Comments on: China Cracks Down Hard on Uighur Jihad

By: sheikyermami

sheikyermami — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:28:02 +0000

LOL!

Palau was given $ 100 million to ‘resettle’ these nice people. Would they return the money to the US or hand it over to Oz if KRudd was to offer them refuge here?

By: kaw

kaw — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:07:09 +0000

Simple – take them off the hands of Palau, who do not have the resources to deal with violent muslim terrorist scum. Bring them to Australia and either: a) deport them to China (bonus points); b) execute them; c) or dissappear them. Either suits. If you can’t work out the difference between b) and c) please don’t ask. And then tell Obama and his PC nitwits to F-OFF whilst also explaining to the American people that F-OFF applies only to Obama and his hand-picked nitwit squad and that we are cool with Americans in general – this is important as the USA and OZ are friends.

By: Mullah Lodabullah

Mullah Lodabullah — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:46:18 +0000

The six Uighurs flown to Palau recently don’t want to stay there;
they want to settle in Australia permanently. Given Kevin 07′s “new leadership” lately – being stood over by Sri Lankans refusing to leave
the vessel that rescued them, hunger-striking & threatening to harm
themselves unless they get what they want, I can’t see Kevin Dudd holding out against the Uighurs for too long. Won’t be long before they are marginalised, suffer from hurt feelings, need mosques, wudu washers & prayer rooms, & get jobs as taxi drivers & baggage handlers.

( voanews.com/english/2009-11-05-voa7 )

Tiny Palau Urges Australia to Resettle Guantanamo Uighurs
By Phil Mercer
Sydney
05 November 2009

Australia is being urged to accept a group of Muslim Uighurs who have been given temporary asylum in the Pacific island nation of Palau. [...]

By: kaw

kaw — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:54:28 +0000

The situation is a little complicated – essentially by the mass migration of ethnic Han supplanting other groups. Chinese interests in Tibet relate essentially to water, although you will not find that written anywhere. The major rivers of SE Asia start on the Tibetian plateau and if you control that – well – the Chinese are not dumb. In other words there is a powerful political reason for expansion into Tibet. However, the Chinese occupation of Tibet has also brought the Tibetans into the modern era. If you imagine for one minute that life in Tibet was a) free b) a bed of roses c) good for all before the Chinese came then I suggest you do some study – you are wrong. Despite Chinese brutality the situation has improved for the Tibetans. The Uighars. on the other hand, are using the unrest generated by Han expansion and funds from muslim supporters ie Saudi Arabia again – to cause problems on behalf of islam, The Chinese approach here is the correct one. Which begs the question – why was that silly Uighar representative feted by Krudd and Co recently on her “world tour”?? Was this an attempt by Krudd to show his independence from China by risking Australian security? Perhaps he should not be selling of our resources and industry in order to make the point.

By: sheikyermami

sheikyermami — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:41:23 +0000

Thanks for that, Dumbles.

You should spent more time here, we need your insight, which is always much appreciated!

By: dumbledoresarmy

dumbledoresarmy — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:35:27 +0000

If the Uighur were Buddhists [as many of their pre-Islamic ancestors undoubtedly were], shamanists, Christians [e.g. Nestorian Christians, as some of their long-ago ancestors probably were], atheists, Hindus or anything else except Muslims, I would be quite prepared to support them and deplore Chinese imperialism – as I deplore Chinese imperial cruelty and greed in Tibet.

But the Uighur are Muslims – which means that, having embraced the Arab National/ Imperial Religion, their original ethnic identity is in process of being annihilated and replaced by an ersatz Arab identity. They bow to a black rock in Arabia and are required to believe that the Arabs are ‘the best of people’.

This is the eastern manifestation of one Empire (the de facto Empire of Islam) colliding with the westward extension of another (the post-Maoist Han communist Empire); and though there is a great deal I detest and deplore about the post-Mao dictatorship, they do permit 1. alcohol 2. pork 3. pet dogs (though they also eat them) 4. women walking about on their own with hair and face uncovered 5. music of all kinds 6. sculpture and representational art, all of which things are forbidden by Islamic sharia. And they are more in favour of hard work and education than are the Muslims, who are characterised by fatalism and invincible, wilful ignorance. So the Han Empire – despite all its cruelty, greed, corruption and injustice – still comes out ahead of the Ummah on points.

By: An Infidel

An Infidel — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:45:57 +0000

The Islamist scum will never take on the chinese. The chinese would turn them into mincemeat.