Latest Terrorist Attempt Highlights Danger of Mass Immigration and Twisted Foreign Policy
Andrew Brons blames the Jews and makes sure that the BNP is no alternative to the Tories or Nullabor:
“The BNP will strike an accord with the Islamic world: in return for a commitment never to interfere in the internal affairs of Muslim nations, the Islamic world will agree to halt its attempts to colonise Europe through immigration and the cradle — and to take back its excess populations.”
Good luck with that.
The latest terrorist attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic airliner has once again highlighted the twin causes of Islamist terrorism: mass immigration into the First World and European nations’ biased foreign policy in the Middle East.
The arrested suspected terrorist, a Nigerian Muslim rejoicing in the name Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab is a perfect example of the product of these twin evils.
Firstly, Mutallab was a “student” at a college in London. Police are currently searching a number of premises associated with Mutallab in Britain’s capital city.
The fact that the 23-year old Nigerian could have obtained a “student” visa despite being registered on an international terrorist suspect watch list, reveals the extent of Britain’s “open doors” immigration policy.
Secondly, Mutallab’s African origin would not on the face of it, make him a sympathiser with radical Islamic causes.
Nonetheless, his religious affiliation allowed him to spiritually link to affairs in the Middle East which provides much of the motivation for Islamic terrorist attacks in Europe and America.
It was this link to British, American and other European nations’ biased foreign policy in the Middle East — which favours Israel above all else — which provided the motivation for not only the 9-11 attacks but many of the other major Islamist terrorist incidents since then.
It is this perception of “the West ganging up against Muslim nations” which allowed, for example, an Egyptian, Mohammed Atta, to lead an attack on the World Trade Centre in New York City, and a Nigerian, Mutallab, to try and blow up an airliner travelling from Amsterdam to Detroit.
Mass Third World immigration into European nations allows the creation of large pools of potential terrorist recruits from which radical Islamists can draw supporters — as has obviously happened with Mutallab. Western nations’ biased foreign policies allows Islamists to fan the flames of hatred against European peoples by pointing out to these Muslim colonists how European nations “hate” them.
Until mass Third World immigration into Europe is halted — and reversed — and until Western nations adopt unbiased foreign policies with regard to the Islamic world (and that includes halting all illegal and immoral wars such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan), Islamist terrorism will continue.
The British National Party alone amongst all the political parties understands the real issues and has the willpower to address the root causes of the problem.
Sure thing, asshat. Blame the Jews. An Arab genocide on the Jews will fix your problems…?
The BNP will strike an accord with the Islamic world: in return for a commitment never to interfere in the internal affairs of Muslim nations, the Islamic world will agree to halt its attempts to colonise Europe through immigration and the cradle — and to take back its excess populations.
A Muslim comittment is not worth the paper it is written on. Keep dreaming!
Only in this way will terrorism from Islamic extremists be halted. It is our moral duty to ensure that this happens.
If that’s what the BNP calls “moral duty” count me out!
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
Yo do NOT make deals with the devil – you DESTROY IT!!!!
They are way off the mark on this one, you cannot make peace with Islam and Islam will certainly not take back its colonisers, I hope that whoever came up with this idea gets up to speed on Islam in a hurry.
I thought that the BNP had the measure of the enemy we are facing. Sadly, NOT.
* The fact that the 23-year old Nigerian could have obtained a “student” visa despite being registered on an international terrorist suspect watch list …
He may have obtained the visa as a necessary part of being accepted on to a Duke of Edinburgh Award course:
“Years earlier, while a pupil at the British International school in Lome, Togo, schoolmates said he shocked them with his extreme views on Islam – but was accepted on to a Duke of Edinburgh Award course in 2004.”
Now his family are backpedalling from the idea that he has been a “radical” for some time, & are now saying it happened about 2 months ago:
* Alleged Nigerian plane bomber normal until two months ago says family
Until about two months ago, the family of the alleged American airline bomber, Faruk Abdul Mutallib, said he was just a devoted Muslim youth who was concerned about his religious duties in addition to his regular studies reports the Abuja based Weekly Trust newspaper. [...]
http://www.businessdayonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7063:alleged-nigerian-plane-bomber-normal-until-two-months-ago-says-family&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=18
Given that all articles on the BNP site must pass their editorial control and that they have previously published sophisticated articles by Mister Fox, I don’t think they are being naive. If I read between the lines correctly, they are tackling the practical problem of finding countries to which all slaves of Allah currently in the UK can be expelled en masse. It’s either that (the moral option) or genocide (the immoral option).
I don’t think expelling is a long term solution. And the question of morals here is difficult – do you simply move a mass-murdering lunatic to another island, from which it can return, in order to protect its rights – or do you terminate it thereby protecting the rights of all others. You also need to read between the lines as this problem cannot be openly stated in the PC polluted world that has been foistered upon us.
Well, there is always the quick and cost-effective terminate-on-sight-or-identification option to deal with slaves of Allah, whether they be expellees or not, who enter the country after the expulsion. With the expulsion, they cannot say they haven’t been forewarned and it is then moral for the Brits to protect themselves and their nation’s borders through the terminate-on-sight-or-identification measure. There will be no more trying the Brits’ patience through all forms of Jihad.