<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portrait of a Good Muslim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-212379</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-212379</guid>
		<description>I have long maintained that it is moderate Muslims that are the problem, not because they are violent but because in huge numbers they will force the rest of us to accommodate them.

BTW, I linked to your article from mine &lt;a href=&quot;http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/2009/11/mohammed_movie_in_production.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mohammed Movie in Production&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long maintained that it is moderate Muslims that are the problem, not because they are violent but because in huge numbers they will force the rest of us to accommodate them.</p>
<p>BTW, I linked to your article from mine <a href="http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/2009/11/mohammed_movie_in_production.html" rel="nofollow">Mohammed Movie in Production</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superdave</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209226</link>
		<dc:creator>Superdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209226</guid>
		<description>Rahil Abbas, just keep telling yourself that.
I mean, like, it wouldn&#039;t be hard to believe that when you actually think islam is the truth.
Abu al Qasim,aka muhammad(yimach shmo vezichro - May his name and memory be obliterated) was a pedophile.

Tabari IX:131 “My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.”

That sounds like pedophilia to me...
Peace to you &amp; i hope one day you find the truth &amp; follow it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahil Abbas, just keep telling yourself that.<br />
I mean, like, it wouldn&#8217;t be hard to believe that when you actually think islam is the truth.<br />
Abu al Qasim,aka muhammad(yimach shmo vezichro &#8211; May his name and memory be obliterated) was a pedophile.</p>
<p>Tabari IX:131 “My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.”</p>
<p>That sounds like pedophilia to me&#8230;<br />
Peace to you &amp; i hope one day you find the truth &amp; follow it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahil Abbas</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209160</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahil Abbas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209160</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t bother reading the entire article as i know it was written by someone who hates islam. that&#039;s ok though, you can hate it if you want, that&#039;s your choice. There have always been people who hate Islam and always people who reject the truth.

There are a few things however, which I&#039;d like to clarify, which are:

Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam - peace and blessings be upon him) was not at all a pedophile as you claim him to be. You have absolutely no grounds to even make this statement. Firstly, let&#039;s have a look at the definition of the word itself. To make things easy for everyone, I&#039;ve taken this definition from www.dictionary.com (thought I&#039;m sure other english dictionaries would agree with the definition given):

–noun Psychiatry. an adult who is sexually attracted to young children. 

Now secondly, let&#039;s look at the life of Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam - peace and blessings be upon him). Let&#039;s look at his marriages shall we;

His first wife, Khadijah (radhiAllahu anha - May Allah be pleased with her). How old was she when she married Muhammad? She was 40, and how old was Muhmmad himself? He was 25. Who was it that proposed the marriage? It was Khadijah.

So a man who married after the age of 25 (and thus having had no sexual relations with anyone else until after this marriage) who married a woman who was 15 years older than himself, who herself proposed the marriage (because of his excellent character). You really still think this man to be a pedophile? there are ignorant people (to the truth) our there, so maybe you still will hold to this claim.

So other than Aisha (radhiAllahu anha - may Allah be pleased with her) who else is there who Muhammad was marriage to who was of a young age? How many of te wives he had were younger than himself, and how many were older than himself? If you know the answers to these questions, and know the definition of the word pedophile, the can you really (and honestly) say that Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam) is a pedophile?

Let&#039;s go back to the definition of the word itself again;

- pedophile:
someone who is sexually attracted to young children. 

peace to those who follow the truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t bother reading the entire article as i know it was written by someone who hates islam. that&#8217;s ok though, you can hate it if you want, that&#8217;s your choice. There have always been people who hate Islam and always people who reject the truth.</p>
<p>There are a few things however, which I&#8217;d like to clarify, which are:</p>
<p>Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam &#8211; peace and blessings be upon him) was not at all a pedophile as you claim him to be. You have absolutely no grounds to even make this statement. Firstly, let&#8217;s have a look at the definition of the word itself. To make things easy for everyone, I&#8217;ve taken this definition from <a href="http://www.dictionary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dictionary.com</a> (thought I&#8217;m sure other english dictionaries would agree with the definition given):</p>
<p>–noun Psychiatry. an adult who is sexually attracted to young children. </p>
<p>Now secondly, let&#8217;s look at the life of Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam &#8211; peace and blessings be upon him). Let&#8217;s look at his marriages shall we;</p>
<p>His first wife, Khadijah (radhiAllahu anha &#8211; May Allah be pleased with her). How old was she when she married Muhammad? She was 40, and how old was Muhmmad himself? He was 25. Who was it that proposed the marriage? It was Khadijah.</p>
<p>So a man who married after the age of 25 (and thus having had no sexual relations with anyone else until after this marriage) who married a woman who was 15 years older than himself, who herself proposed the marriage (because of his excellent character). You really still think this man to be a pedophile? there are ignorant people (to the truth) our there, so maybe you still will hold to this claim.</p>
<p>So other than Aisha (radhiAllahu anha &#8211; may Allah be pleased with her) who else is there who Muhammad was marriage to who was of a young age? How many of te wives he had were younger than himself, and how many were older than himself? If you know the answers to these questions, and know the definition of the word pedophile, the can you really (and honestly) say that Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa sallam) is a pedophile?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go back to the definition of the word itself again;</p>
<p>- pedophile:<br />
someone who is sexually attracted to young children. </p>
<p>peace to those who follow the truth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Infidel</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209146</link>
		<dc:creator>An Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209146</guid>
		<description>&quot;The rally erupted from a rumor that U.S. forces had bombed a mosque and burned a copy of the Muslim holy book, the Quran, H/T Tundra Tabloids.&quot;

