The Solkhar Troll: 10 Questions, No Answers…

troll

Solkhar, the troll, is beating his chest claiming ‘he won the debate’.  Those who followed the exchange are aware that a debate never happened.  Solkhar weaseled and lied, slithered and slimed, and altogether wasted your and my time.  We could of course  do something more useful, gone fishing or to the gym, something more interesting than Islam.

Solkhar believes he is winning because he is stealing our precious time.

To his credit I must say that he never threatened me, never cursed me or my mother/father/sister/brother/wife/children,  which is usually the case when dealing with Mohammedans.

Solkhar is infuriating because he never concedes anything. He lies out of habit, even about the meaning of da’awa. He would have you believe there is no jihad, FGM is cultural, honor killing is cultural, Aisha was older ( in spite of the authentic hadiths by Bukhari & Dawoud) Islam invented hospitals, toilets, the Golden Age, (indeed, the golden age was quite golden for the  Moors, not so for the conquered  dhimmies) but he never tells us where these hospitals and golden toilets were. In his latest posting he blamed the ethnic Han Chinese for the needle attacks on the Uighurs, he blamed Chinese “oppression”of Muslims, and also didn’t stop short of accusing the Han Chinese  with sticking needles into  Muslim asses. Not for the first time: during the Sydney rape epidemic, we also had Mohammedan detractors who tried to  blame the Christian Lebanese. Moslems are never to blame for raping uncovered meat.

Solkhar would have you believe there is no dar-al -harb  that is yet to be conquered and incorporated into the dar ul Islam, there is no apocalyptical, pathological Jew-hatred in the Muslim world, Issa, the Muslim Jesus is a ‘respected Muslim prophet’ and  the Koran, that dirty book, “closes the gaps” in the corrupted Jewish and Christian scriptures. (This last statement is quite revealing, since it shows that Solkhar knows nothing, nothing at all about Judaism or Christianity. It is a statement of ignorance, indoctrination and deep rooted Islamic supremacy) Extremely ludicrous and absurd was his claim about Arab music, that a little known Arab singer  was comparable,  on an equal footing with the hundreds (if not thousands) of outstanding Western composers and geniuses from Mozart to Strawinsky, Bach to Haendel, and from Beethoven to Frank Zappa.

Solkars plea for “appreciation of what people are going through (during Ramadan) is deserved” is amusing, if not laughable. The soldiers of Allah stuff themselves before daylight and at night during Ramadan and don’t eat during the day. There is nothing for us to appreciate, and nothing is deserved. Its the warped Islamic psyche, the demand for entitlement, on display. That’s all.

Solkhar may not be an Arab, more likely a Berber, but what this exchange proves is that Islam stifles mental growth, and Arabness, Uruba, erases every trace of humanity and intelligence in people. Arabs are not the sons of the desert, they are the fathers of the desert. The nonsensical circular reasoning, like “the Koran is the word of Allah because it says so in the Koran” somehow gives him away. Although he claims to  be Dutch-born,  it is hard to believe that a native son of Holland  would submit his faculties to this degree. May your zebiba grow and glow in the dark, Solkhar!

On the other hand, the exchange with Solkhar was also rewarding in as much as one could clearly see the logical absurdities,  the fanatical frenzy,  Solkars flawed  psyche, his hopeless tu quoque, deflection,  the moral bankruptcy,  his  imbecilic reasoning which amounted to no more than “you can have any law as long as it complies with shari’a”.  The smears on Spencer, Bostom, Wilders, myself, Ayaan Ali Hirsi, Wafa Sultan, “right wingers” were tiresome and monotonous. His Koran thumping is equally pathetic, he cannot prove when the Koran, that dirty book, was concocted, but instead pounces on my skepticism. For Solkhar  unbelief is a major deficiency, because  if we were not ‘ignorant’ kuffars, we would naturally see the light of Islam and utter the Shahada. What could be more important than that?

Solkhar, our “fellow human being”,  claims “I am outraged by religous and cultural minorities are targetted in any country, be they in Muslim ones or not”- but of course the outrage is only when the Muslims don’t get their way,  once they have settled amongst the infidels, behind enemy lines. The irony that he himself proudly proclaims to snitch on a Christian missionary who was then deported from Morocco, tells another story altogether: Islam, nothing but Islam matters. That’s what its all about.

For those who missed it: here are the 10 questions once more:

Question 1 for Solkhar: Who Gets The 72 Virgins Now? (tu quoque, question not answered)

Second question for Solkhar, Islamic troll Islamic toilet habits (“No, I don’t use pebbles..”)

Solkhar: Question Number Three! (Wudu, Devils, Jinns in noses… Solkhar refused to answer)

Solkar: Question number four: Muhammad’s X-rated Bordello (Why is homosexuality  forbidden in this world but permitted in Muhammad’s X-rated bordello in the sky? Solkhar didn’t answer..)

Question Number 5 for Solkhar: Contradictions in the Qur’an (Solkhar deposits droppings, but no answer)

Question Number 6 for Solkhar! (Solkhar claims Aisha was older, posts manufactured hadith)

Question No 7 to Solkhar, Islamic Troll (drinking Muhammads urine: “claims were inappropriate for the modern era”-  must have  been alright in the 7th century then…?)

Question number eight for Solkhar (Re “reformist” Islamic university of Fes, Al-Karaouine : Solkhar’s answer: You can have any law as long as it complies with shari’a!)

Question Number Nine for Solkhar, Islamic Agit Prop: Rape of boys and girls in Iran’s prisons: 1. blames the Jews for reporting it, 2.  blames “radicalism”, 3. blames Stazi, SS, 4. inquisition, 5. Evangelical trolls, 6. Bible and  Torah, 7. and finally blames “the rantings of a political-radical group”. (Must be “blog owner”)

Solkhar: Your 10th and Final Question! Solkhar disagrees that Islam breeds terrorists and criminals:

if you strive in the way of Allah and strike terror in the hearts of the unbelievers, that if you follow your prophet in order to make the world Islamic, that this makes you a criminal, an assassin, a terrorist, polygamist and child molester who will inevitably end up dead or in jail?

images


55 thoughts on “The Solkhar Troll: 10 Questions, No Answers…”

  1. Why waste time on this person. Responding to him/her is a waste of time and goes nowhere.

    He/she loves the attention; ignore him/her and hopefully he will go somewhere else and waste the time of otherss.

  2. Sheik – I couldn’t resist making a comment – first one at your site – because your approach to Solkar has been both brilliant, and highly entertaining.

    reijo – The Sheik deliberately messed with Solkar’s head. He got inside, kicked up the dust, and tried to sweep away the cobwebs. Who knows – after all of this – perhaps Solkar will actually start to think for himself. One can only hope. The Skeik has effectively illustrated the damaged caused by Islam, and the idiocy of its followers.

    Sheik – this was definitely worth sticking around for. Love the troll, and am having a huge chuckle over the Troll Spray. Well done!

  3. What we all see here is the prelude to the desparate blog-owner to find an excuse to block further posts, of which he has done.

    As a blog-owner he of course thinks he is in charge and because of blogger.com policy is safe to do so and make-up what he wishes.

    But regardless of what he is capable of doing, the only thing he certainly has been showing is the famous propoganda twist. His intire effort is in a daily hope for tragedy, events and errors to capitalize them. So you will see for example he must have soiled his pants when I made the error of thinking that the events in China was reporting that attacks were by the Han Chinese when they were not. So readers can easily go to the thread and you will see that I have acknowledged that I heard it wrong or read a wrong report.

    You will not see the blog-owner with any such policy of acknowledgements, in fact you will see the complete opposite, you will see twisting, avoidance, just claiming it is a lie or “I do not care” or if really corned, block the post.

    So for instance I never said Muslims invented the toilet, not at all and go and try find such a posting – you will not. But I did say that the during the dark ages of Europe, the people of Al Andalus had access to flushing toilets. A fact.

    As you all know, the questions by the hate-monger was all fixed, not fare questions to give a capacity to answer and thus I did not bother with a number of them because they were “fixed” but answered others because I simply (to continue on my study of agenda-based hate sites) wanted to see his method of BS. What the blog-owner will not say is that three of those questions were answered but you will not see them, they were blocked.

    In the end, though all the attemts to drown me out with just verbal BS from a number of blog-owner rants, the proof is in quality of the texts and this blog fails constantly.

    The basic argument of this blog – which is in fact drowned out by constant and almost self-gratifying rants that are way out of the real of logic, is that Islam is Evil, Mohammed is Evil and that it is not a religion but a cult.

    But time and time again, the blog-owner calls the religion Islam and it a religion, showing that he is not serious.

    Time and time again, his only proof is the words and actions of radical Muslims and terrorists and it raises the question of what is the goal of the blog?

    Over and over again, the blog owner quotes incorrect histories, denies known historical facts and events and then quotes to back himself only far-right anti-Islam authors (authors, not academics) and thus has condemned his blog into the fringe as no quality argument looks only at one side of the argument for sources.

    Thus what we have here is propoganda only on a blog that admits to it being not serious at all – or as the blog-owner admitted in two threads to me as being humouristic based. It is good that he has said that it is humour based, because so far all he has done is to try and tell us that radical Wahhabism and Salafism is the only real Islam, that they are the only real Muslims and that though they are only less than 10 per cent of Islam, the rest of the Muslim world are heratics and not correct in our practices.

    I have never hid my agenda and what I am here or argue for. I am watching this site as part of the process of looking into why people hate and in particular hate Islam. I also have stated that I do not defend the actions of Muslims but I will defend Islam. So if you see all my postings, they are pointing out basically BS when it crosses the line – and on this blog – it does it constantly.

    The blog-owner said that the Qur’an was not made until 200 years later, thus I told him he was wrong, he still will not say I made a mistake like I did in two errors I have made on this thread.

    He also said that Jihad is an integral part of Islam and there is no Islam without it. He also said three times that the Five Schools of Islam supports and teaches Jihad of world domination and elmination of other faiths. I told him that is BS, it is not the case, gave him the historical basis and challenged him to show me were the Five Schools support or endorse this. He has been unable to do so and gives the quotes of 9th to 17th century individuals and a few modern day politicians as being proof. So he has failed and continues to do so.

    He has an agenda to create hate and uses as resources the other agenda based blogers and groups and places them as evidence which is an admittion of failure. He obviously finds me infuriating because the real issue that I have annoyed him is that he thought he would be having his free run to rant and rave using complete BS and that noone would jump in and point out how much, if not almost all of it, was complete maliciously intended lies and propoganda.

    Poor blog-owner.

    1. Good one Sol!

      “I did say that the during the dark ages of Europe, the people of Al Andalus had access to flushing toilets. A fact.”

      Prove it! I’m interested. Impress me! (Fact is that there are hadiths not to urinate or defecate in running water.) That’s why some Arabs donate their turds beside the toilets. Ask the staff of the King George in Londonistan, they’ll tell ya..! Therefore there is very little chance that Arabs ever had toilets with running water. Islam forbids it.

      “He also said three times that the Five Schools of Islam supports and teaches Jihad of world domination and elmination of other faiths. I told him that is BS, it is not the case…”

      Prove me wrong! All Islamic scholars including Muhammad himself would call you an apostate for that statement. Name one Islamic scholar of standing who unequivocally denounces jihad and calls for peaceful coexistence with other faiths, based on equality and Islamic teachings without ifs and buts! Please!
      I promise you to take this blog down and pay you $ 100.000.00 for your efforts! All respectable scholars rely on the writings of Muslims themselves, and if I was a Muslim you would undoubtedly respect and honor me as an eminent scholar, Solker.

      Go ahead and call me emir of mufti already, Soli! Its cool!

      You could start here with this from Islam Q & A: Why do Muslims wage jihad?

      As long as participating in, and supporting jihad, is an ‘obligation, incumbant on every muslim, and refusal is apostacy, there can be no such thing as a moderate muslim.

      I am posting this again to make the point:

      Book of Jihad, on page 580 of Maktba Dar-us-Salam’s publication of Sahih Al-Bukhari: “Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its Pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah is made superior and He becomes the only God who may be worshiped. By Jihad Islam is propagated and made superior. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position. Their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, and Muslim rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape this duty dies as a hypocrite.”

      Note the last two sentences.

      Find some moderation in that.

      “I am watching this site as part of the process of looking into why people hate and in particular hate Islam.”

      Perhaps you should ask yourself why Islam teaches hate.

      Google “things najis” and look for “kafir”, here:
      Faeces
      Semen
      Dead body
      Blood
      Dog
      Pig
      Kafir
      Alcoholic liquors
      The sweat of an animal who persistently eats najasat.

      As for hate, I can offer you a quote from the great Oriana Fallaci, who said: “as I have a right to love, so do I have a right to hate those who want to take that away from me..”

      But no. We don’t hate. We don’t suck the hatred in with the mothers milk like Mohammedans do. Its against everything we believe in, Soli. That’s why we have permitted Mohammedans to settle among us, behind enemy lines. That’s why we have all these problems. And raising awareness about Islam and Islamic jihad is not hatred, its a matter of self-preservation. Because our culture and civilization is infinitely better than yours, Sol. We owe it to our children to protect their birthright, like our forefathers protected ours.

