The obligation to engage in jihad makes every believer a potential terrorist
Saudi security researcher Sultan Al Anqari blasted the newÂ U.S.Â regulation, tellingÂ GulfNews.com that the Obama government is resorting to a form of political blackmail againstÂ Saudi ArabiaÂ because of the country’s anti-Israeli policies. Â Â “It is part of a collective punishment against the Saudis, who are also victims of the wrong doing of some deviant people,” he said. Yes! Please stay away and be gone!
Islamic law is simply incompatible with the principles that have built the sort of societies to which Muslims themselves want to immigrate.
Profiling every inanimate object under the sun prior to a flight doesn’t stop terrorists from getting through.Â Profiling (Islamic) terrorists does.Â I use the terrorist-free Israeli carrier El Al as my proof.Â The Israelis figured out early on that individuals perpetrating acts of terror on Israeli citizens shared certain commonalities, and they used that understanding to protect their people. More>>
Dishonesty. Early Muslims practiced it. Muhammad encouraged it. Even Allah was said to be very good at it. Perhaps this is why today’s Muslims tell us that Islam is against terror, then turn around and engage in terror.
The renowned Muslim historian and philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406) clearly articulates this division:
“In the Muslim community, jihad is a religious duty because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the jihad was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations”- More>>>
The soldiers of profit Moe have caused this mess for all of us and for themselves. Whining over profiling and being singled out for Â extra screening just shows the audacity of these loons. But even more so, it shows Â their complete inability to accept any responsibility for the jihad, which they are obliged to wage against us. Â ME Online
From the WSJ:
The Wall Street Journal discovers the Muslim nature of the problem:
President Obama BO warns against “extremism.” Former Vice President Dick Cheney declaims against “terrorists.” But they hardly ever bark the essential word, the almost always absent critical adjective: Muslim. Almost all the terrorist and extremist violence in the world today is committed by Muslimsâ€”
Obama Â said that the United States was “at war against al Qaeda.” Indeed, we are, and al Qaeda is surely the main Muslim terrorist organization we are fighting. But it is not the only one. Many of the Muslim terrorist groups around the world are their own bosses, particularly in Asia and also in the Middle East. Nonetheless, he still avoided the Muslim nature of the problem…..More WSJ:
Terrific: “Moderate Muslims” come out in large numbers:
Pamela: the media inflate the number to 50. I have attended so many demonstrations over the years – pro-Israel rallies with thousands, anti-Ahmadinejad protests with thousands, my own Rifqa rally with hundreds, and we got no ink.
But a dozen Muslim show up out of hundreds and hundreds of thousands in Detroit, and they get wall to wall coverage. And what is is such a lie. Terror is so much a part of jihad.
The 912 rally with two million didn’t happen. But this did.
“Outside court,Â about a dozen people held up signs reading ‘Islam is against terrorism’ and ‘Not in the name of Islam.'” –Â Reuters, January 8/JW
“About 20 Muslims from nearby Dearborn appeared outside the courthouse to denounce Mr. Abdulmutallab. They carried large American flags and colorful signs that read ‘NOT in the name of Islam’ and ‘Islam is against terrorism.'” –Â New York Times, January 8, first version
“Dozens of Muslims from nearby Dearborn gathered outside the courthouse carrying large American flags and colorful signs that read ‘NOT in the name of Islam’ and ‘Islam is against terrorism.'” –Â New York Times, January 8, second version
“About 50 Detroit-area Muslims chanted ‘We are Americans’ as they marched behind metal barricades outside the courthouse. Many carried U.S. flags or signs with messages such as ‘Not in the name of Islam.'” –Â Associated Press, January 8
“An estimated 150 people attended a peaceful demonstration, carrying large American flags and signs that read, ‘Not in the Name of Islam’ and ‘Not in Our Name.'” –Â Detroit News, January 9
Many people over the last few years have asked why Muslims have demonstrated against Muhammad cartoons, and against the Pope’s remarks in Regensberg in 2006, and against a teddy bear in Sudan, but have not demonstrated against jihad violence even as they profess to condemn it. In response to this, one of the chief talking points of disingenuous Islamic spokesmen in the U.S. has been that MuslimsÂ have been speaking out against terrorism, but that the “Islamophobic” media ignore them.
In reality, however, the mainstream media is avid to find and highlight moderate Muslims who speak out against terrorism, and as you can see from above, will even inflate the numbers of those who do so if reality is too embarrassing. And it’s also interesting to note that Pamela Geller and I had 200 people at the Rally for Rifqa in November, and got virtually no press coverage — while the media wants to spotlight Muslim moderates, it has little or no interest in giving any coverage to those oppressed by Islamic supremacism.
In any case, are these demonstrators sincerely going to challenge the mainstream understanding of the Islamic texts and teachings that jihadists use to justify violence and supremacism? We shall see. But I won’t be holding my breath.