These people are in a permanent state of Apeshit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The rally erupted from a rumor that U.S. forces had bombed a mosque and burned a copy of the Muslim holy book, the Quran, H/T Tundra Tabloids.&#8221;</p>
<p>These people are in a permanent state of Apeshit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209099</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209099</guid>
		<description>This is the telling statement from the above, &quot; Second. We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries. Because more Islam means less freedom&quot;. 

It correctly identifies that the distinction between moderates and radical Muslims is meaningless. The advance of sharia is dependent on the mass of the Muslim population that the Imams can claim. Therefore, as a first step, all immigration of Muslims must stop.

The next step would be to not renew the visas of non-citizen Muslims. 

The next would be to make certain aspects of devout Islamic practice not just illegal but attract a very high punishment. This will make many Muslims leave. It may well be that the ones that leave are the “moderates”, but bear in the first point, that it is the mass of the resident Muslim population that gives rise to demands for sharia, as well as that this is war. 

By this time most Muslims would have seen that there is no hope for the advance of Islam, and many will leave voluntarily. The rest, their morale destroyed, and unable to live as Muslims, will leave or leave Islam. 

I realise that this is hard, but Islam’s barbaric theology and practice leave no other choice if we wish civilisation to continue. The option is a civil war, the resulting cruel murder of innocents, and the chaotic displacement of people and ethnic cleansing. I hope and pray that this can be avoided.

Our politicians, particularly NuLabour, that deliberately planned the admittance of large scale Muslim immigration, have much to explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the telling statement from the above, &#8221; Second. We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries. Because more Islam means less freedom&#8221;. </p>
<p>It correctly identifies that the distinction between moderates and radical Muslims is meaningless. The advance of sharia is dependent on the mass of the Muslim population that the Imams can claim. Therefore, as a first step, all immigration of Muslims must stop.</p>
<p>The next step would be to not renew the visas of non-citizen Muslims. </p>
<p>The next would be to make certain aspects of devout Islamic practice not just illegal but attract a very high punishment. This will make many Muslims leave. It may well be that the ones that leave are the “moderates”, but bear in the first point, that it is the mass of the resident Muslim population that gives rise to demands for sharia, as well as that this is war. </p>
<p>By this time most Muslims would have seen that there is no hope for the advance of Islam, and many will leave voluntarily. The rest, their morale destroyed, and unable to live as Muslims, will leave or leave Islam. </p>
<p>I realise that this is hard, but Islam’s barbaric theology and practice leave no other choice if we wish civilisation to continue. The option is a civil war, the resulting cruel murder of innocents, and the chaotic displacement of people and ethnic cleansing. I hope and pray that this can be avoided.</p>
<p>Our politicians, particularly NuLabour, that deliberately planned the admittance of large scale Muslim immigration, have much to explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209098</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209098</guid>
		<description>Geert Wilders’s speech at Columbia University, October 21, 2009

The main points 

Ladies and gentlemen, time is running out, we need to act. As I already said, we need less Islam, and more freedom. We have to protect our most important right, our right to free speech. We have to protect our liberties. That is why I propose the following measures, measures to preserve our freedom: 

First. We have to end all forms of cultural relativism. For this purpose we need an amendment to our Western constitutions stating that our cultural foundation is the Judeo Christian Humanistic culture, and not Islam. 

Second. We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries. Because more Islam means less freedom. 

Third. I have a clear message to all Muslims in our societies: If you subscribe to our laws, our values and our constitutions you are very welcome to stay and we will help you to assimilate. 

But, if you cross the red line and commit violent crimes or the implementation of shariah law and start practicing jihad, you are not welcome anymore, then we will expel you if possible the same day. 

Fourth. We have to strengthen our laws regarding freedom of speech. In Europe we urgently need some kind of American First Amendment. And we have to resist UN-resolutions that intend to weaken our right of free speech in another attempt to appease the Islamic world. 

Fifth, last but not least. We have to elect brave leaders. Real leaders. We enjoy the privilege of living in a democracy. Let us use that privilege by replacing weak leaders with heroes. Let us have fewer Neville Chamberlains and more Winston Churchills! In short, ladies and gentlemen, my main message of today is that we have to start fighting back. No defence, but offence. We have to fight back and demonstrate that millions of people are sick and tired of losing, of giving in, of appeasing. We must make clear that millions of freedom loving people are saying: enough is enough.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/arch…ves/ 014576.html

Read it all.