  4. [Solkhar] What we all see here is the prelude to the desparate blog-owner to find an excuse to block further posts, of which he has done.

    Really, Solkhar? Does the “desparate blog-owner” need an excuse to
    block [your] posts, or mine, or anyone’s? Do you understand that he
    pays for the resource and can run it to his taste (not yours, mine etc).

    Can any muslim stop being a victim, and simply live at peace, or do
    you feel a need to insinuate your disbelief into every aspect of life,
    backed up with “consequences” if necessary.

    * He also said that Jihad is an integral part of Islam and there is no Islam without it.

    Doesn’t satan (aka allah) state much the same thing?

    A google search on “jihad integral islam” produces heaps of muslims
    (“misunderstanders of islam”) who affirm that jihad is an integral
    part of islam (eg)

    * Jihad is an integral part of Islam By Mohammad Asghar

    * Jihad integral part of curriculum, says Javed Ashraf (Pakistan)
    Jihad is not being deleted from the new curriculum because it is an integral part of Islamic teachings and Muslim beliefs, said Education Minister Lt Gen (r) Javed Ashraf Qazi on Monday.

    And plenty more.

    Stick to food reviews, Solkhar, and leave the heavy lifting to those
    who understand the subject and have the mental horsepower to
    research it.

  5. Though he will hate it and watch how he avoids detail in any retort (his retort will be off-topic or I do not care), let us look at these 10 questions.

    But before listing them, let us put the questions in context. Before question number 1 came out, he accussed me of “avoiding my 10 questions” which implies that they a) already were asked and b) were already formed. Both was BS. He never asked them because they did not exist and in another thread he “thanked others” for offering suggestions for these 10 questions which came out one by one slowly. So it is important that the quality and process is understood here.

    Question 1 for Solkhar: Who Gets The 72 Virgins Now? (tu quoque, question not answered)

    Not worth answering because the blog-owner will accept parrable type language for the Bible and Torah but not for its inheritor The Qur’an.

    Second question for Solkhar, Islamic troll Islamic toilet habits (”No, I don’t use pebbles..”)

    Apart from the constant “name calling” – even though the blog-owner notes that I am polite, I will remind him that in the 7th century instructions about hygiene will not equate to 21st century western world-views. But the blog-owner has proven that he has no knowledge of history. He will also dislike being reminded that during the European Dark Ages, hygiene was worse in there than in most of the Muslim World and that in Al Andalus, some even had water flowing and flushing through purpose-built toilets.

    Solkhar: Question Number Three! (Wudu, Devils, Jinns in noses… Solkhar refused to answer)

    Not answered because like the one about 72 virgins, Christians can still cross themselves, Catholics can talk about Angels, Demons and Devils, Jews can talk about cleaning themeselves and yet Muslims must talk like 21st century westerners in the 7th century. Get real.

    Solkar: Question number four: Muhammad’s X-rated Bordello (Why is homosexuality forbidden in this world but permitted in Muhammad’s X-rated bordello in the sky? Solkhar didn’t answer..)

    The same as above.

    Question Number 5 for Solkhar: Contradictions in the Qur’an (Solkhar deposits droppings, but no answer)

    Instead of providing debate and argument, he will say I have provided “droppings”. You mean you do not want to debate, in fact you have NEVER debated anything yet blog-owner, nothing.

    Question Number 6 for Solkhar! (Solkhar claims Aisha was older, posts manufactured hadith)

    The blog-owner and agenda based bloggers argue that there is no debate in Islam and no logic. Thus I showed him that there is in fact debate and argument and factual historical references. I did not say that there was manufactured hadiths, but I said that they are man-made and thus prone to errors, regardless of good intentions. Thus I am saying that the references in question in a haddith that is popular is in fact incorrect and many academics agree with me. But remember that the blog-owner believes that Wahhabists and Salafists are the only correct Muslims.

    Question No 7 to Solkhar, Islamic Troll (drinking Muhammads urine: “claims were inappropriate for the modern era”- must have been alright in the 7th century then…?)

    I gave references, the blog-owner does not, nor does he debate.

    Question number eight for Solkhar (Re “reformist” Islamic university of Fes, Al-Karaouine : Solkhar’s answer: You can have any law as long as it complies with shari’a!)

    I showed that the institution of a Shari’a Court system is not necessary and that is supported by one of the Five Schools of Islam. The blog-owner avoids the point that Shari’a Court is not in fact existing in the majority of Muslims countries, showing that a theological court struture is not needed. By doing so creates automatically the most hard line legal system based on theological views. Thus the School supports the Moroccan secular system because it follows basic moral Islamic principles which is basically Shari’a compliant. Of course the word Shari’a is interpreted by the blog-owner as radical when 9/10 of those laws are also basic Christian and Jewish values.

    Question Number Nine for Solkhar, Islamic Agit Prop: Rape of boys and girls in Iran’s prisons: 1. blames the Jews for reporting it, 2. blames “radicalism”, 3. blames Stazi, SS, 4. inquisition, 5. Evangelical trolls, 6. Bible and Torah, 7. and finally blames “the rantings of a political-radical group”. (Must be “blog owner”)

    Here is complete BS and I suggest readers go back to that post and read the discussion. The first is I questioned the quality of the INS news report and because it is Isreali, the blog-owner incorrectly used the “he hates Jews” excuse, rather pathetic. More pathetic, I qualified the facts a bit better and explained that the person who quoted did for his political group and not the government nor for the world’s Muslims.

    What I found most pathetic by the blog-owner is that I said that the Republican Guard are radical, like the Stazi, Nazis and Inquisition all wrapped in one and someow the blog-owner has told you that I am finding excuses!

    Solkhar: Your 10th and Final Question! Solkhar disagrees that Islam breeds terrorists and criminals:

    At least he got one point correct, Islam does not breed terrorism and criminals and the blog-owner has never proved otherwise and in fact failed trying and embarassed and identified himself as the hate-monger he is.

  6. Good,Good Sheik…I think you put the last nail in the coffin of our dear Sulker, now we can bury him……
    For the last time,I’ll put my 2 cents because I know that Solkar does not understand me…
    So for instance Solkar you said Muslims invented the toilet,Thats Wrong ! instead, they invented the shit !

  7. Is it OK to insert explosives in the rectum during ramavan?
    Rectum? Well it didn’t do him any good.

    The Butt Bomber has scrolled off, but an update from the Swordi Gazette:

    Bomber had half kilo of explosives inside his body
    By Abdullah Al-Oreifij
    JEDDAH – Suicide bomber Abdullah Asiri had inserted around half a kilogram of explosives into his own body to carry out his failed assassination attempt of Prince Muhammad Bin Naif, Assistant Minister of Interior for Security Affairs, last week.

