Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country

Its official. The cat is out of the bag: Nullabor is trying to replace native Brits with a Mohammedan proletariat for more than a decade now:

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

muslim-women-and-childrenMuslims breed comfortably  on infidel welfare….

Thanks to Tim/   By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor/Telegraph UK

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

Related links:

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”

The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour’s immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a “driving political purpose” behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has “enriched” Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

But he acknowledged that “nervous” ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

“Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.

“But ministers wouldn’t talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: “Now at least the truth is out, and it’s dynamite.

“Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.

“This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.”

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: “We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.

“It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “Our new flexible points based system gives us greater control on those coming to work or study from outside Europe, ensuring that only those that Britain need can come.

“Britain’s borders are stronger than ever before and we are rolling out ID cards to foreign nationals, we have introduced civil penalties for those employing illegal workers and from the end of next year our electronic border system will monitor 95 per cent of journeys in and out of the UK.

“The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”

Sure thing….

9 thoughts on “Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country”

  1. The news that “Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser”, is unadulterated BS. It hides the real reason behind the policy.

    Politicians do not do things to make a country more cultural or enriched, they do so because they wish to remain in power. NuLabour knows that immigrants will vote Labour, for the simple reason that Labour will continue unlimited Benefits for all. A similar situation prevails in America.

    America has upto 15m illegals. I dont see them ever being forced to go back. Therefore, sooner or later they will be legalised. Even if they are not, their children who are born in the US, will be American. In the long run, Democrats in America, and Labour in the UK, are therefore assured an inbuilt majority. Such gerrymandering is of a scale, and more important, intent, quite different from what happened before. It amounts to treason.

  2. Home Office “Britain’s borders are stronger than ever before and we are rolling out ID cards to foreign nationals, we have introduced civil penalties for those employing illegal workers

    Yeah yeah yeah. More to the point, where are the civic i.e., criminal penalties for those who have put the very existence of Britain in jeopardy.

  3. You see ridiculous points of view put forward every day vis-a -vis islam – but ……..
    THIS takes the biscuit -from Jewish newspaper …………..
    Un report women

    :The latest United Nations report by Rapporteur Martin Scheinin expresses concern that the war on terrorism harms women. Scheinin, whose position involves investigating counterterror efforts around the world, advises that nations fighting terrorism abandon the use of a ‘war paradigm’… because of the adverse impacts it has on gender equality. By using terms like war on terror, counterterror forces make abuses such as rape and the enforcement of dress codes on women more likely, he claimed.
    Scheinin also criticized increasing military involvement in counterterror efforts, stating that military involvement in fighting terrorism has exposed women to rape and sexual assault by the armed forces.
    Concern: Counterterror Laws Make Gender Change a Challenge
    Scheinin also expressed concern for those he defined as transgendered — men who identify as women, or vice versa. Security personnel who are on the lookout for male terrorists dressed as women may inadvertantly target all men dressed as women, he worried
    In addition, he said, counterterror measures that make it difficult for citizens to change their identity risk unduly penalizing transgender persons, whose personal appearance and data are subject to change. UN member states have an obligation to ensure that all ID cards, passports, and other such documents that indicate whether the bearer is male or female reflect the person’s profound self-defined gender identity – in other words, that citizens be allowed to choose whether they wish to be male or female and to change their ID in accordance, Scheinin concluded
    Compensate Terrorists’ Families
    Scheinin also determined that terrorists’ families have their rights violated by the detention of male terrorists.
    Female family members… bear the burden of anxiety, harassment, social exclusion and economic hardship occasioned by the loss of the male breadwinner, he found
    The fact that women suffer when their husbands are arrested for terrorist activity means that states fighting terrorism risk violating the right to adequate housing and the right to family life, he cautioned .
    UN member states should compensate the families of those detained under counterterror laws, Scheinin concluded

  4. Britain is going down , i am so sorry for the people , but you must blame the parlement and his dhimmy leadership ! Islamisation has to stop , right now !
    Save Britain , save your children , FIGHT IS-LAM !!!!!!! Fight for EUROPE !!

  5. Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a “driving political purpose” behind immigration policy.
    He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has “enriched” Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

    I wasn’t aware there were gaps in the labour market and I am not sure that bringing in Muslims helps with the labour market.
    As far as cultural enrichment…yes, isn’t it grand when you destroy completely perfect neighborhoods and displace them with islamabad-style third-world living standards. You take a centruies-old cathedrals and put domes and minarets around them,…wonderful cultural enrichment. Truly charming women dressed as black and brown ghosts walk the streets…How colorful that is. Street protesters demonstrate peacefully by burning cars and breaking shop windows. Western women are raped by over-sexed young immigrant men who feel it is their dutiful obligation to let women know they aren’t dressed properly. Parades of soldiers undergo gauntlets of spittle and vile language returning from the fight in Afghanistan.
    The welfare system is strained to the max by multiple wives bearing all the children they can handle.
    YES…
    I am truly impressed with the well-thought-out planning of these leftist morons in this grand social experiment in how to create utter collapse in a commonwealth country, once steeped in a rich history.
    It certainly increases the pride in one’s cultural heritage and as far as the political motivation, “dar al harb” is the new catch phrase, is it not?
    That must get a lot of votes!

    Tourists must be just flocking to the UK to view the new cultural enhancements of this wonderfully cosmopolitan Britain.
    It certainly doesn’t include me. I don’t have a yen for halal food and I’m not sure I could abide to shari’ah laws.
    Putting me on the no-fly list, for the UK, would be fine with me as I have no desire to go there anymore, anyhow. That goes for Europe as well.
    Too bad! So sad! Goodbye to my Scottish heritage!

  6. The latest United Nations report by Rapporteur Martin Scheinin expresses concern that the war on terrorism harms women.

    I’m waiting for the UN report that states that the IPCC has confirmed that the War on Terror harms polar bears.

  7. Putting me on the no-fly list, for the UK, would be fine with me as I have no desire to go there anymore, anyhow. That goes for Europe as well.
    Too bad! So sad! Goodbye to my Scottish heritage!:

    At least Britain is figfhting back. In the USA they have elected Obama. Besides they do not have the intrinsic values that enable Britain to fight back.

  8. I’ve had a feeling for the last two years , that none of the major parties wish to win the coming election. It is this reason why both vie with each other to bring out ever more obnoxious policies. It nay also br the reason why one of Labour’s minions has decided to let the cat out of the bag.

    The mess that the major parties have created, particularly the immigration one, is coming to the boil, and none of them wish to be in charge when it blows up. Furthermore, I get the feeling that both parties are really trying to engineer the BNP into office to sort out the mess of their own creation, while they sit carping on the sidelines, to maintain their liberal consciences. Once its done and dusted they can come back to power, and it will be business as usual.

Comments are closed.