Scum Exposed

Update: looks like a major victory for Ezra Levant in Canada:

siren

CHRC investigates Richard Warman for hate speech

Richard Warman, the hate speech complainant who is personally responsible for all but two section 13 censorship prosecutions this decade, is now being investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for hate speech himself.

I know. It sounds crazy. Just like it sounded crazy when it was revealed that Warman and the CHRC were members of neo-Nazi organizations.

Read it all!

Minimal impairment vs. maximum

Ezra Levant

Maclean’s magazine has a persuasive call for the repeal of section 13, the censorship provision of the Canadian Human Rights Act. I’d encourage you to read the whole thing, here — it’s one of the clearlest analyses I’ve read of the decision in Warman v. Lemire, and it explains why the law is so rotten.

The tribunal decision in Warman v. Lemire focuses on the “aggressive” and “confrontational” nature of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. No kidding. What was supposed to be a conciliatory Oprah-style forum has turned into a case study of government brutality, corruption and abuse.

Update:


The worst excesses of the CHRC were committed by, or in the service of, Richard Warman. He’s the serial litigant-of-fortune who is responsible for more section 13 complaints than anyone else — in fact, all but two of the cases prosecuted this decade have him as the complainant. Funny: you wouldn’t think that a privileged, white lawyer, working for the Canadian government, would face so much discrimination. Of course, he hasn’t — he isn’t gay, or black, or Jewish. But he files complaints in the name of gays and blacks and Jews, and receives tens of thousands of dollars in reward money, extracted from his victims — tax free.

(The fact that Warman himself has joined several neo-Nazi groups, and published hundreds of anti-Semitic, anti-black and anti-gay comments — including while working for the CHRC! — is even more perverse.)

The CHRC was bad enough before Warman started using it as his personal vehicle for vendettas and prosecutions. But he made the CHRC worse. He infected it with his own personal philosophy called “maximum disruption” — where he called for the use of “(almost) any means necessary”.

And sometimes Warman even counseled violence, as he did when one of his victims, David Icke, was speaking in Vancouver. Warman encouraged a group of street urchins to invade a book store where Icke was giving a speech, and pelt him with pies. They did — destroying books in the process. You can see a ten-minute excerpt from a British documentary on the subject, here:

Those are the actions of a radical, amoral activist. Amoral is too lenient, actually; when Warman and his friends laugh about “humiliating” their opponent, it’s not amoral. It’s despicable. This is the culture that Warman injected into the veins of the CHRC — and Jennifer Lynch hasn’t done a damned thing about it, other than try to cover it up.

But there’s a little thing called the Charter of Rights that forbids all that.

Section 2 of the Charter of Rights protects freedom of speech. Of course, many government laws violate that section — the law against forgery, for example, could be seen as a limit on what we can write or draw. But section 1 of our Charter says that some limits on freedom are acceptable in a “free and democratic society”. But the government has to prove that the infringement on our freedoms is “rationally connected” to the public policy goal; the goal is “pressing and substantial”, and that the means used “minimally impaired” the freedoms in question. It’s part of the Oakes Test.

Under our Charter of Rights, as interpreted by our courts through the Oakes Test, a government must infringe upon us in a minimal way. Richard Warman believes in harassing his opponents in a maximum way.

It was Warman’s abuse of the system that made the system illegal. In the end, Warman killed the goose that laid so many golden eggs for him.

I’d call it poetic justice, but Warman’s many victims would surely agree that we’re still far, far away from justice yet.

35 thoughts on “Scum Exposed”

  1. I think the structure of Human Rights Commissions globally, including at the UN, needs to be revisited.

    The purpose for them was noble but reflected the cold-war old world mentality that does not exist. It did not reflect the reality of what is human rights as well as was created in a style that, like the UN, is able to be hijacked by groupings. Before it was one or the other side of the Cold-War, then it was Western Hegimony and now the Muslim World.