    As more details emerged of the events surrounding the attack that took place at the Prince’s home in Obhur, sources told Okaz newspaper Friday that Asiri’s mobile telephone was equipped with two SIM cards, one of which was used to speak to call members of the terrorist organization in Yemen, and the other to detonate the device located inside Asiri’s rectum via a call from the group.
    […]

  8. Pierre à ne pas comprendre l’anglais.

    Learn to read English before you embarass yourself further, I did not say that Muslims invented toilets but I did say they were using clean and water flushed ones during an era when Europeans were squatting over a hole that they probably dug that morning.

  9. Do tell us how this is on-topic? Oh actually it is, flood the pages with individual events to 1) make it look as if it represents the sum total of everything 2) change the topic to avoid debate and 3) try and say “so what I would rather just rant about Muslims”.

  10. instead, they invented the shit and plays with……..
    Sorry,solkar i don’t read French i only read and write Arabic……
    ^_/”(‘,[-*/#rJ)¿ú쨨£•™š›±žŠ‹Æ¿–//_@!$……,,,, !?

  11. [Troll Spray]

    A can of BS Repellent would come in handy!
    (http things) flickr.com/photos/26603050@N02/3472958613

  12. Rather pathetic one blog-owner! Is this your attempt now to have a last attempt at debating before pulling the plug?

    So there are no flushing toilets in the Muslim World at all? So when I go to the Mosque here or when I visited Al Azhar, that I sat down on a flushing toilet was only in my dream? Get real.

    You read to much Spencer I think, or as I have suggested, you are in fact secretly supporting Wahhabism because you certainly are preaching that their version of being a Muslim is the only one!

    What the comment about deficating into water is about deficating into rivers and water supplies, a message about hygiene. Your obviously not stupid (though I have my doubts at times) so it means that either your pathetically ignorant or your just dishing this crap for malicious reasons.

    “Prove me wrong! All Islamic scholars including Muhammad himself would call you an apostate for that statement.”

    Your the one making the accussations blog-owner and have provided only the accussation and none of the substance – it is you who has to provide the proof!

    Your so-called challenge to close down the blog and give money is nothing but a twist and a set up, probably well planned by Spencer himself or stated at some right-wing conference.

    The facts are simple, well known but never mentioned on this blog because it throws your BS back in your face.

    There is reference to Jihad, it is never denied and I do not deny it, but it is a reference to defence and struggle. The defence and struggle to protect Islam from attack is Jihad. There have been Jihads, the last one finished in the Crusades.

    Thus, no academic is going to deny that there is instruction and a place for jihad and it is important that in the event of Islam being attacked and the Schools of Islamic Thought and Jurispudence and governments support such a jihad, there would be one. But there is not, has not been one for centuries and that is it. So your cleverly worded claim is just a hoax.

    Many scholars though talk about peaceful existance all the time with other faiths but again you have used the escape clause of equailty because in Islam there thre are variations of what is equality. Equality in justice and rights and equality but with differing responsibility. For instance men and women are equal under the eyes of God but both are also unequal in the responsibilities and biology. Man is unable to be a mother the most obvious.

    Thus is the carefully written shirking by the blog-owner.

    As for things that are Najis, that is what happens if you talk to an ultra-conservative cleric you will get such thoughts. There are enough of them in all religions who will list out what they think, in this case from haddiths not the Qur’an. I remember reading old lists of what and what is not acceptable for Catholics from the early 1920s. A dozen hail marry’s and a blessing from a preist for touching a Jew.

    You made no debate here blog-owner, just laughs.

  13. * Google “things najis” and look for “kafir”, here:

    Kafir

    Must be a right-wing agenda-driven hate blog, right Solkhar?

    Hmmm al-islam.org – Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project

    Nope, just a hate-filled anti-Kafir site, displaying “allah’s” hatred
    for people who reject his blasphemous death-cult.

  14. No, just a site controlled by theologans and thus shouldbe remembered as such. I like and use the site for many things, but I also know what its limits and contexst is.

  15. More from liberal Sunni Morocco:

    [Channel North Africa]
    The Christian Community

    According to estimates by the Interior Minister, 800 Moroccans have converted to Christianity.

    There are frequent crack downs on proselytism conducted by non Muslims. Article 220 of the Moroccan Penal Code permits criminal action to be taken against anyone who is found responsible of upsetting the faith of a Muslim or converting him or her. Anyone found guilty of this is subject to a variable fine and up to 3 years in prison. Christian Missionaries must work discretely. On November 28, 2006 an expatriate Christian was fined 500 dirhams ($50) and given a 6 month jail sentence for trying to convert a Muslim to the Christian faith. The prison sentence was suspended and the person in question left the country of his own volition.

    Citizens who convert often risk social ostracism and a small number of these believers have been subject to short periods of interrogation or detention by the authorities. They can be accused of treason or of illegal relations with foreign missions. At times the believers are even refused their passports. In general the government confiscates Bibles in Arabic and refuses to grant licenses for their importation or sale; and this without any law officially prohibiting the Bible etc.
    -==-

    Anything to do with you, Solkhar the blasphemer and dobber?

  16. Actually there is an incorrect fact, I can go to the main French language bookstore and buy a Bible.

    But it explains like the post you put before, if there is an undeground “pastor” that means there is criminal and imoral intent to try and deliberatly convert Muslims.

    Those Christians that come into the country are fine to practice their faith and Churches are present, so why are they not? Because they are criminals, criminals of the worse kind, they go condemning Islam and tell people their religion is evil and to be saved you must become one of us……. sick.

  17. But you have STILL not answered any questions TROLL just because you write something that does not constitute answering if you do not directly address the question asked. No I know Mohammedans dont do logic or common sense but perpetual you have displayed is pathetic,

  18. “Those Mohammed worshipers that come into the country are fine to practice their faith and mosques are present, so why are they not? Because they are criminals, criminals of the worse kind, they go condemning Christianity and Judaism and tell people their religion is evil and to be saved you must become one of us……. sick.”

    There. Fixed it for you!

  19. * Because they are criminals, criminals of the worse kind, they go condemning Islam and tell people their religion is evil and to be saved you must become one of us…….

    But Solkhar the Blasphemous, when you talk of “good Christians” and
    “good Jews” being accounted worthy along with muslims, what is the
    meaning of “good” that you prefix Christians and Jews with? Surely
    you are implying that only those who comply with your filtered koran
    are eligible?

  20. * Because they are criminals, criminals of the worse kind, they go condemning Islam and tell people their religion is evil and to be saved you must become one of us……. sick.

    Solkhar the Blasphemous would effectively criminalise Jesus Christ,
    the Son of God, who said, among other things …

    Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6)

    “I and My Father are one.” (John 10:30)

    Yes, Solkhar, I am a “criminal, a criminal of the worst kind”, because
    I place my trust in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the one mediator
    between God and man.

    What are you, Solkhar?

  21. Solki sez:

    “As for things that are Najis, that is what happens if you talk to an ultra-conservative cleric you will get such thoughts.”

    Not. That’s from the Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani, the highest ranking shiite cleric in Iraq who refused to ever meet an unbeliever. Sistani is falsely portrayed as a “conservative”. But when he needed to get his hemorrhoids treated he knew where to go: he couldn’t trust any Moslem with such a delicate task, but went to a non-moslem specialist in Londonistan.

    No double standards or hypocrisy here, as usual. Just typical muselmanic behavior…

  22. * But when he needed to get his hemorrhoids treated he knew where to go…

    He didn’t want an “adabomtomy”, like the Butt Bomber? Cured his
    piles, permanently!

  23. (Solkharism copied from the Uighur thread)

    [Solkhar] The question comes to mind, if your a Christian and you are in Casablanca, why not go to the 12 or so Churches or to the large Cathedral in the centre of the city? Why hide?

    Yes, Solkhar, if you’re a Christian, and you are in Casablanca, why not
    go to the large Cathedral in the centre of the city. Could it be because
    the Sacre-Coeur Cathedral, Casablanca is no longer used as such,
    but is now used for fairs and exhibitions?

    Is this the Cathedral you are referring to, Solkhar?

    Sacre-Coeur Cathedral, Casablanca

    History

    Casablanca’s cathedral was built in 1930, when Morocco was still under the rule of Catholic France. Falling into disuse after Morocco’s independence in 1956, the Cathédrale Sacré-Coeur was used as a school and then a culture center. Today, it hosts fairs and exhibitions.

    That “Cathedral”, Solkhar?

  24. Solkhar, given that you ask why a Christian in Morocco might “hide”,
    rather than go to the [closed?] Cathedral or one of the 12 or so churches,
    could it be that a Moroccan Christian is not permitted to do so?

    Is the following statement from “Journal Chretien” truthful, or is it
    “hate-filled” and “agenda-driven”?

    (journalchretien.net/Converted-Christians-in-Morocco)

    “Islam is the state religion in Morocco around 30 million people. There are some Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant churches which are recognized by Morocco, but they are only for foreigners living in the country. Moroccan Christians have no right to pray in these churches.”

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve?

  25. Solkhar, about those churches in Morocco again, I’m a bit like “Columbo” [Peter Falk] on a case. Just one more thing while I try to
    extract the truth from you concerning Christians in Morocco being
    able to attend the 12 or so churches.

    Is the following statement from “Operation World” accurate, or is it
    more “hate-filled” “agenda-driven” propaganda?

    (operationworld.org/country/moro/owtex)

    “Sunni Islam is the state religion. The government is committed to the preservation of Islam as the religion of all Moroccans. Under the present constitution, a Moroccan church of former Muslims cannot be recognized. Other religious groups are tolerated so long as their ministry is confined to expatriate communities. Persecution index 10th in the world.”

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve?

  26. Just one more thing on freedom of religion in Morocco, Solkhar, and
    the right of Moroccans to worship in churches without the need to
    hide. Is the following from the World Council of Churches on Morocco
    true, or false? Do churches need to be recognised by the Government
    of Morocco? May Moroccan Christians freely enter recognised churches and worship Jesus Christ in them, or do they need to
    “hide”?

    (oikoumene.org/en/member-churches/regions/africa/morocco/cecm)

    Council of Christian Churches in Morocco
    (Conseil des Eglises Chrétiennes au Maroc, CECM)

    To be a member a church must be accepted by the other member churches, and be recognized by the government of Morocco.

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve?

  27. One more thing, Solkhar. Is the following from Smyrna Ministries
    an accurate portrayal of the persecuted church in Morocco, or is
    it more “hate-filled” “agenda-driven” propaganda?

    (smyrnaministries.org/morocco)

    Status of the Persecuted Church in Morocco

    Muslim Population: 98.7%
    (Christian Population: 1.1%)

    There are hundreds — perhaps several thousand — converts from Islam in Morocco. Churches are legally restricted to expatriate Christian communities, so most Moroccan believers form small “underground” congregations. Persecution from authorities tends to be subtle, including job harassment, hassle over renewing passports and other official documents. In theory Bibles may be imported legally, but Arabic versions have been confiscated. Missionary work is not permitted — one German Christian was fined and sentenced to prison time for attempting to convert Muslims — but many foreign Christians work in secular roles, hoping to win souls to Christ.

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve?

  28. Just to tidy up a few loose ends, Solkhar, (or is it DHH)?

    Have you been leaving your droppings on other sites under the handle of DHH?

    Like this one on Islam in Action?

    Greece:Islamic Prayer Center Firebombed

    DHH said…

    Greece is famous for its anarchists, violent demonstrations and equally rough if not violent police response.

    That the new immigrant Muslims reacted in the same fashion is therefore not suprising as is the fire-bombing.

    Nothing to do with Islam or Muslim here, just another example of the Greek style of things.

    * Hmmm (examines droppings) looks like Solkhar.

    DHH said…

    Christopher, it has to do with Islam only in that their core beliefs and most important factor in their very faith was insulted.
    The showing of the Piss Christ and Crucified Frog exhibitions resulted in firebombings in Italy and Spain, massive and somewhat violent demonstrations in all catholic centres around the world, especially in Manila.
    [snip]

    * Smells like Solkhar.

    I am also sure it has to do with the Greek Police whom have a very bad reputation. I was part of my country’s (Netherlands) law enforcement/national security for more than 20 years and most European countries rather disliked dealing with the Greek police.

    * Tastes like Solkhar. Good job I didn’t tread in it!

    You were busted as DHH, Solkhar, so you re-badged yourself and
    continued spewing the same nonsense.

    More of DHH’s droppings on Muslims Against Sharia:

    Politician defends live burials of women
    Pakistan
    September 01, 2008 12:01am

    A POLITICIAN in Pakistan has defended a decision by south-western tribesmen to bury five women alive because they wanted to choose their own husbands, telling stunned MPs to spare him their outrage.

