The Solkhar aka Dom "Hussein" Huntman Expose'

IMG-1

What we know about the Solkhar troll:

Dominique “Hussain” Huntman is a Dutchman converted to Islam and lives in Morocco, the fuedal monarchy nation, with erotic and extreme connotations of comfort and sex for the slightly bent. Hussain Huntman wrote comments and posted pieces in the Canadian Coalition for Democracies a.o..  More

Solkhar is an obsessive blog-troll with too much time on his hands and goes trolling on anti-jihad blogs, when he doesn’t drink mint tea, that is…  he also seems to like playing with -what he calls-  his “left leaning dick…”

Hi,

my name is Dom Huntman, I am also the Human Warlord Solkhar and co-leader 2 of DNA.

To say hello, I thought let’s put a person to the name. I am an
Australian/Dutch dual national, aged 43 (1964) and I am semi-retired
living in Marrakech, Morocco. More here (of course there are reasons for Solkers early “retirement”, are you wondering why he is so shy telling us about it?ed)

(I am a former Dutch diplomat and a consultant on terrorism financing, a liberal Sunni muslim and I am based and work to the North African region)   You wish, Huntsman, you wish!  But apart from being a self-appointed snitch for the Moroccan Gestapo life must be pretty boring…

Solkhar’s exploits

I am a Dutch born Muslim convert, aged 48 and married to a Moroccan, own my own home etc), the think I enjoy the most is that I have learned the language, travel to all areas, popular or chic and talking with locals and appreciating their lives is the most rewarding. Apart from that, I sit in cafes drinking mint tea, read the newspaper and watch the Atlas Mountains (that has snow now on them).

Dominic Huntman aka Solkhar/pic from facebook

Cheap suit, cheap necktie, balding and with 50 years of age still on life support from his thieving mama….

Dom Hussain Huntman apparently found a wife through some sort of muslim  dating service:

http://www.zawaj.com/success5.html

[Asalam alaikum Zawaj,

I placed an add about a year ago and hamdulillah I met someone through  Zawaj.com and I am now married. Masalama.

Dom Hussain Huntman

One thought that I have gathered from 20 plus years on diplomacy and being a graduate from the International School at the FBI College in Virginia (no such record exists, we checked/ed)

Spin, spin spin….

The FBI (go look on its site) for example has a dedicated unit focusing on what they say is the long-term threat to instability in the United States – right-wing radical Christianity. I read in the Sydney Morning Herald today this item (see below) about a US-born Baptist Missionary based in Australia who gladly said that all Jews will go to Hell.

This is the era of mass media (global TV and the internet) and the bulk of western media loves scandal and thus the militancy and Islamists within the Muslim World are prime targets. I would say it is not Islamic principles at all that has caused this, though others will disagree, but the fundamentalism, the confusion between what is core Islam and local tribal and cultural habits and of course economic instabilty, poverty and corruption all has its points to play

Islam, like all religions in the world have a serious problem and it is called fanatasism, radicalism and fundamentalism.

So much BS and so little time. But this is real:

It seems that Grandma Huntman defrauded Centrelink and used  some the money to send gifts to her son in Morocco. Multiple    identities run in the family:

$370,000 fraud: 73-year-old grandmother jailed for false pension payments

The Queanbeyan Age

A 73-year-old Queanbeyan grandmother who stole more than $370,000 in Centrelink payments will spend at least nine months in prison.

Wilhelmina Dominica Huntman, of Doeberl Place in Karabar, pleaded guilty to two sets of fraud charges in Queanbeyan District Court last week.

The case was adjourned and she appeared in court again on Wednesday.

Huntman said she spent most of the money on gifts for her grandchildren in Canberra and her son in Morocco.


She also gambled up to $300 a week on poker machines at the Queanbeyan Leagues Club and had no assets left to repay the money.

The court heard that Huntman had received a Widows Pension and an Aged Pension in her own name between May 1987 and June 2006 – and that she had also been collecting other Centrelink payments in both her maiden name and another false identity.

She had used a fake birth certificate, invented a husband and tampered with her passport to claim the payments.

When Centrelink uncovered the fraud, police executed a search warrant at Huntman’s home and found the documents including the tampered passport, pension cards and medicare cards.

Huntman had claimed the benefits from both Queanbeyan and Belconnen Centrelink offices.

For the charges relating to the payments she claimed in her maiden name, she was sentenced to 10-months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of three months.

For the payments she claimed in her false identity, Huntman was sentenced to 18-months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of seven months.

Judge John Goldring said she would be released on two two-year good-behaviour bonds in June 2008.

She was also ordered to repay the $370,000 – with no fixed date for repayment.

