It was brought in by our John Howard’s Liberal National Government from 1996. It was introduced respectfully, firmly, but slowly [allow five years]. Because the clients sign an agreement to do so, when they apply for Benefits, they start to feel the obligation. Over time, they start to see the benefits of the program. Patience is required, initially, on behalf of the Authorities during implementation.

Maybe they will return home when they find they have to work for their money.

Any society whose economic wealth is centred on a two-tier system – whether religious (islamist/kufir) or monarchistic (aristocrat/serf) – must break down when the number of ‘elite’ exceeds the number of workers.

When the infestation exceeds the body’s ability to sustain it, both the body and the parasite die.

One of the main causes of the economic troubles of Britain has been an increase in willingness to increase a necessary support to people unable to support themselves until we are providing luxury to people who refuse to work for it.

I have heard, not once but often: “why should I work, I can live just as well on the dole.”
I have also heard: “When I deduct my travel expenses, clothes and so on, I am actually better off not working” and “if I worked I wouldn’t have as much time to hang out with my mates” ….

Plus of course, these ‘inciters to riot in the name of allah’ would have less time and energy to spend if they were actually expected to do something for their money.

Much like minarets, mosques & wudu washers in the Dar al Harb, but these are mysteriously transformed into “human rights”.

What, all those muslim reference groups, diversity and sensitivity training, jizyah and special treatment doesn’t work, even in the Dar al Islam? If it doesn’t work there, why bother trying it here?