Its brilliant, and pulls no punches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geert Wilders’s speech at Columbia University, October 21, 2009</p>
<p>The main points </p>
<p>Ladies and gentlemen, time is running out, we need to act. As I already said, we need less Islam, and more freedom. We have to protect our most important right, our right to free speech. We have to protect our liberties. That is why I propose the following measures, measures to preserve our freedom: </p>
<p>First. We have to end all forms of cultural relativism. For this purpose we need an amendment to our Western constitutions stating that our cultural foundation is the Judeo Christian Humanistic culture, and not Islam. </p>
<p>Second. We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries. Because more Islam means less freedom. </p>
<p>Third. I have a clear message to all Muslims in our societies: If you subscribe to our laws, our values and our constitutions you are very welcome to stay and we will help you to assimilate. </p>
<p>But, if you cross the red line and commit violent crimes or the implementation of shariah law and start practicing jihad, you are not welcome anymore, then we will expel you if possible the same day. </p>
<p>Fourth. We have to strengthen our laws regarding freedom of speech. In Europe we urgently need some kind of American First Amendment. And we have to resist UN-resolutions that intend to weaken our right of free speech in another attempt to appease the Islamic world. </p>
<p>Fifth, last but not least. We have to elect brave leaders. Real leaders. We enjoy the privilege of living in a democracy. Let us use that privilege by replacing weak leaders with heroes. Let us have fewer Neville Chamberlains and more Winston Churchills! In short, ladies and gentlemen, my main message of today is that we have to start fighting back. No defence, but offence. We have to fight back and demonstrate that millions of people are sick and tired of losing, of giving in, of appeasing. We must make clear that millions of freedom loving people are saying: enough is enough.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/arch…ves/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amnation.com/vfr/arch…ves/</a> 014576.html</p>
<p>Read it all.</p>
<p>Its brilliant, and pulls no punches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R_not</title>
		<link>http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/25/portrait-of-a-good-muslim/comment-page-1/#comment-209086</link>
		<dc:creator>R_not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheikyermami.com/?p=38466#comment-209086</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, we cannot trust Islam based on some people we consider good people.  If the rest of the Muslim world gets their way, establishes sharia laws, these same people who say to reform Islam would be given some hard choices - stop their crap or die.  In the case of this lesbian writer, she probably would be beaten.  In Arabic there is no &#039;light&#039; beating - those are only in the translations that we got.

If a person is truly good, and really knows Islam - how can they follow such a book and a Prophet?  Seriously, these are two of the nastiest things about Islam and if I were under Sharia laws I would be killed for saying that about their prophet.  

And if the author is frustrated because we who know Islam don&#039;t trust her, well go figure.  Her ideology teaches deception.  Does she just gloss over that stuff?  Do her eye&#039;s glaze over when she read it?  Deception is a tiny bit of the atrocities in Islam, but it is why no one can trust a Muslim anymore, well, only the useful idiots seem to be able to think Islam is cool and would rather believe them than the ones who don&#039;t want them dead, converted or subjugated.  

And I am not just picking on her, the guy (Jassar) who made The Third Jihad - I also have the same questions and comments for him too.   Any and all, Muslims who say they want to reform Islam I question.  What do they do - get rid of most of the Koran and hadith?  That doesn&#039;t make Islam smell any better since Mohammed was still a monster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, we cannot trust Islam based on some people we consider good people.  If the rest of the Muslim world gets their way, establishes sharia laws, these same people who say to reform Islam would be given some hard choices &#8211; stop their crap or die.  In the case of this lesbian writer, she probably would be beaten.  In Arabic there is no &#8216;light&#8217; beating &#8211; those are only in the translations that we got.</p>
<p>If a person is truly good, and really knows Islam &#8211; how can they follow such a book and a Prophet?  Seriously, these are two of the nastiest things about Islam and if I were under Sharia laws I would be killed for saying that about their prophet.  </p>
<p>And if the author is frustrated because we who know Islam don&#8217;t trust her, well go figure.  Her ideology teaches deception.  Does she just gloss over that stuff?  Do her eye&#8217;s glaze over when she read it?  Deception is a tiny bit of the atrocities in Islam, but it is why no one can trust a Muslim anymore, well, only the useful idiots seem to be able to think Islam is cool and would rather believe them than the ones who don&#8217;t want them dead, converted or subjugated.  </p>
<p>And I am not just picking on her, the guy (Jassar) who made The Third Jihad &#8211; I also have the same questions and comments for him too.   Any and all, Muslims who say they want to reform Islam I question.  What do they do &#8211; get rid of most of the Koran and hadith?  That doesn&#8217;t make Islam smell any better since Mohammed was still a monster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

