A List of Mohammedan Demands on the Swiss

by sheikyermami on December 9, 2009

Mohammedans demand that we finance our own demise. Our spineless, witless polit-apes are eager to please:

By Baron Bodissey/Gates of Vienna

The article below, from the Swiss periodical Winkelried, was published before last month’s referendum on the banning of minarets. It provides some useful background information on issues which may have helped the Swiss voters to make their decision.

Many thanks to our Flemish correspondent VH for translating it:

List of gifts wanted by Muslims

By McCarthy

The minarets are among the main desires of our “culture enrichers”. That would be the key to the integration of these oh-so-peaceful and industrious immigrants from the area of the rule of Allah. That is what we almost daily read in the media.

Minarets: bayonets
But then there are still a few little things that still have be resolved as well, so that the Muslims will not feel themselves racially discriminated against. A remarkable study on “The position of the Muslim population in the canton of Zurich” [see the notes for a link to the pdf] presents a litany of demands. This contains about 200 pages and deals with key areas of the life of Muslims in Switzerland: social benefits and the penal system. We would like very much to sum up all the demands here, but there are simply too many to mention them all. Therefore, we restricted ourselves to a few of the demands:

1. Burial in the country of origin

Of all Muslims — who are after all supposedly completely non-religious according to our media — 95% want to be buried in the country of origin. The cost amounts to approximately €27,000 per deceased. The transportation of the body alone would cost almost €7,000. These costs are not paid by social services; however, the travel costs of a limited number of people to attend the funeral is taken into account. The transport is paid by a cultural association. That cultural association is paid with tax money and thus cannot be counted among the social costs.

2. More prayer rooms

The demand for [building permits for] minarets is, according to the study, of secondary importance even to Muslims. They demand more prayer rooms, which in Islam are also meeting places, to maintain group coherence. The ever increasingly frequent protests around those prayer rooms (noise, random parking, crime) are regarded by Muslims as intolerance.

3. Their own hospital

Medical care by Christians is seen as inappropriate by Muslims. Muslims therefore demand a their own hospital as well as their own homes for the elderly [pensioned].

4. Muslims in public administration

There must be more Muslims appointed to public administration, especially with the police. Moreover, there also needs to be an ombudsman to whom they can turn to when they feel they are religiously disadvantaged, especially when they are hindered in the prescribed prayers during working hours. Scarf and chador may in no case be prohibited.

5. Workplaces without male contact

Read further…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click hereThis is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening.We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way...But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted.Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it!One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display.But you won't be back, trust me on that.Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Dhumme Dhimmi December 9, 2009 at 7:52 pm

Anything else?

DP111 December 9, 2009 at 8:56 pm

Sheikh
re: Burial in the country of origin

There is a reason for this. In Switzerland, because of lack of space, all bodies have to be dug up after 20 years or so, cremated, and the ashes handed over to relatives. For Muslims, the idea of a Muslim body being dug up, must go against the grain of their beliefs.

I sincerely hope Switzerland does not grant any special dispensation for Muslims on this issue, for if they do, all Muslim burial places will immediately become dar ul islam.

In addition, Switzerland should cease paying for the removal of the dead body to the “home” country. Such payments are downright unfair to the rest of the population. This will provide great incentive for Muslims not to come to Switzerland.

DP111 December 9, 2009 at 9:05 pm

There is a reason for this. In Switzerland, because of lack of space, all bodies have to be dug up after 20 years or so..

I’m not too sure about this, as it is not the kind of topic one dicusses with my hosts, over a nice BBQ on a hillside in Switzerland. It may well be that the body is not dug up, but the grave is re-used. In either case, the idea will be appalling to Muslims.

Frankly, the culture of Islam and ours, just does not mesh, in life, and as is apparant now, even after death, and among the dead. Yikes.

sheikyermami December 9, 2009 at 11:40 pm

Spot on, DP111.
We must keep in mind that once a mosque is established, along with madrassas, community centers and cemeteries, that land becomes Islamic for all time (in their mind).

In Saudi Arabia, the bodies of diseased foreigners are sent back to their home-countries so as not to pollute the soil of the pure Arabian desert.
We should follow suit….

Darrin Hodges December 10, 2009 at 12:07 am

Meanwhile in another part of town….http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/fears-grow-over-hardline-mosque-in-western-sydney/story-e6freuy9-1225808804013

DP111 December 10, 2009 at 12:59 am

Sheikh

The whole culture of Islam is diseased, and reciprocity demands that we send it back to Saudi Arabia.

One thing that the Swiss referendum has done is to bring the whole issue of Islam right to the front. If the same referendum was held in Switzerland again, it will be passed by more then 80%, as people are no longer afraid to be unPC. That is the message coming from all of Europe. In fact the Northern League would like a referendum not on minarets, but the existence of mosques . If such a referendum was held anyhere in Europe, it will be passed by more then 80%. Unfortunately there is no mechanism for the people to instigate a referendum, as in Switzerland.

The great thing about Switzerland is that it has this feature of a referenda being launched on the initiative of the people. The other is that the state does not have a monopoly of force. In fact it has no force at all -all the force, ie the military, is in the hands of the people. Each man has a state of the art automatic rifle at home, with sufficient ammo – a useful reminder to anyone who maybe getting ideas.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: