

    Fitzgerald is not a mental giant but in fact the more devient hate-monger than Spencer. His articles are directly designed to create hate that is perhaps only equalled by the rhetoric of a former Bosnian Serb leader. His constant use of catchphrases like “dhimmitude” and “jizya” are not the sign of a “walking encyclopedia” but of that of a political activist.

    Both Spencer and Fitzgerald are sell-outs. They could have been smart and attack extremism, radicalism, violence and terrorism and supported and encouraged Muslims and Muslim nations in doing more. They could have even condemned Muslim nations and moderate Muslims for sitting on their backsides and doing nothing to stop radicalism. They could have even condemned western governemnts for their caving in to radicalism and not supporting correctly and ensuring moderates but they did not. Why? Not an ideology or some “knowledge” that they know better than others whom are more qualified, experienced and better travelled – but because it does not make money. Also, that they failed to be important or accepted in the field of education, social or government service and thus chose to attack it.

    Your love for them is rather disturbing blog-owner. They are for me insulting because they are nothing making money from nothing and they detract the effort to fight real and dangerous radicalism and thus are considered dirt by those of us around the world whom are actually working hard, sometimes risking our lives to do something constructive about the real issues.

    1. Look at it, solker, just look at it!

      ONE BIG SMEAR!

      Nothing of substance, just dreck. I let it stand because it shows your intellectual bankruptcy. (I didn’t remove any other posts either, not in the last 5 hours anyhow; so I don’t know what’s you’re missing) I hope its not more of the same. I can imagine that my “love for them is rather disturbing” to you, solker boy, just like the truth which you hate, but Robert Spencer, David Horowitz, Pamela Geller, doctor Andy Bostom, Daniel Pipes etc are very good friends of mine, (we have our differences) they are brave and bright, they have integrity and courage and stand their ground, and and what do you have, solker? A mandate from allah to wage jihad by the pen?

      You cannot oppose us on the field of ideas, you cannot refute what we say, so smears is all you got, apart from the occasional threats. But compared to others you been civil, solker.

      Do you really think that we all could not do far better for ourselves (Islam is such a dumb, boring subject) than to waste time educating silly libtards and far left loons, than dismantling cheap internet snitches who would love to take us off the web?

      What you are suggesting above (to go on a wild goose chase after “radicals”) is the failed head in the sand “policy” currently adapted by western governments at the insistence of clueless fools and sneaky mohammedans. We see it fail every day.

      Ah yes, “we’re in it for the money”, hahahaha!

      That is just dumb.

      Nobody goes through this kind of trouble for the money, we could all do a lot better than dealing with politically correct loons and sly, murderous moslems who lust to kill us.

    2. solker smears:

      “Fitzgerald is not a mental giant but in fact the more devient hate-monger than Spencer. His articles are directly designed to create hate “

      Not solker.Fitzgerald is not a ‘hate-monger.’ Lets put it this way: your “he doesn’t know what he’s talking about” smear gives you away as a mental midget.

      “His constant use of catchphrases like “dhimmitude” and “jizya” are not the sign of a “walking encyclopedia” but of that of a political activist.”

      Fitzgerald is perfectly within his rights to be a political activist. So am I. That’s our choice.

      Once again: we don’t “create hate”- hate comes with the mohammedan mental baggage. We expose it, we expose you.

      Besides, who are you to tell us we are not entitled to hate?

      As we have a G-d given right to love, so do we have a right to hate those who want to take that away from us and destroy our society. We are united in protecting our culture and civilization from Mohammedanism. We follow proudly in the tradition of our forebears who have fought and died to keep our world free from mohammedan domination.

      “dhimmitude” and “jizya”: so why does it bother you that people might begin to understand these “catchphrases?”

      You don’t like the mohammedan grand plans exposed, ain’t that right, solkie?

  7. You have absolutely no idea of the nature of the “god” you serve,
    and in whose name you blaspheme the Son of God and dismiss His crucifixion as something akin to the wares of vacuum cleaner salesmen.

    You are involved in a war against the God of the Universe – you,
    allah and its false prophet are doomed, unless you change your
    mind about the Son of God.

    Islam is on borrowed time, no matter how much glitter you roll it in.

  8. Solkhar the serial blasphemer & snitch wrote “those of us around the world whom are actually working hard, sometimes risking our lives to do something constructive about the real issues.”

    You? dismissing the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the only means by which
    sinners might be saved, as akin to the wares of a vacuum cleaner
    salesman? You? dobbing in preachers of the Gospel? You are a fake, a shapeshifting chameleon in the service of allah and its false prophet – a willing slave, mocking and blaspheming against everything sacred and holy, and now you have the gall to pretend that you are working hard and constructively on “real issues”, while attacking those who
    are.

  9. Solker sez:

    Spencer depicts a world with Imams, Mullahs and radicals on every street corner, women huddled together in burqas running down the street being constantly sexually harassed and the only conversation in cafés is about hatred towards non-Muslims and how they are all going on to some jihad. That image, is of course, complete nonesense.

    Its worse, solker. Far worse:

    The Trash of Cairo

    It might be shocking for most people to realize that the trash collection system for the largest city in the Arab world, the capital of what passes for Arab Muslim civilization, depended on a class of “untouchable” garbage collectors as young as eight years old, and their pigs to keep the city from drowning in its own garbage. A system that is not simply medieval, but pre-medieval, that seems positively Bronze Age. But that is only because the Arab Muslim nations are not actually civilizations in the modern sense, they are post-colonized tribal clumpings with bits and pieces of borrowed governmental structures and technology that never quite work right. And underneath them is something far darker and more primitive, a miserably brutal and ruthless Levantine existence defined not by moral laws, but by tribal ones. And underneath them all are the pigs. Kill the pigs, and the system collapses.

    It isn’t just about the piles of reeking trash in Cairo’s streets. The Arab and Muslim world has been exporting far more dangerous forms of waste in the forms of immigration and Islamic radicalism. Virtually every Arab rulers balances the tension between national allegiance and Islamic law by exporting terrorism abroad, whether it is Arab governments funding suicide bombers in Israel, rabid mosques in Oslo and Manchester or Al Queda hijacked planes racing toward Manhattan– the homelands of Islam have been calculatedly dumping the garbage they don’t want on foreign shores.

    Read the whole thing, here

  10. I’ve looked at the one bad apple link and would like to see it that way except that this blog itself carries sorry tales – tales in the plural – think this can be ignored in spite of bernieb’s exhortations.

    We get the mickey taken out of us in shops for fun by nuslims even as we are cancelling Christmas so we don’t offend them. I hate muslims. i am islamophobic

    I hate begians too – not a good one among them. Thing is saying I hate belgians doesn’t get me called belgophobic.

Comments are closed.