Yemeni Liberal Criticizes Appointment of Dalia Mogahed as Obama's Advisor on Islam

Update:

French Muslim women demand right to be oppressed with burka

minnieburka

Obama is Receiving One-Dimensional Advice on Islam

MEMRI

“The report that Dalia Mogahed has been appointed to the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, which advises U.S. President Barack Obama, filled me with anxiety… To be honest, I was anxious for two reasons.

“First, [when] someone who grew up in a Western environment decides to don the hijab, it is usually [a sign that they are] influenced by a religious ideology [even] more conservative than the one prevailing in the Arab countries…

“The second reason was the enthusiasm shown by the media outlets funded by the Arab Saudi kingdom, as well as the message of congratulations issued by a [certain] Muslim-American organization known for its affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood. The numerous voices welcoming the appointment puzzled me, and scared me.

Related links:

“Still, I tried to distance myself from my own opinions. I said to myself, ‘Wait. Only time will reveal [Mogahed’s] orientation and views.’

“Then came Obama’s speech at Cairo University, in which he addressed the Muslim world. I was generally pleased with the speech – except for one brief statement… Obama was so proud of the freedoms granted to Muslims in the U.S. that he urged his government to ‘go to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.’

“I understood then that Obama had heard [only] one opinion on this matter, which purports to exclusively reflect ‘what Muslim men and women think’ and ‘what Muslim men and women want.’ In actuality, this view represents [only Dalia Mogahed’s] perception of Islam, which is an extremist Islamic perception…

“For the U.S. government to go to court to protect the right of [Muslim] girls to wear the hijab is a puzzling act, not to say a repulsive one – since it is not [an act of] protecting human rights. [Rather, it is tantamount to] participation in violating these young women’s rights.

“How many of us have seen girls of six or nine wearing the hijab? When did we begin to see such sights as a little girl covered from head to toe? In the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, would we have dreamt of wrapping up little girls [this way]? Of course not! Even today, people in urban Arab societies have never heard of a six-year-old who has to wear a hijab. [And this], my friends, is because little girls want to play, run and jump around, not to be swaddled in a length of cloth that chokes them and restricts their every movement.

“Sisters, let’s use our intelligence. Those who defend the wearing of the hijab wish to conceal the feminine side of women, so as to avoid arousing desire in men, whose urges, [they believe], bring them to disaster.

“Even if we accept this bestial perception of human beings… logic dictates that it does not apply to little girls… Girls are not marriageable women. I ask you to keep to yourselves the opinions of [various] clerics regarding [the permissibility] of child marriages – because [these opinions] are shameful, despicable and humiliating for [the clerics who hold them] and for those who accept them.

“The rising tide of political Islam, and the popular wave of extremist Islam, which have spread in certain Muslim circles in the West, have pushed [Muslims] to such radicalism that they fail to see any great difference between a child and a woman… Anything female is dangerous and must be covered and wrapped up in a shroud…

“That is why President Obama’s statement was unfortunate. The man [actually] boasted that his own government was violating the rights of children in his society. And this statement… reflected the perception of his advisor [Dalia Mogahed]…”

Mogahed’s Book Is Not Credible

“I looked for the book that made Mogahed famous – an English-language book titled Who Speaks for Islam? (New York, 2007). The book presents a field study by [Dalia Mogahed] and her colleague John Esposito, conducted in the framework of the Gallup Organization, which claimed to reflect the opinions of more than one billion Muslims from numerous countries…

“I do not know what you think, sisters, but I work in the field of scientific research, and I do not think it possible for a survey to reflect the opinions of more than one billion people. Whoever makes such a claim is not only exaggerating, but is disregarding the very [principles] of research.

“I searched the book for [a definition of] the term ‘Shari’a’… I found that [the authors] defend the Shari’a by explaining that there is confusion between this concept and the concept of Islamic law. The Shari’a, they say, is ‘a [moral] compass reflecting principles valid in any era, which cannot be changed,’ while Islamic law, [or] jurisprudence, is ‘a map that must conform to this compass.’