    National HRCs are suffering the same, smart ethnic and religous communities are able to build up a base of lawyers, find the votes and abuse the laws that are in place.

    Mind you, and here is a confession or should I say addmission, I and two others based in Canada, had the CCD (Canadian Coalition for Democracy) blog-site closed down for inconsistant and biased blogging in defiance of its set aims and goals. The CCD Webiste is still up and running and was not the issue, but the blog-site had a separate administration that was linked to the JDL, cut out postings to support their views and since it had an address and identity in Vancouver and Toronto, I contacted some lawyer friends whom work in the same field as I do and had CHRC charge them and they closed the blog. They then in the “we are under maintenance” page that came up refered to outside risks from viruses, spam-bots and Jihad-Bots” and so I had them change that as well. They cut my postings because they did not like what I said and put clear bigoted postings instead was against their policy and thus they paid the price.

    WoJ users a carefully worded provider that allows his bigotry and though I could attack via the domain name, is not worth it because he is an individual, in the case of CCD, they were an organisation and as I said a number of times, freedom of speech is fine from individuals, once it becomes both collective and public, or from a person of influence and office (like Wilders) it is unacceptable.

    We have to live, like this thread says, “scum exposed”.

    1. Solker sez:

      “Freedom to hate has its limits though.”

      Start burning Koran, the hadith and chase the hate preachers into the desert then, solker!

      Tell the good imams in the mosques, who preach nothing but hatred and those who infect young kids with genocidal hatred of the infidel!

  2. “Tell the good imams in the mosques, who preach nothing but hatred and those who infect young kids with genocidal hatred of the infidel!”

    I do my bit and I tell people like the blog-owner as well.

    1. “I do my bit and I tell people like the blog-owner as well.”

      Yeah, you are certainly doing your bit. You just dumped another steaming pile of taqiyya on this blog and you’re truckin in the da’awa by the truckload!

  3. One only needs to see what is happening around the world when muslims reach critical mass to witness rabid hatred, yet to tackle the problem at its root muslims consider hate. Death to America, Death to Israel, Death to the infidel. This is not hate.
    The islamic cult was created by a psychopathic slave trader who got his rocks off beheading people and a penchant for little girls. This is hate.
    Our struggle is for intellectual freedom, and the alternative is unconditional surrender of the mind. Go to buggery, islam…

  4. “Mind you, and here is a confession or should I say addmission, I and two others based in Canada, had the CCD (Canadian Coalition for Democracy) blog-site closed down for inconsistant and biased blogging in defiance of its set aims and goals.”

    Sounds like the genuine Solkhar – how many islamic hate sites have
    you had closed down?

    1. Right, Mullah.

      But thanks to Ezra Levant’s shakedown of Richard Warman, chief gestapo scumbag at CHRC, it won’t be so easy in the future to harass anyone. The Nazi bastard is now being investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for hate speech himself.

      Scum Exposed

  5. I have done my bit against hate groups more than any of you can imagine. I go over radical and militant web sites and blogs all the time, filtering potential red-flags and details that as a whole may identify organisations and individuals and if they correlated to anyone or any group that is on a proscribed link, I turn them in to the relevant authorities (US DHS & FBI, EuroPol, InerPol, etc).

    Oh, http://solkhar.blogspot.com/2009/09/winds-of-jihads-agenda-exposed-radical.html

  6. Unfortunately, democratic / responsible government is being phased out and replaced by “governance”, often handled by unelected and unaccountable “agenda-driven” bureaucrats (to purloin a phrase).

    “Diversity officers”, “cultural sensitivity training”, and all the rest
    to re-shape a global society, with global governance to handle global
    problems…

  7. Western liberal democracy enforced upon unwilling and un-prepared societies has been amongst the most devastating effects on the life of modern man.

    – Bhoutros Bhoutros Ghali

    Good Governance is the word that needs to replace the overly used and abused word known as “Democracy”.

