Obama sends 6 more Gitmo Jihad Apes to Pacific Island Paradise Palau

US Sends Six Gitmo Uighurs to Palau

KOROR, Palau — Six Chinese Muslims who had been detained at Guantanamo Bay arrived Sunday in the tiny Pacific nation of Palau for resettlement, a person with knowledge of the situation told The Associated Press.

Obama Priorities: Gitmo Terrorists  to get swine flu vaccination

BY CAROL ROSENBERG

CROSENBERG@MIAMIHERALD.COM

Related links:

Even as some Americans await the arrival of their swine flu vaccines, the Pentagon has decided to vaccinate both soldiers and terror suspects at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

There was no word Wednesday on when the the first vaccines would reach the remote base in southeast Cuba.

But U.S. military there were notified late last week that service members would get their H1N1 virus vaccinations first. Private contractors and sailors’ wives and children could get theirs afterward “as the supply permits.”   More

A Saudi cleric has a better idea:

Saudi Scholar Says Allah is the Vaccine for Swine Flu…

Michelle Malkin:

The “media justice” mob strikes again

4 thoughts on “Obama sends 6 more Gitmo Jihad Apes to Pacific Island Paradise Palau”

  1. Sheik,

    Old buddy, you’ve lost me on this one: “Obama sends 6 more Gitmo Jihad Apes to Pacific Island Paradise Palau.” For a start, these Jihadists are Chinese Uighurs and they do not qualify for the description “Ape.” I am old enough to remember when black sportsmen were greeted with monkey cries and I’m told it still happens at English football matches and Australian cricket grounds. It is demeaning, racist and unworthy of what you are trying to achieve.

    I have spent my life in the service of the West generally and no one could accuse me of having terrorist sympathies. The only good terrorist, if you want to generalize, is a dead one but I draw two important distinctions which are lost on the US administration and other governments.

    The first is that the Tamil Tigers were fighting for a homeland and they are not Muslim terrorists. A great deal of support comes from Christian Tamils and there is some justice in their claim of oppression by the Sri Lankan government. I would not like to see them continually lumped into the same category as Al Qaeda, L-e-T, Jamaar Islamiya and a whole host of others on the US State Department’s list of terrorist organizations.

    The second case is that the Chinese Uighurs are fighting against the PRC government – basically the same crowd that brought you the Tianamen Square massacre in 1989 and continue to oppress Tibet by mass migration policies, in order to swamp the locals and destroy Tibetan culture. The Uighurs deserve a chance to obtain a homeland of their own. They are Muslims but I doubt very much whether their leaders would be over the moon about a recent Al Qaeda declaration of fatwa against the Beijing government.

    I don’t think I’m getting soft in my old age but I have yet to hear anybody from the Uighur spokesman in exile extolling the virtues of jihad. They are far more concerned about a homeland free from the tyranny of the Chinese government, which may or may not be regarded as communist state capitalism, depending on which side of the bed you lie.

    Give these guys a break. Palau is no paradise and things will be hard for them. If they declare war on the West, then they surely deserve to be condemned but describing them as ‘apes” should raise the ire of anyone opposed to racist language. We do ourselves no service by describing jihadists in racial terms. Their religion, if you can call it that, is an unreconstructed, unreformed artifact of the sixth century. Until there is genuine reformation of Islam, we must treat it as hostile but it does not make 1.6 billion Muslims “apes” or untermenschen. Adolf Hitler tried to eliminate those he regarded as subhuman (untermenschen) and that was genocide, pure and simple.

    In combating Islamic extremism, we do ourselves no credit at all by dehumanizing the enemy. Personally, I don’t want to see 21st century mankind reverting to mindsets from previous centuries. Call them terrorists, jihadists, Islamic fundamentalists or whatever but apes do not deserve to be slandered because as far as I know, they have not declared war on us.

    1. Point taken, John.

      But I beg to differ:

      “These Jihadists are Chinese Uighurs and they do not qualify for the description “Ape.”

      I have always described Gitmo inmates as ‘Jihad Apes’ and that’s a compliment for Islamic terrorists. I do not believe they have been mistreated or wronged by America and I believe US officials who described them as “the worst of the worst” have been vilified instead. Instead of executing these enemy combatants swiftly on the battlefield, we treat them with kid-gloves, fry them halal burgers and allow them Koran indoctrination by Islamic headbangers and other subversives from mainland USA.

      Having said that, I do not care for their race. I call David Hicks aka Mahmood Dawoud or Jihad Jack or John Walker Lindh Jihad Apes just like I name all those who submit to this murderous cult called Islam and take up weapons against our society, or work in other ways to destroy us.

      I am -of course- aware that the Tamil Tigers are not Muslim terrorists and that they are fighting for a homeland (no longer, their “movement” has just been pulverized) They don’t have a religious obligation to make the world submit to whatever their religion is. For that reason I don’t think we have much to fear from them, but they have a homeland in India already, its called Tamil Nadu and they can go there if they don’t like it in Sri Lanka. We are NOT responsible to solve the worlds problems.

      The second case is that the Chinese Uighurs are fighting against the PRC government – basically the same crowd that brought you the Tianamen Square massacre in 1989 and continue to oppress Tibet by mass migration policies, in order to swamp the locals and destroy Tibetan culture. The Uighurs deserve a chance to obtain a homeland of their own. They are Muslims but I doubt very much whether their leaders would be over the moon about a recent Al Qaeda declaration of fatwa against the Beijing government.