“Considering this distinction between Shari’a and Islamic law, I was surprised to find that the section on women’s rights included no discussion of the personal status laws in Arab [countries]. According to the Arab Human Development Report for 2005, [these laws] must be amended in order to improve the [status] of Arab women, who are currently in a state of backwardness. These laws are based on Koranic texts, so, according to [Mogahed’s] own approach, they are part of the Shar’ia. [However, these laws] perpetuate the discrimination against women within the family.

“Since these [laws] are oppressive according to our present perception of human rights, they are by definition principles that [reflect the norms of] the time in which they appeared, and [therefore] can be changed so as to guarantee the right of women to dignity and independence. This means that the Shari’a can be changed…”

Obama Is Ignoring the Diversity of Views among Muslims

“The strangest thing is that, in launching a dialogue with the Muslim world, U.S. President Obama chose an [advisor] who does not express the diversity of opinions and positions in Muslim countries. On the contrary – he chose [one] who says, ‘this is Islam, and this is the way Muslim men and women are,’ instead of saying ‘this is the way I perceive Islam, and this is what I believe Muslim men and women think…’

“I would have been happy if the U.S. president had appointed more than one [Muslim] figure to his advisory council, and not only Dalia Mogahed… who, in her book, purports to speak for [a billion Muslims]… The big concern is that Obama, who does not want to be like [former U.S.] president Bush with his one-dimensional views, will adopt the opposite type of one-dimensional view…”

__________________________

In an article posted on the liberal website www.metransparent.com, reformist Yemeni journalist Dr. Elham Mane’a came out against the appointment of Muslim American writer Dalia Mogahed to Obama’s Interfaith Advisory Board. Mane’a claimed that Mogahed purported to represent all Muslims, but in fact represented only a limited, extremist view of Islam. This, she said, was reflected in Obama’s statement in his Cairo speech about the Muslim women’s right to wear the hijab.

10 thoughts on “Yemeni Liberal Criticizes Appointment of Dalia Mogahed as Obama's Advisor on Islam”

  1. The Mojan Horse in the US Capitol:

    ( alarabiya.net/articles/2009/04/21/71127 )

    “Mogahed will brief Obama on what Muslims want from the U.S. in a bid to create channels of communication and correct the erroneous image of Muslim Americans.”

    The victim card:

    “Mogahed’s appointment comes at a critical time given the rising tide of Islamophobia in the media and within some academic circles”

    It’s the US’s fault:

    “She hopes to counter stereotypes of Muslims as extremists and sources of unrest that have gained ground in recent years in the wake of U.S.-led wars in two Muslim countries.”

    “Common cause”:

    “”Hijab was not an issue. What the Obama administration is after is sound advice on how to engage American citizens in a common cause,” Mogahed said.”

    What God has to say about “common cause” with muslims etc, who
    deny the truth of Jesus Christ:

    (2 Corinthians 6:14-15)
    14 Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? 15 What accord has Christ with Belial?

    Right, Solkhar? Spin cycle!

  2. Hello I would like to invite you to visit our website : http://www.ikhwanweb.com/

    IKhwanweb is the Muslim Brotherhood”s only official English web site. The Main office is located in London, although Ikhwanweb has correspondents in most countries. Our staff is exclusively made of volunteers and stretched over the five continents.
    The Muslim Brotherhood opinions and views can be found under the sections of MB statements and MB opinions, in addition to the Editorial Message.
    Items posted under “other views” are usually different from these of the Muslim Brotherhood.
    Ikhwanweb does not censor any articles or comments but has the right only to remove any inappropriate words that defy public taste
    Ikhwanweb is not a news website, although we report news that matter to the Muslim Brotherhood”s cause. Our main misson is to present the Muslim Brotherhood vision right from the source and rebut misonceptions about the movement in western societies. We value debate on the issues and we welcome constructive criticism.

    to help inform you about your subject matter,questions

    If you have any addition questions you can email us at :
    omarmorsy51@yahoo.com
    Info@ikhwanweb.net

  3. ““For the U.S. government to go to court to protect the right of [Muslim] girls to wear the hijab is a puzzling act, not to say a repulsive one – since it is not [an act of] protecting human rights. [Rather, it is tantamount to] participation in violating these young women’s rights.”

    This phrase alone shows the writer is either unaware of anything to do with Islam or is promoting a political agenda. Considering the origin of the person, the latter is more than likely.