    – Arch Bishop Desmund Tutu

    1. Western liberal democracy enforced upon unwilling and un-prepared societies has been amongst the most devastating effects on the life of modern man:

      There is a logical fallacy in this statement: one can hardly describe Arabs or Muslims as “modern man”- so it doesn’t apply. If you change the sentence slightly, it makes much more sense:

      Mohammedanism enforced upon unwilling and un-prepared societies has been amongst the most devastating effects on the life of modern man.

      As for Tutu, I have no time for this disgraceful excuse for a human being, just like I have no time for Koffi Annan or peanut Carter or Albright or the Clinton whores, who are equally (if not more) despicable.

  8. Sir Winston Churchill:

    “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for everything else that has been tried.”

    if you look at it realistically, you soon realize that it is a vast improvement over all the other forms of Government which preceded it.

  9. I just love how this muzzy solkar likes to tell us in the West that we have to live by his rules. I have news for you muzzy, your time here in the West is drawing to a close, get out and get out now because you muzzys are pushing us to the point of no return. What is going to happen is that no matter how peaceful you profess yourself to be, nobody is going to care , and the retribution that is to come will make the Serbs look like rank amatuers.

  10. The purpose for them was noble but reflected the cold-war old world mentality that does not exist.

    Really? Since the cold war ended there has been a much more menacing threat to the lovers of freedom and democracy, and I think you know what I am talking about. Hint: It has something to do with “submission”.

  11. Free speech, here is my submission to our Prime Minister in Canada.

    Honorable
    Prime Minister Stephen Harper,

    Sir,

    I realize you have access to the best of intel, but I am taking the liberty of contacting you out of concern.

    Due to my knowledge of Islam, I am connecting some points, that may have slipped your advisers awareness on Obama’s history.

    I’m sure you realize that he was born to a Muslim Kenyan father, Automatically this makes him a Muslim by that religions laws.

    In his mothers second marriage, she married an Indonesian Muslim.

    He was registerd in an Indonesian school as a Muslim, later in life he “supposedly” becomes a Christian, in a sect that hates the U.S.A. and with Communist ties.

    As a Christian he would automatically be considered an Apostate, subject to being Reviled and under a Death ruling, as per Mohammeds edicts.

    Through stealth he has reached one of the most powerful positions in the World, to assist Islam in its Goal of World Domination.

    Here is the most important clue.

    His acceptance into Harvard Law School was assisted by a Muslim Attorney, Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour and associates.

    This Attorney at some stage was an adviser to Saudi Billionaires.

    He also was involved with Hewy Newton and Bobby Seale and helped establish the Black Panther Party. He is known to have an intense hatred of U.S.A and Western Democracies.

    The main point is as an adviser and Muslim tied to Saudi Billionaires, Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour would never of supported a true Christian Apostate from Islam.

    This is a part of the master plan to undermine and conquer Western Societies for Islam.

    Obama also visited Pakistan in 1981, when Americans were not allowed in the country.

    My studies of his psychological reactions to events and speeches, strenghtens my awareness of Obama as a Wolf in Sheeps Clothing.

    DICOVERTHENETWORKS.ORG

    This is the best source I’ve found.

    Sincerely,

    Lorenzo Bouchard
    labouchard@shaw.ca

  12. The above letter will be thrown in the looney-file.

    It falls down immediately in four big categories, the first one saying “Due to my knowledge of Islam” which we all know is cr*p. Such claims without backing them up to set one’s credentials is always read as “I read blogs and comics”.

    The second is putting a reference to a agenda-site like the one he did, linked to fringe hate sites like FrontPageMag. That only confirms the first category. What is worse is he calls it the “best source ever”.

    The third big error is to try and tell someone in authority about rumours and conspiracy theories.

    The fourth and last big error is to tell a third party political leader that you know better than him.

    I had to copy and paste this and send to some friends, they will get a real kick out of it.