    […]

    * Droppings commence:

    DHH said…
    Of course we all know that this has nothing to do with Islam but is (as the politician says himself) a tribal tradition that he does not condemn.
    […]
    As a western born Muslim, very liberal and experienced via my work having travelled extensively throughout the world I see this often. The major confusion for non-Muslims is confusing what outdated and barbaric tribal practices as belonging to Islam. It is compounded that the vast majority of Muslims live in impoverished developing nations with low literacy and education levels and this confusion is exists even amongst themselves.

    Liberal, Solkhar (DHH)?

    Who are you, Solkhar? Who do you serve?

  29. in the name of ALLAH THE ALL MERCIFUL THE VERY MERCIFUL
    I testify that none has the right to be worshiped except ALLAH alone without partners and I testify that Mohammed is his slave and messenger , the last messenger and the seal of all the messengers sent to the worlds of men, jinn, animals and all that exists ,may ALLAH’s peace and blessings be upon him his family and companions augmented peace and blessings until the day of resurection.

    a question was asked to a scholar : what are the obligations in belief for the muslim (to be a muslim)
    the answer was: seeking knowledge varies for every muslim depending on his intelect and how much time he has at disposition* but every muslim is obliged to believe in ALLAH ,his Angels ,his Revelations ,his Messengers, the predestination of bad and evil and the day of resurection also the testification that none has the right to be worshiped except ALLAH alone without partner and the testification that mohammed is his slave and messenger , the five daily prayers the annual payment to the poor the fasting of the month of ramadaan and the pilgrimage to makkah also supposed to know about what is allowed and forbidden starting from the biggest sin witch is worshiping others then ALLAH when it is ALLAH who created us. So it is an obligation for every muslim to believe in all this and comprehend all of this with a general comprehension

    SNIP for length and da’awa

  30. Saturday 24 July 2004: The imam of the Grand Mosque in Makkah Sheikh Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais said here yesterday that terrorism and extremism must be stopped and the organizations that promote terror should be dismantled.

    Delivering his Friday sermon, the imam said militant groups had unleashed a war on religious values, and this must be stopped.

    He said such terror groups should be nipped in the bud. “This should be one of our major priorities in order to preserve the nation against trials and strife,” he told thousands of worshippers.

    “Some of our sons were brainwashed and became tools in the hands of deviants to commit violence and practice terrorism. They took the path of extremism, destruction and explosion. They tried very hard to damage the fabric of the society and sought violent means to change the social system,” he said.

    Al-Sudais expressed the fear that such groups would ratchet up their attacks not only physically but also on ideologies. The next stage would witness a war on religious values using their extremist thoughts, he said

    “We have to overcome these negatives and to rebuild,” Al-Sudais said. He called on the nation to be honest, to abide by the precepts of their religion and to make sure of the safety of their country. “We should be vigilant and counter such extremist thoughts, he said.

    “Thank God that the symbols of terrorism are falling down like tree leaves during fall time. We remind those that still sympathize, or harbor these people that they are committing a crime against their religion, their nation and their country,” said Al-Sudais.

    “A Muslim returning to the right path, even if it is a small step toward it, will face God’s mercy on the Day of Judgment, but not those whose hands are covered with blood.

    “The rulers of this country offered that chance to these people with a one-month amnesty, so that these people return to the right path. Those that gave themselves up have found peace and forgiveness,” he added.

    “Those still sticking to the wrong path will only harm themselves, their family and their society,” he said.

    Published: 24 July 2004

  31. Monday 7 February 2005: A nationwide anti-terror campaign was launched on Saturday as officials, intellectuals, students and the general public vowed to stand by the government in its efforts to stamp out terrorism. The campaign, coinciding with the Counterterrorism International Conference in Riyadh, aims at increasing public awareness of terrorism and deviancy.

    All governorates, ministries and government departments are taking part in the campaign, which aims to isolate the remaining elements who support the terror network.

    Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh, the Kingdom’s grand mufti, said Islam, which calls for the protection of a man’s life, family, wealth, honor and intellect, totally rejects terrorism. “If a person kills a believer, his punishment is hell,” the mufti said, quoting a Qur’anic verse. He also pointed out that the protection of non-Muslims living in a Muslim country was the responsibility of the country’s government.

    Al-Asheikh said terrorists who cause corruption on Earth by carrying out killings and destruction deserve tough punishment as the Holy Qur’an directs.

    In a similar statement, Saleh Al-Asheikh, minister of Islamic affairs and endowments, called upon religious scholars, intellectuals, academics and writers to stand with the government in its fight against terrorism and extremism.

    The Islamic Ministry has planned a variety of programs in support of the anti-terror campaign. “We have set up a team to carry out a number of programs, including lectures and seminars, to educate the public on the danger posed by deviant groups,” the minister said.

    Friday sermons delivered by prayer leaders (imaams) in many of the Kingdom’s mosques focused on the need to confront terrorism.

    “Fighting terrorism is a joint responsibility,” Dr. Saleh Bin-Humaid, one of the imams of the Grand Mosque, said in his sermon. Bin-Humaid, who is also chairman of the Shoura Council, said terrorist actions committed by Al-Qaeda cells in the Kingdom benefited only the enemies of Islam. He reminded scholars, teachers, writers and imams of their responsibility to guide youth and protect them from deviant thought.

    Sheikh Abdul Bari Al-Thubaity, the imam of the Prophet’s Mosque in Madeenah, said Islam had nothing to do with terrorism and condemned those who fish in troubled waters and work to tarnish the image of Islam and Muslims.

    “Islam is a religion of mercy and benevolence. It is a religion of construction, not destruction,” the Saudi Press Agency quoted him as saying.

    Published: 7 February 2005

  32. Friday 8 July 2005: Shaikh Abdulaziz Bin Abdullah Al-AsShaikh, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Chairman of the Committee of Senior Ulema [religious scholars] and Chairman of the Department of Scientific Research and Ifta [guidance], today issued the following statement in response to the killing of the Egyptian envoy to Iraq:

    Praise be to Allah, and prayer and peace upon his last Prophet. We ask Allah to preserve our religion and bless us by adhering with it to the apparent and hidden truth and keep us sane and protect us from the evils of ourselves.

    We heard with great pain what happened to the Egyptian envoy to Iraq, and since this incident was falsely put in a religious context we would like to present the truth, and hope that Allah will guide by it the hearts of those who deviated from the righteous path.

    Killing of the souls that Allah prohibited is a greater crime and one of the greatest sins, as Allah says:

    {And kill not anyone whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause,}

    …and Allah also says:

    {Because of that we ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed all mankind.}

    What happened to the Egyptian envoy, as he was kidnapped and killed, is considered spread of mischief in the land which Allah prohibited.