    The burqa, or complete covering is a tribal cultural item that can be considered abuse of human rights and should be banned and Sarkozy of France was correct to condemn it.

    The Hijab is an act of modesty that many Muslim women chose to wear. Agreed that in some locations girls and women have no choice, but that is now becoming a minority. Women who are conservative simply want and chose to wear it and thus to stop them or condemn them for wearing it is in fact the abuse of human rights, as Obama has recognized. I have a wife and two daughters who do not wear it, it is their choice. If they later chose to do so, my only conseil is that they are serious if they do and not be hypocrits.

    I see no problem with Dalia Mogahed.

    1. Solkie spin:

      “Agreed that in some locations girls and women have no choice, but that is now becoming a minority.”

      Reality: 30 years ago there was not one woman in Indonesia who wore that hideous shroud. Now the unhijabbed ones are becoming a minority.

      Spin: “The Hijab is an act of modesty”

      Reality: the hijab is an in-your-face statement of Islamo-insanity.

      Spin: “Women who are conservative simply want and chose to wear it and thus to stop them or condemn them for wearing it is in fact the abuse of human rights”

      Reality: No woman or girl in her right mind would wear that hideous rag if she is not whacked into it. Most of the time they are indoctrinated and threatened to be killed or to be roasted in hellfire in eternity if they don’t wear it.

      You have a wife and daughters, Solkie? I feel so sorry for them….

  4. Sucky it’s fun to read a muzz who talk of Human Rights… it’s refreshing .They forgot to sign it at the U.N,…Human Rights are totaly incompatible with sharia my dear Sucky and you know it….Secundo,i don’t beleive your wife is not Wearing the Veil or Burka (for mr it’s the same thing) i even think she is Wearing not one burka but 3 Green Trash Bag who cover all his body and face and the same for the 2 youngest…..Who told me that Sucky it’s my Nose…i have a very big Nose of a PIG Sucky Oink,Oinkk….He never deceives me.
    And i don’t beleive one Second than you are living in morroco…HI,Hi,Hi,Hiii Sucky…..Not at All…I think you are living in a Western Country,it’s what i think my dear Sucky.
    Anyway you are always Welcome to my Pigs Farm with your Sex Slaves at anytime …my pigs are waiting for you and even they found a Job for you,a real one at Least.

  5. * You have a wife and daughters, Solkie? I feel so sorry for them….

    He confused being unable to lie straight in bed with something about
    his “manhood”. Who knows if or when he is telling the truth. He is
    a mythomaniac.

  6. The blog-owner yet again has proven his complete lack of knowledge of both Islam and the reality on the ground in Muslim countries. He obviously watches to much movies and of course only reads Spencer.

    He stated the very naive and foolish “No woman or girl in her right mind would wear that hideous rag if she is not whacked into it. Most of the time they are indoctrinated and threatened to be killed or to be roasted in hellfire in eternity if they don’t wear it.”

    But if did step into Muslim countries that are not overly conservative he will find that hijabs are about half the population and a third in the big large cities. Certainly there are neighbourhoods that are more conservative and then he will find others that are not.

    I guess if he walked in the centre of Casablanca and found ladies in jeans and even sleevless tops he will in fact deny it and then claim that Morocco and Casablanca is not Muslims. But then he will have to suffer the same in Tunis, central Algiers, Cairo, Alexandria, Beirut, Amman, Damascus, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, and so on and so forth.

    Your BS hypocrisy is starting to smell bad blog-owner, which world do you live in?

    I guess you will have to also condemn orthodox Jews and Christians for their women to also cover their hair – or are you going to say that they are wearing it for a different reason – because God told them to?

    1. Your BS and hypocrisiy is way past its use by date, Solki. You conveniently forget to mention that the blogowner knows the Mohammedan world very well and is probably 30 years ahead of you in experience,studies, knowledge and first hand encounters. I have seen dramatic increases in shrouds and fanatical Mohammedan frenzy over the last 30 years and that’s a fact.

      I also told you now multiple times that this blog is not about Christianity or Judaism, so could you kindly leave them out of it? Why can’t Mohammeds cult stand on its own?

Comments are closed.