    1. Troll acrobatics:

      Smear the critiq. belittle your opponent, smear the sources without ever getting close to touching the subject:

      Due to my knowledge of Islam” which we all know is cr*p. Such claims without backing them up to set one’s credentials is always read as “I read blogs and comics”.

      Which simply means ‘only Muslims understand Islam’- unbelievers are dumb, deaf and blind apart from being the vilest of creatures…

      Unfortunately for you solker, is that all of the above is well researched, it is true and only one thing is missing: that the so-called “church” of hate-preacher Jeremiah Wright is closely associated with Luis Farrakans Nation of Islam, and Wright himself is a self professed “former Muslim” who preaches the same race hatred that made Malcolm X famous.

  13. Blog-owner is in fact the master of smear, calling for instance the mother of Obama a whore, let alone all the other ugly profanities that have come from him.

    Did I say taht only Muslims understand Islam? No, you did.

    What I said was that those who claim to understand Islam and then provide no evidence or credentials is more than likely saying that I read a nasty blog, some hate books and chose to believe it and thus I am now an expert. Rather like yourself with the added value that your Rabbi probably instructed you to write this blog.

    No in this case the particular poster has only a few times posted and all of it was crap and each time gave a plug to that rediculous rag of a website, which only confirmed my points.

  14. Thanks for confirming that you are totally clueless about Judaism, solker troll.

    I never heard of anyone who was instructed by a Rabbi to write a blog. You are obviously of the belief that Rabbis do what Islamic hate-preachers do: incite and indoctrinate to kill and to strike terror in the hearts of unbelievers…

    As for Stanley “Ann” Dunham, Hussein Obama’s mother, I understand that the truth hurts because Obama is your great hope to make America Islamic (or at least demoralize it and destroy it economically) Here on this blog, however, she will always be called a Gramscian whore because that’s what she was:

    Barack Hussein Obama Jr’s mother, Stanley “Ann” Dunham, gave a telling admission while still in Washington State as a recent high school graduate in the summer of 1960 when she told her friends: “I don’t need to date or marry to have children”. Oddly, although Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was already married with children in Kenya, Ann supposedly married him in order to legitimize her child’s birth.

    Want more? Here’s more:

    I know you want more, solker:

  15. from Pamela:
    CNN won’t touch the birth certificate issue, the Rezko/Auchi corruption, Obama’s anti-semitism, his ACORN/SEIU ties and corruption and other legitimate stories that need investigation. But they write fiction about Palin. Daily. So why not tell the truth about Obama and his reported strange sexual predilections? My question is, it is well known that Obama allegedly was involved with a crack whore in his youth. Very seedy stuff. Why aren’t they pursuing that story? Find the ho, give her a show! Obama trafficked in some very deviant practices. Where’s the investigation?

    He spent three weeks in Pakistan in his college days at Occidental in 1981. WTF was he doing in Pakistan in 1981? In 1979 Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged in Pakistan and the military ruler Zia Ul-Haq enacted the controversial Hudood Ordinance, which was intended to implement Islamic Shari’a law, by enforcing punishments mentioned in the Quran.

    Back in the early 80’s, there were only two reasons to travel to Pakistan. Jihad or drugs. I think he went for the drugs and came back with jihad. (He did, after all, change his name to Barack Hussein Obama from Barry Soetoro, upon his return from that trip).

    Why isn’t CNN pursuing the nude pornographic photos of Obama’s mom, Stanley (unretouched pictures here and here) allegedly taken by Frank Marshall Davis in his apartment. Obama’s spiritual father, Davis was a child rapist and famous communist. I never ran the pics, as it was unseemly and wasn’t relevant. But this assault on Palin is too disgusting. It’s time to tell the ugly truth about the enemy in the White House and his whores in the media. It is Obama operatives who are spreading the Palin lies. I strongly recommend that conservatives start sending emailing these family pictures. They know we won’t play dirty, so it’s time to play dirty.

    I say when they ratchet up the lies, then we ratchet up the truth.

