From a Muslim website in the US:
OMG! 12 Maggots got killed, 31 squashed but still alive! Poor Maggots…
It’s The Jihad, Stupid!
When will the government realize it?
“The quiet, very peaceful person coming in and out of the mosque, I couldn’t believe he could have done this,” Sheikh Shaker Elsayed told CNN.
They radicalize their mosque members and then play the “OMG! I can’t believe he did it!” game after the believer puts the acquired knowledge to use./ From Eye on the world>>>
Taliban misunderstands Islam, promises repeat of Fort Hood jihad massacre
“Taliban” means, of course, “students.” I.e., students of Islam. But somehow they have missed the peaceful teachings of Islam that are so plain and patent to everyone else that only “Islamophobes” have trouble seeing them. How is it that these students of Islam don’t know, as Obama put it yesterday, that “no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor”?
“Taliban promises repeat of Fort Hood massacre: report,” by Nick Allen in the Telegraph, or here, from JW
On the other side:
“Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we’d have been crucified.”
Political Correctness is Killing US…. Politically correct is morally wrong
U.S.-Born Yemen-Based Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki on His CA-Hosted Website: Fort Hood Shooter ‘Nidal Hassan Is A Hero’ / from MEMRI
“Nidal Hassan Is A Hero”
“Nidal Hassan is a hero. He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people. This is a contradiction that many Muslims brush aside and just pretend that it doesn’t exist. Any decent Muslim cannot live, understanding properly his duties towards his Creator and his fellow Muslims, and yet serve as a U.S. soldier.”
“How Can There Be Any Dispute About the Virtue of What He Has Done?”
“The U.S. is leading the war against terrorism which in reality is a war against Islam. Its army is directly invading two Muslim countries and indirectly occupying the rest through its stooges. More>>
Backlash in California: Muslim at mall kiosk tears crucifix from shopper’s neck, shouts “Allah is power”
Whoops, sorry — this isn’t backlash against the poor, innocent Muslims being terrorized and victimized by the thousands after the Fort Hood Nothing-To-Do-With-Islam attack. This is just the familiar Muslim backlash against non-Muslims, which will increasingly be a feature of American life in the coming years. Nothing to see here. Move along.
“Man arrested for ‘anti-Christian’ mall disturbance: Kiosk employee allegedly tore a crucifix from someone’s neck,” by Emily West for the Danville Express, November 10 (thanks to JW):
Police arrested 22-year-old Abdul Walid Hamid of Hayward on the evening of Wednesday, Nov. 4, after he reportedly tore a crucifix from a person’s neck and scared others at Stoneridge Shopping Center.
Hamid, an employee at a mall kiosk near Starbucks, has been charged with battery, terrorist threats and grand theft.
According to reports, Hamid was yelling “Allah is power” and “Islam is great” while holding a pen in a fist over his head. Witnesses said he shouted anti-Christian comments, said police.
Lt. Mike Elerick of the Pleasanton Police Department said the man was not provoked and didn’t threaten violence, but he committed robbery when he grabbed and broke a crucifix off someone’s neck.
Coworkers told police that Hamid’s actions were out of the ordinary and that he had worked at the kiosk for years.
You mean, he didn’t do this daily? What a relief!
Police also said they weren’t aware of a prior criminal history for the man.
“We had multiple people calling 911,” Elerick said. “One female was crouching down and hiding from him. He definitely scared quite a few people.”…
Through an interpreter, Hamid requested a public defender and was scheduled to appear in court at 9 a.m. Thursday where he is expected to enter a plea.
Through an interpreter? He worked at the mall and didn’t speak English?
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Afghan war is bad for security, voters say
Independent poll casts doubt on key justification for Britain’s involvement in conflict By Kim Sengupta in Kabul and Nigel Morris
The majority of British people reject the main justification offered by the Government for keeping troops in Afghanistan; a new opinion poll for The Independent shows today. Four out of five of those questioned do not believe that British involvement in the conflict, with its rising toll of casualties, is keeping the streets of Britain safe from terrorist attacks.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/afghan-war-is-bad-for-security-voters-say-1818207.html
There is no contradiction in our efforts in Afghanistan and keeping the terrorists at bay over here.
1. The first point to make is that if Afghanistan is left to fester as a terrorist safe haven, then there will be more attacks on the West, planned from there.
2. Our whole effort therefore is to take the principles of liberal democracy and tolerance to both countries.
3. It is these principles whose application in the UK and the West, that allow ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Islamic ideology and practice, to function in Britain without hindrance.
4. Why should Muslims in the West, demand tolerance for themselves and their cultures, which for many are barbaric, while opposing that same effort directed to a country such as Afghanistan
If Britain and the West cannot extend the principles of liberalism and tolerance to Muslim countries because it offends Muslims in the West, giving Muslims justification to execute terrorist plots from within, then such Muslims are really not friendly citizens but enemy aliens – they are the enemies of liberty, freedom for women, and tolerance of all. As it is impossible to distinguish a terrorist from a non-terrorist Muslim, the entire Muslim community’s loyalty and allegiance is then open to question.
It is obvious that even Muslim living in the West, and recipient to all the freedoms that we have, without which they would not be tolerated here, are virulently against those same principles made available to Muslims in Afghanistan. “Major” Hasan is very much a case in point.
We must therefore redouble our efforts to take the light of freedom, democracy, and freedom for women, and tolerance for all, to all Muslim countries. We did not ask for this responsibility, but it was thrust on us that fateful September day in 2001.
This is mission is to civilise Islam. If it is succesful, unlikely as it is, Islam will no longer be the threat it is.
If it fails then we learn the lesson, that despite the blood and treasure spent, it cannot be done, and that islam has to be removed from the West.
The important thing to remember is that our interventions in Iraq and particularly in Afghanistan, is having the desired effect – polarisation.
More evidence that muslims belong in another world – perhaps it is time to send them on their way.
Yes, time to send them on thier way.
Who cares what Muslims say about us, anything they do say is usually nonsense.