Huntman showed no emotion as officers led her away after Wednesday’s hearing.

She was taken to Silverwater Prison.

Judge Goldring said Centrelink fraud could not be regarded as less serious than other crimes because there were no victims.

He said every taxpayer was a victim and he had imposed the sentence as a general deterrent to other offenders.

Stay tuned. We also have  Dominique Huntman’s criminal record. We haven’t posted it yet because it would implicate the source.

22 thoughts on “The Solkhar aka Dom "Hussein" Huntman Expose'”

  1. If some looney baptist “missionary” said that all Jews will go to hell, the best thing would be to ignore such rantings.

    Just another oxygen thief and pointless to waste a nanosecond on the dope.

    As for the bigggest threat to the USA being right wing radical (sic)Christianity, this is just a contemptible smear and tells more about the troll than about Christianity.

  2. Wow, not only a serial liar but also a thief. Now wonder Solkar fits so well into Islam.

    Living it up on Australian taxpayers money eh? What a wicked person.

    Jesus Christ vs Solkar’s Islam:

    John 10v10 “The thief comes not but that he may steal, and kill, and destroy: I am come that they might have life, and might have it abundantly. “

  3. With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

    Shame on you Solkhar

  4. Wafa Sultan: Allah’s Apostate Cassandra
    October 20th, 2009 by Andrew Bostom |

    A review of Wafa Sultan’s, “A God Who Hates,” St. Martin’s Press, 2009, 256 pp.

    A God who hates – that fits the bill for allah. Never have I read a book with so much loathing for humanity in general. In fact this allah does not even love Muslims, unless they can outdo allah in evil. It is the reason why allah loves mohammed so much, and is therefore the paragon for Muslims.

  5. Wafa Sultan: Allah’s Apostate Cassandra
    October 20th, 2009 by Andrew Bostom |

    A review of Wafa Sultan’s, “A God Who Hates,” St. Martin’s Press, 2009, 256 pp.

    A God who hates – that fits the bill for allah. Never have I read a book with so much loathing for humanity in general. In fact this allah does not even love Muslims, unless they can outdo allah in evil. It is the reason why allah loves mohammed so much, and is therefore the paragon for Muslims.

    http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2009/10/20/wafa-sultan-allah’s-apostate-cassandra/#comments

  6. “Stay tuned. We also have Dominique Huntman’s criminal record. We haven’t posted it yet because it would implicate the source.”

    yum yum, i can’t wait.

  7. “Stay tuned. We also have Dominique Huntman’s criminal record. We haven’t posted it yet because it would implicate the source.”

    LOL, can’t wait for this.
    did he go to jail because he likes children like big Mo did ?

  8. “my name is Dom Huntman, I am also the Human Warlord Solkhar and co-leader 2 of DNA.”

    I told him he would be better off sticking to role playing games and being a food critic. At the time, I didn’t know how close I was.

  9. I don’t get it…in the one article: “Solkhar and his alias” it states that he is 43 and in the other article on your site it says he is 48. He looks more like 58 with the balding head. I think he lies about his age. In some teeny blogs he probably states that he’s 28 to try to lure young girls into Moroccan air.
    I am keeping that one blooger quote about war games…
    “if a Muslim brags about Salah al-Din (Saladin) and the Crusades just mention the name Chingis Khan (the West called him Genghis) and watch the reaction on their faces.” LOL

  10. I don’t get it…in the one article: “Solkhar and his alias” it states that he is 43 and in the other article on your site it says he is 48. He looks more like 58 with the balding head. I think he lies about his age. In some teeny blogs he probably states that he’s 28 to try to lure young girls into Moroccan air.
    I am keeping that one blooger quote about war games…
    “if a Muslim brags about Salah al-Din (Saladin) and the Crusades just mention the name Chingis Khan (the West called him Genghis) and watch the reaction on their faces.” LOL
    Sorry, forgot to add great post! Can’t wait to see your next post!

  11. Wowww,Super Sheik Congratulations !
    I knew this guy was a Thief or something like that,i told before in my Comments…..I’m a Pork with a Big Nose of a Pork i smell the Shit fron very Fare away.
    Yes he is Retired from work and lived on the Money steal by his Grand-Mother and probaly by him Too.
    He is Completely Disgusting human being,of course he is Muzz…The Pork are more Clean than Him.

  12. When I think that Garbage, Crook Paedophil it made us Morals,even played the Gentleman……..Hey Sucky i want you know than i copied all the Web-Page on my computer and burned on a Dvd…if i never saw you somewhere on the net AGAIN
    I’m going to past information about you,that way everybody will know who you really are…..I hope that’s not bother you,it is a pleasure to serve you…..