  16. Solkhar the rumour-monger (among his many talents) wrote “The third big error is to try and tell someone in authority about rumours and conspiracy theories” and then went on to write “Rather like yourself with the added value that your Rabbi probably instructed you to write this blog”.

    A week or two ago, you were labelling the Sheik as an evangelist,
    now he probably takes instructions from his Rabbi.

    Do you ever stop to think before generating this nonsense, Solkhar?

  17. Solkhar the radical blasphemer wrote “Good Governance is the word that needs to replace the overly used and abused word known as “Democracy”. – Arch Bishop Desmund Tutu”

    Fan of “good governance” instead of democracy, are you Solkhar?

    “Freedom, Justice and Democracy” have lost their value, Solkhar?
    Being abused or misused by the likes of Wilders, are they Solkhar?

    Love for those three words Freedom, Justice and Democracy is
    misguided, is it Solkhar?

    Apparently, in Solkhar’s view, democracy is an excuse for injustice.

    ( dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/09/extreme_right_bloggers_in_cour )

    Extreme right bloggers in court
    Tuesday 08 September 2009

    Two men are to appear in court in Amsterdam for writing discriminatory texts on the extreme right-wing website Stormfront, Nos tv reports on Tuesday.

    (Solkhar joins in)

    It will happen, the US still has stuck in its head a love for three words that have frankly lost its value. Freedom, Justice and Democracy.

    Freedom, such as speech has been poisoned to freedom to smeer and freedom to abuse. Just ask Wilders.

    Justice has been used and abused by governments and big business for way to long, whilst at the same time, being confused as being the domain of western culture only. It needs to be redefined.

    Democracy has lost its meaning all together and has been an excuse for ‘injustice’ throughout the world. (and so on)

    Spin it, Solkhar, but keep on blaspheming against Jesus Christ
    the Son of God in your service to “allah” and his false prophet.

    “Good Governance” will come to Earth, but only when Jesus Christ
    returns to rule the nations. In the meantime, you are free to mock
    and blaspheme His holy name.

  18. Solkhar the blasphemer against Jesus Christ the Son of God apparently thinks it is a good idea to ban and punish “anti-religious, racial or cultural insults” such as ‘Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas’ but would he be keen to ban the koran due to its violence (not to mention its disgusting blasphemy against Jesus Christ the Son of God) in a similar manner to Geert Wilders …

    [The leader of the Netherlands’ right-wing Freedom Party, Geert Wilders, has called for a ban on the sale and distribution of the Qur’an. He would also outlaw the book’s use in the mosque and at home. Mr Wilders says the Qur’an (Koran) is a fascist book which promotes violence and is similar to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.]

    Well, Solkhar, how serious are you about banning hateful and
    blasphemous literature such as the koran, given your hate for
    the Gospel of Jesus Christ and your blasphemy against Him?

    ( dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/09/antijewish_chanting_at_footbal.php )

    Anti-Jewish football chants are illegal
    Wednesday 16 September 2009

    The Dutch High Court ruled on Tuesday that the chant ‘Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas’ is punishable by law because it is insulting to Jews, reports broadcaster Nos. […]

    Solkhar’s view … “I support any bans and punishment of anti-religious, racial or cultural insults and should point out that I am a Muslim.

    A factor, that should be understood though, is that being Jewish is recognised as both a race and religion and that is techically why there are more identifiable laws on that subject. Add to that the collective European guilt for the holocaust, the subject is extra sensitive.

    Sixty years on, that last factor should be with all respect over, but the concentration should be on the collective bigotry that has grown and expanded due to the growth of extreme right (and left) of politics and the introduction of outside (and unwelcome) hatreds via immigration. Time for a new morale standard.”

    Time to end your blasphemy, Solkhar, and stop soaking it up from
    “allah”, the false prophet and the koran.