    Allah says:

    {And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you, in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents. And when he turns away from you, his effort in the land is to make mischief therein and to destroy the crops and the cattle, and Allah likes not mischief. And when it is said to him “Fear Allah,” he is led by arrogance to more crime. So enough for him is Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.}

    It is, therefore, clear that this action is prohibited and is among the great sins, and even worse is to relate it to religion. That is a major crime and deceit using the name of Allah, as Allah says:

    {Verily, those who invent lies against Allah will never prosper.}

    This statement is to present the truth and advise the nation. We ask Allah to preserve our religion and peace, to keep us sane and guide us to understand our religion and adhere to the deeds of our Prophet and to save us from the apparent and hidden temptations of sedition. Aameen.

    Published: 8 July 2005

    fatwa-online.com

    1. {And kill not anyone whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause,}

      LOL! Allah has never forbidden to kill the unbelievers, and there are a million causes that make the killing of unbelievers “just”.

      What a lot of duplicitous rubbish!

    2. “{Because of that we ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed all mankind.}”

      “Allah” didn’t ordain that because he has no business ordaining anything for the children of Israel. Muhammad plagiarized it from the Talmud and perverted it with qualifiers, like the above “just cause”….

      “If a faith cannot stand up for itself and requires “nasty salesmen/conmen” then it is not a faith.”

      Couldn’t agree more, solkie.

      If a faith cannot stand up for itself and requires nasty salesmen/conmen and terror and breeding like mad monkeys then it is not a faith, but an ideology to subjugate people.

      See, fixed it…

  33. Hijacking planes and kidnapping

    From that which is known to everyone who has the slightest bit of common sense is that hijacking airplanes and kidnapping children and the like are extremely great crimes, the world over. Their evil effects are far and wide, as is the great harm and inconvenience caused to the innocent; the total effect of which none can comprehend except Allaah.

    Likewise, from that which is known is that these crimes are not specific to any particular country over and above another country, nor any specific group over and above another group, rather it encompasses the whole world.

    There is no doubt about the effect of these crimes; so it is obligatory upon the governments and those responsible from amongst the scholars and other than them to afford these issues great concern, and to exert themselves as much as possible in ending this evil.

    Shaykh Ibn Baaz

    Kayfa Nu’aalij Waaqi’unaa al-Aleem – Page 108-109

    Published: 15 October 2000

  34. abdullah wrote, among other things:

    “The Prophet’s Intercession:

    We believe in the special great intercession of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. He will plead with Allah, after His permission and on behalf of mankind, to judge among His servants when they suffer from worries and troubles that they cannot bear.”

    Isn’t that interesting, abdullah, given that muslims condemn Christians for praying to God in Jesus’ name, and claim that
    asking Mo for anything is prohibited, as in, for example:

    ================================================

    “IN ISLAM THERE IS NO MEDIATOR BETWEEN ALLAH AND THE SERVANT”

    What about Prophet Muhammad; can a person hold on to him?

    You cannot hold on to him, because supplicating to him or asking for anything from him is prohibited. Even supplicating to saints is forbidden. You cannot pray to the saints or to the Prophet.
    ===============================================

    Which is it, abdullah – can you ask Mo for anything, or can’t you?

    God is very clear that there is one mediator between man and God,
    and that is Jesus Christ, not Mo, so do you for a moment believe
    that asking Mo for something will do you any good? Mo is dead,
    and unable to hear you, or act on your behalf. Deal with it.

    Jesus Christ, on the other hand, was resurrected following the
    crucifixion that the lying Mo denied, and is currently with God
    the Father in heaven, and listening to the prayers of the saints.

    Flee from islam, abdullah – it is a blasphemous, doomed religion.

    (are you Solkhar in a new guise?)

  35. Not me, not my writing style. As for DHH, yep that is me. As for the comments about Christians in Morocci, conversion is currently not recognised in Morocco, a reality here.

    As for something to hide, yep. If there is a pastor of a non-official churche, he is a criminal, as there are already pastors. They have something to hide as it is known that prosthelitizing and seeking converts is a crime and people go out of their way, then they are criminals.

    More than that, they do what you do, which is worse than criminal, it is morally repugnant, that is they go and convert by telling people that Islam is evil and then tell them to be saved they must follow their church.

    I should also point out that the Catholics and Protestant Churches do not argue with Moroccan authorities about the law, they respect it.

    Note the word respect.

  36. * More than that, they do what you do, which is worse than criminal, it is morally repugnant, that is they go and convert by telling people that Islam is evil and then tell them to be saved they must follow their church.

    No, Solkhar, salvation does not come by following a particular church;
    it is purely by grace through faith in the death by crucifixion of Jesus
    Christ the Son of God for your sins, and His subsequent resurrection.

    Something that “allah”, his false prophet, the Government of Morocco, and you all blaspheme against and deny.

    Nothing you & 1.x billion muslims can do about it, however.

    Flee from islam, Solkhar / DHH – run for your life! Ezekiel 38 & 39
    is coming your way, and not too far off, by the looks of things.

  37. * They have something to hide as it is known that prosthelitizing and seeking converts is a crime and people go out of their way, then they are criminals.

    If I lived in Morocco, which praise God in Jesus’ precious name I do
    not, I would be a criminal, according to you, your foul and blasphemous “god” and false prophet, and your anti-Christian government.

    Change your mind about Jesus Christ, Solkhar, while you still have
    a mind to change. God is not mocked.

  38. the LMAO is in response to the prostheletizer.

    As for Gaddafi, not many countries take the man seriously. I certainly have a problem if there are Muslims doing the same cr*p that the other poster or what some of these evangalists do here in Morocco.

    If a faith cannot stand up for itself and requires “nasty salesmen/conmen” then it is not a faith.

    But back t o Gaddafi, he tries all sorts of things, it happens when a 23yr old military leutenant does a coup and forgets to relinquish power to those capable of doing the work. We all know his actions and behavour and I think this will not be the last. Have you seen the car he had designed and constructed for sale? It is called the Rocket and I think it explains the man perfectly.

  39. * LMAO

    Laugh, Solkhar / DHH, but Libya is named as one of the Ezekiel 38/39 nations, and the God that you mock and blaspheme against is going to destroy it.

    “Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal; prophesy against him
    and say: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am against you,
    O Gog, chief prince of Meshech and Tubal.
    I will turn you around, put hooks in your jaws and bring you out with your whole army–your horses, your horsemen fully armed, and a great horde with large and small shields, all of them brandishing their swords. [… …]
    Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:[… …]

    Flee from islam, Solkhar / DHH – God is going to deal with it.

