George “gorgeous” Galloway
News reaches us of a “Peace conference” in Malaysia. The Peace campaigner George Galloway, here praising some “peace campaigners” in Iraq, will be in attendence. More from “Harry’s”
“Flying Imam’s” Provocation & grievance theater pays:
US airline to pay out in flying imams case
WASHINGTON — US Airways has agreed to pay “undisclosed damages” to six imams it kicked off a flight in 2006 because of alleged suspicious activity, a prominent rights group said Tuesday.
Was the Flying Imams caper an orchestrated stunt designed to intimidate airport security personnel?
The Flying Imams settled their case against US Airways yesterday. But questions linger. Here are more revelations from the blockbuster Muslim Mafia. “‘Flying imams’ rewarded for ominous airline ’stunt’? Police detective: ‘Acts of staged controversy could be used to desensitize security personnel,’” by David Kupelian for WorldNetDaily, thanks to JW:
Spying on Muslims causes terrorism:
Excessive surveillance of Muslims undermines a central component of counter-terrorism work, argues Arun Kundnani, author of the IRR study Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism.
Only from the Guardian (for Muslims) , 19 October 2009
“Linking Islam and terrorism is wrong“
The government must stop seeing all Muslims as innately prone to violence if it wants to rebuild trust in the community, argues Rizwaan Sabir.
“Since Muslims make up 20% of the world’s population, their involvement in over 50% of the world’s terrorist groups is telling and troubling”
But it is “Islamophobic” to notice, doncha know.
“An(other) Inconvenient Truth–about Terrorism,” by Timothy Rhea Furnish for theHistory News Network, October 19 (thanks to the astounding Kathy Shaidle):
So, just over half the world’s terrorist organizations are Muslim in origin and function. No other religious ideology is close–not even, most notably, Christianity (with its 2 billion+ membership, you’d think more would be involved in violence, wouldn’t you?). Since Muslims make up 20% of the world’s population, their involvement in over 50% of the world’s terrrorist [sic] groups is telling and troubling–and something the NIS is loathe to admit, thus tainting its claim to “know…the nature of the threats.”
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
http://sioanetwork.com/?p=323
A quote: Unbelievers are not meant to study the doctrine of Islam; the doctrine is clear about treatment of non-believers by adherents of this ideology.
Allah and Mohammed both hate the kafir. The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points. This hatred of kafirs is codified in Islamic law.
Koran: [9:5] When the sacred months (by ancient arab custom there were four months during which there was to be no violence) are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful.
The purpose of Islam is to force all people across the world to submit to Sharia law, the codified commands of Allah and Mohammed. This is the purpose of jihad against the unbelievers – to make them submit to Islam.
It is an entire civilization that includes politics, jurisprudence, war, and a legal system (Sharia). The nature and character of Sharia is so offensive to unbelievers and to anyone who values liberty, equality, inclusiveness, women’s rights, gay rights, freedom of speech and thought that defense …. etc
Who are the other 50% of terrorists?
Most terror groups are islamic based. Links to below
ttp://www.cdi.org/terrorism/terrorist-groups.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._State_Department_list_of_Foreign_Terrorist_Organizations
Good question. When I put up that post I also thought that 50 % might be a bit “conservative” (sarc/off)
As for Islam being a civilization, I beg to differ. But what would be the correct term apart from being a juggernaut, a barbaric, destructive, exploitative force?
I think 50% percent in the sense that 50% of white skinned people have white skin.
Yeah, I agree with you sheik. Civilized is a term that I don’t apply to countries that practice Sharia laws or even people that practice them. The websites that were given to me show that the other fascist regime is communism that has terror groups. gee, go figure.
Then the others could probably make up less than 10%, maybe even less, of the total percentage.
thereligionofpeace.com puts the Irish terrorism in perspective too, along with some other things Muslims like to use as tu quoque excuses for their Jihadists. I am not saying either terrorists were ok though. “More civilians were killed by Muslim extremists in two hours on September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland.”