UK: Muselmaniacs Won't Stand For Infidel Judge

Seven protesters charged over anti-Army demo refuse to stand for judge in court

No respect for the English court but Obama says, respect it!

Needless to mention that this parasitic  mob of professional agit-props is not only on welfare, but they also tie up the courts at the expense of British taxpayers. But even if they are convicted, how will Nullabor make them pay?

Protesters: (from left to right) Jabair Ahmed, Shajjadar Choudhury, Ziaur Rahman, Jalal Ahmed, Munim Abdul and Yousaf Bashir arrive at Luton Magistrates' Court

Seven Muslim protesters accused of screaming insults at soldiers during an Iraq homecoming parade refused to stand for a judge yesterday.

The men are alleged to have shouted ‘murderers’, ‘rapists’, ‘terrorists’ and ‘baby killers’ while waving placards at the 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment marching through Luton.

At the town’s magistrates’ court, they denied using threatening, abusive, insulting words and behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others.

The defendants were given an extra 20 minutes on top of their lunch break to go to pray at a mosque a few minutes’ walk away.

A separate ‘quiet’ room has been set aside for their regular prayer intervals for the rest of the week. The seven accused men are Munin Abdul, 28, Jalal Ahmed, 21, Jabair Ahmed, 19, Yousaf Bashir, 29, Shajjadar Choudhury, 31, Ziaur Rahman, 32, and white Muslim Ibrahim Anderson, 32, all from Luton.

They are alleged to have chanted: ‘British army murderers’, ‘British soldiers burn in hell’ and ‘Baby killers shame on you’.

Read more: Daily Mail

15 thoughts on “UK: Muselmaniacs Won't Stand For Infidel Judge”

  1. A separate ‘quiet’ room; extra prayer time; all in the name of ‘respecting a religion’, whose adherents make no secret of their failure to respect the laws of England.
    Zakir Naik claims that “churches are not allowed in Islamic countries because what they teach is wrong.” His logic therefore concludes that we ‘the western world’ know this to be true, else why else would we tolerate our values being disrepected by muslims.
    So you see, for these people, “tolerance = admission of weakness” and is a confirmation of the correctness of their position.

    They should be forced to stand. No chairs and a guard either side.
    If I, as an atheist, refused to stand in court, I would no doubt be slammed with a contempt charge, and not given permission to take a longer lunch.

    The European courts (incl. UK) need to recognise that ‘”concessions to islam” and special privileges are regarded as confirmation of superiority of Islam and merely makes them more determined to demand ever more rights and privileges.

  2. Remember – at this point in time YOU are the victim. Take advantage of that to the maximum. Killing them won’t do – the tables will turn on you if you do that. Corner them as much as you can; tighten the noose around them and let them come out of their clothes. The world will then see them for what they really are – aggressors and mutilators – and will then collectively deal with their terror tactics in a legal, like manner.

  3. Obviously muslims cannot be tried during ramavan, as they will be feeling hungry & unable to think properly (unless professional soccer players), and will get hurt feelings if they see others eating (and so on).

  4. The timing of this case for me is good as the rabib Anjem Choudhary of Islam4UK is not getting the public on-side; apparent on chat-shows phone-ins and 300,000 (!) Facebook members against him.

  5. FaceBook!!!!!! Why didn’t I think of that for Australia.

    Lawfully, though! A bunch of elites at some Melbourne Private School kids got into serious TROUBLE for saying what they think. Their group was called:-
    “F**K Off Australia Is Full”

  6. DhummeDhimme

    They got into trouble because they broke school rules. At present we can say what we wish to because we are not bound by any clause in the constitution or other to say nothing. If you disagree say something – it is called DEMOCRACY.

    However, whether FACEBOOK sees this is another

  7. Its strange to see the police “protecting” professional soldiers.

    Will police be required to “protect” the Gurkhas when they march past?

  8. One is immediately struck by the donkey like stupidity of these mullah ridden, brainwashed men.

    If they actually felt so strong about the plight of their talabani brothers and sisters, then they would have long gone to Afghanistan and such other places to fight side by side with them. No chance! They are not driven by compassion for their bruvs and sistas, but rather their total and utter contempt for the West and all it stands for. And should they be forced to stand up and be counted to fight like men and soldiers, they are well known for one thing and and one thing only: to run like terrified, squaking geese to hide in the midst of their women and children and even in burkas. All yak and no shack!

  9. Good post Anon. You were stuck by their stupidity ; I was struck by their arrogance..they look like little boys who have never had their bottoms wacked…perhaps I am showing my age. But I think that is part of the problem , they are very spoiled..their culture never really requires them to grow up.
    Whenever I see pictures of British muslims I am always struck by how well fed they look. Remember that well known guy who came out of a British prison weighing twenty can anyone come out of prison weighing twenty stone?

Comments are closed.