  40. Solkhar / DHH “If a faith cannot stand up for itself and requires “nasty salesmen/conmen” then it is not a faith.”

    Really, Solkhar? islam is founded by a conman, and backed up by
    laws protecting its followers from “evangalists” in countries such as
    Morocco where it has taken hold. This is a taste of things to come
    under Mystery, Babylon the Great and the false messiah, the
    Beast whose number is 666.

    Want to live in a global bloodbath, Solkhar? Do nothing.

  41. Has your ramavan fast ended for the day, Solkhar, & you have found
    renewed energy to leave some more droppings in here?

  42. Mohammedans are boring.

    Boring. Especially ‘reverts’, like this balding, obese Solkhar-Huntman-Dominique-Hussein loser with a criminal record who depends on his criminal mama –currently in the slammer for defrauding Centrelink. The Solkhar mama is in the slammer for ripping off Centrelink in order to support her lazy, worthless Mohammed worshipping filius in Morocco.

    You’d think that a full grown man with a western education does something useful with his life, but not Dom Huntman, who prefers a parasitic existence among Mohammedans, drinking mint tea and banging his head on the floor of some mosque in Marrakech.

    Lets visit the Mohammedan denials and claims once more, although they’re boring, they always remain the same, anyhow. Which makes it easier to refute them:

    Here’s a letter from Stendec, posted May 18, 2007, but quite accurate:

    Thank you Robert Spencer for all you have done and are are doing to help us understand the danger we face and to help us rally to defend our freedoms. Your patience, academic integrity, careful reasoning, and perfect gentlemanliness are an inspiration to me, as I am sure, they are to many others.

    As a Friday exercise, here’s a quick go at the generic Muslim talking points.

    1. He’s taking verses out of context.

    Robert Spencer takes the same verses, in the same context, that Bin Laden, Zawahiri, Zarqawi, Ahmadinejad, and thousands of other Islamic jihadists and jihadi organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah take when justifying their unrelenting assaults on civilization across the globe.

    2. He’s an Islamophobe/racist/bigot.

    Robert Spencer analyzes the ideological roots of the international jihadist movement. The fact that those roots are clearly derived, by distinquished Muslim scholars and thinkers themselves, from explicit doctrines of the “religion” called Islam is a simple fact. Stating simple facts is not bigotry. And by the way, Islam is not a race.

    3. He doesn’t know Arabic, and you can’t understand the Qur’an unless it’s in Arabic.

    Robert Spencer reads and writes Arabic. He has studied the Arabic Koran (and many English versions, for comparative analysis).

    4. He’s not an expert on Islam/he has no credentials.

    Robert Spencer has spent over two decades studying Islam, from the canonical documents (the Koran, aHadith, and Sira), to the writings of contemporary and historical Muslim scholars, to the writings of a myriad of western observers and historians.

    5. The Qur’an, the mind of Muhammad, and Islam in general are too complex and mysterious for infidels to understand.

    Muslim understanding of Islam comes from unquestioning acceptance of Islamic doctrines, without any allowance for skeptical inquiry, on pain of punishment for blasphemy. Robert Spencer, who lives in a culture that embraces free and skeptical inquiry, approaches all Islamic writings and declarations with studied academic skepticism and tests each idea against established historical facts and strict adherence to rules of logical exposition. Robert Spencer probably understands Islam better than most Muslims do. He certainly understands Islam from a perspective that, because of a Mohammedan blinkered mental upbringing, no Muslim can. In any case, most of the “complexity” and “mystery” of Islam is simple muddy confusion, as Mohammed mixed elements of Christianity, Judaism, and paganism into his plagiarized concoction of self-serving ideas called the Koran.

    6. What about the Crusades (and other violent Christian actions of the past)?

    The Crusades were a defensive war in response to centuries of bloody Islamic assaults on European civilization. In any case, Robert Spencer is from the United States of America. The United States did not exist at the time of the Crusades. The current Islamic assault on the United States has no justification, other than Islam’s own Koran-driven obsession with world conquest for Allah.

    7. What about the violent verses in the Bible?

    The violent verses in the Bible (Old Testament) relate to specific times and places and peoples. Today, Christianity is motivated by the New Testament, based on the teachings of Jesus, the Prince of Peace. In contrast, the Koran calls for violent struggle against and subjugation of the “other,” from now until Doomsday, based on the violent life example of Mohammed, a bloodthirsty and sex-crazed 7th Century warlord. Robert Spencer is a Catholic. He is peaceful, but sees a clear duty in defending his own noble and decent civilization (and our friends across the globe) from today’s fascist global assault, which is clearly based on the uncompromising Islamic core doctrines.

    8. Those Muslims are not “real” Muslims.

    When a Muslim decides to become pious, that is, to return to the fundamentals of his religion, he embraces the example of Mohammed, a man who killed, raped, murdered, and looted, using his new “religion” Islam as an excuse. The Islamic jihadists across the globe who do the same in imitation are therefore “real” Muslims. They endlessly say so themselves, and no one of authority in the Muslim world contradicts them, because they cannot without rejecting explicit verses in the Koran and without contradicting other directives derived from the Sunnah. Robert Spencer merely points this out, and asks the “moderate” Muslims–If you are really peaceful, then why don’t you “real Muslims” do something about reigning in these “misinterpreters of Islam?”

    9. Only Muslims can address the tough topics.

    To become a Muslim, one only has to recite the Shehada three times. He does not have to read the Koran, or learn Arabic, or know anything about the Islamic doctrines, including the vile doctrine of death for apostates (a potentially nasty surprise to the unwary!). How does this make the everyday Muslim able to “address the tough topics?” Muslims are required to simply accept everything in the Koran and the Hadith as revealed truth, and may not question anything there in the slightest degree, even if well-documented historical events, archeological findings, or established scientific facts conflict, not even for academic discussion. How does that severe mental constraint make Muslims qualified to “address the tough topics?” Robert Spencer, a free man of the highest integrity, following the rigorous analytical protocols of an advanced civilization that has evolved 14 centuries past the immutable framework of Islam, is far better able to “address the tough topics” than any pious Muslim.

  43. Now also known as “The White Rogue” and leaving scat trails at
    http://thewhiterogue.wordpress.com/

    Apparently he now lives in a “protected community” in a land where people are caught driving “pick-ups” while affected by alcohol, with
    firearms in the back – doesn’t sound like Morocco to me, just another Solkhar fantasy.

  44. Now also known as “The White Rogue” and leaving scat trails at
    thewhiterogue.wordpress

    Apparently he now lives in a “protected community” in a land where people are caught driving “pick-ups” while affected by alcohol, with
    firearms in the back – doesn’t sound like Morocco to me, just another Solkhar fantasy.

Comments are closed.