Dutch Inquisition vs Geert Wilders

KitmanTV: 2+2 no longer is legal in Holland

thanks to Vlad Tepes

At the very end of this video is some excellent advice.

Geert Wilders: ‘I want Muslim fanatic Bouyeri to speak in my defence’

The Bouyeri wild card: will it work? Bouyeri is obliged to protect Islam, by employing kitman & taqiyya, religiously mandated lying. It might backfire.

Geert Wilders, the Dutch far-Right MP, has demanded that his race hate trial should hear evidence from the fanatic who used the Koran to justify killing the director of an anti-Islamic film. David Charter, the dhimmi who wrote this for Times Online, stinks…

Ralph Peters: In every single religious revolt in over 2000 years of history – you killed them.

F*kc the wild goose chases! Quit trying to win hearts & minds of our enemies! Roast the MF’s!

No, he didn’t say that. But  somebody will, soon….

The David Horowitz Freedom Center and the Wednesday Morning Club present Ralph Peters. Jauary 12, 2010

Ralph Peters Quote:

“Look at religious fanatics revolts throughout history. 2000 years ago the jewish al-qaida -the zealots – killed more jews than they killed romans. Fast forward to the 16th century, the christian west has its osama bin laden in Thomas Minzer and many others. And they are fanatics, who have to be put down by the sword.
And listen, all this nonsense about counter-insurgency… Hey folks, show me one example of in over 2000 years of recorded history, show me one example of a religious insurgency or revolt by religious fanatics that was put down by compromises. In every single one in over 2000 years – you killed them. Thats the only thing that worked. I wish it was different but I am not gonna lie about it – sorry!”

The Wilders Trial: Voices From Europe

“Loquendi Libertatem Custodiamus”.

The Brussels Journal

6 thoughts on “Dutch Inquisition vs Geert Wilders”

  1. Fort Hood Report Says Nothing; Wilders Says It All

    Two related events took place just as the Massachusetts miracle sucked the oxygen from non-election news excepting Haiti coverage. First, the Pentagon report on the Fort Hood massacre came out. It is 86 pages long and doesn’t mention the words “Muslim,” “Islam,” “jihad,” “Sharia” (Islamic law), “Koran” — despite the fact that we know, among other things, that the killer, who initiated his massacre with a cry of “Allahu Akbar,” was a Muslim inspired by Islam to perform an act of jihad as sanctioned by Sharia derived from the Koran.

    These facts, however, rate official silence. So what else is new? From the Bush years to the present, see-no-Islam denial has turned U.S. government attempts to assess and discuss national security issues into Kabuki gibberish, a perpetual exercise in make-believe that the core doctrines and traditional institutions of Islam — not “radical Islam,” not “Islamism,” not other aliases — pose no threat to the core doctrines and traditional institutions of the non-Islamic Free World. Naturally, mum’s the Pentagon word over jihad at Fort Hood. Or, rather, “self-radicalization” is the word. It is mentioned more than a dozen times in the report.

    I can’t imagine a greater dereliction of duty than this failure of U.S. government leaders to recognize, articulate and defend against what in military parlance is known as the “enemy threat doctrine.” But this dereliction, this failure will trigger no investigations or court proceedings on how and why our leaders consistently mask, soft-soap and otherwise fail to assess and repel the existential threat posed by the imposition or accommodation of these same Islamic doctrines.

    Talk about irony: Within days of the report’s release, one of the few politicians in the world who understands, articulates and fights the imposition and accommodation of these same Islamic doctrines went on trial in the Netherlands for doing exactly that.

    I refer again to Geert Wilders, now enmeshed in a Kafkaesque court trial in which the Dutch government is subverting its own democratic institutions — namely, freedom of speech and the will of the people — in an effort to shut down Wilders and his political opposition to the Islamization of the Netherlands.


    America and Britain are capitulating to Jihad. Yes, the great victors against the Nazis, Japanese, and the communist USSR.

    But then why should we be surprised, for Barak Hussein Obama publicly stated “I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

    Only Geert Wilders, Kurt Westengaard, SIOE – all in Europe, stand unbowed.

  2. What a tragedy, that at a critical juncture in the history of Western civilisation, Americans had to go and elect Barak Hussein Obama. Its like something out of Greek mythology.

  3. I don’t speak dutch and I don’t drink – at least not yet. Kindly confirm that the kitman.tv video translation was sarcasm. I’ll go downstairs to fetch that old dusty bottle of scotch – just in case.

  4. wtd, it was parody. I watched the original video with English translation.
    No drinking now.
    We need all hands on global deck.

  5. twee en twee is vier=two and two equals four.
    “als iets waar is, kan het toch niet strafbaar zijn”(Wilders)
    (if something is true, it couldn’t be punishable)
    weak translation and wrong interpretation
    Something can be true and punishable but in Europe they try
    to reverse things; if negative islamic actions are true they are not
    punishable but negative action resulting from those actions is.
    A good reason to cut back alcohol consumption allover Europe.

Comments are closed.