  19. the fundamentalist/evangalist is still p*ss*ng in his pants because he cannot accept that 1.6 billion Muslims thinks that Issa (Jesus) was not the “son of God”. He also is unable to accept that there are people willing to not accept organised evangelical groups for comming to countries of other faiths and promolgate descent by telling them that their own faith is evil and that to save their soul they must convert – obviously to their religion.

    Actually, this method of “selling his religion” is EXACTLY like the Rainbow Scam. The Rainbow Vacuum cleaning company’s reps will go out of their way to be your friend and offer a free test of your carpet. Being a water-capture system it will show dust and dust-mites and then tell you that you have a big health problem and of course they have the product to fix it. Of course they forget that every house has these mites, having none in them will in fact stop the natural immunity process for you and especially children and you are sucked into buying a very expensive and not-necessary vacuum cleaner.

    To add to the perfect annalogy, it is a good Vacuum Cleaner, but it comes with outdated, uncessary and most of all unwanted baggage.

  20. Of course that was just sarcasm on her part, solker. Why do you always take everything so seriously?

    But just compare the two, solker: Malcolm X and the Muslim POTUS, they look like they hatched from the same egg…

    Btw: I like the analogy:

    “Islam is like a Vacuum Cleaner, but it comes with outdated, uncessary and most of all unwanted baggage.”

    Update: how do you like the pic’s of the Obama-mama, solker?

    You convinced now?

  21. Solkhar the blasphemer wrote “the fundamentalist/evangalist is still p*ss*ng in his pants because he cannot accept that 1.6 billion Muslims thinks that Issa (Jesus) was not the “son of God”.”

    No pants-pissing here, Solkhar, and the Word of God makes it very
    clear that “the word of the cross seems foolish to those who are on the way to destruction; but to us who are on the way to salvation it is the power of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:18)

    I can readily accept that 1.x billion blasphemous muslims are on their
    way to hell forever, simply because they deny that Jesus is the Son
    of God, and that He was crucified. It is foolishness to muslims, who
    are doomed.

    * To add to the perfect annalogy, it is a good Vacuum Cleaner, but it comes with outdated, uncessary and most of all unwanted baggage.

    In your view, Solkhar, but after Ezekiel 38 / 39, the Jews will basically get the task of hoovering up the bodies and body parts
    of the dead and smelly jihadis to bury them at Hamangog / Hamona.

    Where will you be when “allah” seeks to destroy Israel, using his
    1.x billion muslims as proxies?

  22. Sheik,i found the Pics Very Interresting,i’m surprised than she gave birth to hussein obama,i think she’s not his mother it’s probably another Lie , she’s too Cute and Sexy……

  23. Solkwhore:
    Your puerile attempts at reasoned debate are truly pathetic; you’d be thrown out of any first-year logic class after the first two weeks.
    “…freedom of speech is fine from individuals, once it becomes both collective and public, or from a person of influence and office (like Wilders) it is unacceptable.” I suppose you can’t be blamed for your complete ignorance of the ways of free societies, as you lackeys of the great paedophile have never had the privilege of living in one, but please reread and try to understand what you’ve just said; as long as one is a rank-and-file citizen with no influence it is permissable for him to express his views, but once he becomes prominent, or earns a position of authority, he must remain silent. Now picture an election (look it up in the dictionary) campaign with four or five competing candidates, none of whom is permitted to air his views! Makes for a truly informed electorate!
    You see, solkwhore, on this side of the road we try our best to learn the views of those seeking office, in order that we might make an informed choice of the candidate who most closely reflects our own beliefs. We tend to reject those who argue that we should turn off our minds and grovel before the disciples of an illiterate and sadistic child molester.
    By the way, have you ever considered enrolling in a remedial spelling course?

  24. suprkufrB needs to get of their meds and get outside and learn the realities of life, simple. If they also wish to enter the subject with a bit of thought they should read all the posts and not just a part of one (and incorrectly) and participate except not turn up “once in a while”. Laughable this one is.

    That person should also note re spelling that English is not my first, or in fact my second language.

Comments are closed.