Self inflicted dhimmitude:
Political correctness is killing us. Our authorities and the media are in shock and awe from Islam. The cowards among us are self-censoring and submitting to their Islamic overlords:
Windsor, Ontario: Police chief apologizes to Muslims for offending them during FBI arrests
Now can we get an apology from the Muslim community for aiding and abetting jihadists? “Windsor police chief Gary Smith apologizes to Islamic community for ‘offending’ their beliefs during FBI arrests,” from The Windsor Star, November, Jihad Watch
Feds seize four mosques, NYC skyscraper belonging to Iran-linked nonprofit organization
The nonprofit organization, the Alavi Foundation, may be owned by the Iranian government. Details here. “Nonprofit organization?” But of of course: they’re not in it for the money. They want it all…. JW (look out for kidnappings of Westerners from Iran, which is the next scene in this movie…>>)
Seattle Times adopts Sharia: “Do not slander Islam after Fort Hood”
In The American Thinker today, Pamela Geller says of the rush to exonerate Islam and jihad after the Fort Hood massacre: “Shariah law forbids criticism of Islam. And here we are….This is well beyond political correctness. We are enforcing Shariah law.”
Sharia does indeed forbid criticism of Islam, but this is nevertheless hyperbole, no? Well, no. There is an avalanche of articles appearing like this unsigned editorial from the Seattle Times: “Do not slander Islam after Fort Hood,” November 10. Would the Seattle Times have published such an editorial after any conceivable atrocity committed by a Christian believer? What do you think?
Do not compound the atrocity at Fort Hood with loose, slanderous talk about religion, conspiracy and political motives.
ALL of the horror and heartache of the Fort Hood shootings should not be compounded by labels and assumptions seeking motives to explain a heinous, irrational act.
The same restraint is also appropriate with a suspect in custody for the murderous assault that claimed the life of one Seattle police officer and wounded another.
The Fort Hood attack took 13 lives and wounded 41. There is a rush to link Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, with Islamic extremists and generally defame his faith by association.
Of course, Hasan himself made the link. He is the one who passed out Korans and then started shooting people. But the Times, of course, sweeps that under the rug.
Religious and political affiliations make for easy, slanderous links that can be pointedly selective. Little time was spent exploring Timothy McVeigh’s Catholic and Republican connections after he slaughtered 168 men, women and children and wounded hundreds more with a truck bomb.
Never mind that he was an avowed atheist at the time of the attack and only became a Catholic later. Never mind that even if he had been a Catholic, there is nothing in Catholic teaching that exhorts believers to warfare against unbelievers, while there is plenty in Islam that does so exhort believers. Why should the Seattle Times worry about all that? Anything is good for a smear.
There is no more justification for Hasan’s crimes in Islam than there was in the religious teachings of McVeigh’s Christian faith….
Unsupported assertion. Here is some evidence to the contrary. There is plenty more, also. Here is some of it.
Care with words is essential because they have enormous power. If Hasan was an observant Muslim, then he violated his faith. The Seattle police are investigating what amounts to a murky personal grudge.
He violated his faith in what way? Again, an unexplained, unsupported assertion
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Taqiyya and Abrogation, that’s all.
These explain everything about Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’ s motives and actions.
That is all we need to focus on.
Everything else is conjecture, opinion, taqiyya and abrogation.