  13. You’ve done a great humanitarian deed here. And a brilliant cartoonist to translate his reality to the lower realms.

    What great detective work!

    That guy was such a royal pest and now you’ve swatted him into the stratosphere.

    Imagine. Not only is he a prevaricator but he lives off the ill-gotten gains of his granny!

    Definitely in the “you can’t make this stuff up” category. Please let us know when the next shoe drops. Meanwhile, I’ve subscribed to your email list so I don’t miss anything else.

  14. His latest “incarnation” is “The White Rogue”:

    thewhiterogue.wordpress.com

    It was a bit of a giveaway as “White Rogue” like Huntman suffers from kidney stones, & Solkhar subsequently said he was logged into another project & accidentally posted as The White Rogue.

  15. Very true – in common with muslims currently in the news he seems to have some serious issues indeed.

  16. “I recently had a Mohammedan troll who insisted that, since there is no caliph, there is no jihad.”
    To those readers who have been following Solker trolls nonsense and denials: if you ever engage with a Mohammedan troll who denies that there is a global jihad, present them with this:

    “Result 3 from 6
    The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
    BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad
    O-9.6
    It is offensive to conduct a military expedition against hostile non-Muslims without the caliph’s permission (A: though if there is no caliph (def: o-25), no permission is required).”

    [End of quote]
    emphasis added.

    These apologetics about “the caliph is needed for this, and the caliph is needed for that” are not relevant–unless there is in fact a recognized caliph. If there’s no caliph, Muslims are still obliged by the Quran and Muhammad’s example (as described in the Hadith and Sira) to “command the right and forbid the wrong.”

    Also,

    “Result 5 from 6
    The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
    BOOK Q: [Imaam Ghazali’s] COMMANDING THE RIGHT AND FORBIDDING THE WRONG >> Chapter Q-2.0: WHO MAY COMMAND THE RIGHT AND FORBID THE WRONG LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY

    Q-2.3: Having the Caliph’s Permission
    Some scholars stipulate that the person delivering the censure must have permission to do so from the caliph (def: o-25) or his regional appointee, and do not grant that private individuals may censure others. This is untrue, for the Koranic verses and hadiths all indicate that whoever sees something wrong and does nothing has sinned. Stipulating that there must be permission from the caliph is mere arbitrary opinion. One should realize that there are five levels of censure: explaining the wrong nature of the act, admonishing the person politely, reviling him and harshness, forcibly stopping the act (such as by breaking musical instruments or pouring out wine), and finally, intimidation and threatening to strike the person or actually hitting him to stop what he is doing. It is the latter level, not the first four, that requires the caliph, because it may lead to civil disorder. The early Muslims’ invariable practice of reprimanding those in authority decisively proves by their consensus (def: b-7) that there is no need for a superior’s authorization. If it be wondered whether a child is entitled to reprove his father, or a wife her husband, or for private citizens to reprove their ruler, the answer is that all are fundamentally entitled to.
    We have distinguished the five levels: the child is entitled to explain the nature of the act, to admonish and advise his parents politely, and finally may censure at the fourth level by such things as breaking a lute, pouring out wine, and so forth. This is also the sequence that should be observed by a wife. As for private citizens with their ruler, the matter is much graver than a child’s reproving his father, and citizens are only entitled to explain the matter and advise.”

    [End of quote] emphasis added

    Note that violent intervention is mentioned above in the 9.6 section on jihad, i.e., no caliph, the issue of permission is moot/academic/irrelevant. Muslims are obliged to seek knowledgeable Muslims for advice, but ultimately must rely on their interpretation of the Quran, Hadith, and Sira. Indeed, if the caliph is un-Islamic or “unjust,” Muslims have to overthrow him.

    Lastly, consider this quote from the Reliance of the Traveller, in light of Nidal Hasan’s beliefs, claims, and actions:

    “There is no disagreement among scholars that it is permissible for a single Muslim to attack battlelines of unbelievers headlong and fight them even if he knows he will be killed.”

    Solkers annoying denial that there is no “real” sharia regime anywhere in the dar al Islam also needs a damper:

    Egyptian law is required to be “modelled” on the Shari’a. That is, the Shari’a is the unattainable ideal — but it’s the ideal.

    That goes for the rest also: no “man made” law can contradict the Shari’a.

  17. Doctor Bulldog & Ronin scored a wonderful write-up from Solkhar / Huntman in his current incarnation as The White Rogue, together with a particularly low class of evangelists using that site. I wonder who he has in mind?

    thewhiterogue.wordpress.com

Comments are closed.