      Interesting point, one that seems to give you the moral high ground. Leaving Tibet out of it (lets not get too distracted here) why not revisit the recent riots to see who and what’s behind it?

      Look who’s behind the riots in China…http://sheikyermami.com/2009/07/07/look-whos-behind-the-riots-in-china/

      China Jihad: Uighurs stabbed, stoned, burned and beheaded victims…http://sheikyermami.com/2009/07/10/china-jihad-uighurs-stabbed-stoned-burned-and-beheaded-victims/

      No, my dear John. I don’t believe the Uighurs “deserve a homeland” , just like I don’t believe the Muslims in the Philippines or in Thailand or in another 30 theaters of jihad warfare around the world “deserve a homeland”. Islam doesn’t need a homeland because all the world belongs to allah, and jihad terror against unbelievers is a religious mandate for every believing Muslim until the world is Islamic. The ideology is based on the spread and on the dominance, the supremacy of Islam. It doesn’t matter if there is an economic foundation, a history or tradition: Islam must dominate and not be dominated, and the infidel must pay the jiziya with willing submission while feeling subdued. In china, you have two conflicting ideologies, one will not tolerate the other. The recent riots were just a taste of what’s to come.

      No. The communists in China are no longer communists, they probably never were. But with all their faults, they have created more wealth than any government before them and more than any Islamic government will ever achieve. China has every right to control their provinces and a heavy handed approach in this case is more than justified. (again, lets leave Tibet out of it)

      “Give these guys a break. Palau is no paradise and things will be hard for them. If they declare war on the West, then they surely deserve to be condemned but describing them as ‘apes” should raise the ire of anyone opposed to racist language. We do ourselves no service by describing jihadists in racial terms. Their religion, if you can call it that, is an unreconstructed, unreformed artifact of the sixth century. Until there is genuine reformation of Islam, we must treat it as hostile but it does not make 1.6 billion Muslims “apes” or untermenschen. Adolf Hitler tried to eliminate those he regarded as subhuman (untermenschen) and that was genocide, pure and simple”.

      “Give these guys a break.”- why should I? They are jihadists, terrorists, enemy combatants. They are alive because of America’s humanitarian nonsense which extends miranda rights to Islamic terrorists. They would saw your head off and rape your wife and your daughter all the while yelling allahu akbar believing they are doing Gods work.

      “Palau is no paradise” you say? Last time I was there it was very much paradise. People pay lots of money to have a holiday there. You’d be surprised. This resettlement is an outcome totally undeserved, and will help them to establish Islam and Islam-terror in Micronesia.

      “If they declare war on the West, then they surely deserve to be condemned but describing them as ‘apes” should raise the ire of anyone opposed to racist language. We do ourselves no service by describing jihadists in racial terms.”

      Perhaps you don’t know, or you have forgotten that we unbelievers, Jews and Christians, are called “sons of apes and pigs” in the Koran and in the hadith-sunnah. (that’s just for starters) Again, I find that you have imbibed just a little too much of that politically correct “racist” juice that shuts down every debate today. “Racist” is the escape hatch for those unwilling to even debate the most pressing issues. I beg to differ…

      ” Until there is genuine reformation of Islam”- there will never be “genuine reformation in Islam”- its not possible.

      I don’t think there is any intention to “eliminate 1.6 billion Muslims” anywhere, but I’m getting used to this idiotic accusation that usually comes from Muslims who learn in Koran school that they have an obligation to “wipe the unbelievers out to the last”. This is a case of projection. The Muslims are religiously obliged to kill us, but you accuse me of wanting to kill all Muslims. Muslim preachers call for genocide on the Jews, every day of the week, 24/7, Islamic doctrine demands that Israel be “wiped off the map” and you accuse me of calling for genocide?

      Who are you, John? What is your agenda?

  2. Okay,

    That’s your view and I give you full marks for having the cojones to come out and say what you have. I’m too old to be waging counter-jihad as frequently and vehemently as you. I regard the Uighurs in the same category as Tibetans, whose cause I support. But I agree, if they are committed to world-wide jihad, no mercy.

    As for the apes, as regards our hairy cousins, I think you owe them and chimpanzees, orang-outans and other primates an apology. A muslim who adheres to his/her toxic faith (not a religion in my book) must follow the way of the sword of Allah against the infidels and kuffars – us. I haven’t met upright hairy primates bent on jihad but you can’t see under burkas.

    I also recognize that you have to introduce an element of shock into what you write to garb attention. A well-reasoned article of itself is useless because most won’t read and those that do are dhimmis or dummies – take your pick. Drop me a private line.

  3. Thanks John.

    The remedy for you, to be taken straight up, not shaken or stirred:

    when I say “Jihad Apes”, iI refer to the obligation of Muslims to emulate the behavior of the prophet, an Islamic religious mandate, one that includes instructions on how to brush your teeth, how to dress, how to grow a fuzzy beard, more than 70 rules on how to urinate and defecate, (sic) and a total regulation of every aspect of life including the 5 prayers a day, all of it designed to never give the believers a free moment to reflect, never to let them think for themselves and to keep them terrified of hellfire in the afterlife.

    Thus emulating the prophet of Islam, who was the perfect man, uswa hasana, al insan al kamil, for all time and any place, is nothing short of aping his behavior.

    Aping the behavior of the prophet, that’s why “Jihad Apes”. No racism here, nothing racist to see… We humans do a lot of aping. Muslims take it a little further.